摘要(英) |
The land resources in the metropolitan area of Taiwan are quite limited. If the development of urban land is not properly used, it will lead to waste of land resources. In the past, decision makers used the rule of thumb or judgement based on the development experience of neighboring land to make decisions on building development plans, but they may often be biased and lead to wrong decisions, resulting in low land development intensity. Therefore, the construction and development company should use scientific and objective methods to plan the best decision-making plan in a fast and effective manner within compliance with relevant laws and regulations, and at the same time achieve the company′s maximum profit target.
In the past, construction and development companies used empirical methods to determine the development location and development methods in the selection of land construction and development, and lacked a scientific quantitative evaluation model. Such decision-making methods are adequate for small-scale development. When the development scale is enlarged and the project is selected For a long time, without the aid of efficient decision-making tools, the development base and building type decided by the decision-maker may not achieve the maximum benefit; this research is based on the perspective of the builder, targeting the development location, development form and different prices Using linear programming optimization model to find the best development location and development form in each area, and the cost and other conditions, it can be used as a reference for decision-making by the construction and development company.
In this study, there are 20 areas designed in this study, each with 15 development bases, and each development base can choose three different building development types according to the price. In addition, sensitivity analysis is performed based on the sensitivity change trend of each parameter, so as to understand the impact of different sales rates and different selling prices on the overall objective function. In terms of solving method, this research uses EXCEL software to organize and present the land volume, land cost, total floor area, project cost and sales price of each development base, and enter the LINGO 17.0 package software to solve the problem. The result of optimizing interests. |
參考文獻 |
1.吳耿東,「不動產投資管理分析」初版,文笙書局股份有限公司,2004 年。
2.徐正己,「土地開發案決策過程與方案選擇之研究-以個案公司板橋新站特定專用區為例」,國立臺灣大學碩士論文,2004 年。
3.張正瑜,「住宅商品化設施之研究-以台南市集合住宅銷售案為 例」,國立成功大學碩士論文,2000 年。
4.陳翰威,「環保稽查人員排班最佳化模式之研究,國立中央大學碩士論文,2015年。
5.黃書偉、周倚臣、郭馨筠,「住宅之空間區位選擇滿意度研 究」,台灣地理資訊學會年會暨學術研討會論文集,2005年。
6.黃允成、蕭靜如、黃子龍,「最佳化混合式人員排班品質之研究—以國軍某通信中心為例」,技術學刊,第31卷,第4期,頁261-271,2016年。
7.郭桓佐,「國際邊境檢查哨(站)工作人員排班最佳化研究」,國立中央大學,碩士論文,2013年。
8.顏上堯、楊雅玲、王俊懿,「勤業務專責下消防人員每日勤務排班最佳化之研究」,中國土木水利工程學刊,第31卷,第1期,頁91-102,2019年。
9.顏上堯、黃紹凱、王俊懿,「職業安全衛生查核人員指派最佳化」,技術學刊 ,第33卷3期,第173~ 190頁,2018年。
10.顏上堯、林至康、黃彥昌,「污水處理廠檢驗員任務指派優化之研究」,閩江學院學報,2017年。
11.顏上堯、陳俊穎、江紋緣,「捷運司機員輪班最佳化之研究」,中國土木水利工程學刊,第29卷,第2期,第87~95頁,2017年。
12.顏上堯、官明郎,「設計作業人員指派最佳決策模式之研究」,中國土木水利工程學刊,第18卷,第14期,頁135-144,2006年。
13.Arabia, S., “Workforce capacity planning using zero-one-integer programming,” King Abdulaziz University Saudi Arabia, No. 340-354, 2011.
14.Azaiez, M.N. and Al Sharif, S.S., “A 0-1 Goal Programming Model For Nurse Scheduling”, Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 491-507, 2005.
15.Greer, E. Gaylon and Kolbe, T. Phillip, “Investment Analysis For Real Estate Decision, 5th editi n.”, Dearborn Financial Publishing, Inc. (2003).
16.Herroelen, W., R. Leus and E. Demeulemeester, “Critical Chain Project Scheduling:Do Not Oversimplify”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 14, Issue 3, pp. 48-60, December 2002.
17.Kolisch, R., “Efficient Priority Rules for the Resource-constrained Project Scheduling Problem”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 14, Issue 3, pp. 179-192 , September 1996.
18.LINDO Systems Inc., LINGO User’s Guide, LINDO Systems Inc., 2002.
19.Tsai, C.C. and Lee, C.J., “Optimization of nurse scheduling problem with a two-stage mathematical programming model,” Asia Pacific Management Review, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 503-516, 2010.
20.Yan,S.,Tung,T.T.and Tu,Y.P., “Optimal construction of airline individual crew pairings ”, Computers and Operations Research, Vol.29,pp.341-363,2002. |