以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：58

、訪客IP：3.149.229.34

姓名	王前權(Chien-Chuan Wang)  查詢紙本館藏	畢業系所	網路學習科技研究所
論文名稱	從認知風格探討網路遊戲式英語詞彙學習之影響 (The Influences of Cognitive Styles in the Context of Online Game-based English Vocabulary Learning)
相關論文	★ 將可用性整合融入遊戲式學習 ★ 探討認知風格對於行動學習與合作學習的影響 ★ 學習型網站的可用性評估：從問題到解決方案 ★ 從人因的觀點評估遊戲式學習 ★ 探討認知風格在遊戲式學習中對於客製化與個人化系統的影響 ★ 探討認知風格在行動學習中對於客製化與個人化系統的影響 ★ 性別差異與認知風格對合作化遊戲式學習的影響 ★ 探討認知風格如何影響使用者在行動載具下使用電子期刊 ★ 探討專家和新手對遊戲式學習進行可用性評估的觀感差異 ★ 毒品經驗與遊戲先備知識對客製化與個人化遊戲式反毒宣導系統的影響 ★ 探討背景音樂和認知風格對遊戲式學習的影響 ★ 以多媒體科技和數位遊戲為小小人兒及患者家屬發展線上生活百科 ★ 先備知識對註記式多媒體電子書的影響研究：從個別環境到分享環境 ★ 從認知風格的角度探討提示對學習英文片語與文法的影響 ★ 探討先備知識對學習者在使用鷹架英文學習系統的影響: 限制與扣分機制 ★ 發展動畫電子書之研究：從性別差異到性別均等之歷程
檔案	[Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 (2029-1-23以後開放)
摘要(中)	數位遊戲式學習有許多正面的學習影響，它被廣泛地應用於英語詞彙的英語學習，因為它不僅蘊含數位學習的本質，更包含趣味與競爭等遊戲元素，能夠降低學習英語詞彙時的無趣，進而提昇學習者的積極性。因此，本研究取其優點，開發了一個網路遊戲式英語詞彙學習系統，該系統具備兩個主要的特點：(1) 藉由網路在跨平台的載具執行程式，再運用此程式產生即時回饋；(2) 採取創新的拖曳方式來輸入字母，這種方式不但可以增加趣味性，更可以讓學習者不受答題順序之限制，自由組合字母，這種自由組合與學習者的資訊組織有關，而認知風格會影響資訊組織處理的模式，不同認知風格學習者偏好使用不同方式處理資訊。由此可知，認知風格是一個影響學習的關鍵因素，因此本研究從認知風格的角度探討網路遊戲式英語詞彙學習系統的學習影響，實驗對象為桃園某大學之碩士生，研究的問題包括學習表現、學習獎勵、學習偏好、學習行為與相關性分析。 本研究的結果表示，整體型與序列型學習者在網路遊戲式英語詞彙學習系統裡有一些學習上的相似與差異。在相似的方面，他們在學習表現與學習獎勵的結果沒有顯著差異。另一方面，他們在學習行為、學習偏好與相關性分析卻出現了差異，序列型學習者的各個關卡提示總分顯著高於整體型學習者，此發現表明，序列型學習者較偏好使用鷹架提示功能。在連線遊戲方面，序列型學習者比整體型學習者更頻繁地使用中文例句提示，這表明了前者比後者更依賴中文提示。再從行為序列分析來看，整體型學習者為任務導向，針對任務的需求來選擇提示工具，在遭遇錯誤時會依當時遊戲關卡的狀況，選擇不同的提示。反之，序列型學習者集中使用提示工具，在答題錯誤超過系統的限制時，才會選擇其他提示。序列型學習者在遭遇答題的錯誤時，也傾向於選擇第一個中文提示，這項發現表明，提示的順序影響他們的選擇，而整體型的學習者則無此行為，較不受順序的影響。因此，在系統的設計方面，可以利用這個特點來安排系統的提示順序。 除此之外，過去的研究指出，整體型學習者慣於採用由上而下 (Top-down) 的模式，這是整體到局部的學習方式，序列型學習者慣於採用由下而上 (Bottom-up)的模式，這是局部到整體的學習方式。然而，本研究發現，在連線遊戲關卡，整體型學習者先選擇單字提示，這是代表局部的提示，之後他們再選擇中文例句提示，這是代表整體的提示，換句話說，他們採用局部到整體的方式。反之，序列型學習者先選擇代表整體的中文例句提示，再選擇代表局部的單字提示，採用從整體到局部的方式。更具體地說，整體型與序列型學習者在新的網路遊戲環境互動時，改變了慣用的學習方式。在相關性分析方面，學習者若是使用較少字首字尾提示，則遊戲分數較高，反之，學習者若是使用較多字首字尾提示，則遊戲分數較低。另一方面，學習者使用越多的語音提示，則花費的遊戲時間也越多。除此之外，整體型的學習者使用越多的中文提示，花費的遊戲時間則越久，但並非每次遊戲的中文提示都有顯著正相關，序列型的學習者，使用中文提示次數與遊戲時間沒有顯著的相關性。 總而言之，這項研究的實驗有助於更深入地瞭解不同認知風格在學習英語詞彙的學習行為與學習偏好，進而對於改善學習方式有所幫助。因此，本研究的貢獻在於，對於研究者、系統設計者與教育界的師生們，在不同認知風格的英語詞彙學習方面有更全面地瞭解，進而促進網路遊戲式英語詞彙學習的發展。
摘要(英)	Digital game-based learning has many positive impacts because it not only contains the essence of digital learning, but also has the game elements, such as fun and competition, thereby reducing the boredom of learning English vocabulary and hence improving learners’ motivation. Therefore, digital game-based learning is widely used to support English learning, especially English vocabulary. Therefore, this study takes its advantages and proposed an online game-based English vocabulary learning system. This system has two major features: (1) carrying out the program via Internet to have an instant feedback; (2) adopting an innovative method by dragging each alphabetic letter as an input for a new word, which can not only increase the fun, but also allow learners to freely combine letters without being restricted by the sequence when answering questions. This free combination is related to the learners’ abilities in organizing information, and the process of organizing information is linked to the individuals’ cognitive styles. Learners with different cognitive styles tend to process information in different ways. Furthermore, if the system can provide suitable scaffolding instruction according to different learners′ information processing approaches, it will help learners overcome learning obstacles and improve learning effectiveness. Therefore, cognitive style is a key factor affecting student learning. Given the critical influences of cognitive styles and the lack of literature examining the impacts of cognitive style on game-based English vocabulary learning, there is a need to fill this research gap. More specifically, this study utilizes this system for an empirical study. The experimental subjects are master students from a university in Taoyuan. The impact of the online game-based English vocabulary learning system is explored from a cognitive style perspective, including learning performance, learning rewards, learning preferences, learning behaviors and the analysis of its correlation. According to the results of this study, there were some similarities and differences between holists and serialists when they interacted with the online game-based English vocabulary learning system. In the aspects of similarities, holists and serialists demonstrated similar learning performance and learning rewards. On the other hand, in the aspects of differences between these two cognitive styles, serialists obtained significantly higher hint scores at each level than holists. This finding suggested that serialists preferred to use the scaffolding hints. In the connecting game, serialists more frequently used Chinese sentence hints than holists, which indicates that the former depend more on Chinese hints than the latter. In addition, results from the lag sequential analysis showed that holists were task-oriented and selected the hints according to the needs of the task. When encountering an error, holists selected different hints based on the game level at that time. In contrast, serialists used hints intensively, selecting other options only when their errors to the questions exceeded the allowed limits. Serialists also tended to select the first Chinese hints when they gave wrong answers. This finding suggested that the order of the hint affected the choices of serialists whereas holists did not exhibit this behavior. Therefore, such findings can be used to arrange the hint order based on the learners’ preference. Furthermore, the results also showed that learners may change their original learning approaches when facing new learning environments. For example, in online game levels, holists firstly chose word hints and then to choose Chinese example sentence hints. In other words, they started from a small scope. Conversely, serialists first chose Chinese example sentence hints, and then to choose single-word hints. In other words, they started from a large scope. More specifically, holists tended to use a top-down learning approach whereas serialist preferred to use a bottom-up learning approach. However, holists and serialists changed their habitual way of learning when interacting with a new online game environment. In terms of correlation analysis, learners who used fewer initial and final letter hints tended to achieve higher game scores; conversely, those who used more initial and final letter hints tended to have lower game scores. On the other hand, learners who used more voice hints tend to spend more time playing the game. Additionally, holists who used more Chinese hints tended to spend a longer time on the game. However, not every instance of using Chinese hints in the game showed a significant positive correlation. For serialists, there is no significant correlation between the frequency of using Chinese hints and the game duration.　 All in all, this study can help to gain a deeper understanding of the learning behaviors and learning preferences of different cognitive style groups in learning English vocabulary, thus helpful in improving the learning approaches. Therefore, the contribution of this study is to provide researchers, system designers, teachers, and students with a more comprehensive understanding of English vocabulary learning for learners with different cognitive styles, thereby promoting the development of online game-based English vocabulary learning.
關鍵字(中)	★ 英語學習 ★ 詞彙學習 ★ 網路遊戲式學習 ★ 認知風格	關鍵字(英)	★ English learning ★ vocabulary learning ★ online game-based learning ★ cognitive style
論文目次	摘要 i ABSTRACT iii 致謝 vi 目錄 viii 圖目錄 x 表目錄 xi 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 背景 1 1.2 研究目的 6 1.3 研究章節介紹 7 1.4 結論 8 第二章 文獻探討 9 2.1 學習英語與詞彙的重要性 9 2.2 數位遊戲式學習 11 2.3 個體差異中的認知風格 14 2.4 結論 19 第三章 系統設計與實作 20 3.1 拼字遊戲與IZHN連線遊戲 20 3.2 系統特色 23 第四章 研究方法 26 4.1 前言 26 4.2 實驗對象 27 4.3 學習偏好認知風格量表 27 4.4 實驗流程 27 4.5 資料分析 28 第五章 結果與討論 30 5.1 學習表現 30 5.2 學習獎勵 31 5.3 學習偏好 32 5.4 提示次數、遊戲分數及遊戲時間的相關性 34 5.5 學習行為 41 第六章 結論 54 6.1 主要結論 54 6.2 研究結果框架 58 6.3 限制與未來展望 60 參考文獻 61
參考文獻	Abdullah Alhebshi, A., & Gamlo, N. (2022). The effects of mobile game-based learning on Saudi EFL foundation year students’ vocabulary acquisition. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 13. Adams, C. (2017). The Disadvantages of Using Games As a Learning Tool. 2017. Retrieved from https://itstillworks.com/12328164/the-disadvantages-of-using-games-as-a-learning-tool Afzal, N. (2019). A study on vocabulary-learning problems encountered by BA English majors at the university level of education. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 10. Alamr, A. S. (2019). Digital games and English as Foreign Language (EFL) learning in tertiary education in Saudi Arabia (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), University of Wollongong, Australia. https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses1/631 Allinson, C. W., & Hayes, J. (1996). The cognitive style index: A measure of intuition‐analysis for organizational research. Journal of Management studies, 33(1), 119-135. Andreani, W., & Ying, Y. (2019). " PowPow" interactive game in supporting English vocabulary learning for elementary students. Procedia Computer Science, 157, 473-478. Anggraini, N. (2020). STRATEGIES IN LEARNING VOCABULARY USED BY STUDENTS IN MA AL-MA’ARIF TULUNGAGUNG (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang). Aprilani, D. N. (2021). Students′ Perception in Learning English Vocabulary through Quizlet. Journal of English Teaching, 7(3), 343-353. Bai, Z. (2018). An analysis of English vocabulary learning strategies. Journal of language Teaching and Research, 9(4), 849-855. Basoglu, E. B., & Akdemir, O. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students′ English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(3), 1-7. Bergman, N., & Svensson, E. (2021). The effect of gender on English as L2 learning motivation. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1518055&dswid=8334 Bocchi, A., Giancola, M., Piccardi, L., Palmiero, M., Nori, R., & D’Amico, S. (2018). How would you describe a familiar route or put in order the landmarks along it? It depends on your cognitive style!. Experimental Brain Research, 236, 3121-3129. Cárdenas-Moncada, C., Véliz-Campos, M., & Véliz, L. (2020). Game-based student response systems: The impact of Kahoot in a Chilean vocational higher education EFL classroom. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ), 21(1), 64-78. Chang, H. Y., Lin, H. C., Wu, T. T., & Huang, Y. M. (2019, April). The influence of interactive art of visual music on the creativity of science and engineering students. In 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1087-1092). IEEE. Chen, C. H., Shih, C. C., & Law, V. (2020). The effects of competition in digital game-based learning (DGBL): a meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1855-1873. Chen, M. R. A., & Hwang, G. J. (2022). Effects of experiencing authentic contexts on English speaking performances, anxiety and motivation of EFL students with different cognitive styles. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(9), 1619-1639. Chen, S. Y., & Lin, G. L. (2022). An investigation of the virtual competitive scaffolding assistant: a prior knowledge perspective. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1-12. Chen, S. Y., & Tseng, Y. F. (2021). The impacts of scaffolding e-assessment English learning: A cognitive style perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(8), 1105-1127. Chen, S. Y., & Tseng, Y. F. (2022). An investigation of the effects of scaffolding task-based English logic learning: A cognitive style approach. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(15), 1389-1398. Chen, S. Y., & Yeh, C. C. (2017). The effects of cognitive styles on the use of hints in academic English: A learning analytics approach. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 251-264. Chen, S. Y., Chang, C. H., Yang, T. C., & Wang, J. H. (2018). An investigation of the development of an animated E-book: A gender difference approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 28-36. Chen, Z. H., Chen, S. Y., & Chien, C. H. (2017). Students’ reactions to different levels of game scenarios: A cognitive style approach. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 69-77. Chen, Z. H., Lu, H. D., & Lu, C. H. (2019). The effects of human factors on the use of avatars in game-based learning: Customization vs. non-customization. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4-5), 384-394. Cheng, C. Y., Chen, J. M., & Chen, S. Y. (2021). The influences of academic emotion and prior knowledge in the context of online tests. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-16. Clewley, N., Chen, S. Y., & Liu, X. (2009, October). Cognitive styles and web-based instruction: field dependent/independent vs. holist/serialist. In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (pp. 2074-2079). IEEE. Clewley, N., Chen, S. Y., & Liu, X. (2010). Cognitive styles and search engine preferences: Field dependence/independence vs holism/serialism. Journal of Documentation, 66(4), 585-603. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of educational technology systems, 49(1), 5-22. Djelal, M., Dafri, H., & Chaira, F. (2022). Gender and language learning motivation. http://bib.univ-oeb.dz:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/13513 Dochy, F. J., Moerkerke, G., & Martens, R. (1996). Integrating assessment, learning and instruction: Assessment of domain-specific and domaintranscending prior knowledge and progress. Studies in educational evaluation, 22(4), 309-339. Dung, D. T. H. (2020). The advantages and disadvantages of virtual learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 10(3), 45-48. Elgort, I., & Nation, P. (2010). Vocabulary learning in a second language: Familiar answers to new questions. Conceptualising ‘learning’in applied linguistics, 89-104. Fithriani, R. (2021). The utilization of mobile-assisted gamification for vocabulary learning: Its efficacy and perceived benefits. Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ), 22(3), 146-163. Ford, N. (1985). Learning styles and strategies of postgraduate students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 65-77. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423(6939), 534-537. Hadwen-Bennett, A., & Economou, D. (2019, June). Adaptive Hypermedia Driven Serious Game Design and Cognitive Style in School Settings: An Exploratory Study. In International Conference on Immersive Learning (pp. 144-157). Springer, Cham. Hao, K. C., & Lee, L. C. (2021). The development and evaluation of an educational game integrating augmented reality, ARCS model, and types of games for English experiment learning: an analysis of learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1101-1114. Hawlitschek, A., & Joeckel, S. (2017). Increasing the effectiveness of digital educational games: The effects of a learning instruction on students’ learning, motivation and cognitive load. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 79-86. Holzman, P. S., & Klein, G. S. (1954). Cognitive system-principles of leveling and sharpening: Individual differences in assimilation effects in visual time-error. The Journal of Psychology, 37(1), 105-122. Hsieh, C. W., & Chen, S. Y. (2016). A cognitive style perspective to handheld devices: customization vs. personalization. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(1), 1-22. Hsu, C. C. (2022). Applying Digital Game-based Learning in Elementary English Learning: The Moderating Roles of Face and Self-Esteem. Hwang, G. H., Chen, B., & Chen, S. P. (2023). Impacts of digital game-based flipped teaching approach on learning effectiveness of the students with different prior knowledge levels. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-18. Ilyosovna, N. A. (2020). The importance of English language. International Journal on Orange Technologies, 2(1), 22-24. Jhan, Y. C., Luarn, P., & Lin, H. W. (2022). Individual differences in digital game-based supply chains management learning: Evidence from higher vocational education in Taiwan. Sustainability, 14(8), 4614. Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (2012). Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. Routledge. Junttila, K., Smolander, A. R., Karhila, R., Giannakopoulou, A., Uther, M., Kurimo, M., & Ylinen, S. (2022). Gaming enhances learning-induced plastic changes in the brain. Brain and Language, 230, 105124. Kagan, J. (1965). Reflection-impulsivity and reading ability in primary grade children. Child development, 609-628. Kaufhold, J. A. (2007). Basic Statistics for Education Research. iUniverse. Kennedy, G., Coffrin, C., De Barba, P., & Corrin, L. (2015, March). Predicting success: how learners′ prior knowledge, skills and activities predict MOOC performance. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 136-140). Kirschner, P. A. (2017). Stop propagating the learning styles myth. Computers & Education, 106, 166-171. Klimova, B., & Pikhart, M. (2019). Cognitive and applied linguistics aspects of using social media: the impact of the use of Facebook on developing writing skills in learning English as a foreign language. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(1), 110-118. López-Fernández, D., Gordillo, A., Alarcón, P. P., & Tovar, E. (2021). Comparing traditional teaching and game-based learning using teacher-authored games on computer science education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 64(4), 367-373. Malcik, M., & Miklosikova, M. (2017). Learning Styles of Students as a Factor Affecting Pedagogical Activities of a University Teacher. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(2). Nartiningrum, N., & Nugroho, A. (2020). Online learning amidst global pandemic: EFL students’ challenges, suggestions, and needed materials. ENGLISH FRANCA: Academic journal of English language and education, 4(2), 115-140. Nedeva, V., Dimova, E., & Dineva, S. (2010). Overcome disadvantages of E-learning for training English as foreign language. University of Bucharest and University of Medicine and Pharmacy Târgu-Mures, 275-281. Nenakhova, E. (2021). Distance Learning Practices on the Example of Second Language Learning during Coronavirus Epidemic in Russia. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 807-826. Nguyen, H. U. N., & Duong, L. N. T. (2021). The challenges of e-learning through Microsoft Teams for EFL students at Van Lang University in COVID-19. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 12(4), 18-29. Nugroho, A., & Atmojo, A. E. P. (2020). Digital learning of English beyond classroom: EFL learners’ perception and teaching activities. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 7(2), 219-243. Nurchintyawati, I. (2022). Android Based Educational Game in Learning and Teaching English Vocabulary. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 13-18. Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of a game-based learning approach in modifying students′ behavioural outcomes and competence, in an introductory programming course. A case study in Greece. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 10(3), 235-250. Park, J., Kim, S., Kim, A., & Mun, Y. Y. (2019). Learning to be better at the game: Performance vs. completion contingent reward for game-based learning. Computers & Education, 139, 1-15. Pask, G. (1979). Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128-148 Pavita, M. D. A., & Nirmala, D. N. (2021). Merdeka Belajar in Pandemic: Using Quizizz Game Based Learning To Improve Students’ Vocabulary Mastery. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 5(1), 221-227. Prensky, M. (2001). Fun, play and games: What makes games engaging. Digital game-based learning, 5(1), 5-31. Proulx, J. N., Romero, M., & Arnab, S. (2017). Learning mechanics and game mechanics under the perspective of self-determination theory to foster motivation in digital game-based learning. Simulation & Gaming, 48(1), 81–97. Qunfei, X., Abdullah, N., & Mustapha, S. M. (2020). The Influencing Factors and Incentive Measures of College Students’ Online English Learning Motivation. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 15(2), 74-81. Rao, P. S. (2019). The importance of English in the modern era. Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research (AJMR), 8(1), 7-19. Rintaningrum, R. (2018). Investigating Reasons Why Listening in English is Difficult: Voice from Foreign. Asian EFL Journal, 20(11), 6-15. Rojabi, A. R., Setiawan, S., Munir, A., Purwati, O., Safriyani, R., Hayuningtyas, N., ... & Amumpuni, R. S. (2022, September). Kahoot, is it fun or unfun? Gamifying vocabulary learning to boost exam scores, engagement, and motivation. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 7, p. 939884). Frontiers. Shabihi, N., Taghiyareh, F., & Faridi, M. H. (2018, October). The Relationship Between Gender and Game Dynamics in e-Learning Environment: An Empirical Investigation. In European Conference on Games Based Learning (pp. 574-XXIII). Academic Conferences International Limited. Simonsmeier, B. A., Flaig, M., Deiglmayr, A., Schalk, L., & Schneider, M. (2022). Domain-specific prior knowledge and learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist, 57(1), 31-54. Tai, T. Y., Chen, H. H. J., & Todd, G. (2022). The impact of a virtual reality app on adolescent EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 892-917. Tang, S., Hanneghan, M., & El Rhalibi, A. (2009). Introduction to games-based learning. In Games-based learning advancements for multi-sensory human computer interfaces: Techniques and effective practices (pp. 1-17). IGI Global. Trisna, B. N., Budayasa, I. K., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2018). Students’ metacognitive activities in solving the combinatorics problem: The experience of students with holist-serialist cognitive style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1), 012072. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012072 Tsai, C. C. (2020). The effects of augmented reality to motivation and performance in EFL vocabulary learning. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 987-1000. Tsai, M. C., & Lin, H. C. K. (2017, September). A Study on the Behavioral Patterns Formed by Subjects with Different Cognitive Styles in Playing Augmented Reality Interaction Games. In International Symposium on Emerging Technologies for Education (pp. 372-381). Springer, Cham. Wang, L., & Dai, J. (2021). Economic Effect of Language Ability on Income and Employment: The Evidence from China. International Journal of Business and Management, 16(2). Webb, J., & Tezza, D. (2021, November). Exploring Drag-and-Drop User Interfaces for Programming Drone Flights. In HCI International 2021-Late Breaking Posters: 23rd HCI International Conference, HCII 2021, Virtual Event, July 24–29, 2021, Proceedings, Part I (pp. 191-196). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Wichadee, S., & Pattanapichet, F. (2018). Enhancement of performance and motivation through application of digital games in an English language class. Teaching English with Technology, 18(1), 77-92. Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Fattuson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., & Karp, S. A. (1962). Psychological differentiation: Studies of development. Wu, T. T. (2018). Improving the effectiveness of English vocabulary review by integrating ARCS with mobile game‐based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 315-323. Wu, T. T., & Huang, Y. M. (2017). A mobile game-based English vocabulary practice system based on portfolio analysis. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 265-277. Xu, Z., Chen, Z., Eutsler, L., Geng, Z., & Kogut, A. (2020). A scoping review of digital game-based technology on English language learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 877-904. Yang, J. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2020). An investigation of game behavior in the context of digital game-based learning: An individual difference perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, 106432. Yang, J. C., & Quadir, B. (2018). Effects of prior knowledge on learning performance and anxiety in an English learning online role-playing game. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 174-185. Yang, J. C., Quadir, B., & Chen, N. S. (2016). Effects of the badge mechanism on self-efficacy and learning performance in a game-based English learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(3), 371-394. Yang, T. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2020). Investigating students’ online learning behavior with a learning analytic approach: field dependence/independence vs. holism/serialism. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-19. Yang, T. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2023). Investigating students’ online learning behavior with a learning analytic approach: Field dependence/independence vs. holism/serialism. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 1041-1059. Yanti, A. W., Kusaeri, K., & Kustianingsih, M. (2020). Profile of cybernetic thinking of students in Mathematical problem solving based on serialist and holist thinking style. JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika), 4(2), 122-132. Yusoff, Z. S., Gurmani, M. T. A., Sanif, S., & Noor, S. N. F. M. (2022). The Effect of Mobile-Assisted CEFR English Vocabulary Profile Word Lists on L2 Students’ Vocabulary Knowledge. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(2), 526-543. Zhang, M., Wang, X., Wang, F., & Liu, H. (2020). Effect of cognitive style on language control during joint language switching: An ERP study. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 49, 383-400. Zhonggen, Y. (2018). Comparative effectiveness between game-enhanced and pencil-and-paper English vocabulary learning approaches. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations (IJGCMS), 10(2), 1-20. 林思吟. (2016). 淺談差異化教學. 臺灣教育評論月刊, 5(3), 118-123. 高子珺. (2019). 十二年國教教師必修學分—差異化教學之初探. 臺灣教育評論月刊, 8(5), 171-176. 莊宗嚴, 陶淑瑗, & 蘇漢斌. (2018). 探討相異認知風格學習者對於數位遊戲介面元素之偏好. 數位學習科技期刊, 10(3), 21-47. 曾毓棻, 王振漢, & 陳攸華. (2018). 認知風格對英語寫作邏輯訓練系統之使用. 國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報, 14(1), 45-55. 曾毓棻. (2018).從認知風格的角度探討數位工具對學術英語學習之影響.http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw:88/thesis/view_etd.asp?URN=105524014&fileName=GC105524014.pdf 褚麗絹、黃剛銘、蔡坤哲、Chu, Li-chuan、Huang, Kang-ming、Tsai, Kun-che (民93)，網路虛擬社群激勵機制之研究，出版與管理研究，1:1卷頁61-78。
指導教授	陳攸華(Sherry Y. Chen)	審核日期	2024-1-27
推文	facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu
網路書籤	Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare