博碩士論文 111554003 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:86 、訪客IP:18.217.189.152
姓名 吳明靜(Ming-Ching Wu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 網路學習科技研究所
論文名稱 探討運用線上數位遊戲化學習平台並使用觀看-摘要-提問法(WSQ)學習策略促進成年人的牙線技巧學習對學習成效及學習動機的影響
(The Effects of Gamification and the Watch-Summarize-Question (WSQ) Strategy on Learning Effectiveness and Learning Motivation in Adults′ Flossing Skills Using an Online Digital Gamified Learning Platform)
相關論文
★ Using Digital Board Game to Enhance Student Engagementin Learning★ 從人因與互動行為模式的觀點探討數位遊戲式學習輔助能源知識
★ 探討認知風格於數位遊戲式英語學習環境對遊戲行為與學習成效之影響★ 由空間能力探討遊戲式英語學習如何影響學習者之遊戲行為和遊戲表現
★ 探討先備知識及學習風格在角色扮演遊戲中對英語字彙習得成效與行為模式之影響★ 從全面性的角度探討先備知識對同儕互評中受評與 評分之影響
★ 從認知風格的角度探討同儕互評分組對遊戲製作與評量之影響★ 探討創作媒介、個別差異、範例式教學及創作模式對九年級學生音樂創作的學習動機及成效之影響
★ 探討個別差異與回饋形式在數位遊戲式學習系統中對學習動機、學習成效與遊戲表現之影響:以九年級國文學習為例★ 探討趨向表現目標與逃避表現目標對於 學習成效與表現目標採取之影響 -以數位遊戲式英語字彙為例
★ 探討英語焦慮與先備知識對英語發音學習成效、獎章成效、遊戲成效、學習動機及遊戲心流之影響──以大型多人線上角色扮演遊戲為例★ 探討認知風格及遊戲心流對英語字彙學習成效、遊戲成效與自我效能之影響—以多人線上角色扮演遊戲為例
★ 從認知風格的角度探討同儕互評對遊戲式學習系統製作與評量之影響★ 電腦輔助教師回饋於外語寫作情境之研究:成果與觀感
★ 探討英語閱讀遊戲對印尼高中英語學習者的影響★ 製作者與評量者之認知風格匹配與不匹配對遊戲人機介面與教學影片製作與評量的影響
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 本研究的研究背景與動機是因為過去的研究僅著重於對病人的牙線長期使用習慣追蹤研究,並未融入牙線認知和技巧的教學及遊戲化元素,所以本研究讓牙線使用者能透過線上遊戲化學習的體驗來習得正確的牙線使用技巧,並採用WSQ學習策略,使學習者可以在學習過程中觀看教學影片、總結重點並在學習活動中提出問題。本研究探討牙線技巧的學習成效及學習動機,更進一步分析男女學習者的學習成效及學習動機之性別差異的影響,以及在線上遊戲化學習環境中學習者的學習成效與學習動機之間的相關性。本研究之自變項包含有無WSQ學習策略及性別;依變項則為學習成效(包含牙線認知及牙線技巧)及學習動機。研究對象為20歲至30歲的成年人共48人,有使用WSQ學習策略的實驗組人數為24人;無使用WSQ學習策略的對照組人數為24人,實驗組男性及女性人數各占一半,對照組男性及女性人數各占一半。研究結果發現,使用WSQ策略的組別在牙線技巧的認知上有顯著提高學習者的學習成效;而在實際操作的學習成效上實驗組的分數雖然高於對照組,但未達顯著差異。在學習動機方面,有使用WSQ策略的實驗組和無使用WSQ策略的對照組在牙線技巧學習動機的所有向度上都沒有顯著差異。同時也發現性別差異對牙線技巧學習成效及學習動機沒有太大的影響。在線上遊戲化學習環境中學習者的學習成效之牙線技巧實際操作與學習動機之注意力面向之間呈現顯著正相關,亦即當技巧成效越好時,學習動機之注意力面向也會較高。本研究的結果顯示受試者在使用此遊戲化學習平台後,能有效幫助他們學習使用牙線的技巧,並提升使用牙線的能力,因此本研究為牙線技巧學習之研究提供了具體的貢獻。
摘要(英) The background and motivation for this study stem from past research focusing solely on tracking patients′ long-term flossing habits without incorporating educational elements on flossing knowledge and skills, or gamification. Therefore, this research enables floss users to acquire correct flossing techniques through an online gamified learning experience. It employs the WSQ (Watch, Summarize, Question) learning strategy, allowing learners to watch instructional videos, summarize key points, and pose questions during learning activities. This study investigates the learning outcomes and motivation in flossing skills, further analyzing the impact of gender differences on learning outcomes and motivation among male and female learners, as well as the correlation between learning outcomes and motivation in an online gamified learning environment. The independent variables include the presence of the WSQ learning strategy and gender; the dependent variables are learning outcomes (including flossing knowledge and skills) and learning motivation. The study involved 48 adults aged 20 to 30, with 24 participants in the experimental group using the WSQ learning strategy and 24 in the control group without it. Both groups had an equal number of males and females. The results showed that the group using the WSQ strategy significantly improved in cognitive learning outcomes related to flossing skills; however, there was no significant difference in practical skill outcomes between the experimental and control groups. Regarding learning motivation, there were no significant differences in any aspect of motivation to learn flossing skills between groups using or not using the WSQ strategy. Gender differences were also found to have little impact on learning outcomes and motivation for flossing skills. There was a significant positive correlation between the practical operation of flossing skills in the online gamified learning environment and the aspect of attention in learning motivation; meaning, better skill outcomes were associated with higher levels of attention in learning motivation. The findings of this study demonstrate that using this gamified learning platform effectively helps participants learn flossing skills and enhance their flossing ability, thereby making a concrete contribution to the research on learning flossing techniques.
關鍵字(中) ★ 遊戲化
★ WSQ學習策略
★ 牙線技巧
★ 性別差異
★ 學習成效
★ 學習動機
關鍵字(英) ★ Gamification
★ WSQ Learning Strategy
★ Floss Learning
★ Gender Differences
★ Learning Effectiveness
★ Learning Motivation
論文目次 目錄
國立中央大學圖書館學位論文授權書 i
國家圖書館學位論文延後公開申請書 ii
論文指導教授推薦書 iii
論文口試委員審定書 iv
摘要 v
Abstract vi
致謝 vii
目錄 viii
圖目錄 xi
表目錄 xii
第一章 緒論 1
1-1  研究背景與動機 1
1-2  研究目的 3
1-3  研究問題 4
1-4  名詞解釋 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
2-1  數位遊戲化學習及其研究現況 7
2-2  WSQ學習策略及其研究現況 9
2-3  牙線技巧學習之研究現況 13
2-4  文獻探討小結 16
第三章 系統設計 17
3-1  系統工具 17
3-2  學習內容 20
3-3  系統操作流程 22
第四章 研究方法 25
4-1  研究設計 25
4-2  研究對象 26
4-3  研究工具 27
4-4  實驗流程 31
4-5  資料處理與分析 34
第五章 研究結果與討論 35
5-1  與無使用WSQ策略的組別相比,使用WSQ策略的組別是否提高了學習者的學習成效? 35
5-2  與無使用WSQ策略的組別相比,使用WSQ策略的組別是否提高了學習者的學習動機? 37
5-3  使用WSQ策略的組別中,男女學習者的學習成效之性別差異的影響? 39
5-4  使用WSQ策略的組別中,男女學習者的學習動機之性別差異的影響? 40
5-5  在線上遊戲化學習環境中有無使用WSQ策略的組別的學習成效與學習動機之間的相關性? 42
5-6  在線上遊戲化學習環境中男女學習者的學習成效與學習動機之間的相關性? 44
5-7  研究結果討論 45
5-8  研究限制與建議 52
第六章 結論與建議 53
6-1  研究結論 53
6-2  研究貢獻 55
6-3  未來工作 57
參考文獻 58
中文參考文獻: 58
英文參考文獻: 58
附錄 62
附錄一 受試者基本資料 62
附錄二 研究參與者知情同意書 63
附錄三 學習動機量表 66
附錄四 牙線技巧學習認知測驗 67
附錄五 牙線技巧評判表 68
附錄六 影片授權書 69
參考文獻 中文參考文獻:
林若新. (2018).以計畫行為理論為基礎的口腔衛生教育介入對成年人口腔自我照護行為之成效:隨機對照試驗(碩士論文).高雄醫學大學.
長谷川嘉哉. (2019).35歲開始,牙齒決定你的後半生:日本失智症權威親授,活化大腦的護牙術,讓你遠離阿茲海默症、糖尿病和心血管疾病(郭子菱譯).遠流出版事業股份有限公司.

英文參考文獻:
Al Bardaweel, S., & Dashash, M. (2018). E-learning or educational leaflet: Does it make a difference in oral health promotion? A clustered randomized trial. BMC Oral Health, 18(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0540-4
Ali, A. S., Arumugam, A., & Kumaran, S. D. (2021). Effectiveness of an intensive, functional, gamified rehabilitation program in improving upper limb motor function in people with stroke: A protocol of the EnteRtain randomized clinical trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 105, 106381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2021.106381
Arora, V., Tangade, P. S., Ravishankar, T. L., Tirth, A., Pal, S., & Tandon, S. (2014). Efficacy of dental floss and chlorhexidine mouth rinse as an adjunct to toothbrushing in removing plaque and gingival inflammation – A three way cross over trial. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 8(10), ZC01-ZC04. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/8807.4943
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
Bardelli, S., Del Corso, G., Ciantelli, M., Del Pistoia, M., Lorenzoni, F., Fossati, N., Scaramuzzo, R. T., & Cuttano, A. (2022). Improving Pediatric/Neonatology Residents′ Newborn Resuscitation Skills With a Digital Serious Game: DIANA. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.842302
Burke, B. (2014). Gamify: How Gamification Motivates People to Do Extraordinary Things. Gartner.
