博碩士論文 109423073 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:139 、訪客IP:3.144.84.61
姓名 陳維隆(Wei-Long Chen)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱 以推敲可能性模式結合賦能理論探討公益性質群眾募資之贊助意圖:自我價值感與間接互惠的中介角色
(Using the elaboration likelihood model and affordance theory to investigate backer’s funding intention in charitable crowdfunding: The mediating role of sense of self-worth and indirect reciprocity)
相關論文
★ 影響消費者使用冷錢包簽帳卡之研究★ 從預期心理觀點探討線上群眾募資平台之衝動贊助意圖
★ 被忽略的沉默力量:探討瀏覽品質、沉浸體驗、潛水者公民行為之關係★ 當我們同在一起:從消費者—其他消費者互動觀點探究感染氣候與規範信念之影響
★ 對話式服務代理人:探索聊天機器人之服務品質與服務體驗★ 社群商務之快速信任與快速關係建立: 信號理論觀點
★ 由學習轉移理論探索消費者對線上至線下 商業模式之體驗轉移過程★ 自助服務補救:探討電子商務網站補救措施、知覺公平與補救滿意度之關係
★ 運用資料探勘技術優化 次世代防火牆規則之研究★ 組織數位學習準備度對學習者準備度之影響:資訊系統成功模式的觀點
★ 社會行動團體之社群媒體使用對志工保留之影響:社會資本的觀點★ 探討應用資料增強及改善類別不平衡問題 對不同股票圖形之影響-以台灣股市0050ETF為例
★ 以文字探勘技術分析標籤劫持—以twitter為例★ 探討個人賣家之社群商務能力養成:組織學習理論觀點
★ 您累了嗎?遠距辦公之工作—生活壓力對員工工作表現的影響:組織與個人層級應對策略的調節效果★ 探討顧客購買後之角色內到角色外行為: 社群商務顧客關係管理能力的調節效果
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 (2027-7-18以後開放)
摘要(中) 面臨諸多社會問題的嚴峻挑戰,圍繞公眾利益、目標和價值的社會行動團體與個體快速成長,然而在社會行動團體競爭激烈且資源有限的前提下,促使社會行動團體不得不尋求其他的管道以獲取更多資金。其中,線上群眾募資是一種成本較低且能有效地將組織使命與目標傳遞給贊助者的數位管道。面對潛在贊助者所擁有的資源是相對有限的情況下,對於專案發起者來說,該呈現哪些專案相關的資訊內容,往往決定該專案是能否得以說服他人贊助的關鍵因素。然而,甚少研究著墨討論以公益為主題之群眾募資專案,應該採取何種專案賦能因素,以更直觀地方式說服潛在贊助者出現贊助意圖。因此,以賦能理論與推敲可能性模式為基礎,本研究欲探討以專案認知賦能因素(文案敘事性、圖像吸引性)如何經由中央路徑影響個體內在動機(自我價值感)以及專案行動賦能因素(專案可行性、專案持續追蹤)如何經由周圍路經影響個體之內化的外在動機(間接互惠),最終促使其產生贊助意圖。
透過電子問卷的方式蒐集樣本資料,最終以400筆有效樣本進行結構方程模式的分析。研究結果顯示文案敘事性與圖像吸引性會經由中央路徑正向影響自我價值感,而專案可行性及專案持續追蹤則會透過周圍路徑影響個體之間接互惠動機。再者,間接互惠會正向影響贊助者的自我價值感,且兩者亦對贊助意圖存在顯著影響。最後,本研究於學理上提供幾點貢獻,同時也為專案發起者及群眾募資平台管理者提出實務上的建議及做法。
摘要(英) With the development of social forces around the world, social action groups that focus on public interest, goals, and values have grown rapidly. Regarding scarcity and fierce competition for obtaining resources in performing social services, social action groups are currently looking for funding through multiple channels. Online crowdfunding platforms are low-cost digital channels that can effectively help project creators convey their missions, values, and goals to potential backers. Since potential backers have finite resources in doing good deeds, creators should carefully construct project introduction content to persuade potential backers. To the best of our knowledge, none of these studies has focused on how affordance factors influence an individual’s funding intention in charitable crowdfunding. Therefore, drawing upon the elaboration likelihood model and affordance theory, this study explores how project-cognition (i.e., content narrative and visual appeal) and project-action (i.e., project feasibility and project update) affordance factors separately affect individuals’ funding intentions through the mediating roles of intrinsic motivation (sense of self-worth) and internalized extrinsic motivation (indirect reciprocity).
A total of 400 valid samples were collected using convenience sampling and analyzed using structural equation modeling. The results revealed that both content narrative and visual appeal are positively associated with one’s sense of self-worth via the central route. In addition, project feasibility and updates are significantly related to indirect reciprocity via the peripheral route. The findings also indicate that indirect reciprocity is associated with a sense of self-worth, both of which have significant effects on funding intention. Finally, our findings provide theoretical and practical suggestions for project creators and service providers.
關鍵字(中) ★ 公益群眾募資
★ 賦能理論
★ 推敲可能性模式
★ 內在動機
★ 內化的外在動機
★ 贊助意圖
關鍵字(英) ★ Charitable crowdfunding
★ Affordance theory
★ Elaboration likelihood model
★ Intrinsic motivation
★ Internalized extrinsic motivation
★ Funding intention
論文目次 目錄
中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
目錄 iii
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
一、緒論 1
1-1 研究動機 1
1-2 研究目的 2
1-3 研究流程 7
二、文獻回顧 8
2-1 群眾募資平台 8
2-2 賦能理論 10
2-3 自我價值感與間接互惠 13
2-4 推敲可能性模式 15
2-5 假說推論 18
2-5-1 專案認知賦能因素與自我價值感 18
2-5-2 專案行動賦能因素與間接互惠 20
2-5-3 間接互惠與自我價值感 21
2-5-4 自我價值感與贊助意圖 22
2-5-5 間接互惠與贊助意圖 22
三、研究方法 24
3-1 研究架構 25
3-2 研究假說 26
3-3 研究構面定義與衡量 27
3-3-1 文案敘事性 27
3-3-2 圖像吸引性 27
3-3-3 專案可行性 28
3-3-4 專案持續追蹤 28
3-3-5 自我價值感 28
3-3-6 間接互惠 29
3-3-7 贊助意圖 29
3-4 資料分析方法 30
四、研究結果 32
4-1 樣本特性分析 32
4-2 衡量模型分析 37
4-2-1 內部一致性 37
4-2-2 收斂效度 38
4-2-3 區別效度 41
4-3 共同方法變異檢測 45
4-4 結構模型分析 47
4-4-1 模型配適度評估 47
4-4-2 假說檢定 48
4-4-3 控制變數 48
4-4-4 中介效果分析 50
五、研究結論與建議 53
5-1 研究貢獻 56
5-2 管理意涵 59
5-3 研究限制與未來研究方向 61
參考文獻 62

圖目錄
圖1-1研究流程 7
圖3-1研究架構 25
圖4-1研究模型路徑係數圖 52
表目錄
表3-1研究假說整理表 26
表3-2研究分析方法 31
表4-1人口統計變數次數分配表 33
表4-2群眾募資平台使用習慣次數分配表 35
表4-2群眾募資平台使用習慣次數分配表(續) 36
表4-3信度分析 37
表4-4收斂效度分析 39
表4-4收斂效度分析(續) 40
表4-5 Fornell‐Larcker相關係數矩陣 42
表4-6 HTMT分析 43
表4-7交叉負荷量矩陣 44
表4-8方差擴大因子 46
表4-9路徑分析結果 49
表4-10中介效果檢測 51
表5-1研究假說驗證結果 55
參考文獻 Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2015). Crowdfunding: Geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 24(2), 253-274.
Alexiou, K., Wiggins, J., & Preece, S. B. (2020). Crowdfunding acts as a funding substitute and a legitimating signal for nonprofit performing arts organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(4), 827-848.
Allison, T. H., Davis, B. C., Short, J. C., & Webb, J. W. (2015). Crowdfunding in a prosocial microlending environment: Examining the role of intrinsic versus extrinsic cues. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 53-73.
Allison, T. H., Davis, B. C., Webb, J. W., & Short, J. C. (2017). Persuasion in crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(6), 707-725.
Alstete, J. W. (2008). Aspects of entrepreneurial success. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(3), 584-594.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Angst, C. M., & Agarwal, R. (2009). Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: The elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion. MIS Quarterly, 33(2), 339-370.
Argyris, Y. A., & Monu, K. (2015). Corporate use of social media: Technology affordance and external stakeholder relations. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 25(2), 140-168.
Bagheri, A., Chitsazan, H., & Ebrahimi, A. (2019). Crowdfunding motivations: A focus on donors′ perspectives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 218-232.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 8-34.
Beldad, A., Snip, B., & van Hoof, J. (2014). Generosity the second time around: Determinants of individuals’ repeat donation intention. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 144-163.
Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 585-609.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.
Bi, S., Liu, Z., & Usman, K. (2017). The influence of online information on investing decisions of reward-based crowdfunding. Journal of Business Research, 71, 10-18.
Bock, G.-W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y.-G., & Lee, J.-N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.
Bretschneider, U., & Leimeister, J. M. (2017). Not just an ego-trip: Exploring backers’ motivation for funding in incentive-based crowdfunding. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26(4), 246-260.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
Burtch, G., Ghose, A., & Wattal, S. (2013). An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowd-funded markets. Information Systems Research, 24(3), 499-519.
Cao, X., Liu, Y., Zhu, Z., Hu, J., & Chen, X. (2017). Online selection of a physician by patients: Empirical study from elaboration likelihood perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 403-412.
Cardon, M. S., Wincent, J., Singh, J., & Drnovsek, M. (2009). The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 511-532.
Cecere, G., Le Guel, F., & Rochelandet, F. (2017). Crowdfunding and social influence: An empirical investigation. Applied Economics, 49(57), 5802-5813.
Chan, H. F., Moy, N., Schaffner, M., & Torgler, B. (2019). The effects of money saliency and sustainability orientation on reward based crowdfunding success. Journal of Business Research, 125, 443-455.
Chang, H. H., Lu, Y.-Y., & Lin, S. C. (2020). An elaboration likelihood model of consumer respond action to facebook second-hand marketplace: Impulsiveness as a moderator. Information & Management, 57(2), 103171. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2019.103171
Chen, C.-D., Zhao, Q., & Wang, J.-L. (2020). How livestreaming increases product sales: Role of trust transfer and elaboration likelihood model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(3), 1-16.
Chen, Y., Dai, R., Wang, L., Yang, S., Li, Y., & Wei, J. (2021). Exploring donor’s intention in charitable crowdfunding: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(7), 1664-1683.
Cho, C.-H. (1999). How advertising works on the www: Modified elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 21(1), 34-50.
Cholakova, M., & Clarysse, B. (2015). Does the possibility to make equity investments in crowdfunding projects crowd out reward–based investments? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 145-172.
Choy, K., & Schlagwein, D. (2016). Crowdsourcing for a better world: On the relation between it affordances and donor motivations in charitable crowdfunding. Information Technology & People, 29(1), 221-247.
Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. (1970). How we should measure “change”: Or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74(1), 68-80.
Cumming, D. J., Leboeuf, G., & Schwienbacher, A. (2020). Crowdfunding models: Keep‐it‐all vs. All‐or‐nothing. Financial Management, 49(2), 331-360.
Cyr, D., Head, M., Lim, E., & Stibe, A. (2018). Using the elaboration likelihood model to examine online persuasion through website design. Information & Management, 55(7), 807-821.
Davis, B. C., Hmieleski, K. M., Webb, J. W., & Coombs, J. E. (2017). Funders′ positive affective reactions to entrepreneurs′ crowdfunding pitches: The influence of perceived product creativity and entrepreneurial passion. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 90-106.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109-134.
Defazio, D., Franzoni, C., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2021). How pro-social framing affects the success of crowdfunding projects: The role of emphasis and information crowdedness. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(2), 357-378.
Deng, Z., Benckendorff, P., & Wang, J. (2021). Travel live streaming: An affordance perspective. Information Technology & Tourism, 23(2), 189-207.
Dillon, W. R., & Goldstein, M. (1984). Multivariate analysis: Methods and applications: New York (NY): Wiley.
Dineva, D., Breitsohl, J., Garrod, B., & Megicks, P. (2020). Consumer responses to conflict-management strategies on non-profit social media fan pages. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 52, 118-136.
Ding, G., Liu, H., Huang, Q., & Gu, J. (2017). Moderating effects of guanxi and face on the relationship between psychological motivation and knowledge-sharing in china. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(5), 1077-1097.
Dong, X., & Wang, T. (2018). Social tie formation in chinese online social commerce: The role of it affordances. International Journal of Information Management, 42, 49-64.
Efron, B. (1992). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. In Breakthroughs in statistics (pp. 569-593): Springer.
Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132-140.
Evans, J. R., & Mathur, A. (2005). The value of online surveys. Internet Research, 15(2), 195-219.
Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Majchrzak, A. (2011). Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organization Science, 22(5), 1224-1239.
FINDIT (2022)。【群眾募資亮點觀測】疫情干擾不退燒-2021台灣群募百萬專案趨勢發展大揭密。民國111年6月14日,取自:https://findit.org.tw/researchPageV2.aspx?pageId=1925
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Fox, J., & McEwan, B. (2017). Distinguishing technologies for social interaction: The perceived social affordances of communication channels scale. Communication Monographs, 84(3), 298-318.
Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430-447.
fundera. (2021). Crowdfunding statistics (2021): Market size and growth. Maddie Shepherd. Retrieved June 14, 2022, from https://www.fundera.com/resources/crowdfunding-statistics
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception: Classic edition: Psychology Press.
Gleasure, R., & Feller, J. (2016a). Does heart or head rule donor behaviors in charitable crowdfunding markets? International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20(4), 499-524.
Gleasure, R., & Feller, J. (2016b). Emerging technologies and the democratisation of financial services: A metatriangulation of crowdfunding research. Information and Organization, 26(4), 101-115.
Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48-58.
Hair, Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about partial least squares: Comments on rönkkö and evermann. Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182-209.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-Sem: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with fimix-PLS: Part I–method. European Business Review, 28(1), 63-76.
Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis: University of Chicago press.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
Henseler, J., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28(2), 565-580.
Herzenstein, M., Sonenshein, S., & Dholakia, U. M. (2011). Tell me a good story and i may lend you money: The role of narratives in peer-to-peer lending decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 138-149.
Higgins, J. W., & Lauzon, L. (2003). Finding the funds in fun runs: Exploring physical activity events as fundraising tools in the nonprofit sector. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(4), 363-377.
Hobbs, J., Grigore, G., & Molesworth, M. (2016). Success in the management of crowdfunding projects in the creative industries. Internet Research, 26(1), 146-166.
Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5): Sage.
Hou, J., Zhang, C., & King, R. A. (2017). Understanding the dynamics of the individual donor’s trust damage in the philanthropic sector. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(2), 648-671.
Inesi, M. E., Adams, G. S., & Gupta, A. (2021). When it pays to be kind: The allocation of indirect reciprocity within power hierarchies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 165, 115-126.
Jian, L., & Shin, J. (2015). Motivations behind donors’ contributions to crowdfunded journalism. Mass Communication and Society, 18(2), 165-185.
Jiao, H., Qian, L., Liu, T., & Ma, L. (2021). Why do people support online crowdfunding charities? A case study from china. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 130. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.582508
Kerr, G., Schultz, D. E., Kitchen, P. J., Mulhern, F. J., & Beede, P. (2015). Does traditional advertising theory apply to the digital world?: A replication analysis questions the relevance of the elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Advertising Research, 55(4), 390-400.
Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121-140.
Khadjavi, M. (2017). Indirect reciprocity and charitable giving—evidence from a field experiment. Management Science, 63(11), 3708-3717.
Kim, M. J., & Hall, C. M. (2020). What drives visitor economy crowdfunding? The effect of digital storytelling on unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Tourism Management Perspectives, 34, 100638. doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100638
Kim, P. H., Buffart, M., & Croidieu, G. (2016). TMI: Signaling credible claims in crowdfunding campaign narratives. Group & Organization Management, 41(6), 717-750.
Kim, S., & Park, H. (2013). Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers’ trust and trust performance. International Journal of Information Management, 33(2), 318-332.
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 11(4), 1-10.
Kock, N., & Lynn, G. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based sem: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546-580.
Kuppuswamy, V., & Bayus, B. L. (2017). Does my contribution to your crowdfunding project matter? Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 72-89.
Kuppuswamy, V., & Bayus, B. L. (2018). Crowdfunding creative ideas: The dynamics of project backers. In The economics of crowdfunding (pp. 151-182): Springer.
Lee, M. K., Cheung, C. M., & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42(8), 1095-1104.
Leonardi, P. M., Huysman, M., & Steinfield, C. (2013). Enterprise social media: Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 1-19.
Leong, C., Pan, S. L., Newell, S., & Cui, L. (2016). The emergence of self-organizing e-commerce ecosystems in remote villages of china. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 475-484.
Li, G., & Wang, J. (2019). Threshold effects on backer motivations in reward-based crowdfunding. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(2), 546-573.
Li, Y.-Z., He, T.-L., Song, Y.-R., Yang, Z., & Zhou, R.-T. (2018). Factors impacting donors’ intention to donate to charitable crowd-funding projects in china: A utaut-based model. Information, Communication & Society, 21(3), 404-415.
