博碩士論文 10854019 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:76 、訪客IP:18.191.192.81
姓名 曾家儀(Chia-Yi Tseng)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 網路學習科技研究所
論文名稱 從先備知識的角度探討將遊戲式學習和個人化 整合至英語三層式測驗的影響
(An Investigation of Incorporating Game-based Learning and Personalization into English ThreeTier Tests: A Prior Knowledge Aspect)
相關論文
★ 將可用性整合融入遊戲式學習★ 探討認知風格對於行動學習與合作學習的影響
★ 學習型網站的可用性評估:從問題到解決方案★ 從人因的觀點評估遊戲式學習
★ 探討認知風格在遊戲式學習中對於客製化與個人化系統的影響★ 探討認知風格在行動學習中對於客製化與個人化系統的影響
★ 性別差異與認知風格對合作化遊戲式學習的影響★ 探討認知風格如何影響使用者在行動載具下使用電子期刊
★ 探討專家和新手對遊戲式學習進行可用性評估的觀感差異★ 毒品經驗與遊戲先備知識對客製化與個人化遊戲式反毒宣導系統的影響
★ 探討背景音樂和認知風格對遊戲式學習的影響★ 以多媒體科技和數位遊戲為小小人兒及患者家屬發展線上生活百科
★ 先備知識對註記式多媒體電子書的影響研究:從個別環境到分享環境★ 從認知風格的角度探討提示對學習英文片語與文法的影響
★ 探討先備知識對學習者在使用鷹架英文學習系統的影響: 限制與扣分機制★ 發展動畫電子書之研究:從性別差異到性別均等之歷程
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 電子評量可以使學習者透過即時反饋來診斷自己的問題。而在眾多的電子評量機制中,
雙層式測驗是一個有效的學習工具。這是因為雙層式測驗不僅可以用於了解學習者的學
習成效,而且還可以診斷出學習者是否真實了解答案或答案的原因是來自於猜測。雖然
雙層式測驗有上述的優點,但是它仍然有不足的地方,例如: 不能使學習者達到深度學
習。因此,無法使學習者保持長期的記憶。
為了解決這些問題,本研究提出三層式測驗。它不僅承襲雙層式測驗的答案和該題答案
的原因,而且還提供複習題幫助學習者達到反覆練習。通過這樣做,學習者可以達到有
效的學習。然而,三層式測驗仍屬於評量機制,因此,在進行測驗的過程中,學習者可
能會感到挫敗,進而缺乏學習動機。為此,本研究將遊戲式學習納入三層式測驗中。這
是因為遊戲式學習不僅可以提供愉快的體驗,還可以增加學習動機。更具體地說,在實
驗一中,開發了愉悅型三層式測驗。另一方面,個人化不僅可以提高學習者的學習動機,
還可以提升他們的參與度和學習成效。由於這些正面的影響,在實驗二中,藉著將個人
化容納進愉悅型三層式測驗,而開發了個人化愉悅型三層式測驗。
除此之外,不論是愉悅型三層式測驗或個人化愉悅型三層式測驗,仍然與大多數的電子
評量一樣會面臨許多不同的學習者。而學習者之間存在個體差異性,這可能會影響他們
的學習行為。在眾多個體差異中發現,先備知識具有影響性,因為先備知識可以反映學
習者在獲得新知識之前所具備的認知能力。有鑒於此,進行了兩個實證研究,以便能夠
ii
了解先備知識如何影響學習者使用愉悅型三層式測驗與個人化愉悅型三層式測驗,包含
測驗成效、任務成效、學習行為和遊戲行為。
實驗一為探討學習者如何藉著愉悅型三層式測驗來學習英語文法,而實驗二為探討學習
者如何藉著個人化愉悅型三層式測驗來學習英語文法。實驗一與實驗二的結果有一些相
似處,也有一些相異處。關於相似處,在測驗成效方面,高先備學習者都是優於低先備
學習者。而且,不論是高先備學習者或低先備學習者,他們的後測分數都是高於前測分
數。此外,高先備學習者與低先備學習者獲得相似的進步分數。另一方面,在學習行為
方面,學習者們都熱衷於使用各種鷹架輔助提示。而在遊戲行為方面,高先備學習者在
最後一回合時必定會獲勝,而低先備學習者在最後一回合時有可能會輸。
關於相異處,在實驗一中,高先備學習者在主要問題和主要問題的原因上表現比低先備
學習者更好。相反地,在實驗二的結果表明,高先備學習者只有在主要問題原因的表現
優於低先備學習者,但在主要問題時兩者的表現沒有差異。此外,實驗一的結果表明,
低先備學習者在複習題和複習題原因上表現比高先備學習者更好。然而,實驗二的結果
表明,低先備學習者只有在複習題的表現優於高先備,但在複習題原因時沒有差異。另
一方面,無論在實驗一或實驗二,高先備學習者和低先備學習者會使用不同的策略。更
具體地說,在實驗一使用的策略與他們的答案狀態有關,例如:答對和答錯。而在實驗二
使用的策略與他們的先備知識和題目類型有關,例如:複習題和複習題原因。除此之外,
實驗二結果表明,高先備學習者在進階題的表現是優於低先備學習者,而且他們在與個
人化愉悅型三層式測驗互動的過程中善用系統所提供的學習者半控制方法。
綜上所述,這項研究的兩個實驗有助於深入了解先備知識對使用三層式測驗的影響。 同
時,它們還指引了如何將個人化和遊戲式學習納入三層式測驗。這種貢獻的最終目標是
在進行電子評量的過程中,不同學習者的需求和偏好皆可以被滿足。
摘要(英) E-assessment can help learners diagnose their own problems with instant feedback during their
learning process. Among various E-assessment mechanisms, two-tier tests are effective
learning tools. This is because two-tiers can not only be used to assess learners’ learning
effectiveness, but also can be employed to diagnose whether learners really know answers or
such answers results from guessing. Although two-tier tests have the aforementioned
advantages, there are still some shortcomings. For example, it cannot make learners have a deep
impression. Therefore, learners cannot maintain long-term memory.
In order to solve these problems, this research proposes a three-tier test, which not only inherits
the answers and reasons from the two-tier test, but also provides review questions to help
learners achieve drill and practice. By doing so, the aforementioned problem can be sorted out.
However, the three-tier test still belongs to an assessment mechanism. Therefore, learners may
get frustrated and lack learning motivation during the assessment. Due to these disadvantages,
this study incorporates game-based learning into the three-tier test. This is because game-based
learning can not only provide joyful experience, but also increase learning motivation. Thus, an
entertaining three-tier test (ET3) was developed in Study One. On the other hand,
personalization can improve learners’ engagement and learning effectiveness. Due to these
positive influences, a personalized entertaining three-tier test (PET3), which combined
personalization and ET3, was developed in Study Two.
Like most E-assessment, either the ET3 or PET3 face diverse learners. This is because
individual differences exist between each learner. Among various individual differences, prior
knowledge is essential because it can reflect cognitive abilities that learners possess before
v
acquiring new knowledge. Owing to such essence, two empirical studies, i.e., Study One and
Study Two, were conducted to investigate the effects of prior knowledge in the context of the
ET3 and the PET3, including test performance, task performance, learning behavior and gaming
behavior.
Study One examined how learners learned English grammar via the ET3 while Study Two
investigated how learners learned English grammar via the PET3. Results from Study One and
those from Study Two shared some similarities: (1) High Prior Knowledge Learners (HPKL)
performed better than Low Prior Knowledge Learners (LPKL) in test performance; (2) their
post-test scores were higher than the pre-test scores, regardless of HPKL or LPKL; (3) HPKL
and LPKL obtained similar gain scores. (4);both HPKL and LPKL were keen to use various
scaffolding hints; and (5) HPKL must be a winner in the last round while LPKL could be a loser
in the last round.
There were also differences between Study One and Study Two. HPKL performed better than
LPKL in Study One, in terms of main questions and reasons of the main questions. On the
contrary, the results from Study Two showed that HPKL was better than LPKL in the reasons
of the main questions but no differences were found for the main questions. In addition, the
results from Study One showed that LPKL performed better than HPKL in review questions
and reasons of the review questions. However, the results from Study Two showed that LPKL
performed better than HPKL in review questions but no differences were found for the reasons
of the review questions. On the other hand, HPKL and LPKL used different strategies for Study
One and Study Two. More specifically, the strategies used for Study One were related to their
answer statuses, i.e., correct answers or wrong answers. On the other hand, the strategies used
for Study Two were associated with learners’ prior knowledge and the types of the questions
vi
(e.g., review questions or reasons of review questions). Furthermore, the results from Study
Two showed that HPKL performed better than LPKL in the advanced questions. Moreover, both
HPKL and LPKL appreciated the semi-control approach provided by the PET3.
In summary, these two empirical studies contribute to developing a deep understanding of the
effects of prior knowledge on the use of three-tier tests. Meanwhile, they also provide guidance
on how to incorporate personalization and game-based learning into three-tier tests. The
ultimate goal of such contributions is that the needs and preferences of diverse learners can be
accommodated when they interact with e-assessment.
關鍵字(中) ★ 先備知識
★ 三層式測驗
★ 遊戲式學習
★ 個人化
關鍵字(英) ★ Prior Knowledge
★ Three-Tier Test
★ Game-Based Learning
★ Personalization
論文目次 Table of Contents
摘要.............................................................................................................................................i
ABSTRACT ..............................................................................................................................iv
Table of Contents......................................................................................................................vii
List of Figures............................................................................................................................xi
List of Tables ............................................................................................................................xii
List of Abbreviation.................................................................................................................xiii
Chapter 1 Introduction................................................................................................................1
1.1 Background...................................................................................................................1
1.2 Aims and Research Objectives.....................................................................................3
1.3 Chapter Outline ............................................................................................................5
1.4 Summary.......................................................................................................................6
Chapter 2 Literature Review.......................................................................................................7
2.1 E-assessment.................................................................................................................7
2.2 Prior Knowledge...........................................................................................................9
2.3 Game-Based Learning (GBL) ....................................................................................12
2.4 Summary.....................................................................................................................15
Chapter 3 Methodology Design................................................................................................17
3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................17
3.2 Conceptual Framework...............................................................................................18
3.3 Pre-test and Post-test ..................................................................................................19
3.4 Data analysis...............................................................................................................20
3.5 Summary.....................................................................................................................21
Chapter 4 Study One – Entertaining Three-Tier Test...............................................................23
4.1 Participants.................................................................................................................23
viii
4.2 Research Instruments..................................................................................................23
4.2.1 Entertaining Three-Tier Test (ET3) .................................................................23
4.2.2 Pre-test and Post-test .......................................................................................27
4.3 Experimental Procedures............................................................................................27
4.4 Data Analysis..............................................................................................................28
4.5 Results: Test Performance ..........................................................................................28
4.5.1 Gain Scores......................................................................................................29
4.6 Results: Task Performance .........................................................................................29
4.6.1 Main Questions................................................................................................29
4.6.2 Review Questions............................................................................................30
4.6.3 Frequency Differences.....................................................................................31
4.6.4 Status Differences............................................................................................31
4.7 Results: Learning Behavior ........................................................................................32
4.7.1 Usage Frequencies of Scaffolding Hints .........................................................32
4.7.2 Sequences of Learning Behavior.....................................................................33
4.7.2.1Main Questions......................................................................................33
4.7.2.2 Review Questions.................................................................................36
4.8 Results: Gaming Behavior..........................................................................................38
4.9 Discussions.................................................................................................................41
4.9.1 The Impacts of the ET3 ...................................................................................41
4.9.2 The Impacts of Prior Knowledge.....................................................................41
4.9.3 The Impacts of Scaffolding Hints....................................................................42
4.10 Summary...................................................................................................................43
Chapter 5 Study Two –Personalized Entertaining Three-Tier Test ..........................................44
5.1 Participants.................................................................................................................44
ix
5.2 Research Instruments..................................................................................................44
5.2.1 Personalized Entertaining Three-Tier Test ......................................................44
5.2.2 Pre-test and Post-test .......................................................................................49
5.3 Experimental Procedures............................................................................................49
5.4 Data Analysis..............................................................................................................50
5.5 Results: Test Performance ..........................................................................................50
5.5.1 Gain Scores......................................................................................................51
5.6 Results: Task Performance .........................................................................................52
5.6.1 Main Questions................................................................................................52
5.6.2 Review Questions............................................................................................53
5.6.3 Advanced Questions........................................................................................54
5.6.4 Frequency Differences.....................................................................................54
5.6.5 Status Differences............................................................................................55
5.7 Results: Learning Behavior ........................................................................................56
5.7.1 Usage Frequency of Scaffolding Hints............................................................56
5.7.2 Sequences of Learning Behavior.....................................................................57
5.7.2.1 Main Questions.....................................................................................57
5.7.2.2 Review Questions.................................................................................60
5.7.2.3 Advanced Questions.............................................................................62
5.8 Results: Gaming Behavior..........................................................................................65
5.9 Discussion...................................................................................................................67
5.9.1 The Influences of Prior Knowledge.................................................................67
5.9.2 The Influences of Scaffolding Hints................................................................68
5.9.3 The Influences of PET3...................................................................................68
5.10 Summary...................................................................................................................69
x
Chapter 6 Conclusions..............................................................................................................70
6.1 Main Conclusions.......................................................................................................70
6.1.1 Answers to Research Questions.......................................................................70
6.2 Development of a Framework ....................................................................................80
6.2.1 Entertaining three-tier test (ET3).....................................................................80
6.2.2 Personalized entertaining three-tier test (PET3)..............................................81
6.2.3 Study One vs Study Two .................................................................................83
6.3 Contributions of Research ..........................................................................................85
6.4 Limitations and Future works.....................................................................................86
References ................................................................................................................................87
參考文獻 References
Abdelaal, N. M., & Sase, A. S. (2014). Relationship between prior knowledge and reading
comprehension. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(6), 125-131.
Abdulmajeed, R. K., & Hameed, S. K. (2017). Using a linguistic theory of humour in teaching
english grammar. English Language Teaching, 10(2), 40-47.
Ahmad, A. (2017). Developing cooperative learning based e-module to teach basic English
grammar of the first semester of English study program students at FKIP–UIR. J-SHMIC:
Journal of English for Academic, 4(2), 1-11.
Alhazmi, A. K., Imtiaz, A., Al-Hammadi, F., & Kaed, E. (2021). Success and failure aspects of
LMS in e-learning systems. International Journal of Interactive Mobile
Technologies, 15(11).
Alruwais, N., Wills, G., & Wald, M. (2018). Advantages and challenges of using eassessment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(1), 34-37.
Alsadoon, E. (2020). The impact of an adaptive e-course on students’ achievements based on
the students’ prior knowledge. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 3541-3551.
Arab, A. M., Haghighat, A., Amiri, Z., & Khosravi, F. (2017). Lumbar lordosis in prone position
and prone hip extension test: Comparison between subjects with and without low back
pain. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 25(1), 1-6.
Aziz, A. N., Subiyanto, S., & Harlanu, M. (2018). Effects of the digital game-based learning
(DGBL) on students academic performance in Arabic learning at Sambas
Purbalingga. KARSA: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture, 26(1), 1-22.
Baró‐Solé, X., Guerrero‐Roldan, A. E., Prieto‐Blázquez, J., Rozeva, A., Marinov, O., Kiennert,
C., ...2017 & Garcia‐Alfaro, J. (2018). Integration of an adaptive trust‐based e‐assessment
system into virtual learning environments—the TeSLA project experience. Internet
Technology Letters, 1(4), e56.
Behnamnia, N., Kamsin, A., Ismail, M. A. B., & Hayati, A. (2020). The effective components
of creativity in digital game-based learning among young children: A case study. Children
and Youth Services Review, 116, 105227.
Belland, B. R. (2014). Scaffolding: Definition, current debates, and future directions. Handbook
of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 505-518). Springer, New
York, NY.
Cam, L., & Tran, T. M. T. (2017). An evaluation of using games in teaching English grammar
for first year English-majored students at Dong Nai Technology University. International
Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 16(7), 55-71.
Chang, W. L., & Yeh, Y. C. (2021). A blended design of game-based learning for motivation,
knowledge sharing and critical thinking enhancement. Technology, Pedagogy and
Education, 1-15.
Chen, S. Y., & Chang, Y. M. (2020). The impacts of real competition and virtual competition in
digital game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106171.
Chen, Y. X., Wang, J.H., Yang, T.C., & Chen, S. Y. (2018). The Effects of Prior Knowledge on
the Use of A Three-tier Test System. Proceedings of the Workshop on Computer Support
Personalized & Collaborative learning in GCCCE 2018.
Chen, S. Y., & Tseng, Y. F. (2019). The impacts of scaffolding e-assessment English learning:
A cognitive style perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-23.
Chen, M. P., Wong, Y. T., & Wang, L. C. (2014). Effects of type of exploratory strategy and
prior knowledge on middle school students’ learning of chemical formulas from a 3D roleplaying game. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(2), 163-185.
Chen, Z. H. (2014). Exploring students’ behaviors in a competition-driven educational game.
Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 68-74.
Cheung, K. L., & Yang, D. C. (2020). Performance of sixth graders in Hong Kong on a number sense three-tier test. Educational Studies, 46(1), 39-55.
Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, J. C. (2010). A two-tier test approach to
developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science
courses. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1618-1627.
Connelly, L. (2019). Chi-square test. Medsurg Nursing, 28(2), 127-127.
Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning:
beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 88(4), 715.
Cummins, J., Hu, S., Markus, P., & Kristiina Montero, M. (2015). Identity texts and
academic achievement: connecting the dots in multilingual school contexts. TESOL
Quarterly, 49(3), 555-581.
Daniel, C. E., Halimi, F., & AlShammari, I. A. (2018). The impact of motivation and parental
encouragement on English language learning: an Arab students’ perspective. The Reading
Matrix: An International Online Journal, 18(1), 176-194.
Deng, L., Wu, S., Chen, Y., & Peng, Z. (2020). Digital game‐based learning in a Shanghai
primary‐school mathematics class: a case study. Journal of Computer Assisted
Learning, 36(5), 709-717.
Dochy, F., De Rijdt, C., & Dyck, W. (2002). Cognitive prerequisites and learning: How far
have we progressed since Bloom? Implications for educational practice and
teaching. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(3), 265-284.
Dong, A., Jong, M. S.-Y., & King, R. B. (2020). How does prior knowledge influence learning
engagement? The mediating roles of cognitive load and help-seeking. Frontiers in
Psychology, 11(2992).
Eltahir, M. E., Alsalhi, N. R., Al-Qatawneh, S., AlQudah, H. A., & Jaradat, M. (2021). The
impact of game-based learning (GBL) on students’ motivation, engagement and academic performance on an Arabic language grammar course in higher education. Education and
Information Technologies, 26(3), 3251-3278.
Erhel, S., & Jamet, E. (2013). Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback
on motivation and learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 67, 156-167.
Escudier, M. P., Newton, T. J., Cox, M. J., Reynolds, P. A., & Odell, E. W. (2011). University
students′ attainment and perceptions of computer delivered assessment; a comparison
between computer‐based and traditional tests in a ‘high‐stakes’ examination. Journal of
Computer Assisted Learning, 27(5), 440-447.
Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of
Educational Research, 83(1), 70-120.
Fyfe, E. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2016). Feedback both helps and hinders learning: the causal
role of prior knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), 82.
Game, A., & Metcalfe, A. (2009). Dialogue and team teaching. Higher Education Research &
Development, 28(1), 45-57.
Gamlo, N. (2019). The impact of mobile game-based language learning apps on EFL learners′
motivation. English Language Teaching, 12(4), 49-56.
Gao, Q., Wang, D., & Gao, F. (2015). Impact of knowledge representations on problemoriented learning in online environments. International Journal of Human-Computer
Interaction, 31(12), 922-938.
Gerodetti, N., & Nixon, D. (2019). Exploration: Using play to design play—gamification and
student involvement in the production of games-based learning resources for research
methods teaching. In The Power of Play in Higher Education (pp. 283-290). Palgrave
Macmillan, Cham.
Gunantar, D. A. (2016). The impact of English as an international language on English language
teaching in Indonesia. Journal of Language and Literature, 10(2), 141-151.
Hills, K., Andersen, K., & Davidson, S. (2018). Personalized learning and teaching approaches
to meet diverse needs: A prototype tertiary education program. In Reimagining christian
education (pp. 233-257). Springer, Singapore.
Hsieh, C. W., Jhan, S. N., & Chen, S. Y. (2014, July). Individual differences and joyful
assessment-based learning. In 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced
Learning Technologies (pp. 330-335). IEEE.
Huang, B. G., Yang, J. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2021). An investigation of the approaches for
integrating learning materials and digital games: a prior ability perspective. Universal
Access in the Information Society, 20(1), 57-68.
Huda, S. S. M., Kabir, M., & Siddiq, T. (2020). E-assessment in higher education: Students′
perspective. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and
Communication Technology, 16(2), 250-258.
Hwang, G. H., Chen, B., Chen, R. S., Wu, T. T., & Lai, Y. L. (2019). Differences between
students’ learning behaviors and performances of adopting a competitive game-based item
bank practice approach for learning procedural and declarative knowledge. Interactive
Learning Environments, 27(5-6), 740-753.
Jeff, C. B. R. (2019). The most difficult basic skill faced by learners of English in first year
undergraduate classes at UEA/Bukavu, DR Congo. Creative Education, 10(2), 464-474.
Kanli, U. Y. G. A. R. (2015). Using a two-tier test to analyse students′ and teachers′ alternative
concepts in astronomy. Science Education International, 26(2), 148-165.
Khatri, C., Sugand, K., Anjum, S., Vivekanantham, S., Akhtar, K., & Gupte, C. (2014). Does
video gaming affect orthopaedic skills acquisition? A prospective cohort-study. Plos one,
9(10), e110212.
Kiesewetter, J., Sailer, M., Jung, V. M., Schönberger, R., Bauer, E., Zottmann, J. M., ... &
Fischer, M. R. (2020). Learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1-10.
Kim, T. K. (2015). T test as a parametric statistic. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 68(6),
540.
Kunasaraphan, K. (2015). English learning strategy and proficiency level of the first year
students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1853-1858.
Kurniawan, D. E., Dzikri, A., Widyastuti, H., Sembiring, E., & Manurung, R. T. (2019, March).
Smart mathematics: A Kindergarten student learning media based on the drill and practice
model. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1175, No. 1, p. 012037). IOP
Publishing.
Lai, N. K., Ang, T. F., Por, L. Y., & Liew, C. S. (2018). Learning through intuitive interface: A
case study on preschool learning. Computers & Education, 126, 443-458.
Lee, J. Y., Donkers, J., Jarodzka, H., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (2019). How prior knowledge
affects problem-solving performance in a medical simulation game: Using game-logs and
eye-tracking. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 268-277.
Li, L. Y. (2019). Effect of prior knowledge on attitudes, behavior, and learning performance in
video lecture viewing. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4-5),
415-426.
Li, F. Y., Hwang, G. J., Chen, P. Y., & Lin, Y. J. (2021). Effects of a concept mapping-based
two-tier test strategy on students’ digital game-based learning performances and
behavioral patterns. Computers & Education, 104293.
Liu, Z. X., Grady, C., & Moscovitch, M. (2017). Effects of prior-knowledge on brain activation
and connectivity during associative memory encoding. Cerebral Cortex, 27(3), 1991-2009.
Matsuda, A., & Matsuda, P. (2017). Teaching English as an international language: A weinformed paradigm for English language teaching. In World Englishes (pp. 104-117).
Routledge.
Mayer, R. E., Fennell, S., Farmer, L., & Campbell, J. (2004). A personalization effect in
multimedia learning: Students learn better when words are in conversational style rather
than formal style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 389.
Meekaew, N., & Ketpichainarong, W. (2021). The effects of augmented reality-facilitated
mobile game-based learning on the diversity of life for promoting learning at the natural
history museum. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 15(3), 282-
305.
Mihalca, L., & Mengelkamp, C. (2020). Effects of induced levels of prior knowledge on
monitoring accuracy and performance when learning from self-regulated problem
solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 795.
Misbah, N. H., Mohamad, M., Yunus, M. M., & Ya’acob, A. (2017). Identifying the factors
contributing to students’ difficulties in the English language learning. Creative Education,
8(13), 1999-2008.
Nagari-Haddif, G., & Yerushalmy, M. (2018). Supporting online e-assessment of problem
solving: Resources and constraints. In Classroom assessment in mathematics (pp. 93-105).
Springer, Cham.
O′Donnell, E., Lawless, S., Sharp, M., & Wade, V. P. (2015). A review of personalised e-learning:
Towards supporting learner diversity. International Journal of Distance Education
Technologies (IJDET), 13(1), 22-47.
Perrotta, C., Featherstone, G., Aston, H., & Houghton, E. (2013). Game-based learning: Latest
evidence and future directions. Slough: NFER.
Pramesti, Y. S., Mahmudi, H. A. R. I. S., & Setyowidodo, I. R. W. A. N. (2021, March). Using
three-tier test to diagnose students’ level of understanding. In Journal of Physics:
Conference Series (Vol. 1806, No. 1, p. 012013). IOP Publishing.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: Do they really think differently?. On the horizon.
Rana, R., & Singhal, R. (2015). Chi-square test and its application in hypothesis testing. Journal
of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences, 1(1), 69.
Rao, Z. (2016). Language learning strategies and English proficiency: Interpretations from
information-processing theory. The Language Learning Journal, 44(1), 90-106.
Ross, B., Chase, A. M., Robbie, D., Oates, G., & Absalom, Y. (2018). Adaptive quizzes to
increase motivation, engagement and learning outcomes in a first year accounting
unit. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1-14.
Ru’iya, S., & Kistoro, H. C. A. (2021, March). Educating with Paying Attention to Individual
Differences: Case Study of Slow Learner Students in Inclusion School. In 1st Paris Van
Java International Seminar on Health, Economics, Social Science and Humanities (PVJISHESSH 2020) (pp. 113-116). Atlantis Press.
Saba, T. (2020). Intelligent game-based learning: an effective learning model
approach. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 64(2), 208-221.
Sajid, M., & Siddiqui, J. A. (2015). Lack of academic writing skills in English language at
higher education level in Pakistan: Causes, effects and remedies. International Journal of
Language and Linguistics, 2(4), 174-186.
Sek, Y. W., Law, C. Y., Liew, T. H., Hisham, S. B., Lau, S. H., & Pee, A. N. B. C. (2012). Eassessment as a self-test quiz tool: The setting features and formative use. Procedia-Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 737-742.
Shawky, D., & Badawi, A. (2019). Towards a personalized learning experience using
reinforcement learning. In Machine learning paradigms: Theory and application (pp. 169-
187). Springer, Cham.
Shemshack, A., & Spector, J. M. (2020). A systematic literature review of personalized learning
terms. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1-20.
Simonova, I. (2012, September). Two-tier test: Means of fair and reliable evaluation. In 2012
15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL) (pp. 1-4).
IEEE.
Song, H. S., Kalet, A. L., & Plass, J. L. (2016). Interplay of prior knowledge, self‐regulation
and motivation in complex multimedia learning environments. Journal of Computer
Assisted Learning, 32(1), 31-50. doi:10.1111/jcal.12117
Stödberg, U. (2012). A research review of e-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher
Education, 37(5), 591-604.
Strekalova-Hughes, E., Nash, K. T., Schmer, B., & Caldwell, K. (2021). Meeting the needs of
all cultureless learners: Culture discourse and quality assumptions in personalized learning
research. Review of Research in Education, 45(1), 372-407.
Sukasame, N., Kantho, S., & Narrot, P. (2014). A study of errors in learning english grammatical
structures on tenses of Matthayomsuksa 4 students of the demonstration school, Khonkaen
University. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1934-1939.
Sung, H. Y., Hwang, G. J., Lin, C. J., & Hong, T. W. (2017). Experiencing the analects of
confucius: An experiential game-based learning approach to promoting students′
motivation and conception of learning. Computers & Education, 110, 143-153.
Suryawirawati, I. G., Ramdhan, B., & Juhanda, A. A. (2018). Analisis penurunan miskonsepsi
siswa pada konsep pemanasan global dengan tes diagnostik (two-tier test) setelah
pembelajaran predict-observe-explain. Journal Of Biology Education, 1(1), 93-105.
Tokac, U., Novak, E., & Thompson, C. G. (2019). Effects of game‐based learning on students′
mathematics achievement: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted
Learning, 35(3), 407-420.
Tsai, C. C. (2001). The interpretation construction design model for teaching science and its
applications to internet-based instruction in Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Development, 21(5), 401-415.
Tsai, M. J., Huang, L. J., Hou, H. T., Hsu, C. Y., & Chiou, G. L. (2016). Visual behavior, flow
and achievement in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 98, 115-129.
Wade, S., & Kidd, C. (2019). The role of prior knowledge and curiosity in
learning. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 26(4), 1377-1387.
Widiyatmoko, A., & Shimizu, K. (2018). The development of two-tier multiple choice test to
assess students’ conceptual understanding about light and optical instruments. Jurnal
Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 491-501.
Wongwatkit, C., Srisawasdi, N., Hwang, G. J., & Panjaburee, P. (2017). Influence of an
integrated learning diagnosis and formative assessment-based personalized web learning
approach on students learning performances and perceptions. Interactive Learning
Environments, 25(7), 889-903.
Wouters, P., & Van Oostendorp, H. (2017). Overview of instructional techniques to facilitate
learning and motivation of serious games. In Instructional techniques to facilitate learning
and motivation of serious games (pp. 1-16). Springer, Cham.
Wu, T. T. (2018). Improving the effectiveness of English vocabulary review by integrating
ARCS with mobile game‐based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3),
315-323.
Xu, D., Huang, W. W., Wang, H., & Heales, J. (2014). Enhancing e-learning effectiveness using
an intelligent agent-supported personalized virtual learning environment: An empirical
investigation. Information & Management, 51(4), 430-440.
Yang, T. C. (2014). Development and Effectiveness Analysis of a Two-Tier Test-based Online
Learning Environment. (master′s thesis, Department of Computer Science & Information
Engineering, National Central University).Retrieved from https://etd.lib.nctu.edu.tw/cgibin/gs32/ncugsweb.cgi/ccd=oRW5jx/search#result
Yang, T. C., Chen, S. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2015). The influences of a two-tier test strategy on
student learning: A lag sequential analysis approach. Computers & Education, 82, 366-
377.
Yang, T. C., Fu, H. T., Hwang, G. J., & Yang, S. J. (2017). Development of an interactive
mathematics learning system based on a two-tier test diagnostic and guiding
strategy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1).
Yang, J. C., Lin, M. Y. D., & Chen, S. Y. (2018). Effects of anxiety levels on learning
performance and gaming performance in digital game‐based learning. Journal of
Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 324-334
Yang, J. C., & Quadir, B. (2018). Effects of prior knowledge on learning performance and
anxiety in an English learning online role-playing game. Journal of Educational
Technology & Society, 21(3), 174-185.
Yavuz, H. C., & Kutlu, Ö . (2019). Examination of student growth using gain score and
categorical growth models. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6(3),
487-505.
Young, S.-S.-C., & Wang, Y.-H. (2014). The game embedded call system to facilitate English
vocabulary acquisition and pronunciation. Educational Technology & Society, 17 (3),
239–251.
Zakrzewski, S., & Bull, J. (1998). The mass implementation and evaluation of computer‐based
assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 141-152.
Zambrano, J., Kirschner, F., Sweller, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2019). Effects of prior knowledge
on collaborative and individual learning. Learning and Instruction, 63, 101214.
Zou, D., Zhang, R., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2021). Digital game-based learning of information
literacy: Effects of gameplay modes on university students’ learning performance,
motivation, self-efficacy and flow experiences. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 152-170.
指導教授 陳攸華(Sherry Chen) 審核日期 2021-8-12
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明