| 摘要: | 社會經濟活動快速發展，根據內政部營建署之營建剩餘土石方資訊服務中心統計資料顯示，每年全國營建工程約產出均逾四千萬立方公尺之營建剩餘土石方，大部分進入營建剩餘土石方收容處理場所，惟營建剩餘土石方收容處理場所是否管理得當、如何評估優劣，長久以來一直是相關單位相當重視之議題。
內政部「營建剩餘土石方處理方案」為施政指導方針，因各縣市轄情及營建剩餘土石方收容處理場所類型不盡相同，故由各直轄市、縣市政府自行訂定營建剩餘土石方管理自治條例等管理法規，並執行管理，因此各直轄市、縣市政府的管理標準及強度仍有差異。
儘管營建剩餘土石方管理行之有年，仍常發生因處理機具不足以應付收受之各類土質，導致出現營建剩餘土石方後端去化有違規棄置等情事，亦或是惡性削價競爭或為降低處理成本而偷埋暗管排放污泥等不當行為，除了造成環境衝擊及危害公共安全外，也增加後續的行政成本，故本研究目的在於建立評鑑營建剩餘土石方收容處理場所之場地、處理機具設備、營運效能等之管理標準，朝向妥善處理營建剩餘土石方、減少非法棄置及強化經營體質目標發展。
本研究藉由文獻回顧、專家訪談及實地訪查，擬定評鑑項目因子，涵蓋營建剩餘土石方收容處理場所各個面向，全面評估其經營及管理能力，並將其分為「營運管理」、「營運效能」、「設備維護」、「技術研究發展」、「環境安全衛生」和「人員管理」等六大評鑑項目及其十五項關鍵因子，並使用層級分析法評估評鑑項目因子權重及重要程度，求得客觀且可行的評估準則，以建立評鑑架構。
透過營建剩餘土石方收容處理場所管理評鑑試評作業，檢驗評鑑項目在實際運用時，是否具備區分良莠廠商之鑑別度，同時藉由試評成績探討受評之營建剩餘土石方收容處理場所營運及管理現況，並綜合整體試評作業成果進行制度改良，俾使評鑑制度更臻完善，最後完成建立營建剩餘土石方收容處理場所管理評鑑制度，提供營建剩餘土石方收容處理場所主管機關參採。
;The socio-economic activities have experienced rapid development. Statistics indicated the construction surplus soil an annual output of over forty million cubic meters . Most of the construction surplus soil must go to the construction surplus soil facility. However, whether these facilities are managed appropriately and how to assess their quality have long been subjects of considerable concern for relevant authorities.
Due to varying conditions and facility types in different cities , each municipality formulates its own autonomous regulations for the management of such and enforces them. Hence, variations in management criteria and intensity persist across different cities.
Despite years of legal regulation, violations in the management of the construction surplus soil facility still frequently occur, resulting in environmental impacts, endangering public safety. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to establish a set of management standards for evaluating the construction surplus soil facility.
This study formulates evaluation criteria by conducting literature reviews, expert interviews, and on-site visitation. A comprehensive assessment of their operational and management capabilities is carried out, dividing the evaluation into six major categories: "Operational Management," "Operational Efficiency," "Equipment Maintenance," "Technological Research and Development," "Environmental Safety and Hygiene," and "Personnel Management." Fifteen key factors are identified within these categories.
Moreover, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is employed to evaluate the importance and weighting of these evaluation factors, resulting in objective and feasible assessment criteria to establish the evaluation framework.
Through the evaluation trial of construction and demolition waste containment and processing facility management, the discriminative power of the evaluation criteria is tested in practical application. Simultaneously, the trial results shed light on the current operation and management status of the evaluated construction and demolition waste containment and processing facilities. By integrating the outcomes of the entire evaluation process, system improvements are made, aiming for a more refined evaluation system. Ultimately, the establishment of the management evaluation system for the construction surplus soil facility is completed. |