Liao, L., & Huang, T. (2021). The effect of different social media marketing channels and events on movie box office: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Information & Management, 58(7), 103481. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018
Lin, J., Luo, Z., Cheng, X., & Li, L. (2019). Understanding the interplay of social commerce affordances and swift guanxi: An empirical study. Information & Management, 56(2), 213-224.
Liu, C.-J. (2019). Expectation, commitment, and charitable giving: The mediating role of trust and the moderating role of social status. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(4), 754-767.
Liu, C.-J., & Hao, F. (2017). Reciprocity belief and gratitude as moderators of the association between social status and charitable giving. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 46-50.
Liu, L., Suh, A., & Wagner, C. (2018). Empathy or perceived credibility? An empirical study on individual donation behavior in charitable crowdfunding. Internet Research, 28(3), 623-651.
Lu, C.-C., Wu, L., & Hsiao, W.-H. (2019). Developing customer product loyalty through mobile advertising: Affective and cognitive perspectives. International Journal of Information Management, 47, 101-111.
Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 38-55.
Majumdar, A., & Bose, I. (2018). My words for your pizza: An analysis of persuasive narratives in online crowdfunding. Information & Management, 55(6), 781-794.
Markus, M. L., & Silver, M. S. (2008). A foundation for the study of it effects: A new look at desanctis and poole′s concepts of structural features and spirit. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(10), 609-632.
McDowell, W. C., Wilson, R. C., & Kile Jr, C. O. (2016). An examination of retail website design and conversion rate. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4837-4842.
Meer, J. (2014). Effects of the price of charitable giving: Evidence from an online crowdfunding platform. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 103, 113-124.
Mejia, J., Urrea, G., & Pedraza‐Martinez, A. J. (2019). Operational transparency on crowdfunding platforms: Effect on donations for emergency response. Production and Operations Management, 28(7), 1773-1791.
Merchant, A., Ford, J. B., & Sargeant, A. (2010). Charitable organizations’ storytelling influence on donors’ emotions and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 754-762.
Michaelidou, N., Micevski, M., & Siamagka, N. T. (2015). Consumers’ intention to donate to two children’s charity brands: A comparison of barnardo’s and bbc children in need. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24(2), 134-146.
Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1-16.
Moss, T. W., Renko, M., Block, E., & Meyskens, M. (2018). Funding the story of hybrid ventures: Crowdfunder lending preferences and linguistic hybridity. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(5), 643-659.
Murtagh, F., & Heck, A. (2012). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 131): Springer Science & Business Media.
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 223-238.
Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018
Nel, J., & Boshoff, C. (2017). Development of application-based mobile-service trust and online trust transfer: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(8), 809-826.
Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things: Basic books.
Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38-43.
Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2005). Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature, 437(7063), 1291-1298.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). An overview of psychological measurement. Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders, 97-146.
O’Riordan, S., Feller, J., & Nagle, T. (2016). A categorisation framework for a feature-level analysis of social network sites. Journal of Decision Systems, 25(3), 244-262.
Ozdemir, Z. D., Altinkemer, K., De, P., & Ozcelik, Y. (2010). Donor-to-nonprofit online marketplace: An economic analysis of the effects on fund-raising. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2), 213-242.
Park, O.-C., & Hopkins, R. (1992). Instructional conditions for using dynamic visual displays: A review. Instructional Science, 21(6), 427-449.
Pengnate, S. F., & Sarathy, R. (2017). An experimental investigation of the influence of website emotional design features on trust in unfamiliar online vendors. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 49-60.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Communication and persuasion (pp. 1-24): Springer.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(5), 847-855.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Poledrini, S. (2015). Unconditional reciprocity and the case of italian social cooperatives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(3), 457-473.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH, Boenningstedt. Journal of Service Science and Management, 10(3), 32-49.
Roma, P., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Perrone, G. (2017). From the crowd to the market: The role of reward-based crowdfunding performance in attracting professional investors. Research Policy, 46(9), 1606-1628.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Ryu, S., & Kim, Y.-G. (2016). A typology of crowdfunding sponsors: Birds of a feather flock together? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 16, 43-54.
Ryu, S., Park, J., Kim, K., & Kim, Y.-G. (2020). Reward versus altruistic motivations in reward-based crowdfunding. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 24(2), 159-183.
Salido-Andres, N., Rey-Garcia, M., Alvarez-Gonzalez, L. I., & Vazquez-Casielles, R. (2021). Mapping the field of donation-based crowdfunding for charitable causes: Systematic review and conceptual framework. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32(2), 288-302.
