疫情期間台股散戶投資人行為分析- (處置效果、過度自信、從眾效應)

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：25

、訪客IP：18.191.198.56

姓名

李明諺(Ming-Yen Lee) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

產業經濟研究所在職專班

論文名稱

疫情期間台股散戶投資人行為分析- (處置效果、過度自信、從眾效應)

相關論文

★ 疫情、市場情緒、公司治理與股價波動度

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2024-9-1以後開放)

摘要(中)

新冠肺炎（COVID-19）是由一種名為SARS-CoV-2的冠狀病毒引起的疾病。這種病毒最初於2019年在中國湖北省武漢市爆發，並迅速傳播到全球。截至2023年5月6日，全球已經有超過3.7億例確診病例和超過580萬死亡病例；台灣身為國際社會中的一份子，更是無法置身事外。
資料來源為台灣經濟新報(TEJ)中台灣股市大盤報酬率(月)資料及融資交易(日)資料，期間2010年1月至2023年3月(資料涵蓋新冠疫情及俄烏戰爭)；主要從散戶投資人的『處置效果』、『過度自信』、『從眾效應』等變數探討台灣股市散戶投資人面對新冠疫情時的決策行為改變是否會對大盤報酬率造成影響。本研究的結果發現：
一、疫情及俄烏戰爭等事件變數對於大盤(月)報酬率並無顯著影響；但對於大盤(周)報酬率為負向且顯著影響。
二、處置效果係數與大盤報酬率呈現正向關係且在疫情期間依然顯著;不論是否在事件發生地當下，散戶投資人均有賣完股票而大盤報酬率繼續漲的現象。
三、從眾效應係數與大盤報酬率呈現正向關係，且結果是顯著的；過度自信係數與大盤報酬率呈現正向關係，但是並不顯著。
四、排除人為決策上賣得太早及過度操作的行為模式，選擇貼近大盤指數的投資組合看來是種不錯的投資策略。

摘要(英)

Abstract:
COVID-19, caused by a coronavirus known as SARS-CoV-2, is a disease that emerged in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China in 2019 and quickly spread globally. As of May 6, 2023, there have been over 370 million confirmed cases and over 5.8 million deaths worldwide. Taiwan, as part of the international community, has also been affected by this pandemic.
The data for this study is sourced from Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ), including the Taiwan stock market′s monthly return rate and margin trading data from January 2010 to March 2023 (covering the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russo-Ukrainian war). The study primarily explores the changes in decision-making behavior of retail investors in the Taiwan stock market, focusing on variables such as "disposition effect," "overconfidence," and "herding behavior," to determine if these changes impact the overall market return rate. The results of this research are as follows:
(1)Variables such as the pandemic and the Russo-Ukrainian war do not significantly affect the overall monthly market return rate. However, they do have a negative and significant impact on the weekly market return rate.
(2)The coefficient of the disposition effect shows a positive relationship with the market return rate, and this relationship remains significant during the pandemic period. Regardless of whether investors are in the epicenter of the events or not, retail investors tend to sell stocks prematurely while the market return rate continues to rise.
(3)The coefficient of herding behavior shows a positive and significant relationship with the market return rate. The coefficient of overconfidence also shows a positive relationship but is not statistically significant.
(4)By excluding behavioral patterns characterized by selling too early and excessive trading, selecting an investment portfolio that closely aligns with the overall market index appears to be a favorable investment strategy.

Keywords: COVID-19, disposition effect, overconfidence, herding behavior

關鍵字(中)

★ 新冠肺炎
★ 處置效果
★ 過度自信
★ 從眾效應

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

目錄
第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究目的 3
第三節研究流程 4
第二章文獻探討 5
第一節處置效果 6
第二節過度自信 9
第三節從眾效應 11
第三章研究方法與模型設定 15
第一節資料來源 15
第二節模型設定 15
第四章實證結果與分析 17
第一節係數統計 17
第二節報酬率分析 20
第三節係數分析 31
第五章結論與建議 38

參考文獻 40

參考文獻

參考文獻
中文部分
1.林秋雲2002，「股票投資人錯置效果之研究」，輔仁大學應用統計學研究所碩士論文。
2.林淑芬2006，「投資人情緒與台灣股市動能效應相關性之研究」，雲林科技大學財務金融所碩士論文。
3.徐士泓2003，「影響基金投人賣出及持有決策因素之研究:錯置效果VS.市場預測」,台灣大學財務金融所碩士論文
4.許祐瑞2002，台灣股市散戶與三大法人處分效果之研究」，高雄第一科技大學金融營運所碩士論文
5.郭敏華、蔡世烈(2003)，「從行為財務學的觀點探討台灣股市之從眾傾向」，《東海管理評論》，第6卷第1期，12月，頁51-72。。
6.黃美滿2004，「我國機構投資人過度自信交易行為之實證研究一以外資、投信為例」，雲林科技大學財務金融所碩士論文
7.賴麗玲2003，「錯置效應與過度信之實證一以高週轉率共同基金經理人之表現為
例」，實踐大學企業管理所碩士論文。
8.郭敏華2008，「行為財務學-當財務遇上心理學」，智勝文化 pp.112-134
9.龔怡霖 2001，「行為財學一文獻回顧與未來發展」，中央大學財務管理所碩士論文。
10.湯承廷 2013，「行為財務學處分效果與過度自信實證分析」，政治大學金融學所碩士論文。
11.陳俊佑2011，「台灣股票市場多因子績效分析」,貨幣觀與信用評等,第87期
pp.45-50
12.蔡永順劉文智 2011，「台灣機構投資人過度自信行為實證研究」，台灣管理學刊
第11卷第2期2011年8月pp.91-126

英文部分
1. Andreassen, Paul, 1988," Explaining the price-volume relationship : the difference between price changes and changing prices," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41 (3), 371-389.
2. Barber. Brad M. and Terrance Odean, 1999, " The courage of misgnided convictions," Financial Analysis′s Journal, 55 (6), 41-55.
3. Barber. Brad M. and Terrance Odean, 2000, " Trading in hazardous to your wealth," Journal of Finance, 55 (2), 773-806.
4. Barber. Brad M. and Terrance Odean. 2001, " Boys will be boys : gender.overconfidence and common stock investment." Quarterly Jounal Economics,116(1), 261-292.
5. Barberis, Nicholas, Andrei Shleifer and Robert Vishny. 1998. " A model of investor sentiment," Journal of Financial Economics. 49 (3). 307-343.
6. Chui, Andy, Sheridan Titman and K.C. John Wei. 2000, " Momentum, ownership structure, and financial crises : an analysis of Asian stock markets," Working Paper.University of Texas at Austin.
7. Constantinides, George M. , 1984," Optimal stock trading with personal taxes :implications for prices and the abnormal January returns," Journal of Financial nengchi Economics, 13 (1). 65-69.
8. Daniel, Kent. David Hirshleifer and Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, 1998, " Investor psychology and security market under- and overreactions." Journal of Finance, 53(6). 1839-1886.
9. Daniel, Kent and Sheridan Titman, 1999, " Market efficienc y in an irrational world." Financial Analysis′s Jounal, 55 (6), 28-40.
10. Delong, J. Bradford, Andrei Shleifer. Lawrence H. Summers and Robert J.Waldman, 1990, " Positive feedback investment strategies and destabilizing rational speculation," Joural of Finance, 45 (2), 379-395.
11. Frazzini, Andrea. 2006, " The disposition effect and underreaction to news," The Jounal of Finance, 61 (4), 2017-2046.
12. Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky, 1979, " Prospect theory : an analysis of decision under risk." Econometrica. 47 (2). 263-291.
13. Kahneman, Daniel and Mark W. Riepe, 1998, " Aspect of investor psychology."Jounal of Portfolio Management, 24 (4). 52-65.
14. Kunda, Ziva, 1987, " Motivated inference: self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories," Jounal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 (4),636-647.
15. Montier. James, 2002. Behavioural finance: insights into irrational minds andmarkets, John Wiley & Sons. Ltd.
16. Odean, Terrance, 1998, "Are investors reluctant to realize their losses ? " The Jounal of Finance, 53 (5). 1775-1798.
17. Odean, Terrance, 1999, " Do investors trade too much?"The American Economic Review, 89 (5). 1279-1298.
18. Weber, Martin and Colin F. Camerer, 1998, " The disposition effect in securities trading : an experimental analysis," Joumal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 33 (2), 167-184.
19. Shefrin, Hersh and Meir Statman, 1985, " The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long : theory and evidence," The Journal of Finance, 40 (3),777-790.
20. Shefrin, Hersh and Meir Statman, 1994, " Behavioral capital asset pricing theory,"′Jounal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29 (3), 323-349.
21.Statman, Meir, Steven Thorley and Keith Vorkink, 2004, Investor Overconfidence and Trading Volume, working paper.

指導教授

蔡明宏蔡栢昇

審核日期

2023-7-17

推文