職業噪音暴露對人體健康影響研究-以玻璃纖維工廠為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：58

、訪客IP：3.15.221.138

姓名

廖芳儀(Fang-Yi Liao) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

環境工程研究所在職專班

論文名稱

職業噪音暴露對人體健康影響研究-以玻璃纖維工廠為例

相關論文

★ Advanced Wastewater Analysis: AI-Integrated Flow Injection Analysis (FIA) System for COD Online Monitoring	★ 電混凝法應用於金屬表面處理廢水對於處理效率的影響
★ 聚乳酸塑膠在環境水體中的老化及重金屬吸附之探討	★ 化學回收廢棄聚乳酸(PLA) 及製備聚氨酯材料
★ 錳改質牡蠣殼固定土壤中鎘和銅之研究	★ 反向電透析(RED)產電效能評估 -以濃度、流速、膜對數及流道厚度為操作參數
★ 以反向電透析(RED)系統產電並去除氨氮	★ 比較電動堆高機語音式、間歇式、寬頻式警報裝置對作業場所工作者之安全效用探討，以C 造紙廠為例
★ 煅燒條件對牡蠣殼抗菌能力之影響及抗菌物種- 單線態氧的檢測	★ 臺灣石門水庫及入庫河川表層水中微型塑膠時空分佈、組成與相關性調查
★ Feasibility Study of Lanthanum-Modified Calcined Oyster Shells for Phosphorus Removal from Aquatic Environments	★ 氮改質煅燒牡蠣殼提升水中亞甲基藍染料吸附和光催化降解之研究
★ 桃園市三合一生質能中心提升一般廢棄物清除處理效能之研究	★ 耐熱型聚乳酸與非耐熱型聚乳酸塑膠回收再利用過程之特性研究
★ 台灣石門水庫之表層、中層水與下游飲用水廠中微型塑膠之時空分佈、組成與相關性	★ 桌上型能量分散式X射線螢光光譜儀(ED XRF)分析製程廢液之銅、鎳濃度方法開發

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2025-8-14以後開放)

摘要(中)

噪音暴露導致的聽力損失，已經是一個全球性的問題，在現今社會噪音也被列為是其中一項嚴重公害，除了平時儘量減少在高噪音場所活動來保護聽力外，當工作環境充斥噪音時，企業雇主應提供良好的防護措施，以保障員工健康。本研究以玻璃纖維相關製品工廠做為研究對象，針對噪音區域作業人員進行調查，以作業環境監測報告、歷年體檢資料與問卷三方面進行調查及分析，以了解玻璃纖維工廠噪音暴露實況。
研究結果顯示，全廠在噪音作業區工作的員工大部分皆以達到輕度聽力損失的程度，尤其以編織課的聽損失最為嚴重，已經有40 dB的聽力損失情形。彙整各噪音作業區分析結果後得到以下幾個結論：
1.暴露在噪音作業場所時間越長，接收到的暴露劑量越多，風險越大。
2.防音防護具配戴與否，確實會影響聽力損失的情況及嚴重度。
3.血壓與噪音暴露無直接明確的關係。
4.教育訓練的實施，與員工對危害認知有一定程度的關係。
未來建議尋找新的機械設備進行替換，改善機械設備因老舊造成的異音，若無法進行設備更換，建議設置隔音牆、隔音棉等加強製程隔音，才能有效將人員暴露降到最低，進而保障員工健康，達到永續經營的目的。

摘要(英)

Hearing loss caused by noise exposure has been a global problemand become one of the public severe hazards. In addition to minimizing activities in high-noise places to protect hearing, when the working environment is full of noise, business employers should provide reasonable protective measures to protect employees′ health. This study focused on a glass fiber-related product factory and investigated the noise exposure of workers in designated noisy areas. It involved conducting surveys and analyses based on operational environmental monitoring reports, historical physical examination data over the years, and questionnaires. The aim is to understand the actual situation of noise exposure in the fiberglass factory.
The research results showed that most of the employees working in the noisy work area of the factory have achieved mild hearing loss, especially in the knitting class, where the hearing loss is the most serious, with a hearing loss of 40 dB. After collecting the analysis results of each noise operation area, the following conclusions are drawn:
1. The longer the exposure time in the noisy workplace, the greater the exposure dose received and the greater the risk.
2. Whether the soundproof protective gear is worn or not will indeed affect the condition and severity of hearing loss.
3. There is no direct and clear relationship between blood pressure and noise exposure.
4. The implementation of education and training has a certain degree of relationship with employees′ perception of hazards.
In the future, it is recommended to find new mechanical equipment for replacement to improve the abnormal sound caused by old mechanical equipment. If the equipment cannot be replaced, it is recommended to install sound insulation walls, sound insulation cotton, etc. to strengthen the sound insulation of the process, so as to effectively minimize personnel exposure and ensure Employees are healthy and achieve the goal of sustainable operation.

關鍵字(中)

★ 噪音暴露
★ 玻璃纖維工廠
★ 聽力保護
★ 健康影響

關鍵字(英)

★ noise exposure
★ fiberglass factories
★ hearing protection
★ health effects

論文目次

目錄
摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
目錄 IV
圖目錄 VI
表目錄 VIII
第一章　前言 1
1-1研究背景 1
1-2研究動機與目的 1
1-3本研究的原創性與重要性 2
第二章　文獻回顧 3
2-1聲音與噪音： 3
2-2噪音對人體的影響 7
2-3噪音相關法規 10
2-4噪音的量測 10
2-5 聽力保護計畫： 17
2-6噪音監測及暴露評估： 17
2-7噪音危害控制： 17
2-8防音防護具之選用及配戴： 19
2-9聽力保護教育訓練： 19
2-10健康檢查及管理： 19
2-11改善及成效評估： 22
2-12玻璃纖維的歷史與特性 22
2-13過去相關研究 25
第三章　研究方法 27
3-1研究架構與流程 27
3-2 辨識噪音暴露區域及風險分級 27
3-3 繪製噪音分布圖 29
3-4 進行噪音檢測及檢測方法 30
3-5 資料蒐集 31
3-6 問卷調查 31
3-7 彙整並分析結果 32
第四章　結果與討論 33
4-1 辨識噪音暴露區域及風險分級： 33
4-2 噪音檢測結果 39
4-3 體檢資料分析 49
4-4 問卷調查分析 62
第五章　結論與建議 74
5-1結論 74
5-2建議 74
參考文獻 76

參考文獻

參考文獻
1. Buksh, N., et al., Occupational noise exposure and its impact on worker’s health and activities. International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences, 2018. 5(2): p. 180-195.
2. Flamme, G.A., et al., Typical noise exposure in daily life. Int J Audiol, 2012. 51 Suppl 1(0 1): p. S3-11.
3. 張永達、呂廷威, 耳朵的構造. 國立臺灣科學教育館.
4. 長庚耳鼻喉部, 耳科衛教教材. 2011.
5. 黃乾全、董貞吟, 工程小叢書-噪音振動. 民國93年7月, 台北縣: 財團法人中興工程科技研究發展基金會.
6. Geravandi, S., et al., Noise pollution and health effects. Jundishapur Journal of Health Sciences, 2015. 7(1).
7. Manci, K.M. and N.E.R. Center, Effects of Aircraft Noise and Sonic Booms on Domestic Animals and Wildlife: A Literature Synthesis. 1988: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Ecology Research Center.
8. Berglund, B., Community Noise : document prepared for the World Health Organization. 1995: Center for Sensory Research.
9. Goetsch, D.L., Occupational Safety and Health for Technologists, Engineers and Managers Eighth Edition Global Edition by David L. Goetsch.
10. 張大元, 噪音暴露對勞工聽力的影響. 環保資訊月刊, 2016. 第218期.
11. 行政院環境保護署, 噪音管制法. 民國110年1月20日修正.
12. 邱銘杰、張英俊、葉隆吉、藍天雄, 噪音控制技術與原理. 2006年12月, 台北縣: 博碩文化股份有限公司.
13. 陳淨修, 物理性作業環境測定. 2013年7月25日, 新北市: 新文京開發.
14. Organization)., W.W.H., The cronicle of the WHO. 1947. Vol. 1.
15. Attarchi, M.S., Y. Labbafinejad, and S. Mohammadi, Contemporary exposure to cigarette smoke and noise of automobile manufacturing company workers. Journal of Public Health, 2010. 18(3): p. 245-249.
16. Basner, M., U. Müller, and E.M. Elmenhorst, Single and combined effects of air, road, and rail traffic noise on sleep and recuperation. Sleep, 2011. 34(1): p. 11-23.
17. Chen, S., et al., Noise exposure in occupational setting associated with elevated blood pressure in China. BMC Public Health, 2017. 17(1): p. 107.
18. Banerjee, D., Association between transportation noise and cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies among adult populations from 1980 to 2010. Indian J Public Health, 2014. 58(2): p. 84-91.
19. Concha-Barrientos, M., et al., Occupational noise : assessing the burden of disease from work-related hearing impairment at national and local levels / Marisol Concha-Barrientos, Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum, Kyle Steenland. 2004, World Health Organization: Geneva.
20. Münzel, T., et al., Cardiovascular effects of environmental noise exposure. European heart journal, 2014. 35(13): p. 829-836.
21. Münzel, T., et al., Environmental stressors and cardio-metabolic disease: part II–mechanistic insights. European heart journal, 2017. 38(8): p. 557-564.
22. King, R.P. and J.R. Davis, Community noise: health effects and management. International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 2003. 206(2): p. 123-131.
23. Chang, T.-Y., et al., Occupational noise exposure and incident hypertension in men: a prospective cohort study. American journal of epidemiology, 2013. 177(8): p. 818-825.
24. Selander, J., et al., Joint effects of job strain and road-traffic and occupational noise on myocardial infarction. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 2013: p. 195-203.
25. Sørensen, M., et al., Road traffic noise and incident myocardial infarction: a prospective cohort study. PloS one, 2012. 7(6): p. e39283.
26. Organization, W.H., Burden of disease from environmental noise: Quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe. 2011: World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.
27. Zamanian, Z., et al., Investigation of the effect of occupational noise exposure on blood pressure and heart rate of steel industry workers. J Environ Public Health, 2013. 2013: p. 256060.
28. Loukzadeh, Z., et al., Effect of exposure to a mixture of organic solvents on hearing thresholds in petrochemical industry workers. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol, 2014. 26(77): p. 235-43.
29. 勞動部職業安全衛生署, 職業性聽力損失診斷認定參考指引. 民國108年9月修訂.
30. Bluhm, G.L., et al., Road traffic noise and hypertension. Occupational and environmental medicine, 2007. 64(2): p. 122-126.
31. Chang, T.Y., et al., Road traffic noise frequency and prevalent hypertension in Taichung, Taiwan: a cross-sectional study. Environ Health, 2014. 13(1): p. 37.
32. 勞動部職業安全衛生署, 四種物理性危害認定參考指引. 民國108年: 勞動及職業安全衛生研究季刊.
33. McNamee, R., et al., Occupational noise exposure and ischaemic heart disease mortality. Occupational and environmental medicine, 2006. 63(12): p. 813-819.
34. Virkkunen, H., T. Kauppinen, and L. Tenkanen, Long-term effect of occupational noise on the risk of coronary heart disease. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 2005: p. 291-299.
35. Selander, J., et al., Long-term exposure to road traffic noise and myocardial infarction. Epidemiology, 2009: p. 272-279.
36. Willich, S.N., et al., Noise burden and the risk of myocardial infarction. European heart journal, 2006. 27(3): p. 276-282.
37. Sørensen, M., et al., Road traffic noise and stroke: a prospective cohort study. European heart journal, 2011. 32(6): p. 737-744.
38. Buxton, O.M., et al., Adverse metabolic consequences in humans of prolonged sleep restriction combined with circadian disruption. Science translational medicine, 2012. 4(129): p. 129ra43-129ra43.
39. Taheri, S., et al., Short sleep duration is associated with reduced leptin, elevated ghrelin, and increased body mass index. PLoS medicine, 2004. 1(3): p. e62.
40. Said, M. and O. Ahmed, Effect of noise stress on cardiovascular system in adult male albino rat: Implication of stress hormones, endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress. Vol. 35. 2016.
41. Yaghoubi, K., et al., The effect of occupational noise exposure on systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and salivary cortisol level among automotive assembly workers. Int J Occup Saf Ergon, 2021. 27(1): p. 8-13.
42. Basner, M., U. Müller, and B. Griefahn, Practical guidance for risk assessment of traffic noise effects on sleep. Applied Acoustics, 2010. 71(6): p. 518-522.
43. Knipschild, P., VI. Medical effects of aircraft noise: general practice survey. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 1977. 40(3): p. 191-6.
44. Öhrström, E., Sleep disturbance, psycho-social and medical symptoms—A pilot survey among persons exposed to high levels of road traffic noise. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1989. 133(1): p. 117-128.
45. 余仁方, 你的聽力受損了嗎?（原書名：別讓噪音謀殺你的聽力）. Vol. 第二版. 2017年10月, 台北市: 新自然助主義、幸福綠光股份有限公司.
46. Fada, P. and A. Osisanya, Effects of industrial noise pollution on the auditory performance and health Status of industrial workers in Oluyole Industrial Estate, Ibadan, Nigeria. 2017.
47. 勞動部職業安全衛生署, 職業安全衛生法. 民國108年5月15日修正.
48. 勞動部職業安全衛生署, 職業安全衛生法施行細則. 民國109年2月27日修正.
49. 勞動部職業安全衛生署, 職業安全衛生法設施規則. 民國109年3月2日修正.
50. 勞動部職業安全衛生署, 勞工作業環境監測實施辦法. 民國105年11月2日修正.
51. 勞動部職業安全衛生署, 勞工健康保護規則. 民國106年11月12日修正.
52. 蔡國隆、王光賢、涂聰賢, 聲學原理與噪音量測控制. Vol. 第四版. 2016年8月, 新北市: 全華圖書股份有限公司.
53. 蘇德勝, 噪音原理及控制. 民國80年9月, 台北市: 臺隆書店.
54. 許定華, 具定位功能之衝擊性噪音暴露評估系統之研發. 碩士論文, 民國97年1月. 國立中央大學.
55. 勞動部職業安全衛生署, 作業環境監測指引. 民國104年10月6日, 勞動部: 《勞職授字第 10402023631 號》公告修正.
56. 科學工業園區管理局, 園區勞工聽力保護計畫指引. 民國101年12月10日.
57. 陳小娟、曾進興、陳秋蓉、張淑如, 噪音型聽力損失勞工之溝通態度與溝通問題. 勞工安全衛生研究季刊, 民國92年3月. 第十一卷第一期: p. 35-44頁.
58. Newby H, P.G., Audiology. . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. , 1985. 5th ed.
59. 衛生福利部台北醫院, 耳耳鼻喉科衛教文章. 2021: 衛生福利部台北醫院.
60. 勞動部職業安全衛生署, 噪音作業健康服務工作指引. 2014年.
61. 陳定國、翁明祥, 台灣區玻璃纖維工業供需研究. 民國66年. 工業技術研究院金屬工業研究所: p. 6-10 頁.
62. Talbott, E., et al., Occupational noise exposure, noise-induced hearing loss, and the epidemiology of high blood pressure. Am J Epidemiol, 1985. 121(4): p. 501-14.
63. Sbihi, H., H.W. Davies, and P.A. Demers, Hypertension in noise-exposed sawmill workers: a cohort study. Occup Environ Med, 2008. 65(9): p. 643-6.
64. Alimohammadi, I., S. Sandrock, and M.R. Gohari, The effects of low frequency noise on mental performance and annoyance. Environ Monit Assess, 2013. 185(8): p. 7043-51.
65. Chang, T.Y., et al., Noise frequency components and the prevalence of hypertension in workers. Sci Total Environ, 2012. 416: p. 89-96.
66. Sørensen, M., et al., Exposure to road traffic and railway noise and associations with blood pressure and self-reported hypertension: a cohort study. Environ Health, 2011. 10: p. 92.
67. Chang, T.Y., et al., Characterization of road traffic noise exposure and prevalence of hypertension in central Taiwan. Sci Total Environ, 2011. 409(6): p. 1053-7.
68. Barregard, L., E. Bonde, and E. Ohrström, Risk of hypertension from exposure to road traffic noise in a population-based sample. Occup Environ Med, 2009. 66(6): p. 410-5.
69. 馮鑑昌, 以機場航空噪音影響觀點論中正機場第三跑道區位之研究. 碩士論文, 2004. 國立臺北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所.
70. Jarup, L., et al., Hypertension and exposure to noise near airports: the HYENA study. Environ Health Perspect, 2008. 116(3): p. 329-33.
71. Li, X., et al., The Influence of Occupational Noise Exposure on Cardiovascular and Hearing Conditions among Industrial Workers. Sci Rep, 2019. 9(1): p. 11524.

指導教授

林伯勳(Po-Hsun Lin)

審核日期

2023-8-15

推文