以ASTM WPRI與垂直加速度建構檢測設備與評估人行環境舒適性之初步研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：15

、訪客IP：52.14.247.220

姓名

曾佳馨(Chia-Hsin Tseng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

土木工程學系

論文名稱

以ASTM WPRI與垂直加速度建構檢測設備與評估人行環境舒適性之初步研究
(The preliminary study of establishing pedestrian sidewalk inspection vehicle using ASTM WPRI and vertical accelerator.)

相關論文

★ 以臺北市道路檢測資料建構市區道路養護指標系統初探

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

臺灣內政部營建署每年邀請專家學者對當地政府所管養之人行環境進行檢查與評估，本研究目的為建立人行環境調查車(Pedestrian Sidewalk Inspection Vehicle, PSIV)以評估人行道狀況，導入WPRI (Wheelchair Pathway Roughness Index)與垂直加速度，WPRI為ASTM E3028所定義人行道粗糙度之指標，並參考ISO 2631-1定義加速度對人體振動衝擊警戒區，更進一步將人行環境調查車進行驗證，並對國立中央大學校園內之各種人行道路面進行評估，同時量測人行道路面之抗滑能力。人行環境檢測車驗證結果符合ASTM E3028之設備要求，並可檢測人行道路面之垂直加速度。根據WPRI檢測結果顯示各人行道路面狀況具有顯著差異，其中以瀝青混凝土鋪面與人造面磚之表現為佳，且WPRI與人行道鋪磚間距具高度正相關性。WPRI為人行環境粗糙度之指標，而垂直加速度為評估振動狀況之指標，根據本研究結果顯示兩者為低度相關性。綜合研究結果可顯示搭載WPRI與垂直加速度之人行環境檢測車為具有評估人行道路面狀況之設備，有助於協助當地政府與工程師提高殘疾人士、孕婦與年長者所使用之人行道路面服務品質。

摘要(英)

Inspection and evaluation the pedestrian sidewalk of the local government with experts and scholars is the annual program of construction and planning agency ministry of the interior in Taiwan. the objective of this study was established a pedestrian sidewalk inspection vehicle to evaluate the pedestrian sidewalk. The Pedestrian Sidewalk Inspection Vehicle (PSIV) was integrated by Wheel Pathway Roughness Index (WPRI) and the Accelerator. The WPRI was following ASTM E3028 to evaluate the roughness and Accelerator was referenced of ISO 2631-1 to the vibration shock caution zones of human body in this study. The verification of PSIV would be also conducted, and PISV would be adopted to evaluate various pedestrian sidewalk pavement in National Central University Campus. In addition, the friction of various pedestrian sidewalk pavement would be also measurement. The verification results of PSIV were matched the equipment of ASTM E3028 and it could be detecting the vertical vibration from pedestrian sidewalk pavement condition. Based on the results of WPRI, the difference of various pedestrian sidewalk pavement was significance, the asphalt concrete and artificial facing bricking were the best pedestrian sidewalk pavement. The relationship between WPRI and pedestrian sidewalk brick pavement gap was positive high correlative. The WPRI is the index of pedestrian sidewalk roughness, the vertical accelerator is index of vibration and the relationship between WPRI and vibration was low correlative in this study. Based on above, the PSIV with WPRI and vertical accelerator should be a very nice equipment to inspect and evaluate pedestrian sidewalk pavement. Under the assistance of PSIV, it should be helpful for local government and engineers to raise the service level of pedestrian sidewalk pavement for disabled, handicap, pregnant and elder. This study is worthy of further studying to improve our infrastructure in Taiwan.

關鍵字(中)

★ 人行環境、
★ WPRI
★ 垂直加速度

關鍵字(英)

★ Pedestrian sidewalk
★ WPRI
★ vertical acceleration

論文目次

摘　要 I
ABSTRACT II
致　謝 III
目　錄 V
圖目錄 VIII
表目錄 XII
第一章、緒論 1
1-1　　研究背景與動機 1
1-2　　研究目的 2
1-3　　研究範圍 3
1-4　　研究流程 4
第二章、文獻回顧 6
2-1　　人行道設計準則 6
2-2　　人行道評估指標 8
2-2-1　振動狀況 8
2-2-2　人行道狀況指數 10
2-2-3　輪椅通道粗糙度指標 11
2-2-4　抗滑性 12
2-3　　鋪面檢測儀器與驗證 13
2-3-1　檢測載具種類 13
2-3-2　儀器校正與驗證 19
2-4　　人行道鋪磚間距舒適性 22
2-5　　資料分析 23
2-5-1　波譜分析 23
2-5-2　統計分析 26
2-6　　小結 29
第三章、研究方法 30
3-1　　人行道檢測設備 30
3-1-1　距離感測器 30
3-1-2　雷射 32
3-1-3　陀螺儀 33
3-2　　人行道檢測設備驗證方法 34
3-2-1　距離感測器驗證 35
3-2-2　雷射驗證 37
3-2-3　WPRI值計算驗證 39
3-3　　人行道現地狀況調查 40
第四章、實驗室驗證成果分析 43
4-1　　距離感測器驗證結果 43
4-2　　雷射驗證結果 44
4-2-1　單點量測 44
4-2-2　連續量測 45
4-3　　小結 51
第五章、現地調查成果分析 52
5-1　　WPRI值 57
5-1-1　混凝土鋪面 57
5-1-2　瀝青混凝土鋪面 60
5-1-3　洗石子鋪面 61
5-1-4　人造面磚 62
5-1-5　連鎖磚面 65
5-1-6　其他通行廊道 68
5-1-7　整體分析 71
5-2　　垂直加速度 76
5-2-1　混凝土鋪面 76
5-2-2　瀝青混凝土鋪面 78
5-2-3　洗石子鋪面 79
5-2-4　人造面磚 81
5-2-5　連鎖磚面 83
5-2-6　其他通行廊道 85
5-2-7　整體分析 87
5-3　　人行道評估指標檢測結果綜合討論 91
5-3-1　人行道評估指標應用 91
5-3-2　鋪面材質分析結果 93
第六章、結論與建議 95
6-1　　結論 95
6-1-1　人行環境檢測車驗證 95
6-1-2　人行道現地調查應用 96
6-2　　建議 97
參考文獻 98

參考文獻

[1]內政部營建署，2003，「市區道路人行道設計手冊」。
[2]內政部營建署，2021，「市區道路及附屬工程設計標準」。
[3]內政部營建署，2022，「市區道路及附屬工程設計規範」。
[4]尹赫、周家蓓、陳艾懃，2017，「探討以輪椅使用者觀點評估人行道平整度之方法」，第十九屆鋪面工程學術研討會暨2017世界華人鋪面專家學術研討會。
[5]交通部，2022，「道路交通管理處罰條例」。
[6]交通部，2021，「交通工程規範」。
[7]周家蓓、蕭冠箴、陳艾懃，2018，「精進車輛反應加速度平坦度指標之演算法」，鋪面工程，第十六卷，第二期，pp.21-28。
[8]經濟部標準檢驗局，2006，「CNS 15046慣性剖面儀量測舖面縱向剖面試驗法」。
[9]經濟部標準檢驗局，2010，「CNS 15371鋪面量測用慣性剖面儀驗證法」。
[10]衛生福利部統計處，2021，「2.3.3身心障礙者人數按等級及類別分」。
[11]ADAAG. (2002). “Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines,” Washington D.C., U.S.A.
[12]Adu-Gyamfi, Y. O., Attoh-Okine, N. O., and Ayenu-Prah, A. Y. (2010). “Critical Analysis of Different Hilbert-Huang Algorithms for Pavement Profile Evaluation,” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol.24, No.6, pp.514–524.
[13]Alexandra, F., (2013). “Pedestrian Transportation Project Prioritization Incorporating App-Collected Sidewalk Data,” Georgia Institute of Technology, U.S.A.
[14]ASTM. (2018). “Standard Guide for Conducting Subjective Pavement Ride Quality Ratings.” No. 1927, American Society for Testing and Materials
[15]ASTM. (2018). “Standard Practice for Computing Wheelchair Pathway Roughness Index as Related to Comfort, Passability, and Whole Body Vibrations from Longitudinal Profile Measurements. Standard.” No. 3028, American Society for Testing and Materials.
[16]ASTM. (2018). “Standard Test Method for Measuring Surface Frictional Properties Using the British Pendulum Tester.” No. 303-93, American Society for Testing and Materials.
[17]Duvall, J. (2013). “Development of Surface Roughness Standard for Wheelchair Pathways,” University of Pittsburgh, U.S.A.
[18]Duvall, J., Sinagra, E., Cooper, R., and Pearlman, J. (2016). “Proposed Pedestrian Pathway Roughness Thresholds to Ensure Safety and Comfort for Wheelchair Users,” The Official Journal of RESNA, RESNA, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 209–215.
[19]Erik, W., Rory, A.C., Jonathan, P., Shirley, G.F., and Annmarie, K., (2007). “Longitudinal assessment of vibrations during manual and power wheelchair driving over select sidewalk surfaces,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 573-580.
[20]ISO 13473-1. (2019). “Characterization of pavement texture by use of surface profiles — Part 1: Determination of mean profile depth. Standard No. 13473-1:2019,” International Organization for Standardization.
[21]ISO 13473-1. (2002). “Characterization of pavement texture by use of surface profiles — Part 3: Specification and classification of profilometers. Standard No. 13473-3:2002,” International Organization for Standardization.
[22]ISO 2631-1, (1997). “Mechanical vibration and shock — Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration — Part 1: General requirements. Standard No. 2631-1:1997,” International Organization for Standardization.
[23]ISO 2631-1, (2010). “Mechanical vibration and shock — Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration — Part 1: General requirements. Standard – amendment 1, No. 2631-1/AMD 1:2010,” International Organization for Standardization.
[24]ISO 2631-5, (2018). “Mechanical vibration and shock — Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration — Part 5: Method for evaluation of bibration containing multiple shocks No. 2631-5:2018,” International Organization for Standardization
[25]Javed, B., Morshedul, H.S., Sattyjit, K.N., Shakhawat, H.T., and Md, T.H., (2018). “Development of Sidewalk Condition Index (SCI) of Dhanmondi R/A, Gulshan & Bashundhara R/A of Dhaka City,” International Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 53-62.
[26]Jing, W., Shiying S., and Xiaoquang, Z., (2015). “SUnstructured road detection and path tracking for tracked mobile robot,” The 5th Annual IEEE International Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, China.
[27]KSF 2530:2018, (2018). “Standard specifications for stone block foe pavement”, Korean Standards Association (KSA).
[28]Maria, V.C., Paola, D.M., and Laura, M. (2016). “Managing sidewalk pavement maintenance: A case study to increase pedestrian safety,” Journal of Traffic and Transportation Enginerring, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 203-214.
[29]Sinagra, E.J. (2014). “The design, development, characterization, and validation of a pathway measurement tool,” Duquesne University, U.S.A.
[30]Timothy, M., Daniel, S., Laith, T., Nader, T., and Hussain, U.B., “Characterization of Asphalt Pavement Surface Texture,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2295, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 19–26.

指導教授

陳世晃洪境聰(Shih-Huang Chen Ching-Tsung Hung)

審核日期

2022-7-25

推文