使用元宇宙環境對合作科學探究之成效與行為影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：105

、訪客IP：3.133.114.38

姓名

黃煒翔(HUANG,WEI-XIANG) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

使用元宇宙環境對合作科學探究之成效與行為影響
(The Impact of Metaverse Environments on the Performance and Behavior in Collaborative Scientific Inquiry)

相關論文

★ 以視覺為主的遊戲空間輔助全身性學習	★ 以數位教室環境增進同步遠距教學之臨場感
★ 以行動載具支援並分析合作式的探索活動	★ 以混合實境支援工作臺協同探究學習
★ 使用資料探勘輔助學習者探索大型資料庫—學習者經驗之研究	★ 以貢獻與聯結為基礎之社會知識創造模型—一個資源與概念合作聯結工具
★ 互動式計算桌面環境對於合作學習的優缺點	★ 以共享螢幕及群組軟體支援一對一環境下面對面的合作網路探索
★ 合作學習使用網際網路: 學習腳本在面對面網路合作探索的影響	★ 兒童使用超媒體的Web2.0創作故事平台之探究--衍生與重組
★ 以創用為基礎之合作說故事平台 - 衍生、重組、擁有感	★ 透過網路實施模擬實務社群並利用即興創作激發創意
★ 使用群組軟體與共同螢幕進行一對一合作網路探索活動	★ 以Cyber-Physical環境支援程式設計學習之探究
★ 跨領域合作設計活動之互動分析：群組軟體的支援與設計	★ 不同成就學生於模擬遊戲環境中程式學習效果之探究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

在2019年的COVID-19大流行之後，由於現實中社交距離的限制，人們被迫將工作及教育等活動轉為線上的形式。在教育方面若僅將課程內容轉為影片或投影片等資源放在網路上，缺乏互動性的學習環境會使學生處在被動且學習興趣低落的狀態，並無法達到在現實學校一樣的學習成效。因此能提供高度擬真程度和沉浸感的元宇宙成為了人們關注的重點，且在以發展許久的腦輔助之合作學習(Computer Support Collaborative Learning, CSCL)領域中也提到社交上的互動也與學習內容互動同樣重要，元宇宙中透過虛擬化身(Avatar)來表現出表情、動作並能使用語音交流等功能與CSCL的發展方向相當契合。且由於元宇宙中能以虛擬物件進行互動的特性，使得進行科學探究重複實驗的成本降低並在天文或歷史等主題的探究式學習成為可能的發展方向。
本研究招募2所學校中67名高中生為研究對象，並依照學校分為實驗組和控制組，分別以元宇宙環境和一般網路學習環境進行合作科學探究活動。學生能自由分組並以小組共同回答探究問題表單，合作科學探究活動分為上午和下午各90分鐘。在兩組活動前、後各發放一份學習興趣量表及科學概念試題來探討學生在活動前後的學習興趣及學習成效。元宇宙環境將蒐集學生在環境中的移動軌跡，並輸入至虛擬空間之學習行為分析工具「Virtual Space Learning Analysis Tool」（VSLAT）中來觀察學生的學習行為。
研究結果發現相較於網頁環境，以元宇宙環境來進行合作科學探究的學生在學習興趣和學習成效上有較高的提升。且在觀察VSLAT的小組軌跡圖和相遇分布甘特圖後發現元宇宙環境中的4種合作特殊時刻。本研究在最後根據實驗結果給出將元宇宙應用在教育領域的未來方向及建議。

摘要(英)

After the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019, due to the restrictions on social distancing in real life, people were compelled to shift activities such as work and education to online formats. In the realm of education, merely converting course content into videos or slides and placing them online results in a lack of interactive learning environments, which can leave students in a passive state with low learning interest, thereby failing to achieve the same learning outcomes as in physical schools. Consequently, the metaverse, which offers a high degree of realism and immersion, has garnered significant attention. In the field of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), which has been developed over many years, it is noted that social interaction is as crucial as interaction with learning content. The metaverse, with its ability to represent expressions and actions through virtual avatars and facilitate voice communication, aligns well with the development direction of CSCL. Additionally, the metaverse′s capability to interact with virtual objects reduces the cost of conducting scientific inquiries and broadens the scope of topics.
This study designs a collaborative scientific inquiry activity within a metaverse environment. The study involves 67 high school students from two schools, divided into experimental and control groups according to their respective schools, with the experimental group engaging in the inquiry activity within a metaverse environment and the control group using online webpages. Students could freely form groups and collaboratively answer inquiry question sheets, with the inquiry activities divided into two 90-minute sessions in the morning and afternoon. Before and after the activities, a learning interest questionnaire and a science concept test were administered to explore the students′ learning effectiveness. The metaverse environment collected students′ movement trajectories within the environment and input them into the Virtual Space Learning Analysis Tool (VSLAT) to observe students′ learning behaviors.
The results of the study found that students engaged in scientific inquiry within the metaverse environment showed higher improvements in learning interest and effectiveness. Furthermore, by observing group trajectory maps and encounter distribution Gantt charts in VSLAT, four distinct collaborative scenarios were identified in the metaverse environment. Based on the experimental results, the study concludes with future directions and recommendations for applying the metaverse in the field of education.

關鍵字(中)

★ 元宇宙
★ 科學探究
★ 電腦輔助之合作學習

關鍵字(英)

★ Metaverse
★ Science Inquiry
★ Computer Supported Collaborative Learning

論文目次

摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
致謝 IV
目錄 V
表目錄 X
第一章緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的與問題 2
1.3 名詞解釋 2
1.3.1 元宇宙(Metaverse) 2
1.3.2 電腦輔助之合作學習(Computer Support Collaborative Learning, CSCL) 3
1.3.3 科學探究(Scientific Inquiry) 3
1.4 論文架構 3
第二章文獻探討 4
2.1 科學探究 4
2.2 元宇宙 4
2.3 以元宇宙環境進行合作學習 6
3.1 系統特色 8
3.2 系統介紹 9
3.2.1 CoSci物理模擬網站 9
3.2.2 元宇宙平台說明 11
3.2.3 線上合作探究網頁說明 12
3.2.4 VSLAT說明 14
3.3 系統架構 15
第四章研究方法 17
4.1 研究流程 17
4.2 研究對象 18
4.3 實驗設計 18
4.4 研究工具 22
4.4.1 CoSci合作模擬 22
4.4.2 科學探究問題表單 25
4.4.3 科學概念試題 25
4.4.4 科學學習興趣量表 27
4.5資料蒐集與分析 27
4.5.1學習成效分析 28
4.5.1.1科學探究問題表單 28
4.5.1.2 科學概念試題 31
4.5.2 科學學習興趣量表分析 33
4.5.3 學習行為分析 33
4.5.4 特殊時刻分析 34
第五章結果與討論 35
5.1 合作科學探究成效分析 36
5.1.1 科學探究表單成績分析 36
5.1.2科學概念試題分析 40
5.2 科學學習興趣量表分析 47
5.2.1科學學習興趣量表分數成對樣本t檢定 47
5.2.2科學學習興趣量表分數獨立樣本t檢定 48
5.2.3科學學習興趣量表分數共變數分析 50
5.3 科學探究學習行為分析 52
5.3.1 CoSci操作紀錄獨立樣本t檢定 52
5.3.2 CoSci操作紀錄與學習表現相關性分析 53
5.4 元宇宙環境合作科學探究之特殊時刻分析 57
5.4.1 組員同步移動 58
5.4.2 跨組討論 61
5.4.3 尋求並加入小組 66
5.4.4 組內成員在環境中不同位置討論 72
第六章結論與未來建議 79
6.1 結論 79
6.1.1 一般網路學習環境與元宇宙環境的學生合作科學探究成效之比較 79
6.1.2 一般網路學習環境與元宇宙環境的學生對科學學習興趣之比較 80
6.1.3 一般網路學習環境與元宇宙環境的學生合作科學探究學習行為之比較 80
6.1.4學生在元宇宙環境中進行合作科學探究之特殊時刻 80
6.2 研究限制與未來建議 81
參考文獻 82
附錄A 研究參與者知情同意書 91
附錄B 科學探究問題表單 91
附錄C 科學概念試題 95
附錄D 科學學習興趣量表 99

參考文獻

吳一平 (2023)。TPACK 元宇宙學習平台之合作與學習行為分析。國立中央大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文，桃園縣。
Castronova, E. (2001). Virtual worlds: A first-hand account of market and society on the cyberian frontier. Available at SSRN 294828.
Chang, C. J., Liu, C. C., Wu, Y. T., Chang, M. H., Chiang, S. F., Chiu, B. C., ... & Chang, C. K. (2016). Students′ perceptions on problem solving with collaborative computer simulation. In 24th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2016 (pp. 166-168). Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
Cheng, R., Wu, N., Chen, S., & Han, B. (2022). Will metaverse be nextg internet? vision, hype, and reality. IEEE network, 36(5), 197-204.
Dahan, N. A., Al-Razgan, M., Al-Laith, A., Alsoufi, M. A., Al-Asaly, M. S., & Alfakih, T. (2022). Metaverse framework: A case study on E-learning environment (ELEM). Electronics, 11(10), 1616.
Díaz, J., Saldaña, C., & Avila, C. (2020). Virtual world as a resource for hybrid education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(15), 94-109.
Dionisio, J. D. N., Iii, W. G. B., & Gilbert, R. (2013). 3D virtual worlds and the metaverse: Current status and future possibilities. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 45(3), 1-38.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M., ... & Wamba, S. F. (2022). Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 66, 102542.
Hussain, A., Azeem, M., & Shakoor, A. (2011). Physics teaching methods: scientific inquiry vs traditional lecture. International journal of humanities and social science, 1(19), 269-276.
Hwang, G. J., & Chien, S. Y. (2022). Definition, roles, and potential research issues of the metaverse in education: An artificial intelligence perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100082.
Kaddoura, S., & Al Husseiny, F. (2023). The rising trend of Metaverse in education: Challenges, opportunities, and ethical considerations. PeerJ Computer Science, 9, e1252.
Kim, H., & Kim, M. (2023). Presence and effectiveness of online learning using a metaverse platform: Gather. town. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(4), 690-695.
Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (3th ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in human behavior, 19(3), 335-353.
Kye, B., Han, N., Kim, E., Park, Y., & Jo, S. (2021). Educational applications of metaverse: possibilities and limitations. Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, 18.
Leask, B. (2004). Internationalisation outcomes for all students using information and communication technologies (ICTs). Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(4), 336-351.
Lee, L. H., Braud, T., Zhou, P., Wang, L., Xu, D., Lin, Z., ... & Hui, P. (2021). All one needs to know about metaverse: A complete survey on technological singularity, virtual ecosystem, and research agenda. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05352.
Lin, H., Wan, S., Gan, W., Chen, J., & Chao, H. C. (2022, December). Metaverse in education: Vision, opportunities, and challenges. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 2857-2866). IEEE.
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and psychological measurement, 70(4), 647-671.
Ma, X., Liu, J., Liang, J., & Fan, C. (2023). An empirical study on the effect of group awareness in CSCL environments. Interactive learning environments, 31(1), 38-53.
Meier, C., Saorín, J., de León, A. B., & Cobos, A. G. (2020). Using the roblox video game engine for creating virtual tours and learning about the sculptural heritage. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(20), 268-280.
Mistretta, S. (2022). The metaverse—An alternative education space. AI, Computer Science and Robotics Technology.
Mystakidis, S. (2022). Metaverse. Encyclopedia, 2(1), 486-497.
National Research Council, Division of Behavioral, Social Sciences, Board on Science Education, National Committee on Science Education Standards, & Assessment. (1996). National science education standards. National Academies Press.
Ng, D. T. K. (2022). What is the metaverse? Definitions, technologies and the community of inquiry. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 190-205.
Park, S. M., & Kim, Y. G. (2022). A metaverse: Taxonomy, components, applications, and open challenges. IEEE access, 10, 4209-4251.
Raes, A., Schellens, T., & De Wever, B. (2010). The impact of web-based collaborative inquiry for science learning in secondary education.
Rohaeti, E., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2020). Oriented Collaborative Inquiry Learning Model: Improving Students′ Scientific Attitudes in General Chemistry. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(1), 108-120.
Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground–A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in science education, 52(2), 161-197.
Shu, X., & Gu, X. (2023). An empirical study of a smart education model enabled by the edu-metaverse to enhance better learning outcomes for students. Systems, 11(2), 75.
Smart, J.M., Cascio, J., Paffendorf, J. (2007) Metaverse road map; Acceleration Studies Foundation: Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T. D., & Suthers, D. D. (2006). CSCL: An historical perspective.
Stahl, G. (2015). A decade of CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10, 337-344.
Tlili, A., Huang, R., Shehata, B., Liu, D., Zhao, J., Metwally, A. H. S., ... & Burgos, D. (2022). Is metaverse in education a blessing or a curse: A combined content and bibliometric analysis. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 1-31.
Ulfah, M., Harahap, M. B., & Rajagukguk, J. (2018, December). The effect of scientific inquiry learning model for student’s science process skill and self efficacy in the static fluid subject. In 3rd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2018) (pp. 446-449). Atlantis Press.
Van der Land, S., Schouten, A., & Feldberg, F. (2011). Modeling the metaverse: A theoretical model of effective team collaboration in 3D virtual environments. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 4(3).
Wang, Y., Su, Z., Zhang, N., Xing, R., Liu, D., Luan, T. H., & Shen, X. (2022). A survey on metaverse: Fundamentals, security, and privacy. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 25(1), 319-352.
Warburton, S. (2009). Second Life in higher education: Assessing the potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching. British journal of educational technology, 40(3), 414-426.
Weinberger, M. (2022). What is metaverse?—A definition based on qualitative meta-synthesis. Future Internet, 14(11), 310.
Al Yakin, A., & Seraj, P. M. I. (2023). Impact of metaverse technology on student engagement and academic performance: the mediating role of learning motivation. International Journal of Computations, Information and Manufacturing (IJCIM), 3(1), 10-18.
Zhang, X., Chen, Y., Hu, L., & Wang, Y. (2022). The metaverse in education: Definition, framework, features, potential applications, challenges, and future research topics. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1016300.

指導教授

劉晨鐘(Chen Chung Liu)

審核日期

2024-8-7

推文