 |
|
|
|
以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：95 、訪客IP：13.59.38.110
姓名 林宜靜(Yi-Jing Lin) 查詢紙本館藏 畢業系所 網路學習科技研究所 論文名稱 探討個人化、情境化及社會化的智慧機制 輔助真實情境國小幾何學習與其對學習成效之影響
(Investigation of Smart Mechanisms of Personalization, Contextualization and Socialization for Facilitating Geometry Learning with Authentic Contextual Support)相關論文 檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 隨著科技的迅速發展，將“Smart”元素融入教育領域已成為有前瞻性的研究問題。過 去許多研究表明，在課程中結合真實情境與智慧機制可以幫助學習者將幾何概念應用到 日常生活中，但仍然缺乏如何利用智慧機制更有效得協助學習者在真實情境中的個人與 合作學習。在這項研究中，開發了一款手機應用程式，稱為 Smart-UG，此系統可以協助 小學生在周遭環境中藉由測量真實物件來學習幾何，並且在系統中設計了個人化 (Personalization)、情境化 (Contextualization) 和社會化 (Socialization) 的智慧機制，以引 導學習者在真實情境中的幾何學習。本研究的目的是探討學習者在不同智慧機制的輔助 下幾何能力和問題解決策略兩種能力的影響，進一步分析哪些學習行為影響學習成績。 本研究將桃園市某國小共五十二名五年級學生分為兩組進行為期九週的教學實驗，實驗 分為兩個階段，第一階段我們探討了個人化及情境化的智慧機制對學習成效的影響，而 第二階段探討社會化的智慧機制對學習成效的影響。
相關研究結果表明，第一階段的個人學習活動中，藉由個人化及情境化的智慧機制 輔助的實驗組之問題解決策略優於沒有智慧機制支持的控制組，並且學習者在活動練習 中的錯誤率越低以及完成任務的次數越多，會與幾何能力呈現高度相關;在第二階段的 合作學習活動中，藉由社會化的智慧機制輔助的實驗組之學習成效優於僅沒有該智慧機 制輔助的控制組，在學習行為分析中結果顯示，學習者查看學習進度、尋求幫助及查看 合作策略回饋的次數皆會對其學習成效產生正面的影響。這意指著個人化、情境化及社 會化的智慧機制可以有效幫助學習者的幾何學習。最後根據學習者的反饋，多數學習者 給予 Smart-UG 及智慧機制表達高度滿意性、實用性及使用意圖。摘要(英) With the rapid development of information technology, the inclusion of "smart" factors in education has become an important research topic. Although learning geometry in authentic context with advanced technology is a potential issue, there is still a lack of studies addressing smart learning issue to help learners solve geometric problems more efficiently in complex scenario of the real environment. This study aims to propose a mobile application called Smart- UG, to support geometry learning smartly in authentic context. The differently oriented smart mechanisms are proposed in the application to support three dimensions of smart learning and guide leaners to measure and apply geometric concepts into their daily life. The three dimensions include personalization, contextualization and socialization. Distinctively, this study designed a real-time collaborative measuring function based on augmented reality in the mobile application in order to facilitate meaningful collaboration, interaction and socialization among peers. This study also emphasizes the importance of learning activities by designing individual and collaborative learning activities as well as designed task and free exploration activities.
The main purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of learners on two abilities of geometry, including geometry ability (GA) and problem-solving strategy (PSS) under different methods. Moreover, this study investigated what learning behaviors affect learners’ learning achievements. Participants in this study were 52 fifth-grade elementary school students with 26 students for the experimental group (EG) and the control group (CG) respectively. There were two stages in the experiment. In stage 1 we investigated the influence of personalization and contextualization while in stage 2 investigating the influence of socialization for learning.
