Do relative leverage and relative distress really explain size and book-to-market anomalies?

NCU Institutional Repository > 管理學院 > 財務金融學系 > 期刊論文 > Item 987654321/51683

jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/51683

题名:	Do relative leverage and relative distress really explain size and book-to-market anomalies?
作者:	Chou,PH;Ko,KC;Lin,SJ
贡献者:	財務金融學系
日期:	2010
上传时间:	2012-03-27 19:02:44 (UTC+8)
出版者:	國立中央大學
摘要:	In a capital asset pricing model (CAPM) framework, Ferguson and Shockley [2003. Equilibrium "anomalies". Journal of Finance 58, 2549-2580] propose two factors constructed on relative leverage and relative distress, and show that the two factors subsume Fama and French's [1993. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 33, 3-56] factors constructed on size and book-to-market (BM) in explaining the cross-sectional average returns of the 25 size-BM portfolios. Based on tests on individual securities, we find that all factors fail to fully explain the common asset-pricing anomalies. In the spirit of Merton's [1973. An intertemporal capital asset pricing model. Econometrica 41, 867-887] intertemporal CAPM, we propose an augmented five-factor model, which incorporates Ferguson and Shockley's [2003. Equilibrium "anomalies". Journal of Finance 58, 2549-2580] factors into the Fama-French three-factor model. The empirical results show that a simple conditional version of the augmented model is able to explain most well-known asset-pricing anomalies. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier B.V.
關聯:	JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS
显示于类别:	[財務金融學系] 期刊論文

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
index.html		0Kb	HTML	644	检视/开启

在NCUIR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing