博碩士論文 109428026 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:27 、訪客IP:3.147.47.57
姓名 張乃文(Nai-Wen Chang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 財務金融學系
論文名稱 加密貨幣價格跳躍和共同跳躍-方法比較與實證
相關論文
★ 國內股票型共同基金異常報酬之特徵研究★ 台灣境外高收益債券型基金績效分析
★ 財富管理客戶選擇銀行之因素探討★ 境外匯回專法實施前後境外資金解決方案比較-以個案分析為例
★ 利用隨機優勢方法探究商品指數之投資績效★ 承銷關係是否會影響未來承銷業務?
★ 併購動能:以台灣市場為例★ 機構法人對股票報酬與公司價值之影響
★ 投資者情緒與期貨價格關聯性★ 避險基金指數是否能夠提供風險分散效果?- 利用均異擴張檢定
★ Model-Free隱含波動度價差之遠期資訊★ 公開市場購回股票之研究
★ Modeling Long Run Risk with Macroeconomic Fundamentals★ Exploration of Jumps and Cojumps in Financial Markets
★ 社會責任指數與環境、社會及公司治理之關聯性分析-以FTSE4Good系列指數為例★ 運用檢定資產價格泡沫模型建構動態財務危機預警之驗證
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 金融市場上常因反應重大訊息使得價格突然大漲或大跌,並產生跳躍或不連續的情形,價格跳躍對於投資人資產配置和風險管理顯然造成很大的影響,為此,研究與識別金融資產的價格跳躍非常重要。本文透過研究2020年到2022年共738個交易日17種名氣較大的加密貨幣高頻分鐘資料,分別參考BN-S (Barndorff-Nielsen 和 Shephard (2004)) 方法與 Yeh and Yun (2014) 迴歸測試 (Regression-based Tests) 方法,應用在觀察各類型加密貨幣對於貨幣跳躍和共同跳躍的檢測效用。此外,也使用迴歸測試模型的係數來檢測跳躍的整體存在,以及透過迴歸殘差識別跳躍天數的確切日期。實證結果顯示在不同信賴水準下,不論是跳躍檢測還是共跳檢測,迴歸測試的結果都比BN-S跳躍測試的結果更穩健,也沒有過度警報檢測的問題。另外,迴歸測試模型的整體跳躍檢定非常顯著,表明加密貨幣在樣本期間內確實存在跳躍;而跳躍日期檢測則在經過比對後發現與歷史事件吻合,能成功的將跳躍日期鑑別出來。
摘要(英) In the financial market, prices often rise or fall suddenly in response to major news, resulting in jumps or discontinuities. Price jumps obviously have a great impact on investors′ asset allocation and risk management. Therefore, it is very important to study and identify jumps in financial assets. In this paper, by studying the high-frequency one-minute data of 17 kinds of well-known cryptocurrencies in 738 days from 2020 to 2022, we use the BN-S (Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard (2004)) method and Regression-based tests (Yeh and Yun (2014)), respectively. Both methods are applied to examine the detection performance of jumps and co-jumps for various cryptocurrencies. In addition, the coefficients of the regression test model were used to detect the overall presence of jumps, as well as to identify the exact date of jump days through the regression residuals. Empirical results show that under different confidence levels, for jump or co-jump detection, the regression test results are more robust than the BN-S jump test results. Moreover, the regression test is free from the over alarming problem. After the comparison, it is found that the jump date detection is consistent with the historical events, and the jump dates can be successfully identified.
關鍵字(中) ★ 加密貨幣
★ 比特幣
★ BN-S
★ 迴歸測試
★ 跳躍
★ 共同跳躍
關鍵字(英) ★ cryptocurrency
★ bitcoin
★ BN-S
★ regression-based tests
★ jump
★ cojump
論文目次 摘要······································································i
Abstract···································································ii
致謝·····································································iii
第一章 緒論·······························································1
第二章 文獻回顧···························································3
第三章 研究方法···························································5
3.1 研究模型···························································5
3.2 資料樣本···························································5
3.3 模型介紹···························································6
3.3.1 BN-S模型·······················································6
3.3.2 Regression-based Tests 迴歸跳躍測試模型························7
3.3.3 Regression-based Tests for Jump Days···························8
3.3.4 Regression-based Cojump Tests··································9
第四章 研究結果··························································12
4.1基本資料··························································12
4.2 Regression-based jump and BN-S jump································13
4.3 Cojump····························································21
第五章 結論······························································25
參考文獻·································································26
附錄·····································································28
參考文獻 Aït-Sahalia, Y., Fan, J., & Jiang, J. (2010). Nonparametric tests of the Markov hypothesis in continuous-time models. Annals of Statistics, 38(5), 3129-3163.
Barndorff‐Nielsen, O. E., & Shephard, N. (2004a). Econometric analysis of realized covariation: High frequency based covariance, regression, and correlation in financial economics. Econometrica, 72(3), 885-925.
Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., & Shephard, N. (2004b). Power and bipower variation with stochastic volatility and jumps. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2(1), 1-37.
Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., & Shephard, N. (2006). Econometrics of testing for jumps in financial economics using bipower variation. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 4(1), 1-30.
Baur, D. G., Hong, K., & Lee, A. D. (2018). Bitcoin: Medium of exchange or speculative assets? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 54, 177-189.
Cong, L. W., Li, Y., & Wang, N. (2020). Token-based platform finance (No. w27810). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Diaconaşu, D. E., Mehdian, S., & Stoica, O. (2022). An analysis of investors’behavior in Bitcoin market. PloS ONE, 17(3), e0264522.
Dyhrberg, A. H. (2016). Bitcoin, gold and the dollar–A GARCH volatility analysis. Finance Research Letters, 16, 85-92.
Forbes, K. J., & Rigobon, R. (2002). No contagion, only interdependence: measuring stock market comovements. Journal of Finance, 57(5), 2223-2261.
Hasan, M., Naeem, M. A., Arif, M., Shahzad, S. J. H., & Vo, X. V. (2022). Liquidity connectedness in cryptocurrency market. Financial Innovation, 8(1), 1-25.
Huang, X., & Tauchen, G. (2005). The relative contribution of jumps to total price variance. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 3(4), 456-499.
Jacod, J., & Todorov, V. (2009). Testing for common arrivals of jumps for discretely observed multidimensional processes. Annals of Statistics, 37(4), 1792-1838.
Mincer, J. A., & Zarnowitz, V. (1969). The evaluation of economic forecasts. Economic Forecasts and Expectations: Analysis of Forecasting Behavior and Performance (pp. 3-46). NBER.
Phiromswad, P., Chatjuthamard, P., Treepongkaruna, S., & Srivannaboon, S. (2021). Jumps and Cojumps analyses of major and minor cryptocurrencies. PloS ONE, 16(2), e0245744.
Revuz, D., & Yor, M. (1999). Representation of Martingales. Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion (pp. 179-220). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Schilling, L., & Uhlig, H. (2019). Some simple bitcoin economics. Journal of Monetary Economics, 106, 16-26.
Shahzad, S. J. H., Bouri, E., Kang, S. H., & Saeed, T. (2021). Regime specific spillover across cryptocurrencies and the role of COVID-19. Financial Innovation, 7(1), 1-24.
Shahzad, S. J. H., Bouri, E., Roubaud, D., Kristoufek, L., & Lucey, B. (2019). Is Bitcoin a better safe-haven investment than gold and commodities? International Review of Financial Analysis, 63, 322-330.
Sockin, M., & Xiong, W. (2020). A model of cryptocurrencies (No. w26816). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Tauchen, G., & Zhou, H. (2005). Identifying realized jumps on financial markets. Manuscript, Duke University.
Yeh, J.-H., & Yun, M.-S. (2014). Identification and Understanding the Effect of Jumps/ Cojumps in Futures/ Cross Hedging. Working paper, National Central University.
指導教授 葉錦徽(Jin‑Huei Yeh) 審核日期 2022-9-16
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明