| 摘要(英) |
This research is a digital online multiplayer board game developed under the background of the history and geography of the Silk Road in the Middle Ages. This system enables learners to play the part of an ancient civilization in an online learning game, experience running Silk Road trade and dealing with conflicts. And understand the historical content under this situation, improve learners′ learning motivation, and then have a positive impact on their historical literacy; the main function of this system is to provide learners with a virtual Silk Road history platform that they try and operate, and collect their game information , analyzing its game strategy and historical literacy.
The main body of this study is qualitative research, supplemented by quantitative evaluation. The main purpose is to explore the learning motivation, game strategy, and historical literacy of players in digital game-based learning, and how they are related to each other. The operation records and thinking time of the learners during the game will be recorded by this system, so as to analyze their game strategies and behaviors, and discuss activities such as interaction, competition and conflict between players based on these data. Quantitative data is mainly used to analyze whether learners have improved learning motivation and Historical Literacy level after playing the game. A background questionnaire was also used to understand the subjects′ perceptions and thoughts on the cultural and historical knowledge of the Silk Road. Based on the suggestions and problems encountered by the subjects after playing, the research designers optimize the game operation, database record form, and game fluency and detail, in order to bring more practical game systems to learners, and have A more ideal gaming experience.
The results of the study found that the subjects′ learning motivation and historical literacy were all affected by this system, and they were positively improved and promoted. The game strategy can present extremely changeable modes of conflict, defense, trade, and route planning in this system. There are many opportunities for the subjects to try in the game, so as to have a positive ideal for their historical literacy. |
| 參考文獻 |
王文霞（2010）。臺灣歷史學系世界史課程的初步觀察—以 95-98 學年臺大、師大、政大、輔大課程為基礎。歷史教育， 17 期，13頁。
王淑玲（2009）。數位遊戲特質與環境對學習歷程影響的整合研究-子計畫二---個人動機與團體動機對遊戲中之學習歷程與表現之影響。（NSC96-2520-S011-002-MY3）。行政院國家科學委員會。
王藍亭 （2007）。提升中小學生對海洋科學素養之趣味性數位遊戲研發與建置（計畫主題「海洋的科學」）（NSC96-2515-S165-001）。行政院國家科學委員會。
吳安芩（2007年3月2日）。遊戲設計策略在數位學習上的應用：從藝術課程開始。http://140.113.75.242:8080/claire/teaching/techart/assi/94/9342802/遊戲設計策略在數位學習上的應用.doc。
吳玲玲（2004）。資訊控制度與專家知識效應對網路消費者決策之影響。應用心理研究，22期，47 – 66。
吳鐵雄（1988）。電腦軟體遊戲帶來的影響。認識電腦，39（7），64-71。
李昱葳（2015）。國小五年級學生數學解題歷程的自我調整學習策略與動機信念之個案研究。國立中山大學教育研究所，碩士論文。
林育賢 （2001）。電玩暴力對學童攻擊行為之效果研究。世新大學傳播研究所，碩士論文。
林奇賢，徐雅雯（2006）。角色扮演模擬遊戲之設計與其在教育應用上的意義。2005年 NCS全國計算機會議。崑山科技大學。
林長信（2018）。複合式桌遊之設計與開發及人格特質於遊戲歷程之分析與探討。國立臺南大學數位學習科技學系，博士論文。
林珮瑛（2016）閱讀素養在歷史教學上的實踐。臺灣師範大學歷史學系碩士班，碩士論文。doi: 10.6345/NTNU202203612
林菁（2006）。網路遊戲與學習。「數位遊戲學習」專家座談會，2006年6月21日。資策會數位教育研究所。
施如齡 （2009）。台灣鄉土史地之「遊戲與行動」數位學習整合系統開發與成效研究。（NSC98-2511-S024-006-MY2）。行政院國家科學委員會。
胡昭民（2007）。遊戲設計概論。博碩文化股份有限公司。
范丙林 （2005）。專題導向式網路學習社群建置---以數位遊戲設計為內容（NSC94-2511-S152-002）。行政院國家科學委員會。
孫天虹（2007）。歷史教育與電子遊戲。史轍:東吳大學歷史學系研究生學報，第三期。181-195。
陳文欽（1992）。近代電腦遊戲發展史與市場現況。倚天雜誌，54，48-72。
陳國棟（1995）。情境式多媒體輔助學習系統之發展環境。行政院國家科學委員會，計畫編號：NSC83-0111-S008-009-CL。
曾家俊（2010）。台灣鄉土史地之數位遊戲開發與成效研究。國立台南大學數位學習科技學系，碩士論文。
游光昭、蕭顯勝、蔡福興（2006）。運用線上角色扮演遊戲支援網路學習的研究。資訊科學應用期刊，2（1），119-128。
鄒景平（2005）。數位遊戲設計之教學模式建構。國立中央大學學習與教學研究所，碩士論文。
Amory, A., Naicker, K., Vincent, J., & Adams. C. (2002, December 6). The Use of Computer Games as an Educational Tool: Identification of Appropriate Game Types and Game Elements. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 311-321. doi: 10.1111/1467-8535.00121
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989, January). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher 18(1), 32-41. doi: 10.3102/0013189X018001032
Bruer, J. T. (1994). Schools for Thought: A Science of Learning in the Classroom (pp.77-79). London, England. Cambridge MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/6052.001.0001
Collins, A. (1988, January). Cognitive Apprenticeship and Instructional Technology. Technical Report No. 474. Center for the Study of Reading. BBN Labs, Inc., Cambridge, MA. University of Illinois at Urbana. Champaign.
Costikyan, G. (2002, June). I Have No Words & I Must Design: Toward a Critical Vocabulary for Games, (1). Tampere University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990, January 1). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
Durkin, K., & Barber, B. (2002, October 17). Not so Doomed: Computer Game Play and Positive Adolescent Development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 23(4):373-392. doi:10.1016/S0193-3973（02）00124-7
Gredler, M. E. (2002). Educational Games and Simulations: A Technology in Search of a (Research) Paradigm. In D. H. Jonassen （Ed.）, Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Hämäläinen, R. (2006, June 13). Designing and Evaluating Collaboration in a Virtual Game Environment for Vocational Learning. Computers & Education, 50(1), 98-109. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.04.001
Holyoak, K. J. (1991). In D. N. Osherson, & E. E. Smith (eds.), Thinking. An Invitation to Cognitive Science (Pp. 117–146). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Huizinga, J. (1938). Homo Ludens —A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Boston :The Beacon Press.
Kraft, R, J., & Sakofs, M. (1985). The Theory of Experiential Education (PP.43-44). Association for Experiential Education, Boulder, CO.
Mann, B. D., Eidelson, B. M., Fukuchi, S.G., Nissman, S.A., Robertson, S., & Jardines, L. (2002, March). The Development of an Interactive Game-Based Tool for Learning Surgical Management Algorithms via Computer. The American Journal of Surgery 183(3), 305-308. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610（02）00800-0
Norman, D. A. (1994, April 21). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. New York, Addison-Wesley. doi:10.1177/089443939501300119
Petranek, C. F., Corey, S., & Black, R. (1992, June). Three Levels of Learning in Simulations: Participating, Debriefing, and Journal Writing. Simulation & Gaming 23(2). doi: 10.1177/1046878192232005
Prensky, M. (2001, January). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants, Part II: Do They Really Think Differently? On the Horizon, NCB University Press, 9(5), pp.1-6. doi: 10.1145/950566.950567
Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2003, September 25). Rules of Play. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.
Shifroni, E., & Ginat, D. (1997, March 1). Simulation Game for Teaching Communication Protocols. Proceedings of the 28th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 1997), (pp.184-188). doi: 10.1145/268084.268152
Shih, J. –L., Chuang, C. –W., Tseng J. –J., & Shih B. -J. (2010, May 13). Designing a Role-play Game for Learning Taiwan History and Geography. The 3rd IEEE International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning. doi: 10.1109/DIGITEL.2010.27
Suomala, J. (1999). Students’ Problem Solving in the Lego/Logo Learning Environment. PhD Thesis, University of Jyvaskyla. doi:10.21061/jte.v9i2.a.4 |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 (2026-7-31以後開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit