ESG與可持續性人力資源管理的發展與實踐 -我國上市櫃電子公司個案為研究對象

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：33

、訪客IP：18.223.0.53

姓名

尤嘉鈴(Chia-Ling Yu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所在職專班

論文名稱

ESG與可持續性人力資源管理的發展與實踐 -我國上市櫃電子公司個案為研究對象
(The Development and Practice of ESG and Sustainable Human Resource Management：Based Listed Electronic Companies in Taiwan as Research Subjects)

相關論文

★ 電傳勞動者的工作與生活平衡—— COVID-19疫情期間之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究採質性研究，使用訪談、觀察與其他資料（相關文獻、ESG報告書、企業官網、公開資訊觀測站與新聞）等蒐集資料的方法，其研究目的如下：
1.梳理與探討可持續性（Sustainability）與人力資源管理的概念、發展歷程與理論基礎，透過深入研究，以能夠了解其的演變過程與理論基礎。
2.進行探究企業在支持ESG倡議推動可持續發展時所面臨的實際情況，並提出具可行性的建議。
3.進行檢視與探究企業在支持ESG倡議，公司層級的可持續發展策略，以及人力資源部門制定的策略、目標與行動之間的關聯性，並提出具可行性的建議。
本研究透過立意取樣方法選取了來自於十二家國內上市櫃的電子公司，且有意願參與研究的人力資源專業工作者或可持續發展專業工作者，以下是本研究發現結果：
1.可持續性人力資源管理（Sustainable HRM）研究主要集中在學術領域，缺乏從業人員的參與，需要具體指導與可操作性的資源。
2.推動可持續性人力資源管理（Sustainable HRM）的發展，需要組織內的跨部門合作與將可持續性（Sustainability）納入核心價值觀與經營策略。
3.人力資源專業工作者（PSP）需要發展變革管理、資料分析、策略決策與創新等能力，以支持可持續性人力資源管理（Sustainable HRM）的發展。
4.人力資源部門需明確定位在企業可持續發展中的角色，並傳達其價值與貢獻，其包括將可持續性（Sustainability）與人力資源管理實務結合，與其他部門密切合作，以支持企業可持續發展。
5.創造支持可持續發展的文化與價值觀對企業成功至關重要。領導者在塑造角色、溝通與示範方面起關鍵作用，領導者的支持與參與有助於將可持續發展價值觀融入組織與員工的日常工作。
6.企業應提供培訓與教育機會，以提升員工對可持續性（Sustainability）的認識與理解度，透過培訓與發展，激勵員工參與企業可持續發展相關的行動與創新。

摘要(英)

This research utilized qualitative methods, including interviews, observations, and analysis of relevant literature, ESG reports, corporate websites, public information disclosure platforms, and news sources. The study aimed to achieve three main objectives:
1.Establish an understanding framework of the evolution and theoretical foundations of sustainable HRM through in-depth research, thereby facilitating the application and promotion of related practices.
2.Explore the practical challenges that companies face in implementing ESG initiatives for sustainable development. The research involved a detailed investigation of 12 selected research subjects, with practical and feasible recommendations proposed accordingly.
3.Examine the interrelationships between corporate-level sustainable development strategies and the strategies, objectives, and actions of the human resources department in supporting ESG initiatives. Practical and feasible recommendations were provided based on the findings.
The research adopts a qualitative approach and interviews twelve People Strategy Professionals and Sustainability Professionals. These professionals are from publicly listed electronic companies that are actively promoting ESG practices. The study reveals the following key findings in relation to sustainability.
The research literature on sustainable HRM primarily focuses on academics and lacks input from practitioners, which can result in a lack of practicality and specific guidance in implementation. Promoting sustainable HRM requires cross-departmental collaboration, integrating sustainability into core values and strategies. People Strategy Professionals need to develop new skills like change management, data analytics, and strategic decision-making to support sustainable development.
HR departments face challenges in positioning themselves, communicating their value, and collaborating with other departments. Creating a culture that supports sustainability is crucial, with leaders playing a key role. Companies should provide training to enhance employees′ awareness and knowledge of sustainability.

關鍵字(中)

★ ESG
★ 可持續性
★ 可持續性人力資源管理

關鍵字(英)

★ ESG
★ Sustainability
★ Sustainable HRM

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
1一、緒論 1
2-1 研究背景與動機 1
2-2 研究目的與問題 5
2-3 名詞定義 6
2-4 研究步驟 7
2二、文獻探討 9
3-1 可持續性的觀點與理論 9
3-2 人力資源管理的觀點與理論 12
3-3 可持續性人力資源管理（Sustainable HRM） 14
3三、研究設計與執行 22
4-1 研究方法 22
4-2 研究對象與研究參與者選取 23
4-3 研究工具 26
4-4 研究資料蒐集 28
4-5 研究資料整理與分析 29
4-6 研究倫理與品質 33
4四、研究分析與討論 35
5-1 研究分析 35
5-2 研究討論 60
5五、研究結論 65
6-1 研究結論 65
6-2 研究建議 66
附錄一 70
附錄二 73
參考文獻 74

參考文獻

一、中文部份
〔1〕田瀨和夫，初版，〈2030永續企業革命：全方位ESG永續實戰攻略〉，商業周刊，台灣，2022。
〔2〕胡幼慧主編，〈質性研究-理論, 方法及本土女性研究實例〉，台北，巨流圖書公司，1996。
〔3〕黃天牧：專訪金管會黃天牧／加入ESG精神，推動台灣公司治理3.0。2020年1月21日，https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/76579
〔4〕黃正忠：唯有說到做到的ESG、社會與世代正義，才能真正翻轉企業與國家。2021年2月24日，https://esg.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/180688
〔5〕紐文英，三版，〈質性研究方法與論文寫作〉，台北，雙業書廊，2020。
〔6〕陳向明，〈教師如何作質的硏究〉，台北，洪葉文化事業有限公司，2002。
〔7〕蘇郁珊，「從全球報告倡議組織（GRI）指導綱要論企業社會責任之實踐與發展」，國立政治大學，碩士論文，2017。
二、英文部份
〔8〕 Aluchna, M., & Roszkowska-Menkes, M. (2019). Integrating corporate social responsibility and corporate governance at the company level. Towards a conceptual model.Engineering Economics,30(3), 349-361.
〔9〕 Aust, I. ; Matthews, Brian; Muller-Camen, Michael. Common Good HRM: A paradigm shift in Sustainable HRM?.Human Resource Management Review, 2020.
〔10〕Bogdan R, Biklen SK. Qualitative research for education. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 1997 Nov.
〔11〕Bazeley, Patricia; Richards, Lyn. The NVivo qualitative project book. Sage, 2000.
〔12〕Brown, Laura; Grundy, Tony.Value-based Human Resource Strategy. Routledge, 2012.
〔13〕Boselie, Paul. Ebook: Strategic human resource management: A balanced approach. McGraw Hill, 2014.
〔14〕Beer, M., Boselie, P., & Brewster, C. (2015). Back to the future: Implications for the field of HRM of the multistakeholder perspective proposed 30 years ago.Human Resource Management,54(3), 427-438.
〔15〕Boxall, P., Guthrie, J. P., & Paauwe, J. (2016). Editorial introduction: Progressing our understanding of the mediating variables linking HRM, employee well‐being and organisational performance. Human Resource Management Journal,26(2), 103-111.
〔16〕Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management review, 4(4), 497-505.
〔17〕Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
〔18〕Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high‐performance work practices matter? A meta‐analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel psychology,59(3), 501-528.
〔19〕Cohen, E.; Taylor, S.; Muller-Camen, M.HRM’s Role in Corporate Social and Environmental Sustainability; SHRM Report: Alexandria, VA, USA, 2012.
〔20〕Chow, W. S., & Chen, Y. (2012). Corporate sustainable development: Testing a new scale based on the mainland Chinese context.Journal of business ethics,105, 519-533.
〔21〕Corbin J & Strauss A (2015) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Fourth edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Ca.
〔22〕Druker, J., White, G., Hegewisch, A., & Mayne, L. (1996). Between hard and soft HRM: human resource management in the construction industry. Construction Management & Economics, 14(5), 405-416.
〔23〕Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions.Academy of management Journal,39(4), 802-835.
〔24〕Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability.Business strategy and the environment,11(2), 130-141.
〔25〕De Lange, W., & Koppens, J. (2007). De duurzame arbeidsorganisatie.WEKA: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
〔26〕De Prins, P., Van Beirendonck, L., De Vos, A., & Segers, J. (2014). Sustainable HRM: Bridging theory and practice through the ′Respect Openness Continuity (ROC)′-model.Management revue, 263-284.
〔27〕Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of business ethics,167, 333-360.
〔28〕Daugaard, D. (2020). Emerging new themes in environmental, social and governance investing: a systematic literature review. Accounting & Finance,60(2), 1501-1530.
〔29〕Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California management review,36(2), 90-100.
〔30〕Elkington, J. (1997). The triple bottom line. Environmental management: Readings and cases,2, 49-66.
〔31〕Ehnert, I.Sustainable Human Resource Management. A Conceptual and Exploratory Analysis from a Paradox Perspective; Physica-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009
〔32〕Ehnert, I. (2009). Sustainability and human resource management: reasoning and applications on corporate websites. European Journal of International Management, 3(4), 419-438.
〔33〕Ehnert, I. (2011). Sustainability and HRM: A model and suggestions for future research. In The Future of Employment Relations: New Paradigms, New Approaches(pp. 215-237). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
〔34〕Ehnert, I., & Harry, W. (2012). Recent developments and future prospects on sustainable human resource management: Introduction to the special issue. Management revue, 221-238.
〔35〕Ehnert, I. (2013). Paradox as a lens for theorizing sustainable HRM: Mapping and coping with paradoxes and tensions. In Sustainability and human resource management: Developing sustainable business organizations (pp. 247-271). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
〔36〕Ehnert, I. Paradox as a lens for theorizing sustainable HRM. In Sustainability and Human Resource Management: Developing Sustainable Business Organizations; Ehnert, I., Harry, W., Zink, K.J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014, 247–271.
〔37〕Ehnert, I. Sustainability and Human Resource Management Developing Sustainable Business Organizations. Springer, 2014.
〔38〕Ehnert, I., Parsa, S., Roper, I., Wagner, M., & Muller-Camen, M. (2016). Reporting on sustainability and HRM: A comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the world′s largest companies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management,27(1), 88-108.
〔39〕Freeman, R.E. Stakeholder Management: A Strategic Approach; Pitman: New York, NY, USA, 1984.
〔40〕Ferris, G. R., Barnum, D. T., Rosen, S., Holleran, L., & Dulebohn, J. H. (1995). Toward business-university partnerships in human resource management: Integration of science and practice. Handbook of human resource management, 1-13.
〔41〕Guba, E. G. (1990). The paradigm dialog. In Alternative paradigms conference, mar, 1989, indiana u, school of education, san francisco, ca, us. Sage Publications, Inc.
〔42〕Guest, D. E. (1997). Human resource management and performance: a review and research agenda. International journal of human resource management,8(3), 263-276.
〔43〕Giovannoni, E., & Fabietti, G. (2013). What is sustainability? A review of the concept and its applications. Integrated reporting: Concepts and cases that redefine corporate accountability, 21-40.
〔44〕Guerci, M., Shani, A. B., & Solari, L. (2014). A stakeholder perspective for sustainable HRM: Literature review and a research agenda. Sustainability and human resource management: Developing sustainable business organizations, 205-223.
〔45〕Harry, W. (2013). The relevance of the vision of sustainability to HRM practice. In Sustainability and Human Resource Management: Developing Sustainable Business Organizations (pp. 401-419). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
〔46〕Guest, D. E. (2017). Human resource management and employee well‐being: Towards a new analytic framework. Human resource management journal,27(1), 22-38.
〔47〕Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of management journal, 38(3), 635-672.
〔48〕Widyawati, L. (2020).A systematic literature review of socially responsible investment and environmental social governance metrics. Business Strategy and the Environment,29(2), 619-637.
〔49〕Ivo, A. M. (2006). Best perspectives to human resource management. African Centre for Community and Development.
〔50〕Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of management Journal,55(6), 1264-1294.
〔51〕Järlström, M., Saru, E., & Vanhala, S. (2018). Sustainable human resource management with salience of stakeholders: A top management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics,152, 703-724.
〔52〕Kuhn, Thomas S. The structure of scientifi revolutions. The Un of Chicago Press, 1962, 2: 90.
〔53〕Kramar, R. (2014). Beyond strategic human resource management: is sustainable human resource management the next approach?. The international journal of human resource management,25(8), 1069-1089.
〔54〕Lincoln, Yvonna S.; Guba, Egon G. Naturalistic inquiry. sage, 1985.
〔55〕Legge, Karen. Human Resource. The Oxford Handbook of Work and Organization, 2005, 220.
〔56〕Management, Work and Organisations. 1995.
〔57〕Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review,50(4); 370–96.
〔58〕Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper.
〔59〕Singh, J., McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (1997). Study guide to accompany Research in education. (No Title).
〔60〕Müller-Christ, G., & Remer, A. (1999). Umweltwirtschaft oder Wirtschaftsökologie? Vorüberlegungen zu einer Theorie des Ressourcenmanagements. Betriebliches Umweltmanagement im 21. Jahrhundert: Aspekte, Aufgaben, Perspektiven, 69-87.
〔61〕Maykut, Pamela; Morehouse, Richard.Beginning qualitative research: A philosophical and practical guide. Routledge, 2002.Moneva, J. M., Archel, P., & Correa, C. (2006, June). GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability. In Accounting forum (Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 121-137). No longer published by Elsevier.
〔62〕Mariappanadar, S. (2014). Stakeholder harm index: A framework to review work intensification from the critical HRM perspective. Human Resource Management Review,24(4), 313-329.
〔63〕Mariappanadar, S., & Kramar, R. (2014). Sustainable HRM: The synthesis effect of high performance work systems on organisational performance and employee harm. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration,6(3), 206-224.
〔64〕Mariappanadar, S. (2016). Health harm of work from the sustainable HRM perspective: Scale development and validation. International Journal of Manpower,37(6), 924-944.
〔65〕Moneva, J. M., Archel, P., & Correa, C. (2006, June). GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability. In Accounting forum (Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 121-137). No longer published by Elsevier.
〔66〕Misztal, A. (2023). Zrównoważony rozwój przedsiębiorstw, CSR i ESG w dobie kryzysu makroekonomicznego i geopolitycznego. Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie,68(2), 87-99.
〔67〕Pedersen, E. R. (2006). Making corporate social responsibility (CSR) operable: How companies translate stakeholder dialogue into practice. Business and society review,111(2), 137-163.
〔68〕Pfeffer, J. (2010). Building sustainable organizations: The human factor. Academy of management perspectives, 24(1), 34-45.
〔69〕Patton M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
〔70〕Redman & Mory: 1952, The Advanced Learner′s Dictionary of Current English, Oxford, New Delhi, p. 1069.
〔71〕Resolution, General Assembly, et al. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN Doc. A/RES/70/1 (September 25, 2015), 2015.
〔72〕Taylor, Frederick Winslow. The principles of scientific management. NuVision Publications, LLC, 1911.
〔73〕Truss, C., Gratton, L., Hope‐Hailey, V., McGovern, P., & Stiles, P. (1997). Soft and hard models of human resource management: a reappraisal. Journal of management studies,34(1), 53-73.
〔74〕Trainor, Audrey; Graue, Elizabeth (ed.). Reviewing qualitative research in the social sciences. Routledge, 2013.
〔75〕Yoshikawa, T., Nippa, M., & Chua, G. (2021). Global shift towards stakeholder-oriented corporate governance? Evidence from the scholarly literature and future research opportunities. Multinational Business Review,29(3), 321-347.
〔76〕Zaugg, R.J.; Blum, A.; Thom, N.Sustainability in Human Resource Management. Evaluation Report. Survey in European Companies and Institutions. Arbeitsbericht des Instituts für Organisation und Personal der Universität Bern und des eidgenössischen Personalamtes; IOP Press: Berne, Switzerland, 2001
〔77〕Zaugg, R.J.Sustainable HR Management: New Perspectives and Empirical Explanations; Gabler: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2009
〔78〕Ziolo, M., Filipiak, B. Z., Bąk, I., & Cheba, K. (2019). How to design more sustainable financial systems: The roles of environmental, social, and governance factors in the decision-making process. Sustainability,11(20), 5604.

指導教授

潘世偉林文政

審核日期

2024-1-29

推文