印尼營建業之營建安全指引倡議

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：138

、訪客IP：3.140.186.218

姓名

安蒂娜(Andina Mugi Utami) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

土木系營建管理碩士班

論文名稱

印尼營建業之營建安全指引倡議
(The Construction Safety Guideline Initiatives for The Construction Sector in Indonesia)

相關論文

★ 專業營造廠商監督管理能力對品質成本影響之探討 -以柔性鋪面工程為例	★ 營造業施工安全評估與風險評估制度精進之研究
★ 運用知識本體與電腦模擬技術推估品質成本之研究-以柔性鋪面工程為例	★ 鐵路機構可歸責於司機員之行車事故事件原因分析 (以臺鐵公司為例)
★ 整合專案交付契約之研究-以ConsensusDocs文件為中心	★ 人本安全管理原則應用於營造業分析探討
★ 桃園市共同管道建設與管理策略之研究	★ 逆打與雙順打工法應用於SRC結構之工期探討
★ 應用碳足跡評估在印度尼西亞首都城市遷移之研究	★ 桃園市房屋建築工程作業基金設立之研究
★ 營造業職業災害訴訟民刑事責任態樣分析	★ 非正式化住居改造專案因應氣候變遷作爲之研究—以三個東南亞國家爲例
★ 營造業工程人員之正念覺察特質與安全行為關聯性之探討	★ 輕軌運輸系統軌道型式選用分析之探討
★ 應用知識本體建模技術輔助碳排放計算之研究	★ 基於不安全行為規則防範營建工程專案意外發生之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

印尼的營建業有許多的意外事故發生，然而，在過去十年間，營建業的投資價值提升，使其扮演印尼經濟成長的重要角色。為提高安全績效，政府於聯邦法律中訂定關於營建安全之新法規 (2017年第12號法令，即《建築服務》)。因此，必須針對衍生法律層級相對應之法規進行調整與更新。本研究之目的在於提出營建業的安全指引倡議，以作為印尼政府在調整衍生法規時之參考。
在調整法規之過程中，必須研討與比較先進國家之法規，在本研究中亦採用此一方法以便對開發中國家之法規制定有較佳的了解。在比較的過程中，本研究以美國、英國及澳大利亞之安全法規作為標竿學習之基準以進行比較程序，透過改編這些法規來訂定印尼之安全指引倡議。在訂定過程中，為從先進國家中選擇最合適之法規，本研究先使用印尼的安全目標來定義安全指引的特定目標。在驗證過程中，透過線上專家小組討論，獲得專家與聽眾對於指引適用性之審視與回饋意見。驗證之結果被用於確定最終之安全指引，並確保該指引內容是適當且在印尼當前的狀況下能夠被執行的。這些倡議期望可帶來良好之安全績效，減少事故發生，且得以整合印尼各機構不同之安全法規

摘要(英)

Construction Industry in Indonesia has a massive number of accidents. However, it has increased investment value over the past ten years, which made this sector crucial in Indonesia′s economic growth. In order to increase safety performance, the government made new regulations for construction safety in federal law (The Act No. 12 Year 2017 on The Construction Service). Therefore, some adjustments and renewal in the derivative law level are necessary. This research aims to present safety guidelines initiatives for the construction industry as a reference for the Indonesia Government to adjust regulation in derivative law. It is essential to study and compare the regulations of advanced countries in the process of adjusting regulation, which is used in this research as a tool to have a better understanding and knowledge in developing country law-making. Safety regulations from the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia have been used as a benchmark for the comparison process, and these regulations will be adapted to develop the safety guideline initiatives. In the developing process, Indonesia′s safety goals were used to define the specific target of Indonesia safety guidelines in order to choose the most suitable regulations from the advanced countries. Online Expert Panel Discussion was conducted as a validation process to get a review from experts and get feedback questionnaires from the audiences related to the applicability of the guidelines. The result of the validation process was used to finalize the safety guideline and make sure that the guideline is suitable and can be implemented in Indonesia′s current situation. These initiatives are expected to achieve good safety performance, decrease the level of accidents, and also integrate several safety regulations in Indonesia over different institutions.

關鍵字(中)

★ 安全法規
★ 安全指引
★ 標竿學習
★ 先進國家
★ 營建安全

關鍵字(英)

★ Construction Industry in Indonesia has a massive number of accidents. However, it has increased investment value over the past ten years, which made this sector crucial in Indonesia′s economic growth. In order to increase safety performance, the government made new regulations for construction safety in federal law (The Act No. 12 Year 2017 on The Construction Service). Therefore, some adjustments

論文目次

摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iii
LIST OF FIGURE vi
LIST OF TABLE vii
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Objective 4
1.3 Scope and Limitation 4
1.4 Research Problem 4
1.5 Research Method 4
1.6 Thesis Organization 5
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW 7
2.1 Construction Safety Performance 7
2.2 Construction Safety Regulation 8
2.3 Safety Guidelines 9
2.4 Benchmarking Method 11
CHAPTER III SAFETY REGULATIONS REVIEW 14
3.1 Advanced Country Selection 14
3.2 Safety Regulation Review and Comparison from Advance Country 16
3.3 Safety Regulation Review in the United States 23
3.4 Safety Review in the United Kingdom 28
3.5 Safety Regulation Review in Australia 30
3.6 Safety Regulation Review in Indonesia 34
CHAPTER IV METHODOLOGY: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SAFETY GUIDELINE INITIATIVES 38
4.1 Indonesia’s Construction Safety Goals and Indicators 39
4.2 Benchmarking and Comparison 46
CHAPTER V SAFETY GUIDELINE INITIATIVES AND DISCUSSION 48
5.1 Proposed Construction Safety Guidelines 48
5.1.1 Section 1 - Safety Responsibilities for Every Party 48
5.1.2 Section 2 - Pre-Construction Phase 50
5.1.3 Section 3 - Construction Phase 52
5.1.4 Section 3 - Final Hand Over Phase 54
5.2 Validation 55
5.2.1 Expert Panel Interview 55
5.2.2 Feedback Questionnaire 59
5.3 The Revised Version of Construction Safety Guidelines 63
CHAPTER VI CONCLUSION 68
6. 1 Conclusion 68
6.2 Future Research 68
Reference 70
Appendix
App 1 – Safety Guidelines Initiative – Original Version …………… App 1-1
App 2 – Feedback Questionnaire Survey ……………………………. App 1-2
App 3 – Safety Guideline Initiative – Revised Version ……………… App 1-3

參考文獻

Reference
1. OSHA, A.a., Dept. of Labor, and Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, D.C. 1985.
2. Katyln, Optimization Model of Risk Mitigation in Improving The Performance of Safety Construction in Indonesia. International Symposium on Business and Management, 2014.
3. BPJS, Indonesia statistical yearbook on construction 2018. 2018.
4. Machfudiyanto, R., A, Identification of Safety Culture Dimensions Based on The Implementation of OSH Management System in Construction Company. Sustainable Civil Engineering Structures and Construction Materials, 2016.
5. Lan, Review of Regulations and Guides for Excavation and Trenches—Comparison with the Québec Safety Code for the Construction Industry. America Society OF Civil Engineering, 2009. 14:201-209.
6. Quinlan, S.a., Regulating Systematic Occupational Health and Safety Management Comparing the Norwegian and Australian Experience. 2003.
7. Rahem, Disparity between construction safety standards: A global analysis. Safety Science, 2014. 70 / 276–287.
8. Suazo, Comparison Of Construction Safety Codes In the United States And Honduras. America Society OF Civil Engineering, 1993.
9. Yanar, How are Leaders Using Benchmarking Information in Occupational Health and Safety Decision-Making? Safety Sci., 116, 245-253, 2019.
10. Zuo, Comparative Study on the Perception of Construction Safety Risks in China and Australia. America Society OF Civil Engineering, 2009. 135:620-627.
11. Venkataraman, N., Safety Performance Factor. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 14 (3), 327–331., 2008.
12. Hasan, A., Jha, K.N., Safety Incentive and Penalty Provisions in Indian Construction Projects and Their Impact on Safety Performance. Int. J. Injury Control Saf. Promot. 20 (1), 3–12., 2013.
13. Jitwasinkul, B., Hadikusumo, B.H., Identiﬁcation of important organizational factors inﬂuencing safety work behaviors in construction projects. J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 17 (4), 520–528., 2011.
14. Hallowell, M.R., Risk-based Framework for Safety Investment in Construction Organizations. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (8), 592–599. 2011.
15. Hinze, J., Thurman, S., Wehle A., Leading Indicators of Construction Safety Performance. Safety Sci., 51, 23-28, 2013.
16. Mohammadi, A., M. Tavakolan, and Y. Khosravi, Factors influencing safety performance on construction projects: A review. Safety Science, 2018. 109: p. 382-397.
17. Cox, S.J., Cheyne, A.J.T, Assessing safety culture in oﬀshore environments. Saf. Sci. 34 (1), 111–129., 2000.
18. Minchin Jr, R.E., Glagola, C.R., Guo, K., Languell, J.L., Case for drug testing of construction workers. J. Manage. Eng. 22 (1), 43–50., 2006. .
19. Feng, Y., Eﬀect of safety investments on the safety performance of building projects. Saf. Sci. 59, 28–45., 2013.
20. Swuste, P., Frijters, A., Guldenmund, F., Is it possible to inﬂuence safety in the building sector? A literature review is extending from 1980 until the present. Saf. Sci. 50 (5), 1333–1343., 2012
21. Guo, B.H., Yiu, T.W., Developing Leading indicators to monitor the safety conditions of construction projects. J. Manage. Eng. 32 (1), 04015016., 2015.
22. Cheng, C.W., Leu, S.S., Lin, C.C., Fan, C., Characteristic analysis of occupational accidents at small construction enterprises. Saf. Sci. 48 (6), 698–707., 2010.
23. Chen, Q., Jin, R., Multilevel safety culture and climate survey for assessing new safety programs. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (7), 805–817., 2013.
24. Division of Public Safety, U.o.P. 2020; Available from https://www.publicsafety.upenn.edu/pennready/safety-guidelines/.
25. OSHA, D.o.L., USA. 1989; Available from https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=federal_register&p_id=12909.
26. Australia, S.W., Guide To The Work Health And Safety Act. 2019.
27. Li, Y., & Guldenmund, F. W., Safety management systems: A broad overview of the literature. Safety Science, 103, 94–123. DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.11.016, 2018.
28. Representatives, U.S.H.o., Hearing on A Review of OSHA′S Plan to Reduce Ergonomic Injuries Committee on Education and The Workforce, 2002.
29. OSHA, OSHA Safety and Health Program Management Guideline. Draft for Public Comment, 2015.
30. Oswald, T.H., and Burati, J. L., Guidelines For ImpleMenting Total Quality Management In The Engineering And ConstrucTion Industry. ." Rep. Prepared/or Constr. Industry Inst., Clemson University, June 88, 1992.
31. Rothman, H., You need not be big to benchmark. Nation′s Business, December, 80(12), 64-65., 1992.
32. Kleiner, B.M., Benchmarking for Continuous Performance Improvement: Tactics For Success. Environmental Quality Management, 1994. Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 283-295.
33. Shetty, Y., Aiming High: Competitive Benchmarking for Superior Performance. Long Range Planning, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 39-44., 1993.
34. Jaselskis, E.J., Anderson, S.D. and Russell, J.S., Strategies For Achieving Excellence In Construction Safety Performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 122 No. 1, pp. 61-70., 1996.
35. de la Garza, J.M., Hancher, D.E. and Decker, L., Analysis of Safety Indicators In Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 124 No. 4, pp. 312-314., 1998.
36. Fang, Benchmarking Studies on construction Safety Management in China. America Society OF Civil Engineering, 2004. 130:424-432.
37. Ramirez, R.R., Alarcon, L.F.C. and Knights, P., Benchmarking System For Evaluating Management Practices In The Construction Industry. Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 20 No. 3, p. 110., (2004.
38. El-Mashaleh, M.S., Rababeh, S.M. and Hyari, K.H., Utilizing Data Envelopment Analysis to Benchmark Safety Performance of Construction Contractors. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 61-67., 2010.
39. Saunders, International Benchmarking for Performance Improvement in Construction Safety and Health. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 2016. Vol. 23 Iss 4 pp. 916 - 936.
40. Hämäläinen, P., The Effect of Competitiveness on Occupational Safety Institute of Occupational Safety Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland 2007.
41. Martin Luther King, J., Quotes [Internet]. BrainyQuote. Available from: https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/m/martinluth122559.html, 2017 [cited 1 July 2017].
42. Thomas, D.M.J.W., A systematic review of the effectiveness of safety management systems Research. ATSB Transport Safety Report, 2012.
43. Minister of Manpower, R.o.I., National Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Profile in Indonesia R.o.I. Minister of Manpower, Editor. 2018.
44. Swuste, P., van Gulijk, C., Zwaard, W., Safety Metaphors and Theories, A Review of The Occupational Safety Literature of The Us, Uk And The Netherlands, Till The ﬁrst Part Of The 20th Century. Saf. Sci. 48 (8), 1000–1018. 2010.01.020., 2010.
45. Baxendale, T., & Jonas, O., Construction Design and Management Safety Regulations in Practice Progress on Implementation. International Journal of Project Management 18, 33-40, 2000.
46. Toole, T.M., Increasing Engineers Role in Construction Safety Opportunities and Barriers. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 2005. 131(3), 199–207. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2005)131:3(199).
47. Employment, D.o., National review into model occupational health and safety laws. 2008/2009.
48. Kegg, B., Small joint venture operator′s approach to integrated EH&S management. Paper presented at the Asia Paciﬁc Oil & Gas Conference, Perth, Australia., 1998.
49. Commission, P., National Workers’ Compensation and Occupational Health and Safety Frameworks, Report No. 27, Canberra, March. 2004
50. Australian Government, D.o.E., Review Of Safe Work Australia’s Role And Functions. 2016.
51. COAG, Intergovernmental Agreement for Regulatory and Operational Reform in Occupational Health and Safety. 2008.
52. Indonesia, T.H.o.R.R.o., The Act No. 1 Year 1970 on Occupational Safety. 1970.
53. Indonesia, T.H.o.R.R.o., The Law No. 13 Year 2003 on Manpower. 2003.
54. Indonesia, P.o.R., Government Regulation No. 50 of 2012 on the Implementation of Occupational Safety and Health Management System (OSHMS). 2012.
55. Indonesia, M.P.a.P.s.H.W.o.R., Training on Implementation of Minister Public Work regulation No. 5 of 2014 on the Guidelines of Occupational Safety and Health Management System (OSHMS) Construction of Public Works. 2014.

指導教授

王翰翔(Han-Hsiang Wang)

審核日期

2020-7-28

推文