Saxton, G. D., & Wang, L. (2014). The social network effect: The determinants of giving through social media. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 850-868.
Schaefer, S. D., Terlutter, R., & Diehl, S. (2019). Is my company really doing good? Factors influencing employees’ evaluation of the authenticity of their company′s corporate social responsibility engagement. Journal of Business Research, 101, 128-143.
Siering, M., Koch, J.-A., & Deokar, A. V. (2016). Detecting fraudulent behavior on crowdfunding platforms: The role of linguistic and content-based cues in static and dynamic contexts. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(2), 421-455.
Sjöblom, M., Törhönen, M., Hamari, J., & Macey, J. (2019). The ingredients of twitch streaming: Affordances of game streams. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 20-28.
Stanca, L. (2009). Measuring indirect reciprocity: Whose back do we scratch? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2), 190-202.
Sun, Y., Shao, X., Li, X., Guo, Y., & Nie, K. (2019). How live streaming influences purchase intentions in social commerce: An it affordance perspective. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 37, 100886. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100886
Svensson, P. G., Mahoney, T. Q., & Hambrick, M. E. (2020). What does innovation mean to nonprofit practitioners? International insights from development and peace-building nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(2), 380-398.
Tang, Q., Zhao, X., & Liu, S. (2016). The effect of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations on mobile coupon sharing in social network sites: The role of coupon proneness. Internet Research, 26(1), 101-119.
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159-205.
Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143-189.
Turker, D., & Vural, C. A. (2017). Embedding social innovation process into the institutional context: Voids or supports. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 98-113.
Vaast, E., & Kaganer, E. (2013). Social media affordances and governance in the workplace: An examination of organizational policies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 78-101.
van Dijk, M., Van Herk, H., & Prins, R. (2019). Choosing your charity: The importance of value congruence in two-stage donation choices. Journal of Business Research, 105, 283-292.
Volkoff, O., & Strong, D. M. (2013). Critical realism and affordances: Theorizing it-associated organizational change processes. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 819-834.
von Krogh, G., Haefliger, S., Spaeth, S., & Wallin, M. W. (2012). Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. MIS Quarterly, 36(2), 649-676.
Wang, T., Li, Y., Kang, M., & Zheng, H. (2019). Exploring individuals’ behavioral intentions toward donation crowdfunding: Evidence from china. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(7), 1515-1534.
Wang, X., Lu, J., Ow, T. T., Feng, Y., & Liu, L. (2021). Understanding the emotional and informational influence on customer knowledge contribution through quantitative content analysis. Information & Management, 58(2), 103426. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101149
Wang, Z., & Yang, X. (2019). Understanding backers’ funding intention in reward crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood perspective. Technology in Society, 58, 101149. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101149
Winterich, K. P., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Accepting inequality deters responsibility: How power distance decreases charitable behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 274-293.
Xiang, D., Zhang, L., Tao, Q., Wang, Y., & Ma, S. (2019). Informational or emotional appeals in crowdfunding message strategy: An empirical investigation of backers’ support decisions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(6), 1046-1063.
Yan, Y., & Davison, R. M. (2013). Exploring behavioral transfer from knowledge seeking to knowledge contributing: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(6), 1144-1157.
Yan, Z., Wang, T., Chen, Y., & Zhang, H. (2016). Knowledge sharing in online health communities: A social exchange theory perspective. Information & Management, 53(5), 643-653.
Yang, S.-F. (2015). An eye-tracking study of the elaboration likelihood model in online shopping. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(4), 233-240.
Young, L. E., & Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Social issue emergence on the web: A dual structurational model. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(2), 231-246.
Zammuto, R. F., Griffith, T. L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D. J., & Faraj, S. (2007). Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science, 18(5), 749-762.
Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering baron and kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206.
Zheng, H., Li, D., Wu, J., & Xu, Y. (2014). The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: A comparative study in china and us. Information & Management, 51(4), 488-496.
Zheng, W., Ni, N., & Crilly, D. (2019). Non‐profit organizations as a nexus between government and business: Evidence from chinese charities. Strategic Management Journal, 40(4), 658-684.
Zhou, H., & Ye, S. (2019). Legitimacy, worthiness, and social network: An empirical study of the key factors influencing crowdfunding outcomes for nonprofit projects. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(4), 849-864.
Zhou, T. (2012). Understanding users’ initial trust in mobile banking: An elaboration likelihood perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1518-1525.
指導教授 周恩頤(En-Yi Chou) 審核日期 2022-7-19
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明