Cai, Y., Choi, K., He, S., & Ishii, K. (2017). Gender differences in the effects of competition and collaboration in game-based learning. Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 187-198.
Chang, C.-Y., Chung, M.-H., & Yang, J. C. (2022). Facilitating nursing students′ skill training in distance education via online game-based learning with the watch-summarize-question approach during the COVID-19 pandemic: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 109, 105256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105256
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Plenum.
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification". In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9-15). ACM.
Felicia, P. (2009). Digital games in schools: A handbook for teachers. Belgium: European Schoolnet.
Furnham, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2005). Individual differences in students′ preference for instructional methods. Journal of Individual Differences, 26(4), 176-184.
Gee, C., & Burke, M. E. (2001). Realising potential: The new motivation game. Management Decision, 39(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740110384671
Gee, J. P. (2003). What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gerber, S., & Scott, L. (2011). Gamers and gaming context: Relationships to critical thinking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 842–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01106.x
Hakulinen, L., Auvinen, T., & Korhonen, A. (2013, March 21-24). Empirical study on the effect of achievement badges in TRAKLA2 online learning environment. In Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (pp. 47–54). Macau: IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2013.34
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work?--a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025-3034). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
Hamilton, K., Bonham, M., Bishara, J., Kroon, J., & Schwarzer, R. (2017). Translating Dental Flossing Intentions into Behavior: a Longitudinal Investigation of the Mediating Effect of Planning and Self-Efficacy on Young Adults. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 24(3), 420-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-016-9605-4
Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152-161. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.
Haury, D. L., & Rillero, P. (1994). Perspectives of hands-on science teaching. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
Hsia, L. H., Hwang, G. J., & Lin, C. J. (2022). A WSQ-based flipped learning approach to improving students′ dance performance through reflection and effort promotion. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(2), 229-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1651744
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581-592. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581
Huang, W. H. D., & Soman, D. (2013). Gamification of education. Behavioural Economics in Action.
Kim, B. (2015). Designing Gamification in the Right Way. Library Technology Reports, 51(2), 29-35.
Kirch, C.(2012). Flipping with Kirch. Retrieved from. http://flippingwithkirch.blogspot. com/p/wsqing.html.
Karimi, M. (2018). The importance of Dental Floss in improving children’s oral health. CPQ Dentistry, 1, 1-6.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Papastergiou, M. (2009). Exploring the potential of computer and video games for health and physical education: A literature review. Computers & Education, 53(3), 603–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.001
Pandey, N., Koju, S., Khapung, A., Gupta, S., Aryai, D., & Dhami, B. (2020). Dental floss prescription pattern among the dental interns of Nepal. JNMA: Journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 58(228), 580. https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.5133
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
Putra, E., Tantular, B. A., & Ruhimat, M. (2020). The Effect of Simcity as Instructional Media in Geography Learning on Learners′ Spatial Intelligence. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Education Development and Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3392305.3396896
Romero, M., Usart, M., & Ott, M. (2015). Can serious games contribute to developing and sustaining 21st century skills? Games and Culture, 10(2), 148–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412014548919
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Sakashita, R., Hamada, M., Sato, T., Abiko, Y., & Takami, M. (2017). Oral health promotion program for fostering self-management of the elderly living in communities. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 23(3), 535-541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10798587.2017.1348459
Sailer, M., Hense, J., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2007). Influencing children′s self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modeling. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(1), 7-25. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/10573560600837578
Schuz, B., Wiedemann, A. U., Mallach, N., & Scholz, U. (2009). Effects of a short behavioural intervention for dental flossing: randomized-controlled trial on planning when, where and how. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 36(6), 498-505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01406.x
Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006
Wardaszko, M., & Podgórski, B. (2017). Mobile Learning Game Effectiveness in Cognitive Learning by Adults: A Comparative Study. Simulation and Gaming, 48(4), 435-454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878117704350
Wu, T.-T., & Sung, T.-W. (2021). Analysis of the effects of a game-based review system integrated with the hierarchy of learning on learning outcomes in an elementary social science course. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1948870
Yang, S., Lee, J. W., Kim, H.-J., Kang, M., Chong, E., & Kim, E.-m. (2021). Can an online educational game contribute to developing information literate citizens? Computers & Education, 161, 104057. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104057
Zaror, C., Mariño, R., & Atala-Acevedo, C. (2021). Current state of serious games in dentistry: a scoping review. Games for Health Journal, 10(2), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2020.0042
Zhao, X., & McClure, C. D. (2022). Gather.Town: A Gamification Tool to Promote Engagement and Establish Online Learning Communities for Language Learners. Relc Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221097216
指導教授 楊接期(Jie Chi Yang) 審核日期 2024-7-19
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明