參考文獻 |
1. Humphrey, S.J., et al., “High-throughput and high-sensitivity phosphoproteomics with the EasyPhos platform.” Nat Protoc. 13(9), Sep 2018, p. 1897-1916.
2. Duan, G. and D. Walther, “The roles of post-translational modifications in the context of protein interaction networks.” PLoS Comput Biol. 11(2), Feb 2015, p. e1004049.
3. Cohen, P., “The origins of protein phosphorylation.” Nature Cell Biology. 4(5), 2002/05/01 2002, p. E127-E130.
4. Adam, K. and T. Hunter, “Histidine kinases and the missing phosphoproteome from prokaryotes to eukaryotes.” Lab Invest. 98(2), Feb 2018, p. 233-247.
5. Rikova, K., et al., “Global Survey of Phosphotyrosine Signaling Identifies Oncogenic Kinases in Lung Cancer.” Cell. 131(6), 2007/12/14/ 2007, p. 1190-1203.
6. Blume-Jensen, P. and T. Hunter, “Oncogenic kinase signalling.” Nature. 411(6835), 2001/05/01 2001, p. 355-365.
7. Zanivan, S., et al., “In Vivo SILAC-Based Proteomics Reveals Phosphoproteome Changes during Mouse Skin Carcinogenesis.” Cell Reports. 3(2), 2013/02/21/ 2013, p. 552-566.
8. Grundke-Iqbal, I., et al., “Abnormal phosphorylation of the microtubule-associated protein tau (tau) in Alzheimer cytoskeletal pathology.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 83(13), 1986, p. 4913-4917.
9. Eidenmüller, J., et al., “Phosphorylation-mimicking glutamate clusters in the proline-rich region are sufficient to simulate the functional deficiencies of hyperphosphorylated tau protein.” The Biochemical journal. 357(Pt 3), 2001, p. 759-767.
10. Meyerovitch, J., J.M. Backer, and C.R. Kahn, “Hepatic phosphotyrosine phosphatase activity and its alterations in diabetic rats.” The Journal of clinical investigation. 84(3), 1989, p. 976-983.
11. Danielsson, A., et al., “Attenuation of Insulin-stimulated Insulin Receptor Substrate-1 Serine 307 Phosphorylation in Insulin Resistance of Type 2 Diabetes*.” Journal of Biological Chemistry. 280(41), 2005/10/14/ 2005, p. 34389-34392.
12. Giansanti, P., et al., “Six alternative proteases for mass spectrometry–based proteomics beyond trypsin.” Nature Protocols. 11(5), 2016/05/01 2016, p. 993-1006.
13. Giorgianni, F. and S. Beranova-Giorgianni, “Phosphoproteome Discovery in Human Biological Fluids.” Proteomes. 4(4), 2016, p. 37.
14. Engholm-Keller, K. and M.R. Larsen, “Technologies and challenges in large-scale phosphoproteomics.” PROTEOMICS. 13(6), 2013/03/01 2013, p. 910-931.
15. Yang, C., X. Zhong, and L. Li, “Recent advances in enrichment and separation strategies for mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics.” Electrophoresis. 35(24), 2014, p. 3418-3429.
16. von Stechow, L., C. Francavilla, and J.V. Olsen, “Recent findings and technological advances in phosphoproteomics for cells and tissues.” Expert review of proteomics. 12(5), 2015, p. 469-487.
17. Low, T.Y., et al., “WIDENING THE BOTTLENECK OF PHOSPHOPROTEOMICS: EVOLVING STRATEGIES FOR PHOSPHOPEPTIDE ENRICHMENT.” Mass Spectrometry Reviews. n/a(n/a), 2020/06/03 2020, p.
18. Oda, Y., T. Nagasu, and B.T. Chait, “Enrichment analysis of phosphorylated proteins as a tool for probing the phosphoproteome.” Nature Biotechnology. 19(4), 2001/04/01 2001, p. 379-382.
19. Jensen, S.S. and M.R. Larsen, “Evaluation of the impact of some experimental procedures on different phosphopeptide enrichment techniques.” Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 21(22), 2007/11/30 2007, p. 3635-3645.
20. Larsen, M.R., et al., “Highly Selective Enrichment of Phosphorylated Peptides from Peptide Mixtures Using Titanium Dioxide Microcolumns *.” Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 4(7), 2005, p. 873-886.
21. Sugiyama, N., et al., “Phosphopeptide Enrichment by Aliphatic Hydroxy Acid-modified Metal Oxide Chromatography for Nano-LC-MS/MS in Proteomics Applications * S.” Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 6(6), 2007, p. 1103-1109.
22. Larsen, M.R., et al., “Highly selective enrichment of phosphorylated peptides from peptide mixtures using titanium dioxide microcolumns.” Mol Cell Proteomics. 4(7), Jul 2005, p. 873-86.
23. Cantin, G.T., et al., “Optimizing TiO2-Based Phosphopeptide Enrichment for Automated Multidimensional Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Tandem Mass Spectrometry.” Analytical Chemistry. 79(12), 2007/06/01 2007, p. 4666-4673.
24. Kuroda, I., et al., “Phosphopeptide-selective column-switching RP-HPLC with a titania precolumn.” Anal Sci. 20(9), Sep 2004, p. 1313-9.
25. Pinkse, M.W., et al., “Selective isolation at the femtomole level of phosphopeptides from proteolytic digests using 2D-NanoLC-ESI-MS/MS and titanium oxide precolumns.” Anal Chem. 76(14), Jul 15 2004, p. 3935-43.
26. Kyono, Y., et al., “Successive and Selective Release of Phosphorylated Peptides Captured by Hydroxy Acid-Modified Metal Oxide Chromatography.” Journal of Proteome Research. 7(10), 2008/10/03 2008, p. 4585-4593.
27. Simon, E.S., et al., “Improved enrichment strategies for phosphorylated peptides on titanium dioxide using methyl esterification and pH gradient elution.” Anal Biochem. 377(2), Jun 15 2008, p. 234-42.
28. Rappsilber, J., M. Mann, and Y. Ishihama, “Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips.” Nat Protoc. 2(8), 2007, p. 1896-906.
29. Imami, K., et al., “Automated Phosphoproteome Analysis for Cultured Cancer Cells by Two-Dimensional NanoLC-MS Using a Calcined Titania/C18 Biphasic Column.” Analytical Sciences. 24(1), 2008, p. 161-166.
30. Mohammed, S., et al., “Chip-Based Enrichment and NanoLC-MS/MS Analysis of Phosphopeptides from Whole Lysates.” J Proteome Res. 7(4), Apr 2008, p. 1565-71.
31. Tsai, C.-F., et al., “Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography Revisited: pH/Acid Control toward High Selectivity in Phosphoproteomics.” Journal of Proteome Research. 7(9), 2008/09/05 2008, p. 4058-4069.
32. Rush, J., et al., “Immunoaffinity profiling of tyrosine phosphorylation in cancer cells.” Nat Biotechnol. 23(1), Jan 2005, p. 94-101.
33. Bodenmiller, B., et al., “Reproducible isolation of distinct, overlapping segments of the phosphoproteome.” Nat Methods. 4(3), Mar 2007, p. 231-7.
34. Dickhut, C., et al., “Impact of digestion conditions on phosphoproteomics.” J Proteome Res. 13(6), Jun 6 2014, p. 2761-70.
35. Kim, J., D.G. Camp Ii, and R.D. Smith, “Improved detection of multi-phosphorylated peptides in the presence of phosphoric acid in liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.” Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 39(2), 2004/02/01 2004, p. 208-215.
36. Nakamura, T., K.T. Myint, and Y. Oda, “Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid increases identification rate of phosphoproteomics in real biological samples.” Journal of proteome research. 9(3), 2010/03// 2010, p. 1385-1391.
37. Winter, D., et al., “Citrate Boosts the Performance of Phosphopeptide Analysis by UPLC-ESI-MS/MS.” Journal of Proteome Research. 8(1), 2009/01/02 2009, p. 418-424.
38. Choi, H., H.-s. Lee, and Z.-Y. Park, “Detection of Multiphosphorylated Peptides in LC−MS/MS Analysis under Low pH Conditions.” Analytical Chemistry. 80(8), 2008/04/15 2008, p. 3007-3015.
39. Beausoleil, S.A., et al., “A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization.” Nat Biotechnol. 24(10), Oct 2006, p. 1285-92.
40. Boersema, P.J., S. Mohammed, and A.J. Heck, “Phosphopeptide fragmentation and analysis by mass spectrometry.” J Mass Spectrom. 44(6), Jun 2009, p. 861-78.
41. Palumbo, A.M. and G.E. Reid, “Evaluation of gas-phase rearrangement and competing fragmentation reactions on protein phosphorylation site assignment using collision induced dissociation-MS/MS and MS3.” Anal Chem. 80(24), Dec 15 2008, p. 9735-47.
42. Thingholm, T.E., et al., “SIMAC (sequential elution from IMAC), a phosphoproteomics strategy for the rapid separation of monophosphorylated from multiply phosphorylated peptides.” Mol Cell Proteomics. 7(4), Apr 2008, p. 661-71.
43. Gessulat, S., et al., “Prosit: proteome-wide prediction of peptide tandem mass spectra by deep learning.” Nat Methods. 16(6), Jun 2019, p. 509-518.
44. Bekker-Jensen, D.B., et al., “Rapid and site-specific deep phosphoproteome profiling by data-independent acquisition without the need for spectral libraries.” Nature Communications. 11(1), 2020/02/07 2020, p. 787.
45. Kitata, R.B., et al., “A data-independent acquisition-based global phosphoproteomics system enables deep profiling.” Nature Communications. 12(1), 2021/05/05 2021, p. 2539.
46. Masuda, T., et al., “Microscale phosphoproteome analysis of 10,000 cells from human cancer cell lines.” Anal Chem. 83(20), Oct 15 2011, p. 7698-703.
47. Chen, W., L. Chen, and R. Tian, “An integrated strategy for highly sensitive phosphoproteome analysis from low micrograms of protein samples.” Analyst. 143(15), Jul 23 2018, p. 3693-3701.
48. Tsougeni, K., et al., “TiO2–ZrO2 affinity chromatography polymeric microchip for phosphopeptide enrichment and separation.” Lab on a Chip. 11(18), 2011, p. 3113-3120.
49. Zhu, Y., et al., “Nanodroplet processing platform for deep and quantitative proteome profiling of 10–100 mammalian cells.” Nature Communications. 9(1), 2018/02/28 2018, p. 882.
50. Williams, S.M., et al., “Automated Coupling of Nanodroplet Sample Preparation with Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry for High-Throughput Single-Cell Proteomics.” Analytical Chemistry. 92(15), 2020/08/04 2020, p. 10588-10596.
51. Yu, Y.-Q., et al., “Enzyme-Friendly, Mass Spectrometry-Compatible Surfactant for In-Solution Enzymatic Digestion of Proteins.” Analytical Chemistry. 75(21), 2003/11/01 2003, p. 6023-6028.
52. León, I.R., et al., “Quantitative assessment of in-solution digestion efficiency identifies optimal protocols for unbiased protein analysis.” Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP. 12(10), 2013, p. 2992-3005.
53. Masuda, T., M. Tomita, and Y. Ishihama, “Phase Transfer Surfactant-Aided Trypsin Digestion for Membrane Proteome Analysis.” Journal of Proteome Research. 7(2), 2008/02/01 2008, p. 731-740.
54. Connor, P.A. and A.J. McQuillan, “Phosphate Adsorption onto TiO2 from Aqueous Solutions: An in Situ Internal Reflection Infrared Spectroscopic Study.” Langmuir. 15(8), 1999/04/01 1999, p. 2916-2921.
55. Li, Q.R., et al., “Effect of peptide-to-TiO2 beads ratio on phosphopeptide enrichment selectivity.” J Proteome Res. 8(11), Nov 2009, p. 5375-81.
56. Chen, Z., et al., “Non-small-cell lung cancers: a heterogeneous set of diseases.” Nat Rev Cancer. 14(8), Aug 2014, p. 535-46.
57. Lee, D.H., “Treatments for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): The road to a success, paved with failures.” Pharmacol Ther. 174 Jun 2017, p. 1-21.
58. Nyati, M.K., et al., “Integration of EGFR inhibitors with radiochemotherapy.” Nat Rev Cancer. 6(11), Nov 2006, p. 876-85.
59. Ren, S. and B.J. Rollins, “Cyclin C/cdk3 promotes Rb-dependent G0 exit.” Cell. 117(2), Apr 16 2004, p. 239-51.
60. Pluquet, O., et al., “Endoplasmic reticulum stress accelerates p53 degradation by the cooperative actions of Hdm2 and glycogen synthase kinase 3beta.” Mol Cell Biol. 25(21), Nov 2005, p. 9392-405.
61. Bui, N.-L.-C., et al., “Bad phosphorylation as a target of inhibition in oncology.” Cancer Letters. 415 2018/02/28/ 2018, p. 177-186.
62. Casamayor, A., N.A. Morrice, and D.R. Alessi, “Phosphorylation of Ser-241 is essential for the activity of 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1: identification of five sites of phosphorylation in vivo.” Biochem J. 342 ( Pt 2)(Pt 2), Sep 1 1999, p. 287-92.
63. Michalski, A., J. Cox, and M. Mann, “More than 100,000 Detectable Peptide Species Elute in Single Shotgun Proteomics Runs but the Majority is Inaccessible to Data-Dependent LC−MS/MS.” Journal of Proteome Research. 10(4), 2011/04/01 2011, p. 1785-1793.
64. Gillet, L.C., et al., “Targeted Data Extraction of the MS/MS Spectra Generated by Data-independent Acquisition: A New Concept for Consistent and Accurate Proteome Analysis*.” Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 11(6), 2012/06/01/ 2012, p. O111.016717.
65. Bruderer, R., et al., “High-precision iRT prediction in the targeted analysis of data-independent acquisition and its impact on identification and quantitation.” Proteomics. 16(15-16), Aug 2016, p. 2246-56.
66. Tsou, C.C., et al., “DIA-Umpire: comprehensive computational framework for data-independent acquisition proteomics.” Nat Methods. 12(3), Mar 2015, p. 258-64, 7 p following 264.
67. Keller, A., et al., “Opening a SWATH Window on Posttranslational Modifications: Automated Pursuit of Modified Peptides.” Mol Cell Proteomics. 15(3), Mar 2016, p. 1151-63.
68. Wang, J., et al., “MSPLIT-DIA: sensitive peptide identification for data-independent acquisition.” Nat Methods. 12(12), Dec 2015, p. 1106-8.
69. Li, Y., et al., “Group-DIA: analyzing multiple data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry data files.” Nat Methods. 12(12), Dec 2015, p. 1105-6. |