主管視角的內隱追隨力與主管喜愛部屬、部屬工作績效、晉升力評分及 職涯滿意度的關聯性

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：105

、訪客IP：3.142.210.157

姓名

鄭詠怡(Wendy Wing-Yee Cheng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所在職專班

論文名稱

主管視角的內隱追隨力與主管喜愛部屬、部屬工作績效、晉升力評分及職涯滿意度的關聯性
(The correlation between Leader’s Implicit Followership Theories, Liking, Job performance, Promotability Rating and Career Satisfaction.)

相關論文

★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。	★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究	★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究	★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估	★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究－一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素	★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例	★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析	★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討－以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究探討主管視角的內隱追隨力與追隨者與主管喜愛部屬、工作績效、晉升力評分及職涯滿意度之關聯性，旨在提高組織對主管視角的內隱追隨力的關注，致力使領導者在管理及領導上有新的啟發。主管視角的內隱追隨力之核心在於追隨者正原型，當追隨者之行為特質符合領導者心中的正原型時，對追隨者會有正面認知。本研究說明了主管視角的內隱追隨力透過主管對部屬喜愛而提高了追隨者的工作績效，繼而對職涯成果產生影響。
填答者為臺灣地區企業之主管及部屬，以配對方式參與，一共收集 212 份有效問卷，再以結構方程式進行分析。研究發現，主管的內隱追隨力中的勤奮及公民行為與主管喜愛部屬呈正向關聯，主管喜愛部屬正向影響工作績效，工作績效正向影響晉升力評分，而領導者的內隱追隨力中的熱情與主管喜愛部屬以及工作績效與晉升力評分，則無顯著關係。最後，本研究針對領導者及追隨者提供了對內隱追隨的見解，未來建議以職涯贊助及員工滿意度，分別作為中介因子及依變項。

摘要(英)

We investigated the correlation between Leader’s implicit followership theories(LIFTs), liking, job performance, promotability rating and career satisfaction. The purpose of this study is to raise the organizations and leaders’ awareness of LIFTs and to inspire their business and leadership acumen. The central elements of LIFTs are prototypes, described as leaders’ preconceived notion of the characters and behavior of a positive follower. Positive perception will be elicited when the follower is congruent with their prototypes. This research aimed to verify that LIFTs will lead to liking for followers, consequently influenced the job performance and career outcomes.
Structural equation modelling was conducted to analyze the data collected from 212 leader-follower dyads from enterprises in Taiwan. Results demonstrated that industry and good citizen were positively correlated with liking which was correlated to job performance as well. Significant correlation between job performance and promotability rating was found. The enthusiasm was not related to job performance, which was not related to career success as well. The study was concluded with the insights into LIFTs provided to leaders and followers, we also suggested that the future research shall examine the career sponsorship and job satisfaction as the mediator and the dependent variable respectively.

關鍵字(中)

★ 內隱追隨力
★ 主管喜愛部屬
★ 工作績效
★ 晉升力評分
★ 職涯滿意度

關鍵字(英)

★ Leader’s implicit followership theories(LIFTs)
★ Liking
★ Job performance
★ Promotability rating
★ Career satisfaction

論文目次

目錄
中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的 5
二、文獻探討 6
2-1 內隱追隨力概念及理論 6
2-2 內隱追隨力之測量 7
2-3 職涯成功 9
2-4 內隱追隨力與主管喜愛部屬的關係 11
2-5 主管喜愛部屬與部屬工作績效的關係 12
2-6 部屬工作績效與主觀職涯成功的關係 14
三、研究方法 15
3-1 研究架構 15
3-2 研究對象及過程 15
3-3 研究變項衡量 16
3-3-1 內隱追隨量表 16
3-3-2 主管喜愛部屬量表 17
3-3-3 工作績效量表 17
3-3-4 晉升力評分 17
3-3-5 職涯滿意度 18
3-3-6 控制變項 18
3-4 資料分析與統計方法 18
四、研究結果 20
4-1 資料來源及樣本特性 20
4-2 信度及效度分析 21
4-2-1 信度分析 21
4-2-2 收斂效度 22
4-2-3 區辨效度 24
4-2-4 驗證性因素分析 25
4-3 相關分析 26
4-4 假設模型檢驗 27
4-4-1 結構方程式檢驗 27
4-4-2 假設檢驗 28
五、結論與討論 30
5-1 學術貢獻 32
5-2 管理意涵 33
5-3 研究限制與建議 34
六、參考文獻 35

圖目錄
圖一、研究架構圖 15
圖二、結構方程式模型分析結果 28

表目錄
表一、信度分析 21
表二、收斂效度分析 23
表三、區辨效度分析 24
表四、驗證性因素分析 25
表五、Pearson相關分析 26
表六、結構方程式模型分析比較 27
表七、假設檢驗結果 29

參考文獻

一、中文部分
孔茗、袁悅、和錢小軍（2019）。「看好」與「做好」: 內隱原型交互對員工行為的影響。Science of Science and Management of F S. &. T, 40(1)。
王弘鈺、李雲劍（2018）。中國本土情境下內隱追隨的維度與量表開發—基於形成性指標的維度構建方法。廈門大學學報:哲學社會科學版(1)，78-85。
王頊（2011）。追隨的內容結構及與績效的關係研究，浙江大學，博士論文。
周文杰、宋繼文和李浩瀾（2015），中國情境下追隨力的內涵，結構與測量。管理學報，12(03)，355。
祝振兵、羅文豪（2017）。中國組織情境下的內隱追隨:內容、結構與測量。江西社會科學，37(3)，235-244。
曹元坤、許晟（2013）。部屬追隨力：概念界定與量表開發。當代財經，3，82-89。
郭衍宏、蘭玲（2017）。中國情境下內隱追隨理論的建構與測量。中國人力資源開發(7)， 25-37。
彭堅、王霄（2016）。與上司「心有靈犀」會讓你的工作更出色嗎?——追隨原型一致性、工作投入與工作績效，心理學報，48(9)，1151-1162。
楊紅玲、彭堅（2015）。內隱追隨理論研究述評。外國經濟與管理，37(3)，16-26。
趙慧軍（2013）。追随行為的探索性研究，經濟與管理研究，4，106-110頁。
鄭伯壎（1995）。「差序格局與華人組織行為」，本土心理學研究，(3)，142-219頁。
羅文豪（2015），追隨研究的歷史溯源，現實驅力與未來展望，中國人力資源開發，15，6 -15頁。

二、英文部分
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411.
Anderson, J. C., Milkovich, G. T., & Tsui, A. (1981). A model of intra-organizational mobility. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 529-538.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
Bjugstad, K., Thach, E. C., Thompson, K. J., & Morris, A. (2006). A fresh look at followership: A model for matching followership and leadership styles. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 7(3), 304.
Bollen, K. A.(2014). Structural Equations with Latent Variables: John Wiley & Sons.
Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human performance, 10(2), 99-109.
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology.
Carsten, M. K., Uhl Bien, M., West, B. J., Patera, J. L., & McGregor, R. (2010). Exploring social constructions of followership: A qualitative study. The Leadership Quarterly, 21 (3), 543 562.
Chaleff, I. (2009). The courageous follower: Standing up to & for our leaders : Berrett Koehler Publishers.
Chan, S. H., Mai, X., Kuok, O. M., & Kong, S. H. (2016). The influence of satisfaction and promotability on the relation between career adaptability and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 167-175.
Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1997). Nonconscious behavioral confirmation processes: The self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33Social Psychology, 33(5), 541-560.
Collinson, D. (2006). Rethinking Followership: A Post-Structuralist Analysis of Follower Identities. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(2), 179-189.
Cox Jr, T., & Nkomo, S. M. (1992). Candidate age as a factor in promotability ratings. Public Personnel Management, 21(2), 197-210.
Dixon, G., & Westbrook, J. (2003). Followers Revealed. Engineering Management Journal, 15 (1), 19-26
Engle, E. M., & Lord, R. G. (1997). Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchange. Academy of management Journal, 40(4), 988-1010.
Epitropaki, O., Sy, T., Martin, R., Tram-Quon, S., & Topakas, A. (2013). Implicit leadership and followership theories “in the wild”: Taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 858-881.
Feldman, J. M. (1986). A note on the statistical correction of halo error. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(1), 173–176.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics.
Gao, P., & Wu, W. (2019). Effect of leaders’ implicit followership theory on subordinates’ career success. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 47(5), 1-14.
Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of management Journal, 33(1), 64-86.
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological review, 102 (1), 4.
Hall, D. T., & Chandler, D. E. (2005). Psychological success: When the career is a calling. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 26(2), 155-176.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis . Uppersaddle River.
Heslin, P. A. (2005). Conceptualizing and evaluating career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 26(2), 113-136.
Hollander, E. P. (1992). The Essential Interdependence of Leadership and Followership. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 71-75.
Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (1993). Social context of performance evaluation decisions. Academy of management journal, 36(1), 80-105.
Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel psychology, 52(3), 621-652.
Junker, N. M., Stegmann, S., Braun, S., & Van Dick, R. (2016). The ideal and the counter-ideal follower–advancing implicit followership theories. Leadership & Organization Development Journal.
Kedharnath, U. (2011). The influence of leaders’ implicit followership theories on employee outcomes. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University.
Kelley, R. E. (1988). In praise of followers: Harvard Business Review Case Services.
Kelley, R. E. (1992). The Power of Followership: How to Create Leaders People Want to Follow, and Followers who Lead Themselves Broadway Business.
Kelloway, E. K., & Santor, D. A. (1999). Using LISREL for structural equation modelling: A researcher′s guide. Canadian Psychology, 40(4), 381.
London, M., & Stumpf, S. A. (1983). Effects of candidate characteristics on management promotion decisions: An experimental study. Personnel Psychology, 36(2), 241-259.
Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1991). Cognitive theory in industrial and organizational psychology. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 2, 1-62.
McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Murphy, K.R. (1989) Dimensions of job performance. In R. Dillon and J. Pelligrino (eds.), Testing: Applied and Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 218±47). New York: Praeger.
Ng, T. W., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta‐analysis. Personnel psychology, 58(2), 367-408.
Nolan, K. P., Langhammer, K., & Salter, N. P. (2016). Evaluating fit in employee selection: Beliefs about how, when, and why. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 68(3), 222.
Nunally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. (1978). Psychometric Theory, ed. New York McGraw.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.
Peluchette, J. V. E. (1993). Subjective career success: The influence of individual difference, family, and organizational variables. Journal of vocational behavior, 43(2), 198-208.
Poole, P. P., Gioia, D. A., & Gray, B. (1989). Influence modes, schema change, and organizational transformation. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 25(3), 271-289.
Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of applied psychology, 85(4), 612.
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. The urban review, 3(1), 16-20.
Shamir, B. (2007). From passive recipients to active co-producers: Followers′ roles in the leadership process. In B. Shamir, R. Pillai, M. C. Bligh, & M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.), Follower-centered perspectives on leadership: A tribute to the memory of James R. Meindl (pp. ix−xxxix). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing
Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 543-554.
Shore, L. M., Barksdale, K., & Shore, T. H. (1995). Managerial perceptions of employee commitment to the organization. Academy of Management Journal, 38(6), 1593–1615.
Sicherman, N., & Galor, O. (1990). A theory of career mobility. Journal of political economy, 98(1), 169-192.
Su, X., Gao, P., He, Y., & Zhu, X. (2019). Effect of leaders′ implicit followership prototypes on employees′ internal and external marketability. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 47(12), 1-12.
Sy, T. (2010). What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113(2), 73-84.
Thacker, R. A. (1999). Perceptions of Trust, Upward Influence Tactics, and Performance Ratings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88(3_suppl), 1059–1070.
Thacker, R. A., & Wayne, S. J. (1995). An examination of the relationship between upward influence tactics and assessments of promotability. Journal of management, 21(4), 739-756.
Turban, D. B., Jones, A. P., & Rozelle, R. M. (1990). Influences of supervisor liking of a subordinate and the reward context on the treatment and evaluation of that subordinate. Motivation and Emotion, 14(3), 215-233.
Turner RJ. (1960). Sponsored and contest mobility and the school system. American Sociological Review, 25, 855–867.
Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R. E., Lowe, K. B., & Carsten, M. K. (2014). Followership Theory: A Review and Research Agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 83-104.
Van Scotter, J., Motowidlo, S. J., & Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of applied psychology, 85(4), 526.
Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 216-226.
Wang, H., Law, K. S., & Chen, Z. X. (2008). Leader-member exchange, employee performance, and work outcomes: An empirical study in the Chinese context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management,, 19(10), 1809-1824.
Wayne, S. J., & Ferris, G. R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of applied psychology, 75(5), 487.
Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Graf, I. K., & Ferris, G. R. (1997). The role of upward influence tactics in human resource decisions. Personnel Psychology, 50(4), 979-1006.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3). Sage.
Whiteley, P., Sy, T., & Johnson, S. K. (2012). Leaders′ conceptions of followers: Implications for naturally occurring Pygmalion effects. The leadership quarterly, 23(5), 822-834.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of management, 17(3), 601-617.
Wofford, J. C., & Goodwin, V. L. (1994). A cognitive interpretation of transactional and transformational leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 5(2), 161-186.

指導教授

林文政(Wen-Jeng Lin)

審核日期

2021-7-7

推文