中大機構典藏-NCU Institutional Repository-提供博碩士論文、考古題、期刊論文、研究計畫等下載:Item 987654321/87182
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 78937/78937 (100%)
Visitors : 39855666      Online Users : 120
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/87182


    Title: 高級中等學校課程綱要法律定位及行政救濟之研究
    Authors: 黃奕彰;HUANG, YI CHANG
    Contributors: 法律與政府研究所
    Keywords: 高級中等學校課程綱要;課程綱要微調案;法規命令;行政救濟;senior secondary school curriculum guidelines;Curriculum Guidelines;finetuning of Curriculum Guidelines;regulations and orders;administrative relief
    Date: 2021-09-27
    Issue Date: 2021-12-07 15:52:14 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 國立中央大學
    Abstract: 有關教科書審定中課程綱要之爭議,在我國總與政治扯上邊,早從國民政
    府來台前,課堂上教授的內容往往不脫離主政者所喜好,人民似僅能被動的接
    受主政者的喜好而無法有選擇的餘地,即便隨著時代演進,教育理論與教育方
    式均有或多或少的改變,但人民在教育體系被動的地位仍未曾改變。然而隨著
    台灣從威權走向民主,人民的屬性也不同以往,當人民有能力提出對於教育內
    容之意見,與政府的衝突是必然的,而台灣貴為法制社會,人民對於課綱訂定
    程序或內容若有合法性之質疑,理當尋求司法之救濟,原則上課綱為機關所為
    的行政行為,其救濟途徑應循行政訴訟,但現實是,本次103 年課綱微調事件
    卻因為司法實務將其定位為法規命令而無法獲得立即有效的救濟,也因此本論
    文試圖以釐清課綱的行政行為屬性為出發點,探討各學者間對於課綱不同行政
    屬性的看法以及救濟途徑,以供未來類似案件爭訟之參考。;In our coutry ,the disputes regarding on Curriculum Guidelines is always related to
    the politics. Before the National Government came to Taiwan, the content taught in
    the classroom is often not out of the preferences of the governor, and the people
    seem to be able to passively accept the preferences of the governor and have no
    choice. Even with the progress of the times, educational theories and methods have
    changed more or less, but the only thing that remains unchanged is that the
    people still on the passive position in the education system.
    However, as Taiwan has moved from Authoritarianism is moving towards
    democracy, and the attributes of the people are different from the past. When the
    people have the ability to put forward their opinions on the content of education,
    conflicts with the government are inevitable.
    Taiwan is a society under the rule of law. If the people have doubts about the
    legality of the Curriculum Guidelines or content ,it is reasonable to seek judicial
    relief. In principle, the Curriculum Guidelines is an administrative act performed by
    the administrative agency. The remedy should be through administrative litigation.
    However, the reality is that the Curriculum Guidelines fine-tuning incident in 2014
    was positioned as a legal order due to judicial practice. It is impossible to obtain
    immediate and effective relief. Therefore, this thesis attempts to clarify the
    administrative behavior attributes of the Curriculum Guidelines as a starting point,
    and explores the views of various scholars on the different administrative
    attributes of the syllabus and the ways of relief, so as to provide reference for
    similar cases in the future.
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Law and Government] Electronic Thesis & Dissertation

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML118View/Open


    All items in NCUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    ::: Copyright National Central University. | 國立中央大學圖書館版權所有 | 收藏本站 | 設為首頁 | 最佳瀏覽畫面: 1024*768 | 建站日期:8-24-2009 :::
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 隱私權政策聲明