博碩士論文 93443014 詳細資訊



以作者查詢圖書館館藏 、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 、以作者查詢全國書目 、勘誤回報 、線上人數：46 、訪客IP：18.118.205.75
姓名 陳美如(Mei-Ju Chen)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱 探討開放原始碼軟體(OSS)社群成員持續參與之研究:給予文化與情境學習的觀點
(A Study on Sustained Participation in the Open Source Software (OSS) Community: The Perspective of Gift-Giving Culture and Situated Learning)
相關論文
★ 製藥業的成本會計評估研究─ 一個ABC成本制度的應用★ 一個保險業的資料採擷應用--業務員的薪酬制度分析
★ 農漁產品電子化交易中分類分級管理之研究★ 應用類神經網路建構壽險核保決策支援之研究
★ 企業導入ERP之關鍵成功因素-個案研究★ 體外診斷醫療器材滿足CE及GMP驗證要求之個案研
★ 企業資訊系統委外研究－以個案銀行為例★ DRAM月平均價格變動分析
★ 定期航運產業運價及運送時間對經營績效影響之研究-以某外商海運公司在台灣經營為例★ 以交通儲值卡作為電子支付工具的營運模式及可行性分析
★ 軟體公司能力成熟度評估★ 加速台灣海關的通關便捷化－提升行動化服務的解決方案
★ 以均勻度係數為預測晶圓良率指標之可行性分析-以國內某DRAM廠為例★ 某公司資訊部門變革失敗之探討
★ 資訊部門導入ITIL 管理機制之現況分析─ 以企業導入ITIL 服務支援為例★ 導入WCO SAFE 優質企業之可行性分析–以A航空公司為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中) 隨著Raymond於1998年提倡自由軟體運動開始，軟體應該被自由分享與取用的觀念逐漸形成。軟體發展遂歷經了重大的改革，由原來處於完全封閉的軟體開發流程，轉而朝向由虛擬社群所趨使的開放原始碼軟體 (OSS) 開發流程。學者稱此種現象是一種「徹底的創新」模式，其所產生的影響力，直接威脅了世界上最有權力的軟體供應商，並且對軟體產業的生態造成劇烈的衝擊。因此，OSS模式漸漸為商業環境所接受，更被視為是商業軟體的可行替代方案。此外，軟體產業與研究者對OSS社群中成員之間的互動，均抱持高度的興趣，並紛紛投入探討開發者參與OSS社群的最初動機，然而有研究者卻發現最初參與的動機並不代表其會持續參與。再者，卻少有研究探討當OSS社群成員在獲得更多經驗，以及對OSS的熱情消失後，是否仍然會持續地參與OSS社群活動。故本研究嘗試從給予文化與情境學習的角度切入，在彙整相關文獻後提出一個概念性的研究架構，並以現有的OSS社群成員為研究對象，嘗試藉由OSS社群的社會互動過程，來探討其持續參與OSS社群的意圖。根據問卷調查的實證研究發現，(1) 由給予文化所衍生而來的OSS意識型態確實為一項影響參與者於OSS社群中進行後續一連串活動的重要前置因素。(2) OSS的意識型態包含OSS信念與OSS價值，其中參與者感受到的OSS價值被證實對OSS社群中人際關係的信任以及社群氛圍產生影響；而感受到的OSS信念則是對OSS社群中人際關係間信任產生影響。(3) 參與者對OSS社群中人際關係的信任與以及在從事OSS社群活動的沉浸體驗則會正向影響其對該社群的認同。(4) 參與者感受到的OSS社群氛圍，以及在參與社群活動時所面對的挑戰跟自身擁有的技術能力間的平衡與否，則是會直接影響其沉浸體驗的程度。(5) 參與者對OSS社群的認同以及參加該社群活動所產生的沉浸體驗對其持續參與的意圖產生正向的影響。
摘要(英) Ever since the introduction of open source movement by Raymond in 1998, the sense that software source should be freely available has rapidly gained acceptance in the industry. Software development has undergone major changes, from being fully closed software development processes towards community driven open source software (OSS) development processes. As researcher stated that OSS model can be regarded as a “radical innovation”, which challenge the world’s most powerful software firms, in the way software is produced and distributed and is potentially disruptive of competitive equilibrium in the software industry. Hence, industry and researchers alike are interested in understanding the dynamics of OSS communities. While the “voluntary participation” arouses considerable research into OSS developer participation, most research to date has focused on identifying individuals’ initial reasons for getting involved, and that do not necessarily mean that developers will have sustained participation in the OSS community. Therefore, drawing on concepts from the gift-giving culture and situated learning literature streams, the object of this study is to examine the intention of sustained participation in the activity of OSS community. Analysis of empirical data collected through a questionnaire survey in this study reveals that, (1) consistent with prior gift-giving culture studies in OSS communities, our research finding reinforce that OSS ideology is a critical antecedent for participants to devote themselves to the subsequent activities within an OSS community; (2) the elements of OSS ideology such as OSS beliefs and OSS values have been shown to result in the interpersonal trust among participants, while the OSS values creation of a community climate with autonomy and feedback; (3) interpersonal trust and flow experience are significantly associated with community identification; (4) community climate and balance between activity challenges and skills positively influence a participant’s flow experience; (5) both community identification and flow experience influences the intention of sustained participation in an OSS community.
關鍵字(中) ★ 沉浸體驗
★ 持續參與
★ 情境學習
★ 給予文化
★ OSS社群
★ 開放原始碼軟體		 關鍵字(英) ★ flow experience
★ sustained participation
★ situated learning
★ Open source software (OSS)
★ OSS community
★ gift-giving culture
論文目次 1.INTRODUCTION...........................................1
1.1RESEARCH BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION....................1
2. CONCEPTUAL BACKGROUND.................................8
2.1. OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE (OSS)..........................8
2.2. OSS COMMUNITY......................................14
2.3. GIFT-GIVING CULTURE................................21
2.4. THE PERSPECTIVE OF SITUATED LEARNING...............28
2.5. FLOW EXPERIENCE....................................33
3. RESEARCH FRAMEWORK AND HYPOTHESES DEVELOPMENT........36
3.1. RESEARCH FRAMEWORK.................................36
3.2. RESEARCH HYPOTHESES................................37
4. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY.................................51
4.1. SAMPLE SELECTION AND DATA COLLECTION...............51
4.2. INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT.............................51
4.3. TRANSLATION PROCESS OF THE INSTRUMENT AND PILOT TEST....................................................52
4.4. MEASUREMENT VALIDATION.............................54
5. DATA ANALYSIS........................................55
5.1. DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS.............................55
5.2. MEASUREMENT MODEL – SCALE VALIDATION..............57
5.3. STRUCTURAL MODEL – HYPOTHESES TESTING.............63
6. DISCUSSION...........................................66
6.1. DIRECT PARTICIPATION VS. INDIRECT PARTICIPATION....69
6.2. THE MEDIATING EFFECT OF COMMUNITY IDENTIFICATION...72
7. IMPLICATION AND CONCLUSIONS..........................74
7.1. THEORETICAL IMPLICATIONS...........................74
7.2. MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS............................76
7.3. LIMITATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE STUDIES.....78
7.4. CONCLUSION REMARK..................................79
REFERENCE...............................................80
APPENDIX................................................99
A.1. MEASUREMENT ITEMS (ORIGINAL ITEMS IN LITERATURE)...99
A.2. QUESTIONNAIRE (CHINESE LANGUAGE VERSION)..........103
參考文獻 1. Alvesson, M., and Willmott, H. (2002), “Identity Regulation as Organizational Control: Producing the Appropriate Individual,” Journal of Management Studies, 39(5), pp. 619-644.
2. Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1988), “Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach,” Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), pp. 411-423.
3. Amabile, T.M., Hadley, C.N. and Steven, J.K. (2002), “Creativity under the Gun,” Harvard Business Review, 80(8), pp. 52-61.
4. Arthur, W.B. (1997), “Path-dependence, Self-Reinforcement, and Human Learning,” In W. B. Arthur (eds.), Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, pp. 133-158, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor: MI.
5. Argote, L., McEvily, B., and Reagans, R. (2003), “Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes,” Management Science, 49(4), pp. 571-582.
6. Bagozzi, R.P. and Dholakia, U.M. (2006), “Open Source Software User Communities: A Study of Participation in Linux User Groups,” Management Science, 52(7), pp.1099-1115.
7. Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E., Taris, T., Schaufeli, W.B. and Schreurs. P. (2003), “A Multi-group analysis of the job demands – resources model in four homecare organizations,” International Journal of Stress Management, 10, pp.16-38.
8. Bakker, A.B. (2005), “Flow among music teachers and their students: The crossover of peak experiences,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, pp. 26-44.
9. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), pp. 1173-1182.
10. Bateman, T.S. and Organ, D.W. (1983), “Job Satisfaction and the Good Soldier: The Relationship between Affect and Employee Citizenship,” Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), pp. 587-595.
11. Bednar, A.K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T.M. and Perry, J.D. (1991), “Theory into Practice: How Do We Think,” In C.J. Anglin (eds.), Instructional technology: Past, Present, and Future, pp. 88-101, Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
12. Bergquist, M. (2003), “Open source software development as gift culture: Work and Identity Formation in an Internet Community,” In C. Garsten and H. Wulff (eds.), New Technologies at Work: People, Screens and Social Virtuality, pp. 223-241, New York: Oxford.
13. Bernard, J. (1973), The Sociology of Community, Scott Foresman, Glenview: Illinois.
14. Berquist, M. and Ljungberg, J. (2001), “The Power of Gifts: Organizing Social Relationships in Open Source Communities,” Information Systems Journal, 11(4), pp. 305-320.
15. Billett, S. (1996), “Situated Learning: Bridging Socio-Cultural and Cognitive Theorizing,” Learning and Instruction, 6(3), pp. 263-280.
16. Bitzer, J. and Schrder, P.J.H. (2006), “The Economics of Open Source Software Development: An Introduction,” In J. Bitzer and P.J. Schrder (eds.), The Economics of Open Source Software Development, pp.1-13, New York: Elsvier.
17. Blau, P. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York: Wiley.
18. Boland, R.J. and Tenkasi, R.V. (1995), “Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Communities of Knowing,” Organization Science, 6(4), pp. 350-372.
19. Bonaccorsi, A. and Rossi, C. (2003), Why Open Source Software Can Succeed, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Italy, Pisa, Italy.
20. Bonaccorsi, A., Giannangeli, S. and Rossi, C. (2006), “Entry Strategies Under Competing Standards: Hybrid Business Models in the Open Source Software Industry,” Management Science, 52(7), pp. 1085-1098.
21. Braganholo, V., Miranda, B. and Mattoso, M. (2007), “Open Source Web Portals,” In K.S. Amant and B. Still (eds), Hand of Research on Open Source Software Technological, Economic, and Social Perspective, pp.211-216.
22. Brewer, M.B. (1981), “Ethnocentrism and Its Role in Interpersonal Trust,” In M.B. Brewer and B.E. Collins (eds.), Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences, pp.345-360, Jossey-Bass: New York.
23. Broothaerts, W., Mitchell, H., Weir, B., Kalnes, S., Smith, L., Yang, W., Mayer, J., Roa-Rodriguez, C. and Jefferson, R. (2005), “Gene Transfer to Plants by Diverse Species of Bacteria,” Nature, 433, pp. 629-633.
24. Brown, J.S., Collins, A.S. and Duguid, P. (1989), “Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning,” Educational Researcher, 18(1), pp. 32-42.
25. Butler, B.S. (2001),” Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures,” Information Systems Research, 12(4), pp.346-362.
26. Carr, N.G. (1999), “Being Virtual: Character and the New Economy,” Harvard Business Review, May–June, pp. 3-7.
27. Chaiklin, S. and Lave, J. (1993), Understanding practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context, New York: Cambridge University.
28. Cheal, D. (1988), The Gift Economy, New York: Routledge.
29. Chen, J. (2007), “Flow in Games and everything else,” Communications of ACM, 50(4), pp.31-34.
30. Chin, W.W., Marcolin, B.L. and Newsted, P.R. (2003), “A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Result from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-mail Emotion/Adoption Study,” Information Systems Research, 14(2), pp. 198-217.
31. Chin, W.W. (1998), “Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling,” MIS Quarterly, 22(1), pp. 7-16.
32. Choi, J.I. and Hannafin M. (1995), “Situated Cognition and Learning Environments: Roles, Structures, and Implications for Design,” ETR&D, 43(2), pp, 53-59.
33. Contu, A. and Willmott, H. (2003), “Re-embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory,” Organization Science, 14(3), pp.283-296.
34. Coppola, C. and Neelley, E. (2004), “Open source open learning: Why open source makes sense for education,” available at: http://www.rsmart.com/assets/OpenSourceOpensLearningJuly2004.pdf
35. Crowston, K. and Scozzi, B. (2002), “Open Source Software Projects as Virtual Organizations: Competency Rallying for Software Development,” IEE Proceedings Software, 149(1), pp.3-17.
36. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975), Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: The Experience of Play in Work and Games, Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.
37. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990), Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, New York: Harper & Row.
38. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996), Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Collins.
39. Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Eugene R. (1981), The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self, New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988), “The Flow Experience and its significance for human psychology,” In M. Csikszentimihalyi and I. Selega (eds.), Optimal Experience, pp. 15-35, New York: Harper Collins.
41. Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Csikszentmihalyi, I.S. (1988), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness, New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. DiBona, C., Ockman, S., and Stone, M. (1999), Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution, Sebastol, CA: O'Reilly & Associates Inc.
43. Dutton, J.E., Dukerich, J.M. and Harquail, C.V. (1994), “Organizational images and member identification,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, pp. 239-263.
44. Eckstein (2001), “Community as gift-giving: Collective roots of volunteerism,” American Sociological Review, 66(6), pp. 829-851.
45. Economist (2003), “Open Source’s Local Heroes,” Economic Technology Quarterly, 369(8353), p. 5.
46. Elliott, M.S. and Scacchi, W. (2005), “Free Software Development: Cooperation and Conflict in A Virtual Organizational Culture,” In S. Koch (eds.), Free/open Source Software Development, pp. 152-172, Hershey PA: IDEA Group Publishing.
47. Ellis, G.D., Voelil, J.E. and Morrie, C. (1994), “Measurement and analysis issues with explanation of variance in daily experience using the flow model,” Journal of Leisure Research, 26(4), pp. 337-356.
48. Etzioni, A. (1996), “The Responsive Community: A Communitarian Perspective,” American Sociological Review, 61(1), pp. 1-11.
49. Fang, Y. and Neufeld, D. (2009), “Understanding Sustained Participation in Open Source Software Projects,” Journal of Management Information System, 25(4), pp. 9-50.
50. Fleming, L. and Waguespack, D.M. (2007), “Brokerage, Boundary Spanning, and Leadership in Open Innovation Communities,” Organization Science, 18(2), pp.165-180.
51. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), pp. 39-50.
52. Fox, S. (2000), “Communities of Practice: Foucault and Actor Network Theory,” Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), pp. 853-868.
53. Franke, N. and Shah, S. (2003), “How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users,” Research Policy, 32(1), pp. 157-178.
54. Fuhrer, U. (1993), “Behaviour Settings Analysis of Situated Learning: The Case of Newcomers,” In S. Chaiklin and J. Lave (eds.), Understanding Practices: Perspectives on Activity and Context, pp. 179-211, UK: Cambridge University.
55. Fulk, J. and Boyd, B. (1991), “Emerging theories of communication in organizations,” Journal of Management, 17(2), pp. 407-446.
56. Fuller, A., Hodkinson, H., Hodikinson, P. and Unwin, L. (2005), “Learning as Peripheral Participation in Communities of Practice: A Reassessment of Key Concepts in Workplace Learning,” British Educational Research Journal, 31(1), pp. 49-68.
57. Gallivan, M. (2001), “Striking a Balance between Trust and Control in a Virtual Organization: a Content Analysis of Open Source Software Case Studies,” Information System Journal, 11, pp. 277-304.
58. Garzarelli, G. (2002), Open Source Software and the Economics of Organization, Università degli Studi di Roma, ‘La Sapienza’, Rome, Italy.
59. Gasser, L., Ripoche. G. (2003), “Distributed Collective Practices and F/OSS Problem Management: Perspective and Methods,” Conference Cooperation, Innovation, Technology, University de Technologie de Troyes, France.
60. Gasser, L., Scacchi, W., Ripoche, G., Penne, B. (2003), “Understanding Continuous Design in F/OSS Projects,” 16th Internaional Conference Software Energy Applied, Paris, France.
61. Gersick C.J.G. (1988), “Time and Transitions in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development,” Academy of Management Journal, 21, pp. 6-41.
62. Ghosh, R.A., Glott, R., Krieger, B., and Robles, G. (2002), “Survey of Developers, Free/Libre and Open Source Software: Study and Survey,” International Institute of Infonomics, University of Masstricht, The Netherlands, Available at: http://www.infonomics.nl/FLOSS/ report/.
63. Gloor, P. (2006), Swarm creativity. Oxford University Press.
64. Goetz, T. (2003), “Open Source Everywhere,” Wired, 11(11).
65. Godfry, M.W. and Tu, Q. (2000), “Evolution in Open Source Software: A Case Study,” The 2000 International Conference on Software Maintenance, San Jose, California.
66. Goldman, R. and Gabriel, R.P. (2005), "Why Consider Open Source," In R. Goldman and R.P. Gabriel (eds.), pp.75-110, Innovation Happens Elsewhere: Open Source as Business Strategy, Elsevier: San Francisco.
67. Goldman, R. and Gabriel, R.P. (2005), “How to Do Open Source Development,” In R. Goldman and R.P. Gabriel (eds.), Innovation Happens Elsewhere: Open Source as Business Strategy, pp.137-184, San Francisco: Elsevier.
68. Goodnow, I.J. (1990), “The Socialization of Cognition: What’s Involved ? ,” In J.W. Stigler, R.A. Shweder, and G. Herdt (eds.), Cultural psychology, pp. 259-286, UK: Cambridge University.
69. Gosh, R.A., Glott, R., Kreiger, B. and Robles, G. (2002), “The Free/Libre and Open Source Software Developers Survey and Study - FLOSS Final Report, Available at: http:// www.infonomics.nl/FLOSS/report.
70. Gouldner, A.W. (1960), “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement,” American Sociological Review, 25(2), pp. 161-178.
71. Graham, J.M. (2008), “Self-Expansion and Flow in Couples Momentary Experiences: An Experience Sampling Study,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), pp. 679-694.
72. Grewal, R., Lilien, G.L. and Mallapragada, G. (2006), “Location, Location, Location: How Network Embeddeness Affects Projects Success in Open Source Systems,” Management Science, 52(7), pp. 1043-1056.
73. Handley, K., Clary, T., Fincham, R. and Sturdy, A. (2007), “Researching Situated Learning: Participation, Identify and Practices in Client-Consultant Relationships,” Management Learning, 38(2), pp. 641-653.
74. Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R. and Clark, T. (2006), “Within and Beyond Communities of Practice: Making Sense of Learning through Participation, Identity and Practice,” Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), pp. 641-653.
75. Hars, A. and Ou, S. (2001), “Working for Free? Motivations of Participating in Open Source Projects,” Thirty-Fourth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
76. Hars, A. and Ou, S. (2002), “Working for Free? Motivations of Participating in Open Source Projects,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(3), pp. 25-40.
77. Hemetsberger, A., (2002), “Fostering Cooperation on the Internet: Social Exchange Processes in Innovative Virtual Consumer Communities,” Advance in Consumer Research, 29(1), pp. 354-356.
78. He, W., Fang, Y. and Wei, K.K. (2009), “The Role of Trust in Promoting Organizational Knowledge Seeking Using Knowledge Management Systems: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of The American Society For Information Science AND Technology, 60(3), pp. 526-537.
79. Hermann, S., Hertel, G., Niedner, S. (2000), “Linux Study Homepage,” Available at: www.psychologie.uni-kiel.de/linux-study/writeup.html.
80. Hertel, G., Niedner, S. and Hermann, S. (2003), “Motivation of Software Developers in the Open Source Projects: An Internet-Based Survey of Contributors to the Linux Kernel,” Research Policy, 32(7), pp. 1159-1177.
81. Himanen, P., Torvalds, L. and Castells, M. (2001), The Hacker Ethic. Random House, New York.
82. Hofstede. G., Neuijcn, B., Ohayv, D.D., and Sanders, G. (1990). “Measuring Organizational Cultures: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study across Twenty Cases,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), pp. 286-316.
83. Hoffman, D.L. and Novak, T.P. (1996), “Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations,” Journal of Marketing, 60, pp.50-68.
84. Hogg, M.A, Hardie, E.A, Reynolds K.J. (1995), “Prototypical Similarity, Self-Categorization, and Depersonalized Attraction: A Perspective on Group Cohesiveness,” European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, pp. 159-177.
85. Hogg, M.A., and Reid, S.A. (2006), “Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms,” Communication Theory, 16, pp.7-30.
86. Holmes, J.G., (1981), “The Exchange Process in Close Relationships: Microbehavior and Macromotives,” In M.J. Lerner and S.C. Lerner (eds), The Justice Motive in Social Behavior, pp. 261-284, Plenum: New York.
87. Hyde, L. (1983), The Gift: Imagination and the Erotic Life of Property, New York: Vintage.
88. Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Leidner, D.E. (1999), “Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams,” Organization Science, 10(6), pp. 791-815.
89. Johns, G. (1996), Organizational Behavior: Understanding and Managing Life at Work, 4th ed. HarperCollins: New York.
90. Ke, W. and Zhang, P. (2009), “Motivations in Open Source Software Communities: The Mediating Role of Effort Intensity and Goal Commitment,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(4), pp.39-66.
91. Kelton, K., Fleischmann, K.R. and Wallace, W.A. (2008), “Trust in Digital Information,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(3), pp. 363-374.
92. Kim, A.J. (2000), Community Building on the Web: Secret Strategies for Successful Online Communities, London, UK: Addison Wesley.
93. Kogut, B. and Metiu, A. (2001), “Open Source Software Development and Distributed Innovation,” Oxford review of Economic Policy, 17(2), pp.248-264.
94. Kogut, B. and Zander, R. (1996), “What Firms do? Coordination, Identity and Learning,” Organization Science, 7, pp. 502-518.
95. Kohanski, D. (1998), Moths in the Machine. St. Martin’s Press: New York.
96. Kollock, P. (1999), “The Economies of Online Cooperation,” In M. Smith and P. Kollock (eds), Communities in Cyberspace, London: Routledge.
97. Koohang, A. and Harman, K. (2005), “Open Source: A Metaphor for E-Learning,” Informing Science Journal, 8, pp. 75-86.
98. Kramer, R.M. and Brewer, M.B. (1984), “Effects of Group Identity on Resource Use in a Simulated Commons Dilemma,” Journal of Personality and Sociality Psychology, 46, pp. 1044-1057.
99. Krishnamurthy, S. (2002), “Cave or Community? An empirical examination of 100 Mature Open Source Project, First Monday, 7(6), available at: www. Firstmonday.org.
100. Krishnan, M.S. (1998), “The Role of Team Factors in Software Cost and Quality: An Empirical Analysis,” Information Technology & People, 11, pp. 20-35.
101. Kuk, G. (2006), “Strategic Interaction and Knowledge Sharing in the KDE Developer Mailing List,” Management Science, 52(7), pp. 1031-1042.
102. Lakhani, K. and Wolf, R. (2001), “Does Free Software Mean Free Labor? Characteristics of Participants in Open Source Communities,” Boston Consulting Group Survey Report, Boston, MA, available at: www.osdn.com/bcg/.
103. Lakhani, K.R and von Hippel, E. (2003), “How Open Source Software Works: ‘Free’ User-to-User Assistance,” Research Policy, 32, pp.923-943.
104. Lakhani, K.R, Wolf, B. (2005), “Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects,” In J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam and K. Lakhani (eds.), pp.3-22, Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software, MIT Press, Boston: MA.
105. Lakhani, K.R., Wolf, R.G. and Bates, J. (2002), “The Boston Consulting Group Hacker Survey, Release 0.3.,” Boston Consulting Group, available at: http://flosscom.net/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=45.
106. Lave, J. (1988), Cognition in practice, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
107. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
108. Law, K.S., Wong, C.S. and Mobley, W.H. (1998), “Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs,” Academy Management Review, 23(4), pp. 741-755.
109. Lee, G.K., and Cole, R.E. (2003), “From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development,” Organization Science, 14(6), pp.633-649.
110. Lerner, J. and Tirole, J. (2002), “The Simple Economics of Open Source,” Journal of Industry Economic, 52(June), pp. 197-234.
111. Lin, H.F. (2007), “The Role of Online and Offline Features in Sustaining Virtual Communities: An empirical Study,” Internet Research, 17(2), pp. 119-138.
112. Lohr, S. (2004), “Speech Code from I.B.M. to Become Open Source,” New York Times, (13) September, pp. 31-32.
113. Ma, M. and Agarwa, R. (2007), “Through a Glass Darkly: Information Technology Design, Identity Verification, and Knowledge Contribution in Online Community,” Information System Research, 18(1), pp. 42-67.
114. Markus, M.L., Manville, B. and Agres, C.E. (2000), “What Makes a Virtual Organization Work?,” Sloan Management Review, 42(1), pp.13-26.
115. Mauss, M. (1990[1950]), The Gift: the Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, London: Routledge.
116. McGinn, K., Thompson, L. and Bazerman, M. (2003), “Dyadic Processes of Disclosure and Reciprocity in Bargaining with Communication,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 16(1), pp. 17-34.
117. Meyerson, D., Weick, K.E. and Kramer, R.M. (1996), “Swift trust and temporary groups”, In R.M. Kramer and T.R. Tyler (eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, pp.166-195, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
118. Mockus, A., Fielding, R. and Herbsleb, J. (2002), “Two Case Studies of Open Source Software Development: Apache and Mozilla,” ACM Transaction Software Engineering Methods, 11(3), pp. 309-346.
119. Muffatto, M. (2006a), “Open Source Products and Software Quality,” In M. Muffatto (eds.), Open Source: A Multidisciplinary Approach, pp.91-105, Imperial College: London.
120. Muffatto, M. (2006b), “New Tends in Work Organization,” In M. Muffatto (eds.), Open Source: A Multidisciplinary Approach, pp.163-188, Imperial College: London.
121. Muffatto, M. (2006), “The Organization of the Open Source Community,” In M. Muffatto (eds.), Open Source: a Multidisciplinary Approach, pp.49-70, Imperial College: London.
122. Nahapiet, J., Ghoshal, S. (1998), “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage,” Academy Management Review, 23, pp. 242-266.
123. Nakamura, J. and Csikxaentmihalyi, M. (2002), “The concept of flow,” In C. J. Snyder and S. J. Lopez (eds.) Handbook of Positive Psychology, pp. 89-105, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
124. Neisser, M. (1973), “The Sense of Self Expressed through Giving and Receiving,” Social Casework, 54(5), pp. 294-301.
125. Nunnally, J. (1978), Psychometric Theory, New York, McGraw-Hill.
126. Novak, T.P., Hoffmand, D.L. and Yung, Y.-F. (2000), “Measure the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach,” Marketing Science, 19(1), pp. 22-42.
127. O’Mahony, S. and Ferraro, F. (2004), “Hacking Alone? The Effect of Online and Offline Participation on Open Source Community Leadership,” available at: http://opensource.mit.edu.
128. O’Reilly and Associates, Inc. (1999), Open Source: Kurz & Gut, Köln: O’Reilly &Associates.
129. O'Mahony, S. (2002), Guarding the commons: How open source contributors protect their work, Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
130. Orlikowski, W.J. (2002), “Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing.” Organization Science, 13(3), pp. 249-273.
131. Osterloh, M., Rota S. and von Wartburg, M. (2002), Open source – New Rules in Software Development, available at: http://www.iou.uzh.ch/orga/downloads/OpenSourceAoM.pdf.
132. Petter, S., Straub, D. and Rai, A. (2007), “Specifying formative constructs in information systems research,” MIS Quarterly, 31(4), pp. 623-656.
133. Pliskin, N., Balaila, I. and Kenigshtein, I. (1991), “The Knowledge Contribution of Engineers to Software Development: A Case Study,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38(4), pp. 344-348.
134. Poe, D. (1977), “The Giving of Gifts: Anthropological Data and Social Psychological Theory,” Cornell Journal of Social Relations, 12(1), pp. 47-63.
135. Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R. and Seth, N. (2006), “Firm Performance Impacts of Digitially Enabled Supply Chain Integration Capabilities,” MIS Quarterly, 30(2), pp. 225-246.
136. Raymond, E.S. (1999a), The cathedral and the bazaar. First Monday, available at: http://www.firstmonday.org/ issues/issue3_3/raymond/.
137. Raymond, E.S. (1999b), “Interview: Linux and Open Source Success,” IEEE Software, 16, pp. 85-89.
138. Raymond, E.S. (2001), The Cathedral & the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary, 2nd (ed.), Cambridge, MA: O’Reilly.
139. Rayport, J.F and Sviiokla, J.J. (1995), “Exploiting the Virtual Value Chain,” Harvard Business Review, 73, pp. 75-85.
140. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S. and Will A. (2005): SmartPLS 2.0 (beta), available at www.smartpls.de.
141. Rheingold, H., (2000), The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
142. Robert, J.A., Hann, I.H. and Slaughter, S.A. (2006), “Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects,” Management Science, 52(7), pp. 984-999.
143. Roca, J.C., Chiu, C.M. and Martínez, F.J. (2006), “Understanding E-learning Continuance Intention: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, pp. 683-696.
144. Rossi, M.A. (2004), “Decoding the Free/Open Source Puzzle. A Survey of Theoretical and Empirical Contributions. Working paper, Dipartimento Di Economia Politica, Universita degli Studi di Siena, Siena, Italy.
145. Scacchi, W. (2002), “Understanding the Requirements for Developing Open Source Software Systems,” IEEE Proceedings on Software, 149, pp.24-39.
146. Scacchi, W. (2004), “Free and Open Source Development Practices in the Game Community,” IEEE Software, 21, pp. 56-66.
147. Schofield, A. and Cooper, G.S. (2007), “Perceptions of F/OSS Community: Participants’ Views on Participation,” In K. St.Amant, and B. Still, (eds.), Handbook of Research on OSS: Technological Economic and Social Perspectives, pp. 68-94, Unite stated of America: Idea Group.
148. Schwab, D.P. (1980), “Construct Validity in Organization Behavior,” in B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 2, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
149. Shah, S.K. (2006), “Motivation, Governance, and the Viability Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development,” Management Science, 52(7), pp.1000-1014.
150. Smith, J.B. and Barclay, D.W. (1997), “The effects of organizational differences and trust on the effectiveness of selling partner relationships,” Journal of Marketing, 61, pp. 3-21.
151. Sowe, S., Stamelos, I. and Angelis, L. (2006), “Identifying Knowledge Brokers that yield Software Engineering Knowledge in OSS Project,” Information and Software Technology, 48, pp. 1025-1033.
152. Spencer, E.A. and Greene, J. (2003), “A Stealth Attack on Linux from Microsoft? It’s Paying a Licensing fee to SCO - and Techies Smell a Rat,” Business Week, 31(June 2), pp. C4.
153. Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1986), “Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication,” Management Science, 32, pp. 1492-1512.
154. Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1991), Connections: New Ways of Working in the Net- worked Organization, The MIT Press, Cambridge: MA.
155. Stallman, R. (1999), Free Software Foundation Brochure, Cambridge, MA: Free Software Foundation.
156. Stewart, K. and Gosain, S. (2006), “The Moderating Role of Development Stage in Free/Open Source Software Project Performance,” Software Process Improvement and Practice, 11, pp. 177-191.
157. Stewart, K.J. and Gosain, S. (2006), “The Impact of Ideology on Effectiveness: In Open Source Software Development Teams,” MIS Quarterly, 30(2), pp. 291-314.
158. Suliman, A.M.T. (2002), “It is really a mediating construct? The mediating role of organizational commitment in work climate-performance relationship,” The Journal of Management Development, 21(3), pp. 170-183.
159. Tiwana, A. and McLean, E.R. (2005), “Expertise Integration and Creativity in Information Systems Development,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(1), pp. 13-43.
160. Trice, H.M., and Beyer, J.M. (1993), The Cultures of Work Organizations, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
161. Turner J.C., Hogg M.A., Oakes P.J., Reicher S.D. and Wetherell M.S. (1987), Rediscovering the Social Group: A self-Categorizing Theory, Blackwell: Oxford, UK.
162. van Rossum, G. (1999). “Interview with van Rossum,” In O’Reilly & Associates Open Source, pp. 45-48, Koeln: O’Reilly & Associates.
163. Voiskounsky, A.E. (2008), “Flow Experience in Cyberspace: Current Studies and Perspectives,” In A. Barak (eds.), Psychological aspects of cyberspace: theory, research, applications, pp. 70-101, New York: Cambridge University Press.
164. von Hippel, E. (2001), “Innovation by User Communities: Learning from Open Source Software,” MIT Sloan Management Review. 42(4), pp. 82-86.
165. von Hippel, E. and von Krogh, G. (2003), “Open Source Software and the “Private-Collective” Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science,” Organization Science, 14(2), pp. 209-223.
166. von Krogh, G. and von Hippel, E. (2006), “The Promise of Research on Open Source Software,” Management Science, 52(7), pp. 975-983.
167. von Krogh, G., Spaeth, S. and Lakhani, K.R. (2003), “Community, Joining and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study,” Research Policy, 32, pp. 1217-1241.
168. von Prooijen, J.W. (2009), “Procedural Justice as Autonomy Regulation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(6), pp. 1166-1180.
169. Vujovic, S. and Ulhǿi, J.P. (2006), “An Organizational Perspective on Free and Open Source Software Development,” In J. Bitzer and P.J.H. Schrder (eds.), The Economics of Open Source Software Development, pp. 185-205, New York: Elsevier.
170. Waterson, P.E., Clegg, C.W. and Axtell, C.M. (1997), “The Dynamics of Work Organization, Knowledge and Technology during Software Development,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46(1), pp. 81-103.
171. Wayner, P. (2000), Free For All, New York: Harper Collins.
172. Wellman, B. and Gulia, M., (1999), “Net Surfer Don’t Ride Alone: Virtual Community as Community,” In B. Wellman (eds), Networks in the Global Village, pp. 331-366, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
173. Wellman, B., Gulia, M. (1999), “Virtual Communities as Communities,” In M.A. Smith and P. Kollock (eds.), Communities in Cyberspace, Routledge:New York.
174. Wenger, E. (1998), Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University.
175. White, J.C. Varadarajan, P.R., and Dacin, P.A. (2003), “Market situation interpretation and response: the role of cognitive style, organizational culture, and information use,” Journal of Marketing, 67, pp. 63-79.
176. Wilson, J. (2000), “Volunteering,” Annual Review of Sociology, 26, pp. 215-240.
177. Wold, H. (1989), “Introduction to the second generation of multivariate analysis,” In H. Wold (eds.), Theoretical Empiricism, pp. 7-11, New York: Paragon House.
178. Ye, Y., Nakakoji, K., Yamamoto, Y., and Kishida, K. (2005), “The Co-evolution of Systems and Communities in Free and Open Source Software Development,” In S. Koch (eds.), Free/open Source Software Development, pp. 59-82, Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
179. Ye, Y. and Kishida, K. (2003), “Toward an Understanding of the motivation of open source software developers,” Proceedings of 2003 international conference on software engineering (ICSE2003), Portland.
180. Zack, M.H. (1993), “Interactivity and communication mode choice in ongoing management groups,” Information System Research, 4(3), pp. 207-239.
181. Zeitlyn, D. (2003), “Gift economies in the development of open source software: anthropological reflections,” Research Policy, 32(7), pp. 1287-1291.
182. Zhang, W. and Storck, J. (2001), “Peripheral Member in Online Communities,” Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston.
183. Zhang. P. and Ke, W. (2009), “Motivations in Open Source Software Communities: The Mediating Role of Effort Intensity and Goal Commitment,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(4), pp. 39-66.
指導教授 范錚強(Cheng-Kiang Farn) 審核日期 2010-7-20
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題，請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407，或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明