博碩士論文 108325601 詳細資訊



以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：112 、訪客IP：3.141.25.214
姓名 John Mark M. Tabor(John Mark M. Tabor)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 土木系營建管理碩士班
論文名稱
(Maintenance Prioritization Framework for Taiwan’s Pedestrian Bridges)
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中) 臺灣交通部（MOTC）已公佈以DER&U 方式檢測與評估橋梁劣化與維護
橋梁的相關規範與手冊。此DER&U 的檢測與評估方式已被證明可以有效地
維持臺灣公路和鐵路橋梁的結構安全性和服務性。然而，此檢測方與評估
式若應用於人行天橋，可能會浪費已經有限的維護資源，因為人行天橋承
受的載重較輕，相較於較大橋梁其劣化範圍較為狹隘且有所不同。

本研究旨在建立人行天橋的標準化檢測與維護方式，為臺灣的1,268
座人行天橋提供合適的維護管理架構。此架構之基礎，在於先將6 種人行
天橋類型的構件分為結構安全性和服務性，並以目視檢測之方式評估各構
件之劣化情況，再結合對橋梁專家進行兩輪德爾菲方法訪談所得各類型人
行天橋各構件之權重後，即可計算出該人行天橋之橋梁狀況指數。此橋梁
狀況指數可用於橋梁檢測和維護之優先順序，可找出所轄橋梁中最迫切需
要維修之橋梁。本研究建立之維護管理架構，以桃園市5 座人行天橋做為
測試之範例，可驗證此架構具備資源優化的實用性和價值。本研究之成果
適用於大量人行天橋之維護管理，對橋梁工程和管理方面的知識體系具相
當之貢獻。
摘要(英) The central government of Taiwan, through the Ministry of Transportation and Communications (MOTC), has issued bridge inspection and maintenance specifications and manuals that include the DER&U condition assessment process. This process has proven to be effective in maintaining the structural safety and serviceability of Taiwan’s highway and railway bridge inventory. However, adapting it to pedestrian bridges may only consume undue amount of already limited maintenance resources since they carry lighter loads and thus may experience a narrower spectrum of defects than their larger counterparts.

In order to provide a standardized inspection and maintenance approach tailored to their needs, this research developed a framework for the maintenance of Taiwan’s 1,268 pedestrian bridges. The framework is designed to assess the structural safety and serviceability of 6 pedestrian bridge types through visual inspection. Two rounds of Delphi method interviews with bridge experts were conducted to assign weight factors to the components that form each pedestrian bridge type. These weight factors and the visual inspection results are then combined to calculate an index that represents the condition of a pedestrian bridge. The index can be used for inspection scheduling and maintenance prioritization by revealing which pedestrian bridge units in the inventory are the most deteriorated and in urgent need of repair. The framework’s application to 5 pedestrian bridges in Taoyuan City demonstrated its practicality and value in prioritizing pedestrian bridges for maintenance resource optimization. By presenting a strategy for managing a large inventory of pedestrian bridges, this study contributes to the body of knowledge in bridge engineering and management.
關鍵字(中) ★ 人行天橋
★ 橋梁管理
★ 橋梁檢測
★ 狀況指數
★ 維護優先順序
★ 德 爾菲法		 關鍵字(英) ★ pedestrian bridge
★ footbridge
★ bridge management
★ bridge inspection
★ condition index
★ maintenance prioritization
★ Delphi method
論文目次 摘要.........................................................................I
ABSTRACT.....................................................................II
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ..............................................................III
TABLE OF CONTENTS ...........................................................IV
LIST OF FIGURES..............................................................VIII
LIST OF TABLES ..............................................................X

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION......................................................1
1.1 Research Background and Motivation.......................................1
1.2 Research Objectives......................................................3
1.3 Thesis Organization .....................................................3

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW.................................................5
2.1 Pedestrian Bridge – General Design Requirements..........................5
2.1.1 Structural forms, components, and materials ...........................5
2.1.2 Loading considerations.................................................7
2.1.3 Geometric properties ..................................................7
2.2 Bridge Maintenance Inspection ...........................................9
2.2.1 Inspector qualification ...............................................11
2.2.2 Techniques.............................................................12
2.2.2.1 Visual inspection....................................................12
2.2.2.2 NDT- and UAV-based inspection........................................17
2.2.3 Bridge maintenance inspection practices ...............................19
2.2.3.1 United States of America ............................................20
2.2.3.2 Denmark .............................................................22
2.2.3.3 Finland .............................................................22
2.2.3.4 France ..............................................................23
2.2.3.5 Germany .............................................................23
2.2.3.6 Norway ..............................................................24
2.2.3.7 Sweden ..............................................................24
2.2.3.8 Taiwan ..............................................................24
2.3 Bridge Condition Indices ................................................27
2.3.1 Ratio-based method ....................................................27
2.3.2 Worst-conditioned component method ....................................28
2.3.3 Qualitative method ....................................................28
2.3.4 Weighted average condition method .....................................28
2.3.4.1 Chile ...............................................................29
2.3.4.2 Vietnam .............................................................30
2.3.4.3 Taiwan ..............................................................32
2.4 Component Weight Factors in Bridge Condition Indices ....................35
2.5 Cases of Pedestrian Bridges Neglected of Proper Maintenance .............36
2.6 Chapter Summary .........................................................38

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY ......................................................40
3.1 Identification of Pedestrian Bridge Types and Components ................41
3.1.1 Structural safety components...........................................41
3.1.1.1 Type 1 – Suspension bridge ..........................................41
3.1.1.2 Type 2 – Truss bridge................................................42
3.1.1.3 Type 3 – Tied arch bridge ...........................................42
3.1.1.4 Type 4 – Open spandrel arch bridge ..................................43
3.1.1.5 Type 5 – Cable-stayed bridge.........................................43
3.1.1.6 Type 6 – Girder bridge ..............................................43
3.1.2 Serviceability components..............................................44
3.2 Assignment of Pedestrian Bridge Component Weight Factors ................46
3.2.1 Expert panel composition ..............................................47
3.2.2 Round 1 Delphi interview procedure.....................................48
3.2.3 Round 2 Delphi interview procedure.....................................49
3.3 Chapter Summary .........................................................50

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS...........................................................51
4.1 Type 1 – Suspension bridge...............................................51
4.2 Type 2 – Truss bridge ...................................................53
4.3 Type 3 – Tied arch bridge................................................54
4.4 Type 4 – Open spandrel arch bridge.......................................55
4.5 Type 5 – Cable-stayed bridge ............................................56
4.6 Type 6 – Girder bridge...................................................57

CHAPTER 5: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT ............................................59
5.1 Rationale ...............................................................59
5.2 Implementation ..........................................................59
5.2.1 Initiate, access, and search ..........................................60
5.2.2 Decision and response .................................................60
5.3 Weight Factor Adjustment ................................................62
5.4 Condition States and Maintenance Prioritization .........................62
5.5 Validation ..............................................................66
5.5.1 Case 1 – Enclosed concrete girder bridge ..............................66
5.5.2 Case 2 – Enclosed concrete girder bridge ..............................70
5.5.3 Case 3 – Concrete girder bridge .......................................74
5.5.4 Case 4 – Enclosed truss bridge ........................................78
5.5.5 Case 5 – Suspension bridge ............................................83
5.6 Chapter Summary .........................................................89

CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION .......................................................90
6.1 Conclusion ..............................................................90
6.2 Limitations and Future Work .............................................91
6.3 Chapter Summary .........................................................92

REFERENCES ..................................................................93
APPENDIX A: Delphi Round 1 Questionnaire ....................................100
APPENDIX B: Delphi Round 2 Questionnaire ....................................115
APPENDIX C: Pedestrian Bridge Component Weight Factors Per Round ............131
參考文獻 [1] Keil, A., Pedestrian Bridges: Ramps, Walkways, Structures. 2013, Berlin, Germany: DETAIL.
[2] Wells, M. and P. Clash, Footbridges, in ICE Manual of Bridge Engineering, G. Parke and N. Hewson, Editors. 2008, Thomas Telford Ltd.: London. p. 459–484.
[3] Taiwan bridges must be assessed [Editorial], in Taipei Times. 2019: Taipei, Taiwan (R.O.C.).
[4] Wen, Y.-T., H.-T. Lai, and J. Pan, Suspension bridge snaps in Sanchih, in Taipei Times. 2013: Taipei, Taiwan (R.O.C.).
[5] Poston, R.W. and J.S. West. Investigation of the Charlotte Motor Speedway Bridge Collapse. in 2005 Structures Congress: Metropolis and Beyond & 2005 Forensic Engineering Symposium. 2005. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers.
[6] Ryall, M.J., Bridge Management. 2nd ed. 2009, London: CRC Press.
[7] Abdelkhalek, S. and T. Zayed, Comprehensive Inspection System for Concrete Bridge Deck Application: Current Situation and Future Needs. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2020. 34(5): p. 03120001.
[8] Chase, S.B., et al., Synthesis of National and International Methodologies Used for Bridge Health Indices. 2016, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA): Washington, D.C.
[9] Lin, W. and T. Yoda, Inspection, Monitoring, and Assessment, in Bridge Engineering: Classifications, Design Loading, and Analysis Methods, W. Lin and T. Yoda, Editors. 2017, Butterworth-Heinemann: Cambridge, MA. p. 227–243.
[10] Rolander, D., et al., Highway Bridge Inspection: State-of-the-Practice Survey. Transportation Research Record, 2001. 1749: p. 73–81.
[11] Lwin, M.M. and J.M. Kulicki, Bridge Engineering in the United States, in Handbook of International Bridge Engineering, W.-F. Chen and L. Duan, Editors. 2014, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL. p. 43–133.
[12] Kulicki, J.M., Highway Truss Bridges, in Bridge Engineering Handbook: Superstructure Design, W.-F. Chen and L. Duan, Editors. 2014, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL. p. 283–308.
[13] Yang, Y.-B., et al., Bridge Engineering in Chinese Taipei, in Handbook of International Bridge Engineering, W.-F. Chen and L. Duan, Editors. 2014, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL. p. 1087–1124.
[14] Fustok, M. and M. Alemi, Bridge Construction Inspection, in Bridge Engineering Handbook, W.-F.D. Chen, Lian, Editor. 2000, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.
[15] Vinayagamoorthy, M., Maintenance Inspection and Rating, in Bridge Engineering Handbook, W.-F. Chen and L. Duan, Editors. 2000, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.
[16] Kennedy Reid, I.L., Inspection and assessment, in ICE Manual of Bridge Engineering, G. Parke and N. Hewson, Editors. 2008, Thomas Telford Ltd.: London. p. 659–693.
[17] Deng, L., W. Wang, and Y. Yu, State-of-the-Art Review on the Causes and Mechanisms of Bridge Collapse. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2016. 30(2): p. 04015005.
[18] Wardhana, K. and F.C. Hadipriono, Analysis of Recent Bridge Failures in the United States. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2003. 17(3): p. 144–150.
[19] Xu, F.Y., et al., Recent Highway Bridge Collapses in China: Review and Discussion. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2016. 30(5): p. 04016030.
[20] Tonias, D.E. and J.J. Zhao, Bridge Engineering: Design, Rehabilitation, and Maintenance of Modern Highway Bridges. 2012, New York: McGraw-Hill.
[21] Quirk, L., et al., Visual inspection and bridge management. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2018. 14(3): p. 320–332.
[22] Dorafshan, S. and M. Maguire, Bridge inspection: human performance, unmanned aerial systems and automation. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 2018. 8(3): p. 443–476.
[23] Wilcox, K., Bridge Inspections Come of Age, in Civil Engineering Magazine. 2017, American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA. p. 68–71.
[24] Biezma, M.V. and F. Schanack, Collapse of Steel Bridges. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2007. 21(5): p. 398–405.
[25] Campbell, L.E., et al., Human factors affecting visual inspection of fatigue cracking in steel bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2021. 17(11): p. 1447–1458.
[26] Copelan, J.E., Bridge Inspection, in Bridge Engineering Handbook: Construction and Maintenance, W.-F. Chen and L. Duan, Editors. 2014, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL. p. 337–349.
[27] Muñoz Diaz, E.E., F.N. Moreno, and J. Mohammadi, Investigation of Common Causes of Bridge Collapse in Colombia. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 2009. 14(4): p. 194–200.
[28] Phares, B.M., et al., Routine Highway Bridge Inspection Condition Documentation Accuracy and Reliability. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2004. 9(4): p. 403–413.
[29] Sweeney, R.A.P. and J.F. Unsworth, Bridge Inspection Practice: Two Different North American Railways. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2010. 15(4): p. 439–444.
[30] Washer, G.A., et al., Quality of Element-Level Bridge Inspection Data. Transportation Research Record, 2020. 2674(2): p. 252–261.
[31] Washer, G.A., et al., Proposed Guideline for Reliability-Based Bridge Inspection Practices. 2014, Transportation Research Board (TRB): Washington, D.C.
[32] Bujňák, J., et al. Diagnostics and Evaluation of Footbridges. in Steel Structures and Bridges 2012 – 23rd Czech and Slovak International Conference. 2012. Podbanske, Slovakia: Procedia Engineering.
[33] Drury, C.G. and J. Watson, Good Practices in Visual Inspection. 2002, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA): Washington, D.C.
[34] Akgul, F., Inspection and evaluation of a network of concrete bridges based on multiple NDT techniques. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2021. 17(8): p. 1076–1095.
[35] Hearn, G., et al., Bridge Preservation and Maintenance in Europe and South Africa. 2005, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA): Washington, D.C.
[36] Agdas, D., et al., Comparison of Visual Inspection and Structural-Health Monitoring As Bridge Condition Assessment Methods. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2016. 30(3): p. 04015049.
[37] Khan, M.A., Bridge and Highway Structure Rehabilitation and Repair. 2010, Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.
[38] The Manual for Bridge Evaluation. 3rd ed. 2018, Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
[39] Everett, T.D., et al., Bridge Evaluation Quality Assurance in Europe. 2008, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA): Washington, D.C.
[40] Chan, B., J. Jo, and M. Blumenstein, Towards UAV-based bridge inspection systems: A review and an application perspective. Structural Monitoring and Maintenance, 2015. 2: p. 283–300.
[41] Hüthwohl, P., R. Lu, and I. Brilakis. Challenges of bridge maintenance inspection. in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering. 2016. Osaka, Japan: ICCCBE2016 Organizing Committee.
[42] Hida, S., et al., Assuring Bridge Safety and Serviceability in Europe. 2010, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA): Washington, D.C.
[43] Liao, H.-K., et al. Comparison of Bridge Inspection Methodologies and Evaluation Criteria in Taiwan and Foreign Practices. in 34th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining (ISARC 2017). 2017. Taipei, Taiwan (R.O.C.): International Association for Automation & Robotics in Construction (IAARC).
[44] Shepard, R.W. and M.B. Johnson, California Bridge Health Index: A Diagnostic Tool To Maximize Bridge Longevity, Investment, in TR News. 2001, Transportation Research Board (TRB): Washington, D.C.
[45] Wakchaure, S.S. and K.N. Jha, Determination of bridge health index using analytical hierarchy process. Construction Management and Economics, 2012. 30(2): p. 133–149.
[46] Inkoom, S., et al., Bridge Health Index: Study of Element Condition States and Importance Weights. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2612: p. 67–75.
[47] Jiang, X. and K.L. Rens, Bridge Health Index for the City and County of Denver, Colorado. I: Current Methodology. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2010. 24(6): p. 580–587.
[48] Valenzuela, S., H. de Solminihac, and T. Echaveguren, Proposal of an Integrated Index for Prioritization of Bridge Maintenance. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2010. 15(3): p. 337–343.
[49] Hai, D.T., Computerized Database for Maintenance and Management of Highway Bridges in Vietnam. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2008. 13(3): p. 245–257.
[50] Contreras-Nieto, C., et al., Bridge maintenance prioritization using analytic hierarchy process and fusion tables. Automation in Construction, 2019. 101: p. 99–110.
[51] Sinha, K.C., et al., Establishing the Weights of Performance Criteria: Case Studies in Transportation Facility Management. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2009. 135(9): p. 619–631.
[52] Odrobiňák, J. and R. Hlinka. Degradation of Steel Footbridges with Neglected Inspection and Maintenance. in 9th International Conference on Bridges in Danube Basin 2016. 2016. Zilina, Slovakia: Procedia Engineering.
[53] Ogihara, K., Design and Construction of Suspension Bridges, in Inspection, Evaluation and Maintenance of Suspension Bridges, S. Alampalli and W.J. Moreau, Editors. 2015, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL. p. 51–68.
[54] Okukawa, A., S. Suzuki, and I. Harazaki, Suspension Bridges, in Bridge Engineering Handbook: Superstructure Design, W.-F. Chen and L. Duan, Editors. 2014, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL. p. 363–398.
[55] Yanev, B., Suspension Bridges: An Overview, in Inspection, Evaluation and Maintenance of Suspension Bridges, S. Alampalli and W.J. Moreau, Editors. 2015, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL. p. 1–50.
[56] Wang, J., Piers and Columns, in Bridge Engineering Handbook: Substructure Design, W.-F. Chen and L. Duan, Editors. 2014, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL. p. 363–398.
[57] Wang, L., Abutments, in Bridge Engineering Handbook: Substructure Design, W.-F. Chen and L. Duan, Editors. 2014, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL. p. 363–398.
[58] Chen, B., Arch Bridges, in Bridge Engineering Handbook: Superstructure Design, W.-F. Chen and L. Duan, Editors. 2014, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL. p. 309–361.
[59] Vejrum, T. and L.L. Nielsen, Cable-Stayed Bridges, in Bridge Engineering Handbook: Superstructure Design, W.-F. Chen and L. Duan, Editors. 2014, CRC
Press: Boca Raton, FL. p. 399–435.
[60] Ma, J. and S.-G. Low, Precast-Pretensioned Concrete Girder Bridges, in Bridge Engineering Handbook: Superstructure Design, W.-F. Chen and L. Duan, Editors. 2014, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL. p. 1–49.
[61] Duan, L., Y. Saleh, and S. Altman, Composite Steel I-Girder Bridges, in Bridge Engineering Handbook: Superstructure Design, W.-F. Chen and L. Duan, Editors. 2014, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL. p. 171–215.
[62] Kennedy Reid, I.L., et al., Bridge accessories, in ICE Manual of Bridge Engineering, G. Parke and N. Hewson, Editors. 2008: London. p. 553–565.
[63] Zhang, L., Railings, in Bridge Engineering Handbook: Superstructure Design, W.-F. Chen and L. Duan, Editors. 2014, CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL. p. 705–716.
[64] RAND Corporation. Delphi Method. n.d.; Available from: https://www.rand.org/topics/delphi-method.html.
[65] Hallowell, M.R. and J.A. Gambatese, Qualitative Research: Application of the Delphi Method to CEM Research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2010. 136(1): p. 99–107.
[66] Hsu, C.-C. and B.A. Sandford, The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 2007. 12(10).
[67] Saito, M. and K.C. Sinha, Delphi Study on Bridge Condition Rating and Effects of Improvements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1991. 117(3): p. 320–334.
[68] Skulmoski, G.J., F.T. Hartman, and J. Krahn, The Delphi Method for Graduate Research. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 2007. 6: p. 1–21.
[69] Yousuf, M.I., Using Experts′ Opinions Through Delphi Technique. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 2007. 12(4).
[70] Rowe, G. and G. Wright, The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 1999. 15(4): p. 353–375.
[71] Ameyaw, E.E., et al., Application of Delphi method in construction engineering and management research: A quantitative perspective. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2016. 22(8): p. 991–1000.
[72] Mohamed, M. and D.Q. Tran, Risk-based inspection for concrete pavement construction using fuzzy sets and bayesian networks. Automation in Construction, 2021. 128: p. 103761.
[73] Baagøe-Engels, V. and J. Stentoft, Operations and maintenance issues in the offshore wind energy sector. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 2016. 10(2): p. 245–265.
[74] Hasson, F., S. Keeney, and H. McKenna, Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000. 32(4): p. 1008–1015.
[75] Chan, A.P.C., et al., Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 2001. 19(7): p. 699–718.
[76] Seyis, S., Pros and Cons of Using Building Information Modeling in the AEC Industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2019. 145(8): p. 04019046.
[77] Sourani, A. and M. Sohail, The Delphi Method: Review and Use in Construction Management Research. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 2015. 11(1): p. 54–76.
[78] Delbecq, A.L., A.H. Van de Ven, and D.H. Gustafson, Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes. 1975, Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman and Company.
[79] Worrell, J.L., P.M. Di Gangi, and A.A. Bush, Exploring the use of the Delphi method in accounting information systems research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2013. 14(3): p. 193–208.
[80] Brockhoff, K., The performance of forecasting groups in computer dialogue and face to face discussions., in The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, H.A. Linstone and M. Turoff, Editors. 1975, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.: Reading, MA.
[81] Boje, D.M. and J.K. Murnighan, Group Confidence Pressures in Iterative Decisions. Management Science, 1982. 28(10): p. 1187–1196.
[82] Yoe, C., Principles of Risk Analysis: Decision Making Under Uncertainty. 2nd ed. 2019, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
[83] Simmons, D.R., C. McCall, and N.A. Clegorne, Leadership Competencies for Construction Professionals as Identified by Construction Industry Executives. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2020. 146(9): p. 04020109.
指導教授 Yau Nie-Jia Liao Hsien-Ke(Nie-Jia Yau Hsien-Ke Liao) 審核日期 2022-9-27
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題，請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407，或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明