| 摘要: | 「公職人員財產申報法」為陽光法案之一，藉由財務狀況提供人民檢驗之透明化手段，預防公職人員利益衝突甚至是腐敗，也促進人民對政府廉能之信賴。惟此制度亦衍生諸多不利益或不便，例如：侵害公開義務人之隱私權、增加執行的行政成本、降低人民擔任公職之意願。因此，本法自1993年公佈施行以來，雖歷經多次修正，仍有再行修正之聲浪。 本計畫將基於治理理論對施行成效作一檢驗，並透過文獻資料研究法和座談會方式了解本法實施所遇到的難題。此外，本計畫將選擇新加坡、香港、美國、加拿大作為標竿國家，了解各國政策與制度實情，注意哪些因素可移植到我國、哪些特有因素限制我國制度選擇的可能。 經由以上分析，本計畫至少對以下爭議問題提出立法建議：一、申報義務人的範圍是否增減？二、申報範圍與內容是否擴大？三、強制信託的可行性、必要性、和執行方式。四、強制公開或被動公開。五、變動申報的必要性。六、申報不實的入罪化(可罰性)。 ; As one pillar of the Sunshine Acts, the “Act on Property-Declaration by Public Servants” imposes upon the public servants an obligation to disclose their financial situation, so that transparency of their wealth can be increased and monitored. This approach can not only prevent conflict of interest or even corruption, but also promote people’s trust in a clean and competent government. However, such a system may also lead to a number of disadvantages, such as encroachment upon the public servants’ right to privacy, increasing the implementation cost and reducing people’s incentive to hold public office. Therefore, there exist always voices to amend this act; even it has undergone several modifications since its taking effect in 1993. Through the lens of governance theories, this project will examine this act’s post-implementation effect. By way of literature research and roundtable discussions, some practical problems will be exposed. In addition, this project will choose Singapore, Hong Kong, the United States and Canada as benchmarking countries. After comprehensive and systematic comparison of their national policies and institutional facts, we will highlight the factors available for legal and institutional transplantation, and designate the path-dependent factors which limit the possible choices of our system. Through the above-mentioned analysis, we will at least recommend legislative proposals about the following controversial issues: First, should we expand or reduce the scope of public servants to file assets declaration? Second, should we expand or reduce the content of assets declaration? Third, we will explore the feasibility, the necessity, and the means of implementing a mandatory trust. Fourth, should assets disclosure be public or non-public? Fifth, what kind of filing method and frequency serves the policy at best? Sixth, should we introduce special criminal punishment to sanction those making inaccurate statements on assets declaration? ; 研究期間 9811 ~ 9909 |
