股權集中度、股權不均度與企業創新—台灣電子業的實證

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：46

、訪客IP：18.190.217.134

姓名

梁家榮(Chia-Jung Liang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

產業經濟研究所

論文名稱

股權集中度、股權不均度與企業創新—台灣電子業的實證

相關論文

★ 資訊科技的使用對製造業廠商生產力之影響	★ 寶島債介紹及發展前景
★ 電腦軟體與資料庫的採用與對廠商績效的影響- 台灣製造業的研究	★ 中國新高技術園區技術效率及其影響因素的研究
★ 政府管控房地產政策對不動產市場及銀行不動產授信業務之影響	★ 鶯歌捷運線對房價的影響
★ 貿易、技術與薪資溢酬	★ 聚集與生產力:台灣紡織產業的實證研究
★ 勞工派遣與正職受僱型態之實證研究－金融海嘯前後之分析比較	★ 影響政府採購效率之實證研究—以某縣市政府為例
★ 台灣民眾轉換從業身分的決策以及「不景氣-推擠」假說之檢定	★ 汽車燃油效率、反彈效果與特徵價格之研究
★ Three Essays on the Industrial Economics	★ 研究發展與技術購買-台灣製造業之實證研究
★ 合併廠商的績效表現與決策因素分析	★ 合併型態對廠商績效與股票報酬的影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究採用台灣經濟新報 (Taiwan Economy Journal) 2010年至2021年台灣上市櫃電子業廠商資料，探討公司股權結構與專利產出的關聯。股權結構以前三、前五大股東持股，以及類HHI指數衡量股權集中度，並使用類吉尼係數模型建構股權類吉尼係數，衡量股權不均度。此外，本研究亦依據專利種類、公司特徵、電子業細項產業別區分子樣本進行異質性分析。

實證結果顯示，公司股權集中度、不均度與專利數目間呈現U型關係。當股權集中度、不均度較低時，大股東增加持股除了能鞏固其影響力外，亦需承擔更高的風險，導致大股東出現風險趨避行為而限縮公司創新；反之，當公司之股權集中度、不均度較高時，大股東之利益與公司密切相關，其主要考量為公司長遠之發展而推動長期創新，並提供所需之資源及人脈。子樣本的結果發現，股權結構與專利之U型關係主要來自於發明型專利。股權集中度較高、負債比率較低、規模較小、成立較久、屬於家族經營、董事長兼任總經理之企業，以及屬於電腦及週邊產業之公司亦有此現象。股權不均度與專利間的U型關係則顯現於規模較大，與屬於半導體及電子零組件業之公司。

摘要(英)

This study examines the relationship between ownership structure and patent output. Regression analyses are performed on a dataset, extracted from Taiwan Economy Journal, which includes Taiwanese publicly listed firms belonging to the electronic industry. The time span of this study is 11 years (2010-2021). Ownership structure is measured by two indices, ownership concentration and ownership inequality. Ownership concentration is calculated by the sum of the top three, top five shareholders, and HHI-style index, respectively. Ownership inequality is measured by utilizing Gini-style model. Subsamples are divided according to patent types, company features, and subindustries.

This study finds a U-shaped relationship between ownership concentration and ownership inequality with patent output. In firms with low ownership concentration or inequality, block holders′ risk aversion behaviors, driven by their increasing shares, negatively impact patent output. Conversely, in firms with high ownership concentration or inequality, block holders′ interests align with the firm′s prospects, leading to project facilitation and resource allocation that benefit the firm over a longer time span. Subsample analysis confirms that the U-shaped relationship between ownership structure and patent output stems from the invented patents. Furthermore, the U-shaped relationship between ownership concentration and patent output extends to firms with higher concentration ratios, lower leverage ratios, smaller sizes, family-run firms, those with CEO duality, or those in the computer-related industry. Additionally, a U-shaped relationship between ownership inequality and patent output is observed among larger firms and those in the semiconductor and electronic component industries.

關鍵字(中)

★ 股權集中度
★ 股權不均度
★ 企業創新
★ 專利數目
★ 類吉尼係數

關鍵字(英)

★ Ownership concentration
★ ownership inequality
★ patent
★ Gini-style coefficient

論文目次

摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌謝 III
目錄 IV
第一章緒論 1
1-1研究背景與動機 1
1-2研究目的與架構 4
第二章文獻回顧 6
第三章資料來源與實證模型 9
3-1資料來源 9
3-2變數定義與說明 11
3-3實證模型 17
（一）股權結構的衡量方式 17
（二）Pooled Poisson model 18
第四章實證結果 20
4-1敘述統計量 20
4-2解釋變數間之相關係數 21
4-3股權集中度、股權不均度與專利申請總數之估計結果 23
4-4股權集中度、股權不均度與各細項專利數目之估計結果 26
4-5異質性分析—以公司特徵區分子樣本 28
4-6電子業細項產業之估計結果 34
第五章結論與研究限制 37
5-1結論 37
5-2研究限制 38
參考文獻 40
中文文獻 40
英文文獻 42

參考文獻

中文文獻
王冰穎 (2008)，「公司治理與創新效率之關聯性研究─以台灣資訊電子業為例」，國立彰化師範大學會計學系，碩士論文。
王曉雯、王泰昌與吳明政（2008），「企業經營型態與研發活動績效」，管理學報，25(2)，173-193。
吳欣怡 (2015)，「家族股權結構與傳承如何影響研發投資？」，元智大學財務金融暨會計碩士班（財務金融學程），碩士論文。
李欣昱 (2022)，「研發支出與公司價值關係之研究：論控制股東股權結構之影響」，國立嘉義大學財務金融學系，碩士論文。
李柏聖 (2015)，「股權結構、研發投資與企業績效之關係-以台灣電子產業為例」，國立高雄第一科技大學財務管理研究所，碩士論文。
邱瀞頤 (2014)，「家族企業股權結構與高階經理人薪酬之關聯性 -創新績效之中介角色」，東海大學會計學系，碩士論文。
金成隆與陳俞如（2006），「公司治理與專利權：台灣新興市場」，管理學報， 23(1)， 99-124。
黃滋敏 (2005)，「控制股東股權結構對研發活動的攸關性與可靠性之影響」，國立政治大學會計研究所，碩士論文。
黃瓊儀 (2022)，「股權結構與董監酬勞對經營績效之影響」，國立高雄科技大學財政稅務系，碩士論文。
楊志海與陳忠榮（2002），「研究發展，專利與生產力-台灣製造業的實證研究」，經濟論文叢刊，30(1)，27-48 。
葉佳原 (2015)，「研發支出與經營績效─研發強度、證券市場與激勵薪酬之影響」，國立中央大學會計研究所，碩士論文。
雷鈞凱 (2021)，「股權結構、董事會特徵及獨立董事特徵對經營績效之影響」，國立中正大學會計與資訊科技研究所，碩士論文。
廖義芳 (2002)，「專利權與經營績效關係之研究：各項專利權之比較」，國立彰化師範大學商業教育學系，碩士論文。
蔡茗姍 (2022)，「股權結構、董事會特性、創新研發對企業績效之相關性研究」，國立中正大學會計與資訊科技研究所，碩士論文。

英文文獻
Aghion, P., J. V. Reenen and L. Zingales (2013), “Innovation and institutional ownership,” American Economic Review, 103(1), 277-304.
Alchian, A. A. and H. Demsetz (1972), “Production, information, cost, and economic organization,” The American Economic Review, 62(5), 777-795.
Brown, M. C.(1994), “Using Gini-style indices to evaluate the spatial patterns of health practitioners: Theoretical considerations and an application based on Alberta data,” Social Science & Medicine, 38(9), 1243–1256.
Chin, C.-L., Y.-J. Chen, G. Kleinman and P. Lee (2009) “Corporate ownership structure and innovation: Evidence from Taiwan’s electronics industry,” Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 24(1), 145–75.
Choi. S. B, B. I. Park and P. Hong (2012) “Does ownership structure matter for firm technological innovation performance? The case of Korean firms,” Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(3), 267-288.
Chou, T.-K. and L. Johennesse (2021), “Board characteristics, ownership structures and firm R&D intensity,” Accounting, 7(2021), 635-644.
Eng, L.-L, M. Shackell (2001), “The impact of long-run performance plans and institutional ownership for firms research and development expenditures,” Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 16(2), 117-139.
Hosono, K., M. Tomiyama and T. Miyagawa (2004), “Corporate governance and research and development: Evidence from Japan,” Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 13(2), 141-164.
Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling (1976) “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Lee, P. G. and H. M. O’Neil (2003), “Ownership structure and R&D investments of US and Japan Firms: Agency and stewardship perspectives,” Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 212-225.
Lee, S. (2021), “Does corporate ownership matter for innovation,” Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, DOI: 10.1080/13547860.2021.1884174
Mavruk, T., C. Overland and S. Sjögren (2020), “Keeping it real or keeping it simple? Ownership concentration measures compared,” European Financial Management, 26(4), 958–1005.
Minetti, R., P. Murro and M. Paiella (2015), “Ownership structure, governance, and innovation,” European Economic Review, 80(2015), 163–193.
Nguyen, D. N., Q.-N. Tran and Q.-T. Truong (2021), “The ownership concentration −Innovation nexus: Evidence from SMEs around the world,” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(5), 1288–1307.
Nguyen, D., H. Nguyen and K. S. Nguyen (2018), “Ownership feature and firm performance via corporate innovation performance: Does it really matter for Vietnamese SMEs?” Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 25 (2), 239-250.
Ortega-Argilés, R., R. Moreno and J. S. Caralt (2005), “Ownership structure and innovation: Is there a real link?” Ann Reg Sci, 39(2005), 637–662.
Pham, P. K., P. S. Kalev and A. B. Steen (2003), “Underpricing, stock allocation, ownership structure and post-listing liquidity of newly listed firms,” Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(5), 919–947.
Puca, M., M. Vatiero (2017), “Ownership and innovation: Evidence from Switzerland,” DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2739880
Song, Z.-H., X. Wang and D.-M. Lee (2021), “The influence of ownership structure on firms’ R&D investments: An empirical investigation,” European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(4), 103–107.
Ting, I.W.K., H.-C. Lo and Q.L. Kweh (2020), “How do ownership concentration and family control affect R&D investments? New evidence from Taiwan,” International Review of Finance, 20(1), 275-291.
Wahal, S. and J. J. Mcconnell (2000), “Do institutional investors exacerbate managerial myopia?” Journal of Corporate Finance, 6(3), 307-329.

指導教授

鄒孟文(Meng-Wen Tsou)

審核日期

2023-6-16

推文