以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數:30 、訪客IP:3.145.65.167
姓名 陳品蓁(Pin-Chen Chen) 查詢紙本館藏 畢業系所 網路學習科技研究所 論文名稱 未來城市:基於永續發展目標概念之城市開發模擬系統輔助探究學習分析
(Future City: Exploring the Application of Simulation System Assisted Inquiry-Based Learning on the Concept of Sustainable Development Goal)相關論文 檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式] [Bibtex 格式] [相關文章] [文章引用] [完整記錄] [館藏目錄] 至系統瀏覽論文 (2027-7-31以後開放) 摘要(中) 本研究為了要改善目前學習者大多僅學習知識結果,跳過知識建構的流程,沒有反思資料的正確性問題並且全盤接收;因此,透過融入探究式學習的方式,促進主動學習提供一良好自主學習環境,設計基於永續發展目標概念之<未來城市>模擬系統。過程中,學習者針對開發與保育所造成的環境與經濟問題,反思這些問題的本質是什麼,自由的形成問題、規劃蒐集流程、執行蒐集流程、形成結論、報告並小組討論。本研究結合三種不同的探究式方式,利用逐步減少教師輔助的方式,觀察學習者在整體探究學習活動當中的表現為何,最後透過開發或保育項目的建設方式,模擬社會環境的變化,給予學習者驗證其探究學習過程的正確性。
透過質性研究為主、量化問卷為輔的方式,針對學習者探查的資料內容進行文字分析,討論學習者的探究學習內容為何,同時分析探究學習行為,輔助說明學習者在探究學習過程當中的探究學習內容廣度與行為模式的變化。透過前後測問卷去瞭解經歷整體探究學習活動過後,學習者的探究學習能力及對於永續發展目標的態度變化為何,最後收集學習者對本活動的回饋意見。
研究結果發現,從學習者探究內容說明,協商討論會導致每一組具有不同觀點的探究學習內容,角色任務與利益也會影響每個角色的探究學習內容,具有各自關注的面向與行為模式。漸進式開放探究的方式,有助於豐富探究學習內容廣度,在呈現方式相較複雜的主題需要花費更多時間。探究行為記錄發現引導式、開放式階段當中,大多學習者會有反覆比對不同領域資料的行為;若只注重單一主題,會反覆查找該領域資料,與其他領域的比對行為模式較不明顯。而結構式探究中則無此行為模式,僅具教師規劃探究流程的單一線性行為模式。經過本次活動發現,學習者的整體探究學習能力與形成結論的能力有顯著提升,並且對於永續發展目標的態度也有所提升。學習者對於整體活動流程設計中,開發與建設的模擬功能,都給予正面評價。摘要(英) This study aims to improve the current situation where most learners merely acquire knowledge outcomes, bypassing the process of knowledge construction without reflecting on the accuracy of information and accepting it wholesale. Therefore, by integrating inquiry-based learning, the study aims to facilitate active learning and provide a conducive environment for autonomous learning by designing a simulation system based on the concept of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for "Future Cities." During the process, learners reflect on the environmental and economic issues caused by development and conservation, contemplate the essence of these issues, freely form questions, plan data collection processes, execute data collection processes, draw conclusions, report, and engage in group discussions.
This study combines three different inquiry based approaches, gradually reducing teacher assistance, to observe learners′ performance in the overall inquiry learning activities. Finally, through the construction of development or conservation projects, the study simulates changes in the social environment, providing learners with validation of their inquiry learning process.
Using qualitative research as the main method and quantitative questionnaires as a supplement, the study conducts textual analysis on the data explored by learners, discussing the content of learners′ inquiry learning and analyzing their inquiry learning behavior to elucidate changes in the breadth of inquiry learning content and behavioral patterns during the inquiry learning process. Through pre- and post test questionnaires, the study aims to understand how learners′ inquiry learning abilities and attitudes toward Sustainable Development Goals change after experiencing the entire inquiry learning activities, and finally collect feedback from students on this activity.
The research findings indicate that from the explanation of learners′ inquiry content, negotiation discussions lead to inquiry learning content with different perspectives in each group, and roles, tasks, and interests also affect the inquiry learning content of each role, each with its own focus and behavioral pattern. The gradual open inquiry approach helps enrich the breadth of inquiry learning content, especially for more complex topics that require more time for presentation. Inquiry behavior records show that during the guided and open stages, most learners engage in behavior of repeatedly comparing data from different domains. If only a single topic is emphasized, learners tend to repeatedly search for data in that domain, and the pattern of comparing with other domains is less evident. However, this behavior pattern is absent in structured inquiry, which only exhibits a single linear behavior pattern of teachers planning the inquiry process. Through this activity, it was found that learners′ overall inquiry learning abilities and ability to draw conclusions significantly improved, and their attitudes toward Sustainable Development Goals also increased. Students gave positive feedback on the overall activity design, particularly the simulation function of development and construction in the activity flow.關鍵字(中) ★ 探究式學習
★ 模擬系統
★ 永續發展目標
★ 城市開發關鍵字(英) ★ Inquiry-Based Learning
★ Simulation System
★ Sustainable Development Goals
★ Urban development論文目次 摘要.............................................................................................................................................i
Abstract.......................................................................................................................................ii
誌謝...........................................................................................................................................iv
目錄............................................................................................................................................v
圖目錄.....................................................................................................................................viii
表目錄.....................................................................................................................................xiv
一、緒論....................................................................................................................................1
1-1 研究背景與動機........................................................................................................1
1-2 研究目的....................................................................................................................3
1-3 研究問題....................................................................................................................3
二、文獻探討............................................................................................................................4
2-1 探究式學習................................................................................................................4
2-2 模擬系統....................................................................................................................7
2-3 永續發展目標............................................................................................................8
三、活動設計..........................................................................................................................10
3-1 活動規劃..................................................................................................................10
3-1-1 活動規劃 .......................................................................................................10
3-1-2 探究學習架構 ...............................................................................................12
3-1-3 角色設計 .......................................................................................................15
3-1-4 城市開發模擬 ...............................................................................................18
3-1-5 小組協商討論 ...............................................................................................19
3-1-6 反思與總結 ...................................................................................................20
3-2 探究學習內容..........................................................................................................20
3-2-1 探究學習單 ...................................................................................................21
3-2-2 探究學習資料_水資源數據 .........................................................................23
vi
3-2-3 探究學習資料_土地資訊 .............................................................................26
3-2-4 探究學習資料_動物保育 .............................................................................29
3-2-5 探究學習資料_人口結構 .............................................................................31
3-3 模擬系統..................................................................................................................33
3-3-1 開發工具 .......................................................................................................34
3-3-2 模擬系統流程與功能 ...................................................................................35
3-3-3 模擬系統介面 ...............................................................................................38
3-3-4 模擬系統紀錄 ...............................................................................................42
四、實驗設計..........................................................................................................................44
4-1 實驗對象..................................................................................................................44
4-2 實驗架構與流程......................................................................................................44
4-3 實驗工具..................................................................................................................46
4-3-1 探究學習單...................................................................................................47
4-3-2 協商討論學習單...........................................................................................49
4-3-3 探究學習能力問卷.......................................................................................50
4-3-4 永續發展目標態度問卷...............................................................................51
4-3-5 反思回饋問卷...............................................................................................51
4-4 實驗資料分析方式..................................................................................................52
五、研究結果..........................................................................................................................59
5-1 模擬結果..................................................................................................................59
5-2 探究學習分析..........................................................................................................61
5-2-1 以小組分析不同探究式學習內容與協商討論內容 ...................................61
5-2-2 以小組分析不同探究式學習之探究行為 ...................................................80
5-2-3 以小組分析探究學習行為差異 ...................................................................92
5-2-4 以角色分析探究學習行為差異 ...................................................................96
5-3 探究學習能力分析................................................................................................100
vii
5-4 永續發展目標態度分析........................................................................................101
5-5 整體活動反思........................................................................................................104
六、 結論與未來建議..........................................................................................................105
6-1 結論........................................................................................................................105
6-2 未來建議................................................................................................................108
參考文獻................................................................................................................................ 110
中文部分......................................................................................................................... 110
英文部分......................................................................................................................... 111
附件一 家長知情同意書...................................................................................................... 115
附件二 探究學習單.............................................................................................................. 118
附件三 協商討論學習單...................................................................................................... 119
附件四 探究學習能力問卷..................................................................................................121
附件五 永續發展目標態度問卷..........................................................................................123
附件六 反思回饋問卷..........................................................................................................125參考文獻 中華民國交通部公路局(2022)。中華民國交通部公路局。臺北市:作者。取自
https://ws.thb.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvNDM2L3JlbGZpbGU
vMTI4MjMvMTE5NS8zYzhlMWIyMi1lMmVmLTQ2NTctODdhNi05YTI5NTU2ZDQ
zYTIucG5n&n=5YWs6Lev57ay5ZyWX%2biLl%2baglzExMzAxLnBuZw%3d%3d&ic
on=..png
內政部國土繪測中心中心(2022)。國土繪測圖資服務雲。臺北市:作者。取自
https://maps.nlsc.gov.tw/T09/mapshow.action
行政院環境保護署(2022)。全國環境水質監測資訊網。臺北市:作者。取自
https://wq.moenv.gov.tw/EWQP/zh/Default.aspx
洪文東(2005)。以探究式教學活動設計提升學習者科學探究能力。行政院國家科學委員
會專題研究計畫,NSC93-2511-S-153-004-。
苗 栗 縣 政 府 ( 2021 )。 苗 栗 縣 國 土 計 畫 。 苗 栗 縣 : 作 者 。 取 自
https://spatialplan.miaoli.gov.tw/flDload/pdf/%E8%8B%97%E6%A0%97%E7%B8%A3
%E5%9C%8B%E5%9C%9F%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB(%E5%85%AC%E5%91%8A
%E5%AF%A6%E6%96%BD%E7%89%88).pdf
苗 栗 縣 政 府 主 計 處(2016)。苗 栗 縣 人 口 統 計 分 析。苗栗縣:作者。取
自
https://webws.miaoli.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvNDE1L3JlbGZ
pbGUvOTczMi81Nzk2Ni8wMmM0NjI1ZS1kZDdiLTQ2YzUtYTMyZS1kZjFlMjdjMTc
2MjUucGRm&n=MjAxNjA4MTYwMTI4NDcyMTMzNjc1Njk0LnBkZg%3D%3D
苗栗縣生命統計資料視覺化畫廊(2016)。苗栗縣各鄉鎮市人口結構。苗栗縣:作者。取
自
https://public.tableau.com/views/_7366/Story?:embed=y&:showVizHome=no&:display_
111
count=y&:display_static_image=y&:bootstrapWhenNotified=true
苗栗縣政府農業處(2019)。「苗栗縣大尺度之路殺風險評估」暨「縣道 140 改善建議
分析」。苗栗縣:作者。取自
https://webws.miaoli.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvNDA5L3JlbGZ
pbGUvMTMxMTkvNDIyMTgwL2UyNWI0MjY4LTk3NDMtNDQyZC04NjQxLTNlMj
ZkZDI2MDM5My5wZGY%3d&n=44CM6IuX5qCX57ij5aSn5bC65bqm5LmL6Lev5q6
66aKo6Zqq6KmV5Lyw44CN57WQ5qGI5aCx5ZGKLnBkZg%3d%3d
苗栗縣義勇消防總隊協會(2021)。「苗栗縣石虎族群數量與分布調查」委託專業研究
調查服務案(後續第 2 次擴充)。苗栗縣:作者。取自
https://webws.miaoli.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvNDA5L3JlbGZ
pbGUvMTMxMTkvNTE2MjI4L2ZlNDFlZTc5LTJiZjMtNDViZi05YmY0LTMxOTJjO
DEzMTczZC5wZGY%3D&n=6IuX5qCX57ij55%2Bz6JmO5peP576k5pW46YeP6IiH5
YiG5biDLeaIkOaenOWgseWRii3lrprnqL8t5bqn5qiZ5bGP6JS9LnBkZg%3D%3D&icon
國立中央大學太空及遙測研究中心(2022)。前瞻衛星開放服務平台。桃園市:作者。取
自 https://opendata.csrsr.ncu.edu.tw/index.aspx
臺 灣 苗 栗 地 方 法 院 ( 2024 )。 臺 灣 苗 栗 地 方 法 院 。 苗 栗 縣 : 作 者 。 取 自
https://mld.judicial.gov.tw/tw/cp-3407-51207-728f7-201.html
盧昱豪(2002)。線上議題探究系統之探究能力分析。國立中央大學網路學習科技研究
所碩士論文,桃園市。取自 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/c8257r
Abdi, A. (2014). The Effect of Inquiry-Based Learning Method on Students′ Academic
Achievement in Science Course. Universal journal of educational Research, 2(1), 37-41.
Allen, C., Metternicht, G., & Wiedmann, T. (2018). Initial progress in implementing the
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A review of evidence from
112
countries. Sustainability science, 13, 1453-1467.
Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and children, 46(2), 26.
Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2011). Public–private partnerships: Perspectives on
purposes, publicness, and good governance. Public administration and development, 31(1),
2-14.
Bybee, R., McCrae, B., & Laurie, R. (2009). PISA 2006: An assessment of scientific literacy.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 865-883.
Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science scope, 23(6), 42-44.
Collste, D., Pedercini, M., & Cornell, S. E. (2017). Policy coherence to achieve the SDGs: using
integrated simulation models to assess effective policies. Sustainability science, 12, 921-
931.
Karamustafaoğlu, S. (2010). Evaluating the science activities based on multiple intelligence
theory. Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED),
7(1).Karamustafaoglu,s.(2010)Evaluating the Science Activities Based On Multiple
Intelligence Theory. Journal of TURKISH SCIENCE EDUCATION ,7(1), 3.
Keselman, A. (2003). Supporting inquiry learning by promoting normative understanding of
multivariable causality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 898-921.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction
does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based,
experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
Land, S. M., Zimmerman, H. T., Murray, O. T., Hooper, S., Sharma, P., & Mundie, J. (2011).
Mobile computing: Perspectives on design, learning, and development. The Annual
Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology,1, 394-
402.
Lee, O., Buxton, C., Lewis, S., & LeRoy, K. (2006). Science inquiry and student diversity:
Enhanced abilities and continuing difficulties after an instructional intervention. Journal
113
of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 607-636.
Lu, Y.H., Shih, J.L., & Hong, G.D. (2022). Issue-based gGuided iInquiry mModel with Rreal
sSocioscientific Oopen dData <City Auncel>. The Main Proceedings of the 30th
International Conference on Computers in Education (536-541), Malaysia: Asia-Pacific
Society on Computers in Education.
Magnusson, P. S., Christensson, M., Eskilson, J., Forsgren, D., Hallberg, G., Hogberg, J., ... &
Werner, B. (2002). Simics: A full system simulation platform. Computer, 35(2), 50-58.
Martín, E. G., Giordano, R., Pagano, A., Van Der Keur, P., & Costa, M. M. (2020). Using a
system thinking approach to assess the contribution of nature based solutions to
sustainable development goals. Science of the Total Environment, 738, 139693.
Morioka, S.N., Bolis, I., Evans, S., Carvalho, M.M., 2017. Transforming sustainability
challenges into competitive advantage: Multiple case studies kaleidoscope converging into
sustainable business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 723-738.
National Research Council [NRC]. (1996).National science education standards.Washington,
DC: National Academic Press.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A
guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Nelson, B. C., & Ketelhut, D. J. (2007). Scientific inquiry in educational multi-user virtual
environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 265-283.
Pedaste, M., & Sarapuu, T. (2006). Developing an effective support system for inquiry learning
in a web‐based environment. Journal of computer assisted learning, 22(1), 47-62.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Leijen, Ä., & Sarapuu, T. (2012). Improving students’ inquiry skills
through reflection and self-regulation scaffolds. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and
Learning, 9(1-2), 81-95.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., ... &
Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry
114
cycle. Educational research review, 14, 47-61.
Pedersen, C. S. (2018). The UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) are a great gift to
business!.. Procedia Cirp, 69, 21-24.
Project 2061 (American Association for the Advancement of Science). (1993). Benchmarks for
science literacy. Oxford University Press.American Association for the Advancement of
Science (AAAS).(1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Rosenblum, M., Herrod, S. A., Witchel, E., & Gupta, A. (1995). Complete computer system
simulation: The SimOS approach. IEEE Parallel & Distributed Technology: Systems &
Applications, 3(4), 34-43.
Ruis, A. R., Tan, Y., Brohinsky, J., Yang, B., Wang, Y., Cai, Z., & Williamson Shaffer, D. (2023).
Thin Data, Thick Description: Modeling Socio-Environmental Problem-Solving
Trajectories in Localized Land-Use Simulations. Communications in Computer and
Information Science , 1895, 349-364.
Shih, J. L., Chuang, C. W., & Hwang, G. J. (2010). An inquiry-based mobile learning approach
to enhancing social science learning effectiveness. Journal of Educational Technology &
Society, 13(4), 50-62.指導教授 施如齡(Ju-Ling Shih) 審核日期 2024-7-2 推文 facebook plurk twitter funp google live udn HD myshare reddit netvibes friend youpush delicious baidu 網路書籤 Google bookmarks del.icio.us hemidemi myshare