主管真誠領導對員工建言行為的影響-以領導與部屬交換關係及心理資本為序列中介變項

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：100

、訪客IP：18.224.73.124

姓名

巫少瓊(Shao-Chiung Wu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所在職專班

論文名稱

主管真誠領導對員工建言行為的影響-以領導與部屬交換關係及心理資本為序列中介變項
(The Influence of Supervisor′s Authentic Leadership on Employee Voice Behavior: Leader-Member Exchange Relationship and Psychological Capital as Sequential Mediators)

相關論文

★ 業務主管領導力對部屬招募行為之影響-以S壽險公司為例	★ 人力精簡對企業績效的影響–以產業特性為調節變項
★ 經理人超額薪酬、經理人異動與公司績效之關係	★ 人口老化對企業之影響與因應對策-以傳統產業為例
★ 運用羅吉斯迴歸探討企業績效、公司治理與經理人異動之關聯性	★ 護理人員組織承諾與專業承諾對離職傾向與離業傾向的影響
★ 運用存活分析探討高科技產業招募者人格特質與離職風險之關聯性-以A公司為例	★ 金融電子化對台灣銀行業組織績效及人力彈性影響之探討
★ 人力資源部門角色與功能轉變之個案研究	★ 高階主管薪酬級距與公司績效之關聯性分析
★ 人力招募政策及主管領導風格對新進人員晉升與離職傾向之影響-以房仲業S公司為例	★ 影響台灣勞工赴海外就業的決定性因素
★ 董事會特性對企業績效之影響-以人力資本為調節變項	★ 董事會異質性之決定因素
★ 公司治理結構與就業調整	★ 總經理雙元性、股權集中度、人力資本與組織績效

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

面對瞬息萬變的經營環境，員工建言是企業推動變革與創新的關鍵之一，而建言對員工而言存在風險與挑戰，過往文獻多以建構員工心理安全感為探討，本研究試圖以主管的真誠領導行為並以領導與部屬交換關係及心理資本作為中介效果，進一步探討影響員工建言行為之原因。研究採用問卷調查法，以台灣在職人員為研究對象，共計350 份問卷作為統計分析資料。
研究結果顯示：(1)主管真誠領導行為對員工建言行為有正向影響效果；(2)主管真誠領導行為對領導與部屬交換關係有正向影響效果；(3)主管真誠領導行為對心理資本有正向影響效果；(4)領導與部屬交換關係對員工建言行為間具有正向影響效果；(5)領導與部屬交換關係對心理資本有正向影響效果；(6)心理資本對員工建言行為有正向影響效果；(7)領導與部屬交換關係對主管真誠領導行為與員工建言行為間具有中介效果；(8)心理資本對主管真誠領導行為與員工建言行為間具有中介效果；(9)領導與部屬交換關係與心理資本對主管真誠領導行為與員工建言行為間具有序列中介效果。
透過員工角度探討，當員工感知主管真誠領導行為並能與主管建立高品質交換關係時，有助於員工心理資本建構，促進員工建言行為。

摘要(英)

To cope with the rapidly changing business environment of the company, employee voice is a key driver for organizational change and innovation. However, making suggestions poses risks and challenges for employees. Previous literature has explored employees′ psychological safety as an antecedent for employee voice behavior, while this study attempts to further investigate potential reasons that affect employees′ voice behavior by examining the mediating effects of supervisors′ authentic leadership behavior, leader-member exchange relationship (LMX), and psychological capital. Using a questionnaire survey method, we collected 350 valid responses from employed individuals in Taiwan for statistical analysis.
The research findings suggest that: (1) supervisor′s authentic leadership behavior has a positive impact on employees′ voice behavior; (2) supervisor′s authentic leadership behavior has a positive impact on LMX; (3) supervisor′s authentic leadership behavior has a positive impact on psychological capital; (4) LMX has a positive impact on employees′ voice behavior; (5) LMX has a positive impact on psychological capital; (6) psychological capital has a positive impact on employees′ voice behavior; (7) LMX mediates the relationship between supervisor′s authentic leadership behavior and employees′ voice behavior; (8) psychological capital mediates the relationship between supervisor′s authentic leadership behavior and employees′ voice behavior; (9) LMX and psychological capital have a serial mediating effect on the relationship between supervisor′s authentic leadership behavior and employees′ voice behavior.
From the perspective of employees, perceiving authentic leadership behavior from their supervisors tends to establish a high-quality exchange relationship, which helps to build their psychological capital and further promotes their voice behavior.

關鍵字(中)

★ 真誠領導
★ 領導與部屬交換關係
★ 心理資本
★ 員工建言

關鍵字(英)

★ Authentic leadership
★ Leader-member exchange relationship
★ Psychological capital
★ Employee voice

論文目次

摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 vii
第一章緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的 3
1-3 研究流程 4
第二章文獻探討 5
2-1 真誠領導 5
2-2 建言行為 8
2-3 領導與部屬交換關係 10
2-4 心理資本 12
2-5 各變項之間的關係與假設推論 14
2-5-1 主管真誠領導行為對員工建言行為的影響 14
2-5-2 主管真誠領導行為對領導與部屬交換關係的影響 15
2-5-3 主管真誠領導行為對心理資本的影響 15
2-5-4 領導與部屬交換關係對員工建言行為的影響 16
2-5-5 領導與部屬交換關係對心理資本的影響 17
2-5-6 心理資本對員工建言行為的影響 17
2-5-7 領導與部屬交換關係對主管真誠領導行為與員工建言行為間具有中介效果 18
2-5-8 心理資本對主管真誠領導行為與員工建言行為間具有中介效果 18
2-5-9 LMX與心理資本對主管真誠領導行為與員工建言行為間具有序列中介效果 19
第三章研究方法 20
3-1 研究架構 20
3-2 研究假設 20
3-3 研究變項之衡量 21
3-3-1 真誠領導 21
3-3-2 建言行為 22
3-3-3 領導與部屬交換關係（LMX） 23
3-3-4 心理資本 23
3-3-5 控制變項 25
3-4 資料蒐集和分析方法 25
3-4-1 資料蒐集 25
3-4-2 分析方法 26
第四章資料分析與研究結果 28
4-1 敘述性統計 28
4-2 驗證性因素分析（Confirmatory factor analysis; CFA） 29
4-3 信度與效度分析 30
4-3-1 信度分析 30
4-3-2 組合信度、收斂效度及區辨效度 31
4-4 相關分析 32
4-5 結構方程模型分析結果 34
第五章結論與建議 37
5-1 研究結果與討論 37
5-1-1 序列中介模型研究架構結論 38
5-1-2 領導與部屬交換關係對主管真誠領導行為與員工建言行為間具有中介效果 38
5-1-3 心理資本對主管真誠領導行為與員工建言行為間具有中介效果 39
5-1-4 領導與部屬交換關係與心理資本對主管真誠領導行為與員工建言行為間具有序列中介效果 40
5-2 管理意涵 41
5-3 研究限制與未來研究建議 43
參考文獻 45
附錄 52
附錄一-問卷 52
附錄二-「真誠領導」量表授權書 56
附錄三-「心理資本」量表授權書 57

參考文獻

一、中文文獻
王婷虹。 (2019) 是自己人重要嗎? 從領導部屬交換理論看溝通風格與其相似性對主管滿意度之影響。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文。
王議賢、周麗芳、李芸蘋、葉羿廷。 (2020) 建言行為與員工創新行為績效: 一個探討促進型建言, 抑制型建言, 領導與部屬交換關係與員工創新行為績效的三階交互作用模型。人力資源管理學報, 20(1), 1-26.
何揚民、袁郁章。 (2015) 員工建言的前因與後果: 後設分析與研究建議。2015 年勞動關係學術研討會。
周麗芳、任金剛、林守紀。 (2013) 轉型領導與建言行為: 文化價值觀的關鍵角色。組織與管理, 6(2), 115-159.
林文政、鍾珮珊、范維恩。 (2014) 好關係沒有壞影響嗎? 領導部屬交換關係對組織年資與晉升力評分倒 U 字型關係的調節效果。東吳經濟商學學報,(86), 1-28.
林守紀、周麗芳、任金剛、曾春榮。 (2017) 員工建言行為: 回顧與未來。人力資源管理學報, 17(1), 1-33.
陳怡靜、吳宗祐、游佳臻。 (2018) 心安即可直言? 從相似性-吸引理論與程序公平理論探討深層相似性與員工建言之關係。組織與管理, 11(2), 27-64.
詹姆斯.迪特、伊森.布瑞斯。 (2016) 讓員工暢所欲言。哈佛商業評論全球繁體中文版資料庫, 2016年1月號.
蔡松純、鄭伯壎、周麗芳。 (2015) 領導者與部屬上下關係認定之理論模式建構。中華心理學刊, 57(2), 121-144.
簡忠仁、鄭伯壎、連玉輝。 (2019) 真誠崇拜或真誠感染？真誠領導的雙路徑模式. 中華心理學刊, 61(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.6129/cjp.201903_61(1).0001

二、英文文獻
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The leadership quarterly, 16(3), 315-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The leadership quarterly, 15(6), 801-823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.003
Avolio, B. J., & Luthans, F. (2003). Authentic leadership devolopment. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 241-258). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual review of psychology, 60, 421-449.
Botero, I. C., & Van Dyne, L. (2009). Employee voice behavior: Interactive effects of LMX and power distance in the United States and Colombia. Management Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 84-104.
Burris, E. R., Detert, J. R., & Chiaburu, D. S. (2008). Quitting before leaving: the mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice. Journal of applied psychology, 93(4), 912-922.
Cheng, J., Chang, S., Kuo, J., & Lu, K. (2014). Social relations and voice behavior: The mediating role of psychological safety. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 11(1) ,130-140.
Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278-321.
Dansereau, F., Cashman, J., & Graen, G. (1973). Instrumentality theory and equity theory as complementary approaches in predicting the relationship of leadership and turnover among managers. Organizational behavior and human performance, 10(2), 184-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(73)90012-3
Dansereau Jr, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational behavior and human performance, 13(1), 46-78.
Day, D. V. (2000). Leadership development: A review in context. The leadership quarterly, 11(4), 581-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(00)00061-8
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of management journal, 50(4), 869-884.
Dienesch, R., & Liden, R. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: a critique and further development. The Academy of Management Review, 11, 618-634. https://doi.org/10.2307/258314
Duan, J., Li, C., Xu, Y., & Wu, C.-h. (2017). Transformational leadership and employee voice behavior: A pygmalion mechanism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(5), 650-670. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2157
Dutton, J. E., & Ragins, B. R. E. (2007). Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Erickson, R. J. (1995). The importance of authenticity for self and society. Symbolic interaction, 18(2), 121-144.
Farrell, D. (1983). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect as responses to job dissatisfaction: A multidimensional scaling study. The Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 596-607.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol, 56(3), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.218
Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005). “Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. The leadership quarterly, 16(3), 343-372.
George, B. (2003). Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value (Vol. 18). John Wiley & Sons.
George, B. (2017). VUCA 2.0: A strategy for steady leadership in an unsteady world. Forbes Magazine. https://www.forbes.com/sites/hbsworkingknowledge/2017/02/17/vuca-2-0-a-strategy-for-steady-leadership-in-an-unsteady-world/?sh=46ba6f4513d8
Graen, G., & Scandura, T. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175–208.
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The leadership quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
Guildford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. McGraw-Hill.
Harter, S. (2002). Authenticity. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 382–394). London: Oxford University Press.
He, W., Fehr, R., Yam, K. C., Long, L. R., & Hao, P. (2017). Interactional justice, leader–member exchange, and employee performance: Examining the moderating role of justice differentiation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(4), 537-557.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2004. Print.
Hsieh, C. C., & Wang, D. S. (2015). Does supervisor-perceived authentic leadership influence employee work engagement through employee-perceived authentic leadership and employee trust? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(18), 2329-2348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1025234
Hsiung, H. H. (2012). Authentic leadership and employee voice behavior: A multi-level psychological process. Journal of business ethics, 107(3), 349-361.
Hsiung, H. H., & Tsai, W. C. (2009). Job definition discrepancy between supervisors and subordinates: The antecedent role of LMX and outcomes. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 82(1), 89-112.
Hunt, J. G., & Dodge, G. E. (2000). Leadership déjà vu all over again. The leadership quarterly, 11(4), 435-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00058-8
Ilies, R., Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D. (2005). Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader–follower outcomes. The leadership quarterly, 16(3), 373-394.
Kernis, M. H. (2003). Target article: Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1401_01
Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in experimental social psychology, 38, 283-357.
Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002). Time counts: future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and aging, 17(1), 125-139.
Lebel, R., Wheeler-Smith, S., & Morrison, E. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Development and validation of a new multi-dimensional measure. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, San Antonio, Texas.
LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of applied psychology, 83(6), 853-868.
LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of applied psychology, 86(2), 326-336.
Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of management journal, 55(1), 71-92.
Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of management journal, 23(3), 451-465.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Stilwell, D. (1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of applied psychology, 78(4), 662-674.
Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The leadership quarterly, 21(1), 189-202.
Loi, R., Chan, K. W., & Lam, L. W. (2014). Leader–member exchange, organizational identification, and job satisfaction: A social identity perspective. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 87(1), 42-61.
Luthans, F. (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Perspectives, 16(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2002.6640181
Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., & Patera, J. L. (2008). Experimental analysis of a web-based training intervention to develop positive psychological capital. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(2), 209-221.
Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541-572.
Luthans, F., Luthans, K. W., & Luthans, B. C. (2004). Positive psychological capital: Beyond human and social capital, Business Horizons, 47(1), 45-50
https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bushor.2003.11.007
Luthans, F., & Youssef-Morgan, C. M. (2017). Psychological capital: An evidence - based positive approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 339-366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113324
Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.01.003
Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., Sweetman, D. S., & Harms, P. D. (2013). Meeting the leadership challenge of employee well-being through relationship PsyCap and health PsyCap. Journal of leadership & organizational studies, 20(1), 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051812465893
Mathieu, J. E., & Farr, J. L. (1991). Further evidence for the discriminant validity of measures of organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction. Journal of applied psychology, 76(1), 127-133.
Maynes, T. D., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2014). Speaking more broadly: an examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors. Journal of applied psychology, 99(1), 87-112.
Mehta, P. (2022). Work alienation as a mediator between work from home-related isolation, loss of task identity and job insecurity amid the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Workplace Health Management. 15(3), 287-306.
Morrison, E. (2011). Voice and silence within organizations: Literature review and directions for future research. Academy of Management annals, 5(1), 373-412.
Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 173-197.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2003). On assimilating identities to the self: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization and integrity within cultures. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 253–272). The Guilford Press.
Seligman, M. E. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Simon and Schuster.
Shamir, B., & Eilam, G. (2005). “What′s your story?” A life-stories approach to authentic leadership development. The leadership quarterly, 16(3), 395-417.
Smith, C., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of applied psychology, 68(4), 653.
Story, J. S., Youssef, C. M., Luthans, F., Barbuto, J. E., & Bovaird, J. (2013). Contagion effect of global leaders′ positive psychological capital on followers: Does distance and quality of relationship matter? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(13), 2534-2553.
Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2012). Ask and you shall hear (but not always): Examining the relationship between manager consultation and employee voice. Personnel Psychology, 65, 251-282.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01248.x
Trilling, L. (1972). Sincerity and authenticity. Harvard University Press.
Uhl-Bien, M. (2003). Relationship development as a key ingredient for leadership development. In S. E. Murphy & R. E. Riggio (Eds.), The future of leadership development, (pp. 129–147). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410608895
Uhl-Bien, M., Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (2000). Implications of leader-member exchange (LMX) for strategic human resource management systems: Relationships as social capital for competitive advantage. Research in personnel and human resources management, 18, 137-186.
Walumbwa, F., Mayer, D., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., & Christensen, A. (2011). Organizational behavior and human decision processes linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 204-213.
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of management, 34(1), 89-126.
Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research. Journal of management, 15(2), 251-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500207
Zhang, Z., Liang, Q., & Li, J. (2022). The curvilinear relationship between employee voice and managers’ performance evaluations: The Moderating Role of Voice Consensus. Sustainability, 14(16), 9970.
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/9970

指導教授

陳明園(Ming-Yuan Chen)

審核日期

2023-5-22

推文