| 摘要(英) |
In Taiwan, most pipelines are buried under the road pavement, and the five vital pipelines are important for people′s livelihood. The underground condition of the pipelines is staggered and complicated. To maintain the existing pipelines and new pipelines, repeated excavation and backfilling are often carried out on the pavement, thus affecting the road pavement service and causing difficulties for the road authorities to maintain and manage the pavement. It is an important subject to understand the influence of pipeline excavation engineering on pavement service.
Considering that there is no set of matching design regulations for CLSM in China at present, in addition, there is no exact regulation on the time and thickness of resurfacing after temporary repair, which is often suspected of unstable quality, excessive design, or insufficient design strength. Therefore, this study first referred to ACI-211, ACI-229, and construction specifications, and adjusted the CLSM ratio design process suitable for domestic by the regulations under the consideration of seasonal influences. Then, the finite element method was used to analyze the pavement structure of pipeline excavation, analyze the influence of pipeline backfilling on the pavement, and discuss the mechanical behavior of pavement structure. Subsequently, in-situ test laying of pipeline excavation was carried out according to the proposed matching process, and relevant effectiveness tests were carried out on the surface layer and CLSM of the testing process, to verify the rationality of the matching design process and structural analysis adjusted in this study.
In this study, parameters including CLSM parameters and tube depth were discussed. Finite element analysis was used to understand the influence of different parameters on the surface layer of temporary repair, to analyze the strength development of CLSM during the temporary repair period, and to the optimal tube depth. The structural analysis showed that the strength of CLSM could reach a stable state after 4 days of temporary repair and maintenance. In addition, the Clegg impact test was carried out on CLSM for 4 days after temporary repair in the site test, and the result can meet the requirement that the bottom strength CBR is greater than 80% in the construction specification. Based on the above structural analysis and the results of in-situ test laying, it can be seen that the pipeline excavation with CLSM backfill can be carried out in a comprehensive surface planning operation after 4 days of temporary repair and maintenance.
In addition, the structural analysis of different planing thicknesses is also carried out. The ESALs values of the common planing thickness of 10 cm and 20 cm are analyzed. From the structural analysis, the ESALs values of the traffic volume of 20 cm are about 3~4 times that of 10 cm. In addition, the light deflection instrument test (LWD) was carried out for the section of 10 cm surface layer and 20 cm surface layer in the ground test pavement. The test results show that the strength of the 20 cm AC surface layer is about 3 times that of 10 cm, which verifies the rationality of the above structural analysis.
Finally, the results of the field test were discussed. It can be seen from the results that the matching design process of CLSM established in this study can meet the requirements of relevant specifications, and the results of the structural analysis were verified. Therefore, the relevant specifications of CLSM were discussed at last in this study, hoping to improve the construction and design quality of CLSM in China by using the results of this study. |
| 參考文獻 |
〔1〕 潘昌林、鄭瑞濱，「控制性低強度材料(CLSM)之工程運用」，中華民國第四屆鋪面材料再生學術研討會論文集，2000。
〔2〕 沈永年、陳以洲、王聰田，「低強度高流動性混凝土於管道回填工程之應用」，第十一屆鋪面工程學術研討會， 2001。
〔3〕 魏光譽，「縣市政府提升道路挖掘埋設維生管線管理成效之研究－以桃園縣為例」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2008
〔4〕 臺灣營建研究院，「控制性低強度材料於土木工程應用之研究」，第六章CLSM 與剩餘土石混合之研究，內政部營建署，2002。
〔5〕 簡瑞村，「預拌混凝土廠分級制度之研究以CLSM廠分級為例」，碩士論文，國立中央大學土木工程學系在職專班，2019。
〔6〕 柯乃文，「控制性低強度回填材料之規範及品質控制之比較」，碩士論文，國立中興大學土木工程學系所，2021。
〔7〕 龔智禹，「混燒飛灰安定化技術與其再利用於控制性低強度回填材料之研究」，碩士論文，國立臺北科技大學土木工程系土木與防災碩士班，2022。
〔8〕 Vahid Alizadeh, Sam Helwany, Al Ghorbanpoor, and Konstantin Sobolev. “Design and application of controlled low strength materials as a structural fill “, Construction and Building Materials, Vol 53, pp 425-431 February 2014.
〔9〕 Lasater, Darin V., “Resilient performances of controlled density fill in utility trench excavations ”, 1990.
〔10〕 Kearsley, E.P. and Wainwright, P.J., “The effect of high fly ash content on the compressive strength of foamed concrete ”, Cement of Concrete Research, Vol 31, pp.105-112, January 2001.
〔11〕 Kearsley, E.P. and Wainwright, P.J., “Porosity and permeability of foamed concrete ”, Cement of Concrete Research, Vol 31, pp. 805-812, May 2001.
〔12〕 Kearsley, E.P, Wainwright, P.J., “The effect of porosity on the strength of foamed concrete ”, Cement of Concrete Research, Vol 32, pp. 233-239, February 2002.
〔13〕 Kearsley, E.P., Wainwright, P.J., “Ash content for optimum strength of 62 foamed concrete ”, Cement of Concrete Research, Vol 32, pp. 241-246, February 2002.
〔14〕 Wu, Jason Y., and Ming-Zhe Lee. “Beneficial reuse of construction surplus clay in CLSM “International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, Vol 4,pp 293-300, September 2011.
〔15〕 Lini Dev K.,“Controlled Low-Strength Materials (CLSM) as backfill: experimental investigation on CLSM properties and numerical evaluation of stresses and strains using PLAXIS 2D.” Geomechanics and Geoengineering, Published Online: 09, 2022.
〔16〕 Etxeberria Miren, Ainchil Javier, Pérez Ma Eugenia, González Alain, “Use of recycled fine aggregates for Control Low Strength Material Vol 44, pp142-148, Construction and Building Materials , July 2013.
〔17〕 “Report on Controlled Low-Strength Materials ”, reported by ACI 229R-22,2022.
〔18〕 “Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete”, reported by ACI 211.1, 1991.
〔19〕 林嘉永、楊健國，「北部第二高速公路路基承載強度CBR之施工品管」，第二屆國道建設技術研討會，1994。
〔20〕 行政院公共工程委員會，「第02726章v10.0級配粒料底層」，2023。
〔21〕 行政院公共工程委員會，「第03377章v9.0控制性低強度回填材料」，2021。
〔22〕 臺北市，「臺北市道路挖掘管理自治條例」，2019。
〔23〕 交通部公路總局，「交通部公路總局受理挖掘公路作業程序手冊」，2019。
〔24〕 Boussinesq, M.J., Applications des potentials, a l’etude de l’equilibre et du movement des solides elastique. Gauthier-Villars, Paris ,1885.
〔25〕 Burmister, D. M., “The Theory of Stresses and Displacements in Layered Systems and Applications to the Design of Airport Runways,” Proceeding, Highway Research Board, Vol. 23, pp.126-144., 1943.
〔26〕 馮天正，「三維有限元素應用於柔性鋪面之非線性分析」，國立中央大學，碩士論文，2000。
〔27〕 徐瑞宏，「道路管線埋設對鋪面強度衰減之影響研究」，國立中央大學，博士論文，2000。
〔28〕 李明輝，「CLSM之抗壓強度預測模式及有限元素分析」，國立屏東科技大學，碩士論文，2012。
〔29〕 張家瑋，「高性能低強度混凝土材料力學行為研究」，國立屏東科技大學，碩士論文，2012。
〔30〕 Blanco, P. Pujadas, S.H.P. Cavalaro, and A. Aguado. “Methodology for the design of controlled low-strength materials. Application to the backfill of narrow trenches “, Construction and Building Materials, Vol.72, pp.23-30, December 2014.
〔31〕 Vahid Alizadeh, Sam Helwany, Al Ghorbanpoor, and Konstantin Sobolev. “Design and application of controlled low strength materials as a structural fill “, Construction and Building Materials, Vol 53, pp 425-431 February 2014.
〔32〕 Saadeldin, Ramy, Yafei Hu, and Amr Henni. “Numerical analysis of buried pipes under field geo-environmental conditions “, International Journal of Geo-Engineering, Vol 6, pp 1-22, June 2015.
〔33〕 Vahid Alizadeh.,“Analytical study for allowable bearing pressures of CLSM bridge abutments.” Transportation Geotechnics, Vol 21, 2019.
〔34〕 Muhammad Asim.,“Prediction of Rutting in Flexible Pavements using Finite Element Method.” Civil Engineering Journal, Vol 7, pp.1310-1326,2021.
〔35〕 Meng Guo and Shuaixiang Zhang.,“Research and Evaluation on Dynamic Response Characteristics of Various Pavement Structures.” Hindawi, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, Vol 2022, pp.1-15,2022.
〔36〕 ASTM D4123-82, “Standard Test Method for Indirect Tension Test for Resilient Modulus of Bituminous Mixtures.”, 1995.
〔37〕 AASHTO, “Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges”, 17th edn. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, USA,2002.
〔38〕 Kerkhoven, R.E., and G.M. Dormon, "Some Considerations on the California Bearing Ratio Method for the Design of Flexible Pavement," Shell Bitumen Monograph No. 1,1953.
〔39〕 Shook, J.F., F.N. Finn, M.W. Witczak, and C.L. Monismith, "Thickness Design of Asphalt Pavements-The Asphalt Institute Method," Proceedings, 5th International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, Vol. 1, pp. 17-44,1982.
〔40〕 AASHTO, “Guide for Design of Pavement Structures.” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington D.C, 1993.
〔41〕 ASTM E2583-07, “Standard Test Method for Measuring Deflections with a Light Weight Deflectometer (LWD)", 2020.
〔42〕 ASTM D5874, ”Standard Test Methods for Determination of the Impact Value (IV) of a Soil.”,2016.
〔43〕 Al-Amoudi, O.S.B., Asi, I.M., Wahhab, A&Khan, Z.A.“Clegg Hammer—California-Bearing Ratio Correlations.” Journal of Materials in. Civil Engineering., Vol. 14, No.6, pp.512-523,2002. |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
[檢視]
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit