探討學習環境及個體差異對學術英文字彙學習成效、學習動機、學習焦慮之影響-以Quizlet為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：110

、訪客IP：3.145.164.139

姓名

項仁瑄(Jen-Hsuan Hsiang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

網路學習科技研究所

論文名稱

探討學習環境及個體差異對學術英文字彙學習成效、學習動機、學習焦慮之影響-以Quizlet為例
(Effects of Learning Environment and Individual Differences on Academic English Vocabulary Learning Outcomes, Learning Motivation and Learning Anxiety: A case study of Quizlet)

相關論文

★ Using Digital Board Game to Enhance Student Engagementin Learning	★ 從人因與互動行為模式的觀點探討數位遊戲式學習輔助能源知識
★ 探討認知風格於數位遊戲式英語學習環境對遊戲行為與學習成效之影響	★ 由空間能力探討遊戲式英語學習如何影響學習者之遊戲行為和遊戲表現
★ 探討先備知識及學習風格在角色扮演遊戲中對英語字彙習得成效與行為模式之影響	★ 從全面性的角度探討先備知識對同儕互評中受評與評分之影響
★ 從認知風格的角度探討同儕互評分組對遊戲製作與評量之影響	★ 探討創作媒介、個別差異、範例式教學及創作模式對九年級學生音樂創作的學習動機及成效之影響
★ 探討個別差異與回饋形式在數位遊戲式學習系統中對學習動機、學習成效與遊戲表現之影響：以九年級國文學習為例	★ 探討趨向表現目標與逃避表現目標對於學習成效與表現目標採取之影響－以數位遊戲式英語字彙為例
★ 探討英語焦慮與先備知識對英語發音學習成效、獎章成效、遊戲成效、學習動機及遊戲心流之影響──以大型多人線上角色扮演遊戲為例	★ 探討認知風格及遊戲心流對英語字彙學習成效、遊戲成效與自我效能之影響—以多人線上角色扮演遊戲為例
★ 從認知風格的角度探討同儕互評對遊戲式學習系統製作與評量之影響	★ 電腦輔助教師回饋於外語寫作情境之研究：成果與觀感
★ 探討英語閱讀遊戲對印尼高中英語學習者的影響	★ 製作者與評量者之認知風格匹配與不匹配對遊戲人機介面與教學影片製作與評量的影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

在全球化趨勢下，英文在教育政策中的重要性日益提升，目前台灣的升學考試及高等教育均需應對英文學習，尤其是學術英文字彙的學習需求迫切。字彙是語言學習的基礎，大量研究顯示字彙對非母語學習者的重要性，但傳統記憶方法枯燥乏味。隨著科技與網路的普及，新學習模式如結合行動輔助和遊戲化元素的學習平台Quizlet，能刺激學習動機、降低焦慮並提升學習成效。儘管有實證研究顯示學術英文字彙融入行動輔助學習平台有顯著影響，但較少探討學習成效、動機、焦慮的影響及其相互關聯。此外，過去針對個體差異對學習成效影響的研究結果存在分歧，且過去的研究多為考量單一個體差異的因素，因此本研究將同時考量性別和先備知識兩種因素。本研究將學術英文字彙引入Quizlet，旨在比較不同學習環境對學習成效、動機及焦慮的影響，並探討性別和先備知識對學習成效的影響，結合質性訪談深入理解學習者的想法。研究目的包括：探討不同學習環境對學習成效、動機及焦慮的影響，探討性別及先備知識對學習成效的影響，以及這些因素與學習成效的相關性。本研究對象為台灣某所國立大學56名在職專班碩士學生，分成男性與女性各28人，使用Quizlet的實驗組和傳統紙本的控制組各28人，再依先備知識分為高先備知識組及低先備知識組，採用準實驗研究法中的「不相等的控制組設計」和混合設計法。研究工具為包含英文字彙成效測驗卷、英文學習動機量表、外語學習焦慮量表、平台使用經驗量表及半結構式訪談。資料分析使用包含信度分析、成對樣本t檢定、獨立樣本 t檢定、皮爾森相關性分析、描述性統計及質性分析。
結果主要涵蓋：(1) 不同學習環境的學習者在學習成效上均有顯著進步，但整體成效及分項成績無顯著差異。實驗組在整體學習動機及多項分項動機（如外在目標、任務價值、自我效能與期望成功）上有顯著提升，而控制組在整體學習動機上無顯著提升，且控制信念動機顯著下降。兩組在學習焦慮上無顯著差異，但實驗組在溝通焦慮及課程焦慮上顯著降低。實驗組的學習動機與學習焦慮呈負相關，而控制組則呈正相關；(2) 性
ii
別差異方面，男性和女性在使用Quizlet後，學習成效均有顯著進步。男性在整體動機及分項動機中任務價值有顯著提升，而女性在整體動機未有明顯變化，但在分項動機中外在目標導向、任務價值及自我效能與期望成功皆有顯著提升。兩組間在分項動機中的自我效能與期望成功後測成績有顯著差異，女性高於男性。在焦慮中男性未有差異，而女性在整體焦慮上顯著降低。男性學習成效與學習動機呈負相關，學習成效與學習焦慮呈正相關，而女性學習成效與學習動機呈正相關；(3) 先備知識差異方面，高低先備知識組在使用Quizlet後，學習成效上均顯著提升，高先備知識組高於低先備知識組。高先備知識組在整體學習動機無顯著提升，分項動機之控制信念顯著下降，而低先備知識組在整體學習動機上有顯著提升，在分項動機中的任務價值、自我效能與期望成功之動機有顯著提升。高先備知識組在整體學習焦慮未有變化，但在分項焦慮之溝通焦慮有顯著降低，而低先備知識組在整體焦慮有降低且在分項焦慮的課程焦慮有顯著降低。高先備知識的學習成效、學習動機、學習焦慮之間均未呈現相關性，低先備知識的學習動機與學習焦慮呈負相關，此外低先備知識的學習焦慮與學習成效、學習成效與學習動機之間均無呈現顯著相關性；(4) 平台使用經驗及訪談結果顯示，高先備知識不論男女皆對享樂性表示肯定，高先備知識者偏好Quizlet，尤其高先備知識女性對此平台表現出較高的使用感受，而低先備知識女性則偏好傳統紙本學習。
本研究發現數位學習工具在不同學習環境中的應用對學習者、教學者和開發者均有啟發。對學習者而言，研究幫助其了解Quizlet和傳統紙本學習的優缺點，提供個性化學習建議，並指出數位工具在減少學習焦慮方面的優勢。對教學者而言，研究提供實證數據以幫助選擇和設計適合不同性別及學習背景的教學工具，並強調調整教學策略的重要性。對開發者而言，研究建議增強Quizlet的互動性和遊戲化設計，並結合傳統學習方法以滿足不同學習者的需求，從而提升學習效果。

摘要(英)

In the context of globalization, the importance of English in education policies has increased significantly. In Taiwan, English proficiency is crucial for entrance exams and higher education, especially for academic vocabulary. Vocabulary is the foundation of language learning, and extensive research shows its importance for non-native learners. However, traditional memorization methods are often tedious. The widespread use of technology and the internet has introduced new learning models, such as Quizlet, which combines mobile-assisted and gamified elements to stimulate motivation, reduce anxiety, and enhance learning outcomes. While empirical studies have shown the significant impact of integrating academic vocabulary into mobile-assisted learning platforms, few studies explore the effects on learning outcomes, motivation, and anxiety, and their interrelationships. Additionally, past research on individual differences′ impact on learning outcomes has been inconsistent, often focusing on single factors. This study simultaneously considers gender and prior knowledge. This study introduces academic English vocabulary into Quizlet to compare the effects of different learning environments on learning outcomes, motivation, and anxiety. It also explores the impact of gender and prior knowledge on learning outcomes and combines qualitative interviews to gain deeper insights into learners′ perspectives. The objectives are to investigate the effects of different learning environments on learning outcomes, motivation, and anxiety, examine the influence of gender and prior knowledge on learning outcomes, and understand the relationships between these factors and learning outcomes.
The study involved 56 master′s students from an in-service program at a national university in Taiwan, divided equally into male and female groups. Each group was further divided into an experimental group using Quizlet and a control group using traditional paper-based methods, with prior knowledge categorized as high or low. A quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent control group and mixed-method approach was employed. The research tools included an English vocabulary achievement test, an English learning motivation scale, a foreign language learning anxiety scale, a platform usage experience scale, and semi-structured interviews. Data analysis included reliability analysis, paired sample t-tests, independent sample t-tests, Pearson correlation analysis, descriptive statistics, and qualitative analysis.
The main results included: (1) Learners in different learning environments showed significant improvement in learning outcomes, but there were no significant differences in overall effectiveness and sub-component scores. The experimental group showed significant improvement in overall learning motivation and several sub-motivations, such as extrinsic goals, task value, self-efficacy, and expected success, while the control group showed no significant improvement in overall learning motivation and a significant decrease in control belief motivation. There were no significant differences in learning anxiety between the two groups, but the experimental group showed significant reductions in communication and course anxiety. In the experimental group, learning motivation was negatively correlated with learning anxiety, whereas in the control group, they were positively correlated. (2) Regarding gender differences, both males and females showed significant improvements in learning outcomes after using Quizlet. Males showed significant improvements in overall motivation and the task value sub-motivation, while females showed no significant change in overall motivation but significant improvements in extrinsic goal orientation, task value, self-efficacy, and expected success sub-motivations. There were significant differences between the two groups in post-test scores for self-efficacy and expected success, with females scoring higher than males. In terms of anxiety, males showed no significant differences, whereas females showed significant reductions in overall anxiety. Males′ learning outcomes were negatively correlated with learning motivation and positively correlated with learning anxiety, whereas females′ learning outcomes were positively correlated with learning motivation. (3) In terms of prior knowledge differences, both high and low prior knowledge groups showed significant improvements in learning outcomes
after using Quizlet, with the high prior knowledge group outperforming the low prior knowledge group. The high prior knowledge group showed no significant improvement in overall learning motivation and a significant decrease in control belief motivation, while the low prior knowledge group showed significant improvements in overall learning motivation and in task value, self-efficacy, and expected success sub-motivations. The high prior knowledge group showed no change in overall learning anxiety but a significant reduction in communication anxiety, while the low prior knowledge group showed significant reductions in overall anxiety and course anxiety. In the high prior knowledge group, there were no correlations among learning outcomes, learning motivation, and learning anxiety, whereas in the low prior knowledge group, learning motivation was negatively correlated with learning anxiety. Additionally, in the low prior knowledge group, there were no significant correlations between learning anxiety and learning outcomes, nor between learning outcomes and learning motivation. (4) Platform usage experiences and interview results showed that high prior knowledge learners, regardless of gender, appreciated the enjoyment aspect of Quizlet. High prior knowledge learners preferred Quizlet, especially high prior knowledge females, who showed higher satisfaction with the platform. In contrast, low prior knowledge females preferred traditional paper-based learning.
This study reveals insights into the application of digital learning tools in different learning environments for learners, educators, and developers. For learners, the research helps them understand the advantages and disadvantages of using Quizlet versus traditional paper-based learning, provides personalized learning recommendations, and highlights the benefits of digital tools in reducing learning anxiety. For educators, the study offers empirical data to assist in selecting and designing teaching tools suitable for different genders and learning backgrounds, emphasizing the importance of adjusting teaching strategies. For developers, the research suggests enhancing Quizlet’s interactivity and gamification design, integrating traditional learning methods to meet diverse learners’ needs, thereby improving learning outcomes.

關鍵字(中)

★ Quizlet
★ 行動輔助學習
★ 個體差異
★ 學術英文字彙
★ 學習成效
★ 學習動機
★ 學習焦慮

關鍵字(英)

★ Quizlet
★ mobile-assisted learning
★ individual differences
★ academic English vocabulary
★ learning effectiveness
★ learning motivation
★ learning anxiety

論文目次

摘要 ............................................................................................................................................. i
ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................................. iii
誌謝 .......................................................................................................................................... vii
目錄 ......................................................................................................................................... viii
圖目錄 ..................................................................................................................................... xiii
表目錄 ..................................................................................................................................... xiv
第1章緒論 .............................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 ......................................................................................................... 1
1.2 研究目的 ..................................................................................................................... 3
1.3 研究問題 ..................................................................................................................... 3
1.4 名詞解釋 ..................................................................................................................... 4
1.5 研究範圍及限制 ......................................................................................................... 7
第2章文獻探討 ...................................................................................................................... 8
2.1 行動輔助學術英文字彙學習 ..................................................................................... 8
2.1.1 行動輔助學術英文字彙學習之相關研究 ........................................................ 8
2.1.2 行動輔助學術英文字彙學習平台 – Quizlet ................................................. 10
2.2 遊戲化學習 ............................................................................................................... 12
2.2.1 遊戲化學習在英文學習的應用 ...................................................................... 12
2.2.2 遊戲化學習對學習成效的影響 ...................................................................... 14
2.2.3 遊戲化學習對學習動機和學習焦慮的影響 .................................................. 15
2.3 個體差異 ................................................................................................................... 15
2.3.1 性別差異 .......................................................................................................... 16
2.3.2 先備知識 .......................................................................................................... 20
2.4 文獻探討總結 ........................................................................................................... 26
第3章研究方法 .................................................................................................................... 28
3.1 研究設計 ................................................................................................................... 28
3.1.1 自變項 .............................................................................................................. 29
3.1.2 依變項 .............................................................................................................. 29
3.1.3 控制變項 .......................................................................................................... 30
3.2 研究對象 ................................................................................................................... 30
3.3 研究工具 ................................................................................................................... 31
3.3.2 學術英文字彙測驗卷 ...................................................................................... 35
3.3.3 英文學習動機量表 .......................................................................................... 36
3.3.4 外語學習焦慮量表 .......................................................................................... 38
3.3.5 平台使用經驗問卷 .......................................................................................... 40
3.3.6 半結構式訪談 .................................................................................................. 40
3.4 實驗流程 ................................................................................................................... 41
3.5 資料分析 ................................................................................................................... 43
第4章結果與討論 ................................................................................................................ 45
4.1 不同學習環境對學術英文字彙學習成效、學習動機、學習焦慮之影響 ........... 45
4.1.1 不同學習環境的組別（Quizlet、傳統紙本）對學術英文字彙學習成效之影響 .......................................................................................................................... 45
4.1.2 不同學習環境的組別（Quizlet、傳統紙本）對學術英文字彙學習動機之影響 .......................................................................................................................... 47
4.1.3 不同學習環境的組別（Quizlet、傳統紙本）對學術英文字彙學習焦慮之影響 .......................................................................................................................... 52
4.2 在Quizlet中，不同性別對學術英文字彙學習中學習成效、學習動機、學習焦慮之影響 .......................................................................................................................... 55
4.2.1 在Quizlet中，不同性別（男性、女性）對學術英文字彙學習中學習成效之影響 ...................................................................................................................... 55
4.2.2 在Quizlet中，不同性別（男性、女性）對學術英文字彙學習中學習動機之影響 ...................................................................................................................... 57
4.2.3 在Quizlet中，不同性別（男性、女性）對學術英文字彙學習中學習焦慮之影響 ...................................................................................................................... 62
4.3 在Quizlet中，不同先備知識對學術英文字彙學習中學習成效、學習動機、學習焦慮之影響 .................................................................................................................. 65
4.3.1 在Quizlet中，不同先備知識（高先備知識、低先備知識）對學術英文字彙學習中學習成效之影響 ...................................................................................... 65
4.3.2 在Quizlet中，不同先備知識（高先備知識、低先備知識）對學術英文字彙學習中學習動機之影響 ...................................................................................... 68
4.3.3 在Quizlet中，不同先備知識（高先備知識、低先備知識）對學術英文字彙學習中學習焦慮之影響 ...................................................................................... 72
4.4 不同學習環境對學術英文字彙學習中的學習成效、學習動機、學習焦慮之相關性 ...................................................................................................................................... 75
4.5 在Quizlet中，不同個體差異對學術英文字彙學習中的學習成效、學習動機、學習焦慮之相關性 .......................................................................................................... 76
4.5.1 在Quizlet中，不同性別（男性、女性）對學術英文字彙學習中的學習成效、學習動機、學習焦慮之相關性 ...................................................................... 76
4.5.2 在Quizlet中，先備知識（高先備知識、低先備知識）對學術英文字彙學習，學習成效、學習動機、學習焦慮之相關性 .................................................. 77
4.6 不同個體差異的學習者在Quizlet的使用經驗 ..................................................... 78
4.7 不同個體差異的學習者對於使用Quizlet學習學術英文字彙的看法及見解 ..... 81
4.7.1 不同學習環境（Quizlet及傳統紙本學習）的喜好差異 ............................. 81
4.7.2 使用數位學習平台學習學術英文字彙動機之影響 ...................................... 82
4.7.3 使用數位學習平台學習學術英文字彙焦慮之影響 ...................................... 84
4.7.4 使用Quizlet學習學術英文字彙時的問題 .................................................... 85
4.7.5 對Quizlet學習學術英文字彙提供改善建議 ................................................ 86
4.7.6 未來使用Quizlet學習的可能性 .................................................................... 86
4.8 綜合討論 ................................................................................................................... 88
4.8.1 不同學習環境對學術英文字彙學習成效、學習動機、學習焦慮之影響 .. 88
4.8.2 在Quizlet中，不同性別對學術英文字彙學習中學習成效、學習動機、學習焦慮之影響 .......................................................................................................... 92
4.8.3 在Quizlet中，不同先備知識對學術英文字彙學習中學習成效、學習動機、學習焦慮之影響 .............................................................................................. 94
4.8.4 不同學習環境對學術英文字彙學習中的學習成效、學習動機、學習焦慮之相關性 .................................................................................................................. 97
4.8.5 在Quizlet中，不同個體差異對學術英文字彙學習中的學習成效、學習動機、學習焦慮之相關性 .......................................................................................... 98
第5章結論與建議 .............................................................................................................. 100
5.1 研究結論 ................................................................................................................. 100
5.2 研究貢獻 ................................................................................................................. 103
5.2.1 學術貢獻 ........................................................................................................ 104
5.2.2 應用貢獻 ........................................................................................................ 104
5.3 未來工作 ................................................................................................................. 105
5.3.1 研究設計改善與建議 .................................................................................... 105
5.3.2 系統設計改善與建議 .................................................................................... 106
參考文獻 ................................................................................................................................ 108
附錄一英文字彙學習內容 .................................................................................................. 125
附錄二英文字彙成效測驗卷 .............................................................................................. 129
附錄三前測問卷 .................................................................................................................. 132
附錄四後測問卷 .................................................................................................................. 136

參考文獻

中文文獻
于賢華（2023）。精確優化教師自主學習教學力-培育終身學習者。臺灣教育評論月刊， 12(5), 127-133。
吳婷婷、黃國禎與宋天文（2007）。建構情境感知無所不在學習之應用. TANET2007 臺灣網際網路研討會論文集。
吳靜吉與程炳林（1992）。激勵的學習策略量表之修訂。測驗年刊，39，54-78。
高永欽（2014）。高中英語教科書及大考閱讀測驗試題之字頻表及字彙涵蓋量語料庫分析研究。﹝碩士論文。國立臺灣科技大學﹞。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/fk2e82。
國家發展委員會（2018）。2030雙語國家政策發展藍圖。https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xNDUzMi83NDBlMTY5Ny1lZmIwLTRjZGItYjYxMi03M2UzMTVhMTM5ZjIucGRm&n=MjAzMOmbmeiqnuaUv%2Betli5wZGY%3D&icon=.pdf
陳麗華 (2008)。書評: 評介 [為學習而設計的教科書] 及其對我國中小學教科書設計與研究的啟示。教科書研究, 1(2), 137-159。
黃如妏（2015）。探討數位遊戲式學習和數位獎章機制對英語學習動機和學習成效之影響。﹝碩士論文。國立中央大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3z74wr。
楊時芬（2019）。PaGamO線上遊戲應用於數學教學對不同成就之七年級學生數學學習態度與學習成就之探究 —以因數與倍數單元為例。﹝碩士論文。國立臺南大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/7pj7a7。
潘淑滿. (2022). 質性研究: 理論與應用。心理出版社股份有限公司。
英文文獻
Abdollahpour, Z., & Asadzadeh Maleki, N. (2023). Fostering academic vocabulary learning: Opportunities for explicit learning through a mobile-assisted app in the field of applied linguistics. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 11(44), 133-152. https://doi.org/10.30495/jfl.2023.700437
Abuhamdeh, S., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the competitive context: An examination of person-situation interactions. Journal of Personality, 77(5), 1615-1635. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00594.x
Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012). Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1816-1828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.023
Adams, A.-M., & Simmons, F. R. (2019). Exploring individual and gender differences in early writing performance. Reading and Writing, 32, 235-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9859-0
Al-Omairi, M. (2020). The use of vocabulary learning strategies by EFL and EAP undergraduate university learners’ in the Iraqi context. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on the English Language in Iraqi Context. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3533601
Alamer, A., & Almulhim, F. (2021). The interrelation between language anxiety and self-determined motivation; a mixed methods approach. Frontiers in Education, 6, 618655. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.618655
Alderson, J. C. (1979). The cloze procedure and proficiency in English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 219-227. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586211
Alemi, M., Meghdari, A., & Ghazisaedy, M. (2015). The impact of social robotics on L2 learners’ anxiety and attitude in English vocabulary acquisition. International Journal of Social Robotics, 7, 523-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0286-y
Appana, S. (2008). A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, the instructor and the tenured faculty. International Journal on E-learning, 7(1), 5-22. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/22909/
Aprilani, D. N. (2021). Students′ Perception in Learning English Vocabulary through Quizlet. Journal of English Teaching, 7(3), 343-353. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v7i3.3064
Arce, N. H., & Valdivia, A. C. (2020). Adapting competitiveness and gamification to a digital platform for foreign language learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(20), 194-209. https://doi.org/https://www.learntechlib.org/p/218340/
Arsari, M. H. A., Sumarni, S., & Darmahusni, D. (2023). Mobile assisted language learning (MALL) in English language education. English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings,
Arsyad, S., Waluyo, B., & Maisarah, I. (2024). Enhancing TOEFL performance and student motivation through integrated flipped and gamified learning in online settings. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1054242
Aslan, O. (2009). The role of gender and language learning strategies in learning English [Middle East Technical University]. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12611098/index.pdf
Bai, S., Hew, K. F., & Huang, B. (2020). Does gamification improve student learning outcome? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts. Educational Research Review, 30, 100322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100322
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy the exercise of control. New York: H. Freeman & Co. Student Success, 333, 48461. https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
Bećirović, S. (2020). Motivation, anxiety and students’ performance. Ahmetović, E., Bećirović, S., and Dubravac, 2020, 271-289. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2020.2.271
Birol, C., Bekirogullari, Z., Etci, C., & Dagli, G. (2009). Gender and computer anxiety, motivation, self-confidence, and computer use. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER)(34).
Bittermann, A., McNamara, D., Simonsmeier, B. A., & Schneider, M. (2023). The landscape of research on prior knowledge and learning: A bibliometric analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09775-9
Bruner, J. S. (2009). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press.
Bueno-Alastuey, M. C., & Nemeth, K. (2022). Quizlet and podcasts: Effects on vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1407-1436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1802601
Cagiltay, N. E., Ozcelik, E., & Ozcelik, N. S. (2015). The effect of competition on learning in games. Computers and Education, 87, 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.001
Caponetto, I., Earp, J., & Ott, M. (2014, October 9-10 ). Gamification and education: A literature review 8th European Conference on Games Based Learning (ECGBL 2014), Berlin, Germany.
Carrell, P. L. (1983). Three components of background knowledge in reading comprehension 1. Language learning, 33(2), 183-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00534.x
Chang, A. C.-S. (2008). Sources of listening anxiety in learning English as a foreign language. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.106.1.21-34
Chang, C.-C., Warden, C. A., Liang, C., & Lin, G.-Y. (2018). Effects of digital game-based learning on achievement, flow and overall cognitive load. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2961
Chen, M.-P., Wang, L.-C., Zou, D., Lin, S.-Y., Xie, H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2022). Effects of captions and English proficiency on learning effectiveness, motivation and attitude in augmented-reality-enhanced theme-based contextualized EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(3), 381-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1704787
Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Going to the MALL: Mobile assisted language learning. Language Learning and Technology
Cook, G. (2003). Applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213-238. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951
Coxhead, A. (2019). Academic vocabulary. In The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 97-110). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429291586-7
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Dahal, N., Manandhar, N. K., Luitel, L., Luitel, B. C., Pant, B. P., & Shrestha, I. M. (2022). ICT tools for remote teaching and learning mathematics: A proposal for autonomy and engagements. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(1), 289-296. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2022.01.013
Dehghanzadeh, H., Fardanesh, H., Hatami, J., Talaee, E., & Noroozi, O. (2021). Using gamification to support learning English as a second language: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(7), 934-957.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1648298
Deliany, Z., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2020). Metacognitive reading strategies awareness and metacognitive reading strategies use of EFL university students across gender. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 421-437. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.17026
Denden, M., Tlili, A., Essalmi, F., Jemni, M., Chen, N.-S., & Burgos, D. (2021). Effects of gender and personality differences on students’ perception of game design elements in educational gamification. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 154, 102674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102674
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011, September 28 - 30). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining" gamification". MindTrek ′11: Academic MindTrek 2011, Tampere Finland.
Dong, A., Jong, M. S.-Y., & King, R. B. (2020). How does prior knowledge influence learning engagement? The mediating roles of cognitive load and help-seeking. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 591203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591203
Dong, L., Jamal Mohammed, S., Ahmed Abdel-Al Ibrahim, K., & Rezai, A. (2022). Fostering EFL learners’ motivation, anxiety, and self-efficacy through computer-assisted language learning-and mobile-assisted language learning-based instructions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 899557. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899557
Duffy, M. C., & Azevedo, R. (2015). Motivation matters: Interactions between achievement goals and agent scaffolding for self-regulated learning within an intelligent tutoring system. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 338-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.041
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 275-298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719
Eskey, D. E. (1986). Theoretical foundations. Teaching Second Language Reading for Academic Purposes, 3-23.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2012). Sex/gender: Biology in a social world. Routledge.
Fithriani, R. (2021). The utilization of mobile-assisted gamification for vocabulary learning: Its
efficacy and perceived benefits. Call-Ej, 22(3), 146-163. https://doi.org/10.1145/3492547.3492646
Francis, M. K., Wormington, S. V., & Hulleman, C. (2019). The costs of online learning: Examining differences in motivation and academic outcomes in online and face-to-face community college developmental mathematics courses. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 476499. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02054
Fu, Y., Zhang, L., Zhao, S., & Chen, Y. (2021). Perceptions of non-English major college students on learning English vocabulary with gamified apps. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(18), 268-276. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i18.24125
García, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Assessing students′ motivation and learning strategies: The motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Document No: Ed 383770. . https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED383770
Gholami, J., & Azarmi, G. (2012). An introduction to mobile assisted language learning. International Journal of Managment, IT and Engineering, 2(8), 1-9.
Gossa, F. (2017). Investigating the effects of language anxiety on English language learners’ pronunciation case study: First year LMD EFL students at Biskra University [University of Mohamed Kheider-Biskra].
Grossman, P. L., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1995). Content as context: The role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(8), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X024008005
Guo, J., & Ding, Q. (2023). Self-regulation, motivation, emotion, and skill mastery of online learning: New evidence from a survey during COVID-19. In Supporting Self-Regulated Learning and Student Success in Online Courses (pp. 238-254). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6500-4.ch011
Hanafiah, W., Aswad, M., Sahib, H., Yassi, A. H., & Mousavi, M. S. (2022). The impact of CALL on vocabulary learning, speaking skill, and foreign language speaking anxiety: The case study of Indonesian EFL learners. Education Research International, 2022, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5500077
Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S., & Göritz, A. (2010). Needs, affect, and interactive products–facets of user experience. Interacting with Computers, 22(5), 353-362.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.002
Hidayanti, I., & Umamah, A. (2019). Listening strategy: A link between gender and student’s achievement. Abjadia: International Journal of Education, 4(1), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.18860/abj.v4i1.6290
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern language Journal, 70(2), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.2307/327317
Hou, Y.-j. (2019, July 26–31). Gender difference in language learning with technology. Learning and collaboration technologies. Designing Learning Experiences: 6th International Conference, LCT 2019, Held as Part of the 21st HCI International Conference, HCII 2019, Part I 21, Orlando, FL, USA,.
Humrickhouse, E. (2021). Flipped classroom pedagogy in an online learning environment: A self-regulated introduction to information literacy threshold concepts. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(2), 102327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102327
Huotari, K., & Hamari, J. (2017). A definition for gamification: Anchoring gamification in the service marketing literature. Electronic Markets, 27(1), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0212-z
Hussin, S., Manap, M. R., Amir, Z., & Krish, P. (2012). Mobile learning readiness among Malaysian students at higher learning institutes. Asian Social Science, 8(12), 276-283. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n12p276
Jeong, K.-O. (2022). Facilitating sustainable self-directed learning experience with the use of mobile-assisted language learning. Sustainability, 14(5), 2894. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052894
Jiang, P., Namaziandost, E., Azizi, Z., & Razmi, M. H. (2023). Exploring the effects of online learning on EFL learners’ motivation, anxiety, and attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a focus on Iran. Current Psychology, 42(3), 2310-2324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04013-x
Johnson, A. M., Ozogul, G., & Reisslein, M. (2015). Supporting multimedia learning with visual signalling and animated pedagogical agent: Moderating effects of prior knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(2), 97-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12078
Johnson, H. P., & Mejia, M. C. (2014). Online learning and student outcomes in California′s
community colleges. Public Policy Institute Washington, DC.
Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (2012). Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. Routledge.
Kizilcec, R. F., & Schneider, E. (2015). Motivation as a lens to understand online learners: Toward data-driven design with the OLEI scale. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 22(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2699735
Klimova, B. (2021a). Evaluating impact of mobile applications on EFL university learners’ vocabulary learning–A review study. Procedia computer Science, 184, 859-864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.108
Klimova, B. (2021b). An insight into online foreign language learning and teaching in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. Procedia computer Science, 192, 1787-1794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.021
Klimova, B., & Polakova, P. (2020). Students’ perceptions of an EFL vocabulary learning mobile application. Education Sciences, 10(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10020037
Kosovich, J. J., Flake, J. K., & Hulleman, C. S. (2017). Short-term motivation trajectories: A parallel process model of expectancy-value. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 130-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.004
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition. Second Language Learning, 3(7), 19-39.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271-289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000335
Laoli, A., Waruwu, E., Ndraha, A. B., & Zebua, D. I. (2023). Gender differences in college students′ achievement in teaching English as a foreign language using inquiry-based learning. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(4), 666-673.
Laugwitz, B., Held, T., & Schrepp, M. (2008, November 20-21). Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire HCI and Usability for Education and Work: 4th Symposium of the Workgroup Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Engineering of the Austrian Computer Society, USAB 2008, Graz, Austria.
Legault, L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual
Differences, 2416-2419. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3
Lei, X., Fathi, J., Noorbakhsh, S., & Rahimi, M. (2022). The impact of mobile-assisted language learning on English as a foreign language learners’ vocabulary learning attitudes and self-regulatory capacity. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 872922. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872922
Lestari, M., & Wahyudin, A. Y. (2020). Language learning strategies of undergraduate EFL students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v1i1.242
Li, L.-Y. (2019). Effect of prior knowledge on attitudes, behavior, and learning performance in video lecture viewing. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4-5), 415-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543086
Light, D., Keller, S., & Calhoun, C. (1991). Sociología. McGraw-Hill.
Lin, J.-J., & Lin, H. (2019). Mobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 878-919. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1541359
Lin, M.-H., Chen, H.-C., & Liu, K.-S. (2017). A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553-3564. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00744a
Liu, T.-C., Lin, Y.-C., & Paas, F. (2014). Effects of prior knowledge on learning from different compositions of representations in a mobile learning environment. Computers and Education, 72, 328-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.019
Llach, M. P. A., & Gallego, M. T. (2012). Vocabulary knowledge development and gender differences in a second language. Elia: Estudios de lingüística inglesa aplicada, 12.
Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in a blended learning context. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.189
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1994). The subtle effects of language anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language learning, 44(2), 283-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01103.x
Madden, J. P. (2004). The effect of prior knowledge on listening comprehension in ESL class discussions The University of Texas at Austin].
Maguire, E. A., Frith, C. D., & Morris, R. G. (1999). The functional neuroanatomy of comprehension and memory: The importance of prior knowledge. Brain, 122(10), 1839-1850. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/122.10.1839
Mahmud, M., & Nur, S. (2018). Exploring students′ learning strategies and gender differences in English language teaching. International Journal of Language Education, 2(1), 51-64. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v2i1.4346
Majuri, J., Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2018, May 21-23). Gamification of education and learning: A review of empirical literature. 2nd GamiFIN 2018, Pori, Finland.
Manihuruk, D. H. (2020). The correlation between EFL students′ vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension: A case study at the English education eepartment of universitas Kristen Indonesia. Journal of English Teaching, 6(1), 86-95. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v5i3.1312
Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Askew, K. (2009). Gender and motivation. Handbook of Motivation at School, 425-446.
Miangah, T. M., & Nezarat, A. (2012). Mobile-assisted language learning. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems, 3(1), 309. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijdps.2012.3126
Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2013). Vocabulary size revisited: The link between vocabulary size and academic achievement. Applied Linguistics Review, 4(1), 151-172.
Monem, R., Bennett, K. D., & Barbetta, P. M. (2018). The effects of low-tech and high-tech active student responding strategies during history instruction for students with SLD. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 16(1), 87-106.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Multimedia-supported metaphors for meaning making in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 17(3), 215-248. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1703_1
Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children′s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33
Mykytka, I. (2023). The use of quizlet to enhance L2 vocabulary acquisition. Encuentro Journal, 31, 56-69. https://doi.org/10.37536/ej.2023.31.2123
Nalipay, M. J. N., Cai, Y., & King, R. B. (2020). Why do girls do better in reading than boys? How parental emotional contagion explains gender differences in reading achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 57(2), 310-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22330
Nation, I. S., & Nation, I. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language (Vol. 10). Cambridge University Press Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009093873
Newton, J. M., & Nation, I. S. (2020). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203114
Noprianto, E., & Purnawarman, P. (2019). EFL students’ vocabulary learning strategies and their affixes knowledge. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(1), 262-275.
Nurmukhamedov, U. (2012). Online English-English Learner Dictionaries Boost Word Learning. English Teaching Forum, 50(4), 10-15.
ÖDEN, M. S., Bolat, Y. İ., & GOKSU, İ. (2021). Kahoot! as a gamification tool in vocational education: More positive attitude, motivation and less anxiety in EFL. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 9(18), 682-701. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.924882
Ogata, H., & Yano, Y. (2004). Knowledge awareness map for computer-supported ubiquitous language-learning. Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1109/WMTE.2004.1281328
Okumuş Dağdeler, K. (2023). A systematic review of mobile-assisted vocabulary learning research. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00235-z
Oosterheert, I. E., & Vermunt, J. D. (2001). Individual differences in learning to teach: Relating cognition, regulation and affect. Learning and Instruction, 11(2), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00019-0
Oxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M. (1992). Second language research on individual differences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 188-205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002464
Özdemir, O., & Seçkin, H. (2024). Quantifying cognitive and affective impacts of Quizlet on learning outcomes: A systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1349835. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1349835
Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The differential impact of extrinsic and mastery goal orientations on males′ and females′ self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(2), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(00)80003-5
Pedro, L. Z., Lopes, A. M., Prates, B. G., Vassileva, J., & Isotani, S. (2015, April 13 - 17). Does gamification work for boys and girls? An exploratory study with a virtual learning environment. SAC 2015: Symposium on Applied Computing, Salamanca Spain.
Peng, H., Jager, S., & Lowie, W. (2021). Narrative review and meta-analysis of MALL research on L2 skills. ReCALL, 33(3), 278-295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344020000221
Pimmer, C., Mateescu, M., & Gröhbiel, U. (2016). Mobile and ubiquitous learning in higher education settings. A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 490-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.057
Pintrich, P. R. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED338122.pdf
Polakova, P., & Klimova, B. (2022). Vocabulary mobile learning application in blended English language learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 869055. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.869055
Prima, S., Riyanto, B., & Hartono, D. (2022). Exploring students’ anxiety in online and offline English language classrooms. International Journal of English and Applied Linguistics (IJEAL), 2(2), 295-300. https://doi.org/10.47709/ijeal.v2i2.1630
Putri, N. A., & Degeng, P. D. D. (2024). Utilizing mobile-assisted language learning (MALLl) to alleviate speaking anxiety among EFL students. English Review: Journal of English Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i1.9352
Putz, L.-M., Hofbauer, F., & Treiblmaier, H. (2020). Can gamification help to improve education? Findings from a longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 106392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106392
Rachels, J. R., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J. (2018). The effects of a mobile gamification app on elementary students’ Spanish achievement and self-efficacy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1-2), 72-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1382536
Rustamov, D., Shakhabitdinova, S., Solijonovc, S., Mattiyev, A., Begaliyev, S., & Fayziev, S. (2021). Research of peculiarities of speech of male and female on phonetic and lexical levels
of language. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 421-430. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.26
Sadiqa, B. J. (2020). Comparing students’ achievement and gender in learning EFL. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(1), 346-357.
Sailer, M., & Sailer, M. (2021). Gamification of in‐class activities in flipped classroom lectures. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12948
Sari, F. M., & Oktaviani, L. (2021). Undergraduate students’ views on the use of online learning platform during COVID-19 pandemic. Teknosastik, 19(1), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.33365/ts.v19i1.896
Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., & Thomaschewski, J. (2017). Design and evaluation of a short version of the user experience questionnaire (UEQ-S). International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 4 (6), 103-108. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2017.09.001
Setiawan, M. R., & Wiedarti, P. (2020). The effectiveness of Quizlet application towards students’ motivation in learning vocabulary. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 83-95. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.15359
Severiens, S. E., & Ten Dam, G. T. (1994). Gender differences in learning styles: A narrative review and quantitative meta-analysis. Higher Education, 27(4), 487-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384906
Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2019). Is there a gender gap? A meta-analysis of the gender differences in students′ ICT literacy. Educational Research Review, 27, 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.03.007
Simanjutak, R. R. (2020). Learning specific academic vocabulary using MALL: experience from computer science students. Teaching English with Technology, 20(5), 87-107. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474248327.0022
Simonsmeier, B. A., Flaig, M., Deiglmayr, A., Schalk, L., & Schneider, M. (2022). Domain-specific prior knowledge and learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist, 57(1), 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1939700
Singh, B. S. (2020). Physical Vs. virtual classroom: A comparative study of teacher effectiveness before and during Covid-19 pandemic. Gyan Management Journal, 14(1), 16-26.
Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021). The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 214-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888348
Song, D. (2016). Expertise reversal effect and sequencing of learning tasks in online English as a second language learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.862553
Stevens, C. K., & Gist, M. E. (1997). Effects of self‐efficacy and goal‐orientation training on negotiation skill maintenance: What are the mechanisms? Personnel Psychology, 50(4), 955-978. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb01490.x
Su, C.-H. (2016). The effects of students′ motivation, cognitive load and learning anxiety in gamification software engineering education: A structural equation modeling study. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 75, 10013-10036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-2799-7
Tahir, F., Mitrovic, A., & Sotardi, V. (2021). Do gaming experience and prior knowledge matter when learning with a gamified ITS? 2021 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 75-77. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT52272.2021.00030
Talan, T. (2020). The effect of mobile learning on learning performance: A meta-analysis study. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 20(1), 79-103. https://doi.org/10.12738/jestp.2020.1.006
Thompson, R. A., & Zamboanga, B. L. (2003). Prior knowledge and its relevance to student achievement in introduction to psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 30(2), 96-101. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP3002_02
Tisza, G., Zhu, S., & Markopoulos, P. (2021, November 2–5). Fun to enhance learning, motivation, self-efficacy, and intention to play in DGBL. Entertainment Computing–ICEC 2021: 20th IFIP TC 14 International Conference, Proceedings 20, Coimbra, Portugal.
Toda, A. M., Valle, P. H., & Isotani, S. (2017). The dark side of gamification: An overview of negative effects of gamification in education. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 832, 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97934-2_9
Todorova, N. (2023). Effect of Quizlet use on Ukrainian service members’ English vocabulary acquisition. Advanced Education, 29-41. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.281048
Tsai, C.-C. (2020). The effects of augmented reality to motivation and performance in EFL vocabulary learning. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 987-1000. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13460a
Tu, C.-H., Sujo-Montes, L. E., & Yen, C.-J. (2015). Gamification for learning. Media Rich Instruction: Connecting Curriculum to All Learners, 203-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00152-4_13
Tuncer, M., & Dogan, Y. (2015). Effect of foreign language classroom anxiety on Turkish university students′ academic achievement in foreign language learning. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(6), 14-19. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i6.998
Vallance, R. J. (2004). Males′ academic motivation: doing a personal best. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8(4), 95-101.
Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4
Vargas, J. M. (2011). Modern learning: Quizlet in the social studies classroom [Wichita State University]. http://hdl.handle.net/10057/3986
Voyer, D., & Voyer, S. D. (2014). Gender differences in scholastic achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1174. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0036620
Wünderlich, N. V., Gustafsson, A., Hamari, J., Parvinen, P., & Haff, A. (2020). The great game of business: Advancing knowledge on gamification in business contexts. Journal of Business Research, 106, 273-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.062
Waluyo, B., & Bucol, J. L. (2021). The impact of gamified vocabulary learning using Quizlet on low-proficiency students. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 158-179.
Wang, Q. (2019). A comparative study of gender differences in refusal strategies from English majors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(8), 1040-1048. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0908.24
Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching (Vol. 111). Edward Arnold London.
Williamson, J. M. (2018). Individual differences. Teaching to Individual Differences in Science and Engineering Librarianship, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101881-1.00001-7
Wood, L. C., & Reiners, T. (2015). Gamification. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Third Edition (pp. 3039-3047). IGI global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch297
Wulantari, N. P., Rachman, A., Sari, M. N., Uktolseja, L. J., & Rofi′i, A. (2023). The role of gamification in English language teaching: A literature review. Journal on Education, 6(1), 2847-2856. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.3328
Xodabande, I., Iravi, Y., Mansouri, B., & Matinparsa, H. (2022). Teaching academic words with digital flashcards: Investigating the effectiveness of mobile-assisted vocabulary learning for university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 893821. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.893821
Yang, J. C., & Kuo, W. C. (2022). A mobile game‐based app to facilitate learners′ motivation and achievement in learning Chinese reading activities: An individual differences perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1448-1464. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12698
Yang, J. C., & Quadir, B. (2018). Effects of prior knowledge on learning performance and anxiety in an English learning online role-playing game. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 174-185. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26458516
Yashima, T., Kimberly A, N., Shizuka, T., Takeuchi, O., Yamane, S., & Yoshizawa, K. (2009). The interplay of classroom anxiety, intrinsic motivation, and gender in the Japanese EFL context. 関西大学外国語教育研究, 17, 41-64.
Yau, H. K., Cheng, A. L. F., & Ho, W. M. (2012, June 21-22). Gender difference in using technology for learning: An empirical study in Hong Kong higher education. 7th International Conference on eLearning (ICEL 2012), Hong Kong, China.
Yeo, J.-H., Cho, I.-H., Hwang, G.-H., & Yang, H.-H. (2022). Impact of gender and prior knowledge on learning performance and motivation in a digital game-based learning biology course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(3), 989-1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10099-8
Yih, Y. J., Chin, V., & Ling, T. H. (2018). The role of gender in English language learning anxiety among tertiary students. E-Academia Journal, 6(2).
Young, D. J. (1991). Creating a low-anxiety classroom environment: What does language anxiety research suggest? The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 426-439.
https://doi.org/10.2307/329492
Young, M. R., Klemz, B. R., & Murphy, J. W. (2003). Enhancing learning outcomes: The effects of instructional technology, learning styles, instructional methods, and student behavior. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(2), 130-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475303254004
Yu, Z. (2021). The effects of gender, educational level, and personality on online learning outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00252-3
Yu, Z., & Deng, X. (2022). A meta-analysis of gender differences in e-learners′ self-efficacy, satisfaction, motivation, attitude, and performance across the world. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 897327. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.897327
Yu, Z., Gao, M., & Wang, L. (2021). The effect of educational games on learning outcomes, student motivation, engagement and satisfaction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(3), 522-546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120969214
Yu, Z., & Yu, L. (2021). A meta-analysis of online learning outcomes and their gender differences. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 19(3), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2021070103
Yuhanna, I., Alexander, A., & Kachik, A. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of Online Learning. Journal Educational Verkenning, 1(2), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.48173/jev.v1i2.54
Yusoff, Z. S., Gurmani, M. T. A., Sanif, S., & Noor, S. N. F. M. (2022). The effects of mobile-assisted CEFR EVP word lists on L2 learners′ vocabulary knowledge. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(2), 526-543. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v18i2.18159
Zafar, S., & Meenakshi, K. (2012). Individual learner differences and second language acquisition: A review. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(4), 639. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.4.639-646
Zainuddin, Z. (2018). Students′ learning performance and perceived motivation in gamified flipped-class instruction. Computers and Education, 126, 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.003
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016

指導教授

楊接期(Jie-Chi Yang)

審核日期

2024-8-2

推文