| 摘要(英) |
With the vigorous development of the Internet and the state of one-machine for everyone,people′s learning methods have developed from physical to online, various information transmission and information transmission have become very convenient, and "online communities" have grown rapidly at a speed beyond the naked eye. As long as there is an
Internet, the transmission and reception of information are not limited by space and time, which is very convenient and real-time, which has also promoted the gradual ransformation of the community of professional practice of teachers from physical to online, and the number of community articipation members has also increased significantly.
In 2019, the coronavirus (COVID-19) was triggered, due to the increasingly serious epidemic, Taiwan entered a three-level alert state on May 15, 2021, which affected the people′s diversion to work, schools switched to online classes, etc. This article focuses on how teachers can use online teacher professional growth community practice knowledge renovation under the influence of the new crown pneumonia.
There are many studies at home and abroad that focus on the virtual online community, mainly based on its business methods and teaching content, however, there is currently no
relevant research in China on how to transform the knowledge of the online teacher professional practice community under the influence of the new crown pneumonia. This study takes a
professional growth community platform of Facebook as the main research object, the content is mainly based on the member posts on May 15, 2021 ~ February 22, 2023, during which a total of 16562 members published articles, most of which are members sharing articles, so the relevant publications related to teaching assessment, teaching design, mixed teaching, class management and homework correction correction were extracted as research values, a total of 150 member posts and 3087 member palindrome discussion strings. Through the collection,aggregation, collation of discussion strings, and observation of the research process of knowledge renewal.
The results of the study found that "homework correction" was the most important teaching issue discussed by members of the Teachers′ Professional Practice Community.
"Coming up with ideas" is the most common knowledge reinvention behavior among members of the Teacher′s Professional Practice Community.
No matter which stage, the behavior of personal motional expression and relationship management is the most obvious; The least significant part is that the first stage is mainly to supplement relevant information and continue to put forward ideas that need to be improved, the second stage is mainly to revise and ropose better ideas, continue personal emotional expression and relationship management, and the third stage is mainly to propose ideas, continue personal emotional expression and relationship management.
In the first stage, just entering the warning period, there are many questions, so the sequence of behavior of "coming up with ideas" followed by "coming up with ideas" in this stage is more significant than in the other two stages; In the second stage, members are on track and begin to organize their ideas, so the period of "coming up with ideas" followed by "integrating ideas" is more significant than the other two stages; In the third stage, the nblocking phase, members begin to propose where ideas can become better, so the sequence of behaviors in this stage of "where ideas need improvement" followed by "requiring refinement of ideas" is more significant than the other two stages. |
| 參考文獻 |
APA Work Group of the Board of Educational Affairs (1997, November). Learner－centered
psychological principles:A framework for school reform and redesign. (Rev. Ed.)
Bakeman, R. (1986). Observing interaction: an introduction to sequential analysis.
Cambridge. New York:Cambridge University Press.
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction:An introduction to sequential
analysis. Cambridge university press.
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what
they know. Harvard Business Press.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning?
Hong, H. Y., & Lin, P. Y. (2019). Elementary students enhancing their understanding of energy
－saving through idea －centered collaborative knowledge－building scaffolds and
activities. Educational technology research and development, 67, 63－83.
Hong, H. Y., Lin, P. Y., Chen, B., & Chen, N. (2019). Integrated STEM learning in an idea－
centered knowledge－building environment. The Asia－Pacific Education Researcher, 28,
63－76.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge.
Liberal education in a knowledge society, 97, 67－98.
Liu, X., Magjuka, R. J., Bonk, C. J., & Lee, S. H. (2007). Does sense of community matter? An
examination of participants′ perceptions of building learning communities in online
courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(1), 9.
Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community, revised edition:Homesteading on the electronic
frontier. MIT press.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of
knowledge. Liberal education in a knowledge society, 97, 67－98.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building environments:Extending the limits
of the possible in education and knowledge work. Encyclopedia of distributed learning,
120, 269－272.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge Building:Theory, Pedagogy,and
Technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of: The learning sciences,
97–115. Cambridge University Press.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology,
97－118.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2014). Knowledge Building and Knowledge Creation:
Theory, Pedagogy, and Technology.
Jaffee, G. (1997). Asynchronous learning: Technology and pedagogical strategy in a distance
learning course. Teaching Sociology, 25(4), 262-277.
吳清山（1992）。班級經營。臺北市：心理出版社。
余泰魁（2005）。虛擬社群線上行為模式之實證研究－線性結構模式之交叉效度檢定。交大管理學報, 25(1), 67－95.
揚智先（2006）。教師社群互動，工作希望感受與創造性轉化之關係：量化模式建構與典範案例分析。政治大學教育研究所學位論文，1－120。
毛慶禎（2007）。導論－網路社群。取自http：//blue.lins.fju.edu.tw/mao/icommunity/introduction.htm
教育部（2009）。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊。臺北市：教育部。
蔡逸勳（2011）。特殊教育教師專業學習社群初探。
htpps：//rc052.ndhu.edu.tw/var/file/89/1089/img/3403/179717062.pdf/
林維真（2012）。同步線上學習。取自： http：//terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678790/
Carl Bereiter& Marlene Scardamalia(2012)。促進學生探究與知識翻新的成功教學設計。取自： https：//kb－pedagogies.cite.hku.hk/kb－theory.php?lang=tc
王金國, & 孫台鼎（2014）。從學生的負向經驗省思合作學習的實施。臺灣教育評論月刊，3(7), 88－91.
洪煌堯、蔡佩真、林倍伊（2014）。透過知識創新教學理念與學習平臺以培養國小學生自然課合作學習與翻新想法的習慣。科學教育學刊，22(4)，413－439。
秦采帆（2015）。知識結構學習系統於翻轉教室之學習成效。﹝碩士論文。國立臺中教育大學﹞。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
取自：https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=aYBuiK/record?r1=1&h1=0
教育部（2016）。中華民國教師專業標準指引。臺北市：教育部。
PhD Thesis（2019)。從實踐中湧現的說故事專家知識─實踐社群理論觀點。National Central University.
黃萱（2019）。從實踐社群觀點探究博物館解說人員之養成：以國立自然科學博物館為例 (Doctoral dissertation, fu ren da xue bo wu guan xue yan jiu suo).
取自：https://hdl.handle.net/11296/hue74t
張明宜（2021）。臉書是促進了社會聯繫，還是讓人們愈來愈隔離？ 談社群媒體與個人的社會網絡與社會資本。
取自： https：//twstreetcorner.org/2021/09/28/ming－yi－chang/
洪國財、許菱雅、洪煌堯（2021）。國小學生集體共構達悟族大傳文化知識的知識翻新活動。教育研究月刊，32(4)，36－38。
賴俊維（2022）。在 6E 模式中使用知識翻新原則於物聯網與視覺化實作課程對高中生之學習成效及學習態度影響之研究。﹝碩士論文。國立臺灣師範大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。取自： https：//hdl.handle.net/11296/exw6ce/
陳年興、楊錦潭（2006）。數位學習理論與實務。新北市：博碩文化出版。
陳建文、馮朝進、吳姿樺（2009）。影響國中小教師線上學習滿意度因素之研究：以彰化縣 K12 數位學校為例。臺中教育大學學報，23 (2)，29-50 頁。楊家興（2006）。線上教學的理論與活動設計。國立空中大學管理與資訊學報，11(3)
，271-308 頁。
劉唯玉、鄒銘哲、陳美瑩（2021）。線上教學師生互動初探─社會臨場感觀點。教育理論與實踐學刊，44(2)，29-56 頁。
林翠雲（2015）。華語同步教學四方互動設計線上帶領策略探析－－以美國維吉尼亞大學同步課程之教學設計示例。應華學報，11(3)，39-60 頁。
李維智（2018）。Qland 多功能行動平台輔助華語遠距教學之成效。﹝碩士論文。文藻外語大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。取自： https://hdl.handle.net/11296/f67tgs/
蔡易宸（2022）。在協作知識翻新環境中培養學生自主學習能力。﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https:ps://hdl.handle.net/11296/qpj79h
張雅玲（2020）。知識翻新反思活動對學生英文寫故事之影響。﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/u5j7nz。
許菱雅（2020）。知識翻新活動融入達悟族大船文化課程教學之行動研究--以臺東縣蘭嶼鄉朗島國小六年級學生為例。﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/cq4aeu。
李依靜（2020）。基於知識翻新理論的教師共同備課平台之開發與初步評估。﹝碩士論 文。國立中央大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
https://hdl.handle.net/11296/99mhw3。
陳虹如（2020）。基於知識翻新理論的科學探究專題平台之開發與初步評估。﹝碩士論 文。國立中央大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
https://hdl.handle.net/11296/7jt3y5。
林美岐（2021）。國小教師專業學習社群運作歷程之行動研究-以「戶外教育教師專業學習社群」為例。﹝碩士論文。國立臺中教育大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/49gk28。
許詩珮（2010）。小學教師專業學習社群發展之研究－以同德國小閱讀教學教師專業學習社群為例。﹝碩士論文。國立新竹教育大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5n4qxy。
王榆蓉（2023）。跨領域教師專業學習社群共備課程研究－以在地特色主題融入國小藝術中心為例。﹝碩士論文。國立臺北教育大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 ttps://hdl.handle.net/11296/azjjz8。
朱岱英（2023）。科技壓力、專業學習社群與教師專業成長之研究 -以｢優派創新教學社群｣為例。﹝碩士論文。中國文化大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4ma8by。
王美枝（2022）。以社會網絡探究專業學習社群成員教師專業互動網絡關係之研究。 ﹝碩士論文。國立臺北教育大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/sn227q |
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 (2026-7-1以後開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit