博碩士論文 105554009 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:26 、訪客IP:3.147.27.35
姓名 陳婕寧(Chieh-Ning Chen)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 網路學習科技研究所
論文名稱 運用差異化教學於國小低年級英語單字複習之嘗試
(An Attempt to Differentiate Instruction on English Vocabulary Review in Elementary School)
相關論文
★ 探索電玩遊戲頻率對於視覺注意力表現能力的效應★ 代理表現學習模式—以動物同伴為例
★ 常用邏輯句型重組之學習★ 電腦支援國小數學文字題擬題活動初探
★ 解釋數學:透過科技支援創作與討論以增強小學生的數學溝通能力★ 提問式鷹架教學結合數位閱讀寫作系統對國小低年級學生語文能力的影響
★ 數學島:興趣驅動之國小數學線上平台設計與初步評估★ 以「猜擬題」活動增進學生數學文字題解題能力
★ 基於學生練習使用回饋之學習成效預測模型與動態題數練習機制★ 透過主題地圖與寵物同伴促進閱讀更深更廣的書籍
★ 具推薦書籍功能之閱讀島系統架構設計★ 透過學生影片創作進行國小數學學習:趣創者理論之應用
★ 英文單字樂園:學生自創字卡搭配複習機制強化英文字彙學習之系統設計及學習成效初探★ 設計與實作明日寫作系統增進國小學生寫作表現
★ 設計與實踐「提升式寫作」活動以提升國小學生寫作品質與寫作興趣★ TTPR:設計科技強化型全肢體反應為了小學生和國中生在印尼學習英語詞彙
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 國小英語課堂中學生程度差異大是長期存在的問題,在台灣,許多學生於就讀小學前便在私人機構接受英語教育,導致入學後班級中形成極大落差。過去教師常以異質分組方式來縮減學習成就落差。然而,不少研究發現分組的改善效果有限。針對學生準備度設計相對應的教學方式很可能才是改善此現象的根本方法。因此,差異化教學被視為兼容班級程度落差最有效教學方法之一。過去許多研究指出施行差異化教學加重了教師備課負擔,導致教師在教學現場施行差異化教學並不普遍。如何協助教師在較少額外備課負擔下施行差異化教學成為一個重要的議題。
有鑑於此,本研究嘗試提出一套科技輔助之差異化教學方法,一方面考量不同準備程度來設計教學內容;另一方面,以電腦系統協助教師建置差異化教學的施行環境,而學生依據自身準備度以不同方式運用英語單字圖卡系統複習字彙。除此之外,本研究針對準備程度差異較大之低年級生進行教學實驗,期望透過上述方法提升學童英語單字學習的成效與自我效能,進而改善英語學習中班級程度差異大之情形。實驗結果顯示,學生整體英語單字學習成效達顯著提升,而自我效能中對於“我若努力即可完成英語學習任務”及“我有自信能得到同儕的讚美”項目中亦有提升;此外,參與的教師也指出差異化教學對於課程準備及課堂教學皆有正向幫助。
摘要(英) Multilevel classroom is one of the main problems of the English class in public elementary school in Taiwan. This is due to the fact that a number of students have learned English in private institutes before entering elementary schools. Hence, the traditional “teaching to the middle” way may no longer meets students’ needs.
Differentiated instruction (DI) is an approach that aims to design a course to adapt the diversity of students. However, the increased DI teaching preparation burden can cause drawbacks for teachers’ willingness on implementing DI in their classes. Therefore, assisting teachers to conduct DI gains great attention.
In this vein, this research is an aim to design a teaching model of technology-enhanced DI along with the traditional DI strategy on English vocabulary review, which is a picture flashcard CALL system and the traditional DI strategy refers to “tiered activity” and “flexible grouping” in this study. In order to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency, an experiment was conducted. The results of this study addressed that not only students’ learning performance have significantly improved, it may also affect students’ self-efficacy on English learning. Moreover, the response from the teacher indicated that implementing DI strategy benefits the teaching both before and during the class.
關鍵字(中) ★ 差異化教學
★ 科技輔助差異化教學
★ 電腦輔助語言學習
★ 班級程度差異
★ 以英語為外語的學習
關鍵字(英) ★ Differentiated Instruction
★ Technology-enhanced DI
★ CALL
★ Multilevel Class
★ EFL Learning
論文目次 Table of Contents iii
List of Tables vi
List of Figures vii
1. Introduction 1
1.1 Motivation and Background 1
1.2 Purpose of the Study 8
1.3 Research Question 9
1.4 Organization of the Thesis 10
2. Literature Review 12
2.1 Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) on Vocabulary Learning 12
2.1.1 Flashcards in CALL 14
2.2 Adaptive Teaching and Differentiated Instruction 16
2.3 Differentiated Instruction (DI) 18
2.3.1 Knowledge and Theory Foundation of DI 20
2.3.2 Components and Features of DI 24
2.4 Implementing Differentiated Instruction in EFL/ESL Teaching 31
2.5 Technology-enhanced Differentiated Instruction 37
2.6 Self-efficacy 39
2.7 Summary 42
3. The System and Course Design 44
3.1 i-Drawing 45
3.2 Tiered Activity-Vocabulary Worksheet 50
3.3 Tiered Activity-Review Worksheet 53
4. Methodology 58
4.1 Experimental Design 58
4.2 Participants 59
4.3 Procedure 59
4.3.1 The Preparatory Stage 60
4.3.2 The Implementation Stage 61
4.3.3 The Evaluation Stage 67
4.4 Instruments 69
4.4.1 Course Material 69
4.4.2 Pre-test and Post-test 70
4.4.3 Self-efficacy Questionnaire 72
4.4.4 Interview 73
5. Results and Discussion 74
5.1 Students’ Vocabulary Performance 75
5.2 Students’ Self-efficacy on English Learning 78
5.3 Interview 80
5.4 Researcher’s Perception on Implementing DI 88
6. Conclusion, Limitations and Future Works 90
6.1 Conclusion 90
6.1.1 Implementing Differentiated Instruction 90
6.1.2 Student’s Vocabulary Performance 92
6.1.3 Student’s Self-efficacy 92
6.2 Limitations and Future Works 93
References 95
Chinese References 95
English References 98
Appendix 1: Performance Test 117
Appendix 2: Self-efficacy Questionnaire 119
Appendix 3: Vocabulary Worksheet (Level one) 121
Appendix 4: Vocabulary Worksheet (Level two) 122
Appendix 5: Review Worksheet-1 (Level one) 123
Appendix 6: Review Worksheet-1 (Level two) 124
Appendix 7: Review Worksheet-2 (Level one) 125
Appendix 8: Review Worksheet-2 (Level two) 126
Appendix 9: Review Worksheet-3 (Level one) 127
Appendix 10: Review Worksheet-3 (Level two) 128
參考文獻 Chinese References
王蕙榮,「英語單字學習策略與英語學習成就之研究–以桃園縣成功國民小學為個案研究」,國立臺北教育大大學,碩士論文,民國96年。
丘愛鈴,「成就每一個學生: 差異化教學之理念與教學策略」,教育研究月刊,第231期,18-33頁,高等教育,民國102年7月。
李崗,徐美雲,「[說故事] 學英語: 實施差異化教學對偏鄉國中學生的影響」,課程與教學季刊,19卷4期,159-189頁,中華民國課程與教學學會,民國105年10月。
林于珊,「運用差異化教學提升國小六年級學童英語寫作能力之行動研究」,國立臺中教育大學,碩士論文,民國106年。
林佩璇,「矛盾趨動擴展學習:差異化教學的實踐轉化」,課程與教學季刊,20卷4期,117-150頁,中華民國課程與教學學會,民國106年10月。
高桂懷,「一位國民中學英語教師運用差異化教學的 歷程與反思之研究」,中原大學,碩士論文,民國103年。
張錫勳,「差異化教學的桃花源: 國中課堂學習共同體的差異化教學設計與實踐」,中等教育,67卷4期,85-111頁,臺灣師範大學實習輔導處地方教育輔導組,民國105年12月。
陳偉仁,黃楷茹,陳美芳,「學校學習支援系統中差異化教學的實施」,教育研究月刊,第233期,5-20頁,高等教育,民國102年9月。
曾莉鈞,「差異化教學融入國小英語寫作教學之行動研究」,國立臺北教育大學,碩士論文,民國106年。
鄒純菁,「使用 iPad 實施差異化教學探究國中學生的英語口語朗讀流暢度與學習反應之行動研究」,國立臺北教育大學,碩士論文,民國105年。
謝惠存,「DGA: 自製互猜互評網路字卡以幫助小學低年級學生英語單字學習」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,民國107年。
簡玉敏,邱美玲,「教師社群運用差異化教學提升國小學童閱讀能力」,教育研究月刊,第233期,61-78頁,高等教育,民國102年9月。
顏惠君,「滿足學生學習需求, 落實教育機會均等: 美國維州一所公立高中實施差異化教學之經驗與啟示」,教育研究月刊,第233期,121-138頁,高等教育,民國102年9月。
魏珮君,「桌上遊戲融入差異化教學對國小英語學習成就與動機研究」,淡江大學,碩士論文,民國106年。

English References
Abraham, L. B. (2008). Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 199-226.
AbuSeileek, A. F. M. (2013). Hypermedia annotation presentation: Learners′ preferences and effect on EFL reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition. Calico Journal, 25(2), 260-275.
Ainslie, S. (1994). Mixed Ability Teaching: Meeting Learners′ Needs. Netword 3: Teaching Languages to Adults. Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research, 20 Bedfordbury, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4LB, England, United Kingdom.
Akama, K. (2006). Relations among self-efficacy, goal setting, and metacognitive experiences in problem-solving. Psychological Reports, 98(3), 895-907.
Alavinia, P., & Farhady, S. (2012). Using differentiated instruction to teach vocabulary in mixed ability classes with a focus on multiple intelligences and learning styles. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2(4), 72-82.
Allum, P. (2004). Evaluation of CALL: Initial vocabulary learning. ReCALL: the Journal of EUROCALL, 16(2), 488.
Anderson, L. W., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom′s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Ariew, R., & Ercetin, G. (2004). Exploring the potential of hypermedia annotations for second language reading. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(2), 237-259.
Ariew, R., & Ercetin, G. (2004). Exploring the potential of hypermedia annotations for second language reading. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(2), 237-259.
Armstrong, P. (2015). Bloom′s Taxonomy, Vanderbilt University. Center for Teaching, http://cft. vanderbilt. edu/guides-sub-pages/blooms-taxonomy/, access, 14.
Asakereh, A., & Dehghannezhad, M. (2015). Student satisfaction with EFL speaking classes: Relating speaking self-efficacy and skills achievement. Issues in Educational Research, 25(4), 345.
Asgari, A., & Mustapha, G. B. (2011). The type of vocabulary learning strategies used by ESL students in University Putra Malaysia. English language teaching, 4(2), 84.
August, D., Carlo, M., Dressler, C., & Snow, C. (2005). The critical role of vocabulary development for English language learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(1), 50-57.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986, 23-28.
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 5(1), 307-337.
Bantis, A. M. (2008). Using Task Based Writing Instruction to Provide Differentiated Instruction for English Language Learners. Online Submission.
Basoglu, E. B., & Akdemir, O. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students′ English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(3), 1-7.
Beltramo, J. L. (2017). Developing adaptive teaching practices through participation in cogenerative dialogues. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 326-337.
Bender, W. N. (2012). Differentiating instruction for students with learning disabilities: New best practices for general and special educators. Corwin Press.
Bender, W. N., & Waller, L. (2011). The teaching revolution: RTI, technology, and differentiation transform teaching for the 21st century. Corwin Press.
Benjamin, A. (2005). Differentiated instruction using technology. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
Bong, M. (2002). Predictive utility of subject-, task-, and problem-specific self-efficacy judgments for immediate and delayed academic performances. The Journal of experimental education, 70(2), 133-162.
Bradfield, A. D. (2012). The effects of differentiated instruction on struggling readers in first grade (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn (Vol. 11). Washington, DC: National academy press.
Broderick, A., Mehta-Parekh, H., & Reid, D. K. (2005). Differentiating instruction for disabled students in inclusive classrooms. Theory into practice, 44(3), 194-202.
Brown, S. A., Dennis, A. R., & Venkatesh, V. (2010). Predicting collaboration technology use: Integrating technology adoption and collaboration research. Journal of management information systems, 27(2), 9-54.
Brualdi, A. (1998). Gardner′s theory. Teacher Librarian, 26(2), 26.
Brühwiler, C., & Blatchford, P. (2011). Effects of class size and adaptive teaching competency on classroom processes and academic outcome. Learning and instruction, 21(1), 95-108.
Brusso, R. C., & Orvis, K. A. (2013). The impeding role of initial unrealistic goal-setting on videogame-based training performance: Identifying underpinning processes and a solution. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1686-1694.
Buteau, G., & True, M. (2009). Differentiating instructional strategies to support English language learners. New England Reading Association Journal, 44(2), 23-25.
Çelik, S., & Toptaş, V. (2010). Vocabulary learning strategy use of Turkish EFL learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 62-71.
Chan, Y. J. (2008). Incorporating literature circle in a sixth-grade English class in Taiwan. Unpublished master′s thesis), Ming Chuan University, Taiwan.
Chang, V. W. (2007). A Brief Sketch of Taiwan’s English Edðcation at Primary Level. In REGIONAL SEMINAR (p. 67).
Chang, Y. J., Chen, C. H., Huang, W. T., & Huang, W. S. (2011, July). Investigating students′ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of English learning using augmented reality. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Checkley, K. (1997). The first seven... and the eighth a conversation with Howard Gardner. Educational leadership, 55, 8-13.
Chern, C. L. (2010). An overview of English language education at primary level in Taiwan. In Second Language Studies: Acquisition, Learning, Education and Technology.
Chien, C. W. (2013). Implementing choice boards with cooperative learning to serve mixed-level elementary school EFL learners. Journal of Taipei Municipal University of Education, 44(1), 67-88.
Chien, C. W. (2015). Learning to plan and teach differentiated instruction in a TESOL methods course. 師資培育與教師專業發展期刊, 8(1), 21-43.
Chien, Y. C. (2006). Impacts of English vocabulary learning strategy instruction to 5th grade elementary school student. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taipei University of Education, Taipei.
Chularut, P., & DeBacker, T. K. (2004). The influence of concept mapping on achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(3), 248-263.
Cohen, M. (2009). The effectiveness of imagery interventions on the vocabulary learning of second grade students.
Cohen, M. (2012). The importance of self-regulation for college student learning. College Student Journal, 46(4), 892-902.
Corno, L. Y. N. (2008). On teaching adaptively. Educational psychologist, 43(3), 161-173.
Council, N. R. (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, D. C.: National AcademyPress.
Crawford, J. (2003). Language in the Elementary Program: A Tale of Two Contexts. English Teaching & Learning, 28(2), 61-78.
Çubukçu, F. (2008). A Study on the Correlation between Self Efficacy and Foreign Language Learning Anxiety. Online Submission, 4(1), 148-158.
Danzi, J., Reul, K., & Smith, R. (2008). Improving Student Motivation in Mixed Ability Classrooms Using Differentiated Instruction. Online Submission.
Davidson, J., Isom, A., Mitchell, A., Roper, J., Shelton, K., Uline, C., & Notar, C. E. (2007). Pumped: Motivation as the foundation for learning; a review of research literature on motivation and who is responsible for it. Asian Social Science, 3(11), 128-131.
Decarrico, J. S. (2001). Vocabulary learning and teaching. Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 3, 285-299.
Deunk, M. I., Smale-Jacobse, A. E., de Boer, H., Doolaard, S., & Bosker, R. J. (2018). Effective differentiation practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the cognitive effects of differentiation practices in primary education. Educational Research Review, 24, 31-54.
Ellis, N. C. (1995). The psychology of foreign language vocabulary acquisition: Implications for CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8(2-3), 103-128.
Etienne, J. S. (2011). A Grounded Theory Approach to Use of Differentiated Instruction to Improve Students′ Outcomes in Mathematics.
Eyyam, R., & Yaratan, H. S. (2014). Impact of use of technology in mathematics lessons on student achievement and attitudes. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 42(1), 31S-42S.
Fan, M. Y. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 222-241.
Fernandez, G. (2003, August). Cognitive scaffolding for a web-based adaptive learning environment. In International Conference on Web-Based Learning (pp. 12-20). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Foster, A., & Kim, J. (2015). Technology Integration into Differentiated Mathematics Instruction: Teacher Attitudes.
Fryer Jr, R. G., & Levitt, S. D. (2006). The black-white test score gap through third grade. American law and economics review, 8(2), 249-281.
Fulton, K. (2012). The flipped classroom: transforming education at Byron High School: A Minnesota high school with severe budget constraints enlisted YouTube in its successful effort to boost math competency scores. THE Journal (Technological Horizons in Education), 39(3), 18.
Gardner, H. E. (2008). Multiple intelligences: New horizons in theory and practice. Basic books.
German, D. J., Schwanke, J. H., & Ravid, R. (2012). Word finding difficulties: Differentiated vocabulary instruction in the speech and language room. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 33(3), 146-156.
Gilbert, D. L. (2011). Effects of Differentiated Instruction on Student Achievement in Reading. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, PO Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
Good, M. E. (2006). Differentiated Instruction: Principles and Techniques for the Elementary Grades. Online Submission.
Goodfellow, R. (1995). A computer-based strategy for foreign-language vocabulary-learning (Doctoral dissertation, The Open University).
Grimes, K. J., & Stevens, D. D. (2009). Glass, bug, mud. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 677-680.
Groot, P. J. (2000). Computer assisted second language vocabulary acquisition. Language learning & technology, 4(1), 56-76.
Gu, P. Y. (2003). Vocabulary learning in a second language: Person, task, context and strategies. TESL-EJ, 7(2), 1-25.
Haager, D., & Klingner, J. K. (2005). Differentiating instruction in inclusive classrooms: The special educator′s guide. Allyn & Bacon.
Hall, T. (2002). Differentiated instruction. Wakefield, MA: National Center on.
Hamzah, M. S. G., Kafipour, R., & Abdullah, S. K. (2009). Vocabulary learning strategies of Iranian undergraduate EFL students and its relation to their vocabulary size. European Journal of social sciences, 11(1), 39-50.
Hawkins, V. J. (2009). Barriers to implementing differentiation: Lack of confidence, efficacy and perseverance. New England Reading Association Journal, 44(2), 11-16.
Hirsch Jr, E. D., & Moats, L. C. (2001). Overcoming the Language Gap. American Educator, 25(2), 4-9.
Hsu, H. W. (2009). Helping less proficient children in multi-level classrooms: A study of teaching English to young learner teachers’ strategies used. In Language at the University of Essex (LangUE) 2008 proceeding (pp. 52-66). Colchester: Department of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex.
Hsu, H. W. (2013). Teachers′ Perceptions of Teaching Multilevel Classes in Primary School EFL Settings. English Teaching & Learning, 37(3).
Hulstijn, J. H. (2003). Connectionist models of language processing and the training of listening skills with the aid of multimedia software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(5), 413-425.
Jawahar, I. M., & Elango, B. (2001). The effect of attitudes, goal setting and self-efficacy on end user performance. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 13(2), 40-45.
Johnson, I. (2017). Female faculty role models, self-efficacy and student achievement. College Student Journal, 51(1), 151-172.
Kam, H. W. (2002). English language teaching in East Asia today: An overview. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(2), 1-22.
Kara-Soteriou, J. (2009). Using technology to differentiate instruction across grade levels. New England Reading Association Journal, 44(2), 86-90.
Kaur, J. (2016). Causal relationships between integrative motivation, self-efficacy, strategy use and English language achievement. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 22(3).
Kayaoglu, M. N., & Akbas, D. (2011). A small scale experimental study: Using animations to learn vocabulary. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(2), 24-30.
Kessler, G. (2007). Formal and informal CALL preparation and teacher attitude toward technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(2), 173-188.
King-Shaver, B., & Hunter, A. (2004). Differentiated instruction in the English classroom: Content, process, product, and assessment. Education Review.
Kolb, L. (2011). Adventures with cell phones. Educational Leadership, 68(5), 39-43.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom′s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218.
Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B. P. (2008). Using a multidimensional approach to measure the impact of classroom-level factors upon student achievement: A study testing the validity of the dynamic model. School effectiveness and school improvement, 19(2), 183-205.
Laufer, B. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: same or different?. Applied linguistics, 19(2), 255-271.
Lawrence-Brown, D. (2004). Differentiated instruction: Inclusive strategies for standards-based learning that benefit the whole class. American secondary education, 34-62.
Lee, J., Bong, M., & Kim, S. I. (2014). Interaction between task values and self-efficacy on maladaptive achievement strategy use. Educational Psychology, 34(5), 538-560.
Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford University Press.
Liu, Y. F. (2008). Differentiated Instruction through Flexible Grouping in EFL Classroom. 臺北市立教育大學學報. 教育類, 39(1), 97-122.
Lu, M. C. (2002). A study of the effects of vocabulary learning strategy instruction on junior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, ROC.
Mariani, L. (1997). Teacher support and teacher challenge in promoting learner autonomy. Perspectives: A Journal of TESOL Italy, XXIII (2). Retrieved from http://www. learningpaths. org/papers/papersupport. htm.
Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of educational Psychology, 84(4), 444.
McCarthy, M. (1998). Spoken language and applied linguistics. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2014). Language as discourse: Perspectives for language teaching. Routledge.
McCullough, S. M. (2012). The Effects of Differentiated Instruction on Academic Achievement of Struggling Second Grade Readers. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, PO Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
Mohseni-Far, M. (2008). In search of the best technique for vocabulary acquisition. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat, (4), 121-138.
Mulroy, H., & Eddinger, K. (2003). Differentiation and literacy. Institute on Inclusive Education, Rochester.
Nakata, T. (2008). English vocabulary learning with word lists, word cards and computers: Implications from cognitive psychology research for optimal spaced learning. ReCALL: the Journal of EUROCALL, 20(1), 3.
Nation, I. S. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language Google eBook. Cambridge University Press.
Nation, P. (2003). The role of the first language in foreign language learning. Asian EFL journal, 5(2), 1-8.
Nelson, J. M., & Manset-Williamson, G. (2006). The impact of explicit, self-regulatory reading comprehension strategy instruction on the reading-specific self-efficacy, attributions, and affect of students with reading disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29(3), 213-230.
Nesselhauf, N., & Tschichold, C. (2002). Collocations in CALL: An investigation of vocabulary-building software for EFL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(3), 251-279.
Oberg, A. (2011). Comparison of the effectiveness of a CALL-based approach and a card-based approach to vocabulary acquisition and retention. Calico Journal, 29(1), 118.
Ogle, D. M. (1986). KWL: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The reading teacher, 39(6), 564-570.
Olson, J., & Platt, J. (2000). The instructional cycle: Teaching children and adolescents with special needs.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategiesWhat every teacher should know. Heinle & heinle Publishers.;.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of educational research, 66(4), 543-578.
Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1992). Phonological short-term memory and the learning of novel words: The effect of phonological similarity and item length. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 44(1), 47-67.
Parsons, S. A., Vaughn, M., Scales, R. Q., Gallagher, M. A., Parsons, A. W., Davis, S. G., ... & Allen, M. (2018). Teachers’ instructional adaptations: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 205-242.
Penuel, W. R., & Means, B. (2000). Designing a performance assessment to measure students’ communication skills in multi-media-supported, project-based learning. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Pettig, K. L. (2000). On the road to differentiated practice. Educational leadership, 58(1), 14-18.
Pintrich, P. R. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).
Prensky, M. (2005). J COMPUTER GAMES AND LEARN| NG: D 1 G ITAL GAME-BASED LEARN 1 NG.
Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory?. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 437-447.
Randi, J., & Corno, L. (2005). Teaching and learner variation. In BJEP Monograph Series II, Number 3-Pedagogy-Teaching for Learning (Vol. 47, No. 69, pp. 47-69). British Psychological Society.
Raoofi, S., Tan, B. H., & Chan, S. H. (2012). Self-Efficacy in Second/Foreign Language Learning Contexts. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 60-73.
Rashid, T., & Asghar, H. M. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 604-612.
Read, J. (2004). 7. research in teaching vocabulary. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 146-161.
Rico García, M., & Vinagre Arias, F. (2000). A comparative study in motivation and learning through print-oriented and computer-oriented tests. Computer assisted language learning, 13(4-5), 457-465.
Scalise, K. (2007). Differentiated e-learning: five approaches through instructional technology. International Journal of Learning Technology, 3(2), 169-182.
Scarborough, H. S., Neuman, S., & Dickinson, D. (2009). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis) abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. Approaching difficulties in literacy development: Assessment, pedagogy and programmes, 10, 23-38.
Schipper, T. M., van der Lans, R. M., de Vries, S., Goei, S. L., & van Veen, K. (2020). Becoming a more adaptive teacher through collaborating in Lesson Study? Examining the influence of Lesson Study on teachers’ adaptive teaching practices in mainstream secondary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, 102961.
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy, 199227.
Schmitt, N., & McCarthy, M. (1997). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge university press.
Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2020). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge university press.
Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. R. (1993). Identifying and Assessing Vocabulary Learning Strategies. Thai TESOL Bulletin, 5(4), 27-33.
Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational psychology review, 1(3), 173-208.
Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational psychology review, 1(3), 173-208.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2007). Influencing children′s self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modeling. Reading & writing quarterly, 23(1), 7-25.
Segler, T. M., Pain, H., & Sorace, A. (2002). Second language vocabulary acquisition and learning strategies in ICALL environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(4), 409-422.
Shepard, L. A. (2005). Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational leadership, 63(3), 66-70.
Shin, E. C., Schallert, D. L., & Savenye, W. C. (1994). Effects of learner control, advisement, and prior knowledge on young students′ learning in a hypertext environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(1), 33-46.
Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. SAGE publications limited.
Smit, R., & Humpert, W. (2012). Differentiated instruction in small schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1152-1162.
Snow, R. E. (1997). Aptitudes and symbol systems in adaptive classroom teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(5), 354.
Sousa, D. A., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2011). Differentiation and the brain: How neuroscience supports the learner-friendly classroom. Solution Tree Press.
Sparks, R. L., & Patton, J. (2013). Relationship of L1 skills and L2 aptitude to L2 anxiety on the Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale. Language Learning, 63(4), 870-895.
Stanford, P., Crowe, M. W., & Flice, H. (2010). Differentiating with technology. TEACHING exceptional children plus, 6(4), n4.
Steinkuehler, C. A. (2005). Cognition and learning in massively multiplayer online games: A critical approach (pp. 1-228). The University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Su, F. H. (2000, November). New goal orientation of English teaching for young EFL learners. In Selected Papers from The Conference of ELT Curriculum for Young Learners in East Asia, Taipei, Taiwan.
Suggate, S., Schaughency, E., McAnally, H., & Reese, E. (2018). From infancy to adolescence: The longitudinal links between vocabulary, early literacy skills, oral narrative, and reading comprehension. Cognitive Development, 47, 82-95.
Suprayogi, M. N., & Valcke, M. (2016). Differentiated instruction in primary schools: Implementation and challenges in Indonesia. PONTE, 72(6), 2-18.
Suprayogi, M. N., Valcke, M., & Godwin, R. (2017). Teachers and their implementation of differentiated instruction in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 291-301.
Tileston, D. W. (2004). What every teacher should know about diverse students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Tileston, D. W. (2004). What every teacher should know about classroom management and discipline (Vol. 5). Corwin Press.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2000). Differentiation of Instruction in the Elementary Grades. ERIC Digest.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2000). Reconcilable differences: Standards-based teaching and differentiation. Educational leadership, 58(1), 6-13.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). Differentiated Instruction in the Regular Classroom: What Does It Mean? How Does It Look?. Understanding Our Gifted, 14(1), 3-6.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). Grading for Success. Educational Leadership, 58(6), 12-15.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2005). Grading and differentiation: Paradox or good practice?. Theory into practice, 44(3), 262-269.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Ascd.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Allan, S. D. (2000). Leadership for differentiating schools and classrooms. Ascd.
Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., ... & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2-3), 119-145.
Tomlinson, C. A., Brimijoin, K., & Narvaez, L. (2008). The differentiated school: Making revolutionary changes in teaching and learning. ASCD.
Torat, B. (2000). Computer-assisted language learning: An overview. Silpakorn University International Journal, 1(1), 131-153.
Tuttle, J. (2000). Differentiated classrooms. Woodbury: Cedar Mountain Academy.
VanTassel-Baska, J., Xuemei Feng, A., Brown, E., Bracken, B., Stambaugh, T., French, H., ... & Bai, W. (2008). A study of differentiated instructional change over 3 years. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(4), 297-312.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society (M. Cole, S. Scribner, V. John-Steiner, & E. Souberman, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University (Original work published in 1934).
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: Problems of the theory and history of psychology (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.
Wan, S. W. Y. (2017). Differentiated instruction: are Hong Kong in-service teachers ready?. Teachers and Teaching, 23(3), 284-311.
Wang, S. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2012). The role of collective efficacy, cognitive quality, and task cohesion in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). Computers & Education, 58(2), 679-687.
Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language teaching, 31(2), 57-71.
Williams, C. J. (2013). Generational perspective of higher education online student learning styles.
Wilson, K., & Devereux, L. (2014). Scaffolding theory: High challenge, high support in Academic Language and Learning (ALL) contexts. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8(3), A91-A100.
Wong, M. S. L. (2005). Language learning strategies and language self-efficacy: Investigating the relationship in Malaysia. RELC journal, 36(3), 245-269.
Yun, J. (2011). The effects of hypertext glosses on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(1), 39-58.
指導教授 陳德懷(Tak-Wai Chan) 審核日期 2020-7-23
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明