The results revealed that EG with assistance of smart mechanisms significantly improved GA and PSS and got higher scores than CG. In stage 1, EG completed more tasks and made
ii
fewer mistakes than CG since the smart mechanisms for personalization and contextualization which gave the appropriate feedbacks according to their learning status could help them to learn smartly in authentic context. In stage 2, EG performed significantly better than CG in error rate and free exploration activity since the smart mechanisms for socialization which provided them ways to ask others for help assisted them to solve problems in authentic context. Therefore, Smart-UG with the smart mechanism for personalization, contextualization and socialization support could facilitate learners to learn geometry efficiently and smartly in authentic context and enhance their geometry learning achievement. Moreover, learners showed a positive attitude and high intention toward Smart-UG. Therefore, it’s potential to apply more smart mechanisms to support geometry learning in authentic contexts.關鍵字(中) ★ 幾何學習
★ 情境學習
★ 個性化、情境化及社會化的智慧機制
★ 幾何能力
★ 幾何 問題解決策略關鍵字(英) ★ geometry learning
★ authentic context learning
★ smart mechanisms for personalization, contextualization and socialization
★ strategy for geometry problem-solving論文目次 中文摘要 .....................................................................................................................................i
Abstract .....................................................................................................................................ii
List of Contents........................................................................................................................iv
List of Figures ..........................................................................................................................vi
List of Tables...........................................................................................................................vii
Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Research Background and Motivation ...........................................................................1 1.2 Research Questions ........................................................................................................4 1.3 Theoretical Support ........................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Smart ACL Framework .................................................................................................. 6 1.5 Definition of Terms ........................................................................................................ 8
Chapter 2 Literature Review...................................................................................................9
2.1 Geometry Learning in Authentic Context ...................................................................... 9 2.2 Geometry Problem-Solving Strategy in Authentic Context.........................................11 2.3 Collaborative Learning in Authentic Context ..............................................................12 2.4 Smart Mechanisms for Geometry learning in Authentic Context ................................ 14
Chapter 3 System Design and Implementation ...................................................................16
3.1 System Design .............................................................................................................. 17 3.1.1 Individual Single Shape Activity ........................................................................18 3.1.2 Individual Compound Shape Activity.................................................................20 3.1.3 Collaborative Single Shape Activity...................................................................22 3.1.4 Collaborative Compound Shape Activity ...........................................................22
3.2 Learning Activity Module ............................................................................................ 25 3.2.1 Learning of Geometric Concepts ........................................................................25 3.2.2 Designed Task.....................................................................................................26 3.2.3 Free Exploration..................................................................................................27
3.3 Smart Mechanisms .......................................................................................................28 3.3.1 Personalization .................................................................................................... 28 3.3.2 Contextualization ................................................................................................31
iv
3.3.3 Socialization........................................................................................................32
Chapter 4 Methodology .........................................................................................................34
4.1 Participants ................................................................................................................... 34 4.2 Research Framework .................................................................................................... 35 4.2.1 Independent variables..........................................................................................36 4.2.2 Control variables ................................................................................................. 36 4.2.3 Dependent variables ............................................................................................ 36 4.3 Experimental Procedure ...............................................................................................38 4.4 Experimental Instruments.............................................................................................40 4.5 Data Analysis Approach...............................................................................................42
Chapter 5 Results ...................................................................................................................42
5.1 Analysis of learning achievements...............................................................................42 5.1.1 Learning achievements between groups in Stage 1 ............................................43 5.1.2 Learning achievements between groups in Stage 2 ............................................45
5.2 Comparison of learning behaviors between groups .....................................................47 5.2.1 Comparison between groups in learning behaviors in Stage 1 ...........................47 5.2.2 Comparison between groups in learning behavior in Stage 2.............................50
5.3 Relationship between learning behaviors and learning achievements .........................52 5.3.1 Correlation of learning behaviors and achievements in Stage 1 ......................... 52 5.3.2 Correlation of learning behaviors and achievements in Stage 2 ......................... 55
5.4 Prediction of the dependent variables to learning achievements..................................58 5.4.1 Prediction of the dependent variables to learning achievements in Stage 1 .......58 5.4.2 Prediction of the dependent variables to learning achievements in Stage 2 .......60
5.5 Learners’ perception of Smart-UG...............................................................................62
Chapter 6 Conclusion.............................................................................................................67 Reference ................................................................................................................................. 70 Appendix A: Pretest ............................................................................................................... 75 Appendix B: Stage 1 posttest ................................................................................................. 78 Appendix C: Stage 2 posttest.................................................................................................81 Appendix D: TAM questionnaire..........................................................................................84 Appendix E: Semi-structured interview question ............................................................... 88參考文獻 Aydoğdu, M. Z., & Keşan, C. (2014). A RESEARCH ON GEOMETRY PROBLEM SOLVING STRATEGIES USED BY ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS TEACHER CANDIDATES. Engineering Sciences & Technologies/Nauki Inzynierskie i Technologie, 4(1).
Bilgin, C. U., & Tokel, S. T. (2019). Facilitating Contextual Vocabulary Learning in a Mobile-Supported Situated Learning Environment [Article]. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(4), 930-953. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118779397
Billinghurst, M., Poupyrev, I., Kato, H., & May, R. (2000). Mixing realities in shared space: An augmented reality interface for collaborative computing. 2000 IEEE international conference on multimedia and expo. ICME2000. Proceedings. Latest advances in the fast changing world of multimedia (Cat. No. 00TH8532),
Booker, G. (2008). Problem-solving in mathematics. RIC Publications.
Breen, C. (2005). 9 Dilemmas of change: seeing the complex rather than the complicated?
Researching Mathematics Education in South Africa: Perspectives, Practices and
Possibilities, 233.
Carlson, M. P., & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent
multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational studies in Mathematics,
58(1), 45-75.
Chang, C. W., Lee, J. H., Wang, C. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2010). Improving the authentic
learning experience by integrating robots into the mixed-reality environment [Article]. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1572-1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.023
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. Ieee Access, 8, 75264-75278.
Daradoumis, T., & Marquès, J. (2000). A methodological approach to networked collaborative learning: Design and pedagogy Issues. Networked learning 2000. Proceedings of the 2000 international conference on innovative approaches to lifelong learning and higher education through the internet,
Di Paolo, E., Rohde, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2010). Horizons for the enactive mind: Values, social interaction, and play. In Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science.
Fu, Q. K., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Trends in mobile technology-supported collaborative learning: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2016 [Review]. Computers & Education, 119, 129-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.004
70
Gros, B. (2016). The design of smart educational environments. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 1-11.
Hernandez, R. (2012). Collaborative learning: Increasing students′ engagement outside the classroom. US-China Education Review, 804-812.
Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2014). Authentic learning environments. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 401-412.
Hillis, P. (2008). Authentic learning and multimedia in history education [Article]. Learning Media and Technology, 33(2), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880802097634
Hossain, A., & Tarmizi, R. A. (2013). Effects of cooperative learning on students’ achievement and attitudes in secondary mathematics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 473-477.
Hossain, M. M., & Wiest, L. R. (2013). Collaborative middle school geometry through blogs and other web 2.0 technologies. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 32(3), 337-352.
Huang, Y.-M., Jeng, Y.-L., & Huang, T.-C. (2009). An educational mobile blogging system for supporting collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 163-175.
Hwang, W.-Y., Lin, L.-K., Ochirbat, A., Shih, T. K., & Kumara, W. (2015). Ubiquitous geometry: Measuring authentic surroundings to support geometry learning of the sixth-grade students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(1), 26-49.
Hwang, W.-Y., Nurtantyana, R., & Putra, M. T. M. (2021). Facilitating 3D Geometry Learning with Augmented Reality in Authentic Contexts. International Conference on Innovative Technologies and Learning,
Hwang, W. Y., Hoang, A., & Lin, Y. H. (2021). Smart mechanisms and their influence on geometry learning of elementary school students in authentic contexts. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1441-1454.
Hwang, W. Y., Hoang, A., & Tu, Y. H. (2020). Exploring Authentic Contexts with Ubiquitous Geometry to Facilitate Elementary School Students′ Geometry Learning [Article]. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(3), 269-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00476-y
Hwang, W. Y., & Hu, S. S. (2013). Analysis of peer learning behaviors using multiple representations in virtual reality and their impacts on geometry problem solving [Article]. Computers & Education, 62, 308-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.005
Hwang, W. Y., Lin, L. K., Ochirbat, A., Shih, T. K., & Kumara, W. (2015). Ubiquitous Geometry: Measuring Authentic Surroundings to Support Geometry Learning of the Sixth-Grade Students [Article]. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(1), 26-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633114568852
71
Hwang, W. Y., Purba, S. W. D., Liu, Y. F., Zhang, Y. Y., & Chen, N. S. (2019). An Investigation of the Effects of Measuring Authentic Contexts on Geometry Learning Achievement [Article]. Ieee Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(3), 291-302. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2018.2853750
Hwang, W. Y., Shadiev, R., Tseng, C. W., & Huang, Y. M. (2015). Exploring Effects of Multi-Touch Tabletop on Collaborative Fraction Learning and the Relationship of Learning Behavior and Interaction with Learning Achievement [Article]. Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 459-473. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000362516300035
Janssen, J., & Bodemer, D. (2013). Coordinated computer-supported collaborative learning: Awareness and awareness tools. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 40-55.
Jong, M. S. Y., Chan, T., Hue, M. T., & Tam, V. W. L. (2018). Gamifying and Mobilising Social Enquiry-based Learning in Authentic Outdoor Environments [Article]. Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 277-292. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000447287000022
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). A Cognitive Load Approach to Collaborative Learning: United Brains for Complex Tasks [Review]. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9095-2
Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486-490.
Lee, J., Zo, H., & Lee, H. (2014). Smart learning adoption in employees and HRD managers. British Journal of educational technology, 45(6), 1082-1096.
Levine, D. R. (1982). Strategy use and estimation ability of college students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13(5), 350-359.
Li, H.-C., & Tsai, T.-L. (2018). Investigating teacher pedagogical changes when implementing problem-based learning in a year 5 mathematics classroom in Taiwan. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(5), 355-364.
Liu, Y. F., Hwang, W. Y., & Liu, Z. Y. (2021). Effects of Mobile Drama With Authentic Contexts on English Learning [Article]. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(7), 1294-1318, Article 0735633121994289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633121994289
Lowyck, J., & Poysa, J. (2001). Design of collaborative learning environments [Article; Proceedings Paper]. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(5-6), 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0747-5632(01)00017-6
Newman, D., Johnson, C., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1997). Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported co‐operative learning. Journal of the American Society for Information science, 48(6), 484-495.
Ning, H. (2011). Adapting cooperative learning in tertiary ELT. ELT journal, 65(1), 60-70.
72
Novriani, M. R., & Surya, E. (2017). Analysis of student difficulties in mathematics problem solving ability at MTs SWASTA IRA Medan. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 33(3), 63-75.
Ohshima, T., Satoh, K., Yamamoto, H., & Tamura, H. (1998). AR/sup 2/Hockey: a case study of collaborative augmented reality. Proceedings. IEEE 1998 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (Cat. No. 98CB36180),
Okur, M., Tatar, E., & İşleyen, T. (2006). Problem Solving Approaches at a Level of Primary Education. Journal of Qafqaz University, 18, 166-170.
Pischetola, M., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2020). Enactivism and digital learning platforms. Proceedings for the Twelfth International Conference on Networked Learning,
Quinn, P. (2006). Cooperative learning and student motivation
Reys, R., Lindquist, M., Lambdin, D. V., & Smith, N. L. (2014). Helping children learn
mathematics. John Wiley & Sons.
Ruiperez-Valiente, J. A., & Kim, Y. J. (2020). Effects of solo vs. collaborative play in a
digital learning game on geometry: Results from a K12 experiment [Article]. Computers & Education, 159, 12, Article 104008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104008
Rüschoff, B. (2009). Output-oriented language learning with digital media. In Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 42-59). IGI Global.
Sabri, M., & Retnawati, H. (2019). The implementation of authentic assessment in mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,
Sherard, W. H. (1981). Why is geometry a basic skill? The Mathematics Teacher, 74(1), 19- 60.
Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge (acting with technology). The MIT Press.
Timayi, J., Bolaji, C., & Kajuru, Y. (2015). Effects of Jigsaw IV cooperative learning strategy (J4CLS) on academic performance of secondary school students in geometry. thought, 29, 31.
Wang, F., Hwang, W. Y., Li, Y. H., Chen, P. T., & Manabe, K. (2019). Collaborative kinesthetic EFL learning with collaborative total physical response. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 745-783. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1540432
Wang, Q. Y. (2009). Design and evaluation of a collaborative learning environment [Article]. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1138-1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.023
White, R. (2021). Authentic learning in senior secondary music pedagogy: an examination of teaching practice in high-achieving school music programmes [Article]. British Journal of Music Education, 38(2), 160-172, Article Pii s0265051720000297. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265051720000297
73
Yazgan, Y. (2007). Observations about fourth and fifth grade students’ strategies to solve non-routine problems. Elementary Education Online, 6(2).
Zhu, Z.-T., Yu, M.-H., & Riezebos, P. (2016). A research framework of smart education. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 1-17.
Zurita, G., & Nussbaum, M. (2004). Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computers & Education, 42(3), 289- 314.指導教授 黃武元(Wu-Yuin Hwang) 審核日期 2022-7-6 推文 plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
網路書籤 Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit