中大機構典藏-NCU Institutional Repository-提供博碩士論文、考古題、期刊論文、研究計畫等下載:Item 987654321/84999
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 78937/78937 (100%)
Visitors : 39854099      Online Users : 272
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/84999


    Title: Rolston 荒野價值理論探究;Rolston Wilderness Values Research
    Authors: 熊克維;Hsiung, Ke-Wei
    Contributors: 哲學研究所
    Keywords: 荒野;自然環境;工具價值;客觀內在價值;Rolston
    Date: 2021-01-04
    Issue Date: 2021-03-18 17:09:35 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學
    Abstract: 荒野 (wilderness) 作為原始生態的保留區,蘊含著豐富的生物多樣性,以及渾然天成的自然景觀,但由於人們將荒野視作工具,來進行大量的開墾與利用,使當代環境的大生態已逐漸面臨到生態危機,導致荒野中的生物多樣性開始產生物種失衡或滅絕的現象,因此,本論文將以Rolston環境倫理學之荒野觀來進行探究。故而,本論文一開始主要先釐清“Wildness”與“Wilderness”之概念對比簡析,並從荒野的角度來探究,荒野與自然、荒野與文化,以及荒野與宗教的關係。

    接著,第二章將基於Rolston環境倫理學所闡揚的自然環境之價值理論,分別探討自然環境之工具價值、自然環境之內在價值,以及自然環境的系統價值,其中,為闡揚Rolston客觀內在價值論,將從「自然環境先於人類而存在」與「演化論」之立場,來作為其客觀性的依據,並依此提出批判與反思。

    最後,第三章將從荒野的角度來闡述,荒野的工具價值與客觀內在價值,並以荒野保育的教育面與荒野保育的法律政策面,期許我們可對荒野生態抱持「尊重」與「義務」來改善荒野的對待之道,進而實現人與自然生態間的和諧共處。
    ;Wilderness, as a primitive ecological reserve, contains rich biodiversity and natural landscapes. However, because people regard the wilderness as a tool for a large of reclamation and utilization, the large ecological environment of the contemporary environment has been Gradually facing an ecological crisis, the biodiversity in the wilderness has begun to produce species imbalance or extinction. Therefore, this article will explore the wilderness view in Rolston′s environmental ethics. Based on this, we will explore the relationship between wilderness and nature, wilderness and culture, wilderness and religion from the perspective of wilderness.

    Next, we will discuss the Instrumental value, Intrinsic value and Systemic value of the Natural environment elucidated by Rolston′s environmental ethics. Finally, In Chapter 3 of this article is based on the discussion in Chapter 2, from the perspective of the wilderness, the Instrumental value and Objective intrinsic value of the wilderness, and from the perspective of the education and policy of the wilderness, we have expected that we can "Respect" and "obligation" to improve their treatment, and to achieve harmonious coexistence between humans and natural ecology.
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Philosophy] Electronic Thesis & Dissertation

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML189View/Open


    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明