一種基於物件、屬性導向之變更影響分析方法於差異化產品設計

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：41

、訪客IP：18.219.206.102

姓名

林庫伸(Ku-shen Lin) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

一種基於物件、屬性導向之變更影響分析方法於差異化產品設計
(An Object-Based, Attribute-Oriented Change Impact Analysis Method in Variant Product Design)

相關論文

★ 專案管理的溝通關鍵路徑探討─以某企業軟體專案為例	★ 運用並探討會議流如何促進敏捷發展過程中團隊溝通與文件化：以T銀行系統開發為例
★ 專案化資訊服務中人力連續派遣決策模式之研究─以高鐵行控資訊設備維護為例	★ 以組織正義觀點介入案件指派決策之研究
★ 應用協調理論建立系統軟體測試中問題改善之協作流程	★ 應用案例式推理於問題管理系統之研究 -以筆記型電腦產品為例
★ 運用限制理論於多專案開發模式的人力資源配置之探討	★ 應用會議流方法於軟體專案開發之個案研究：以翰昇科技公司為例
★ 多重專案、多期再規劃的軟體開發接案決策模式：以南亞科技資訊部門為例	★ 會議導向敏捷軟體開發及系統設計：以大學畢業專題為例
★ 會議流方法對大學畢業專題的團隊合作品質影響之實驗研究	★ 實施敏捷式發展法於大學部畢業專題之行動研究 – 以中央大學資管系為例
★ 建立一個用來評核自然語言需求品質的線上資訊系統	★ 結合本體論與模糊分析網路程序法於軟體測試之風險與風險關聯辨識
★ 在軟體反向工程中針對UML結構模型圖之線上品質評核系統	★ 以模糊專家系統實作軟體專案調適準則

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

在產品生命週期中，變更是無可避免的且可能於任何時間發生。當產品產生變更時，所有受該變更影響的項目必須要即時的處理以維持產品的一致性與完整性。隨著競爭市場的全球化與顧客導向市場的趨勢之下，快速回應市場與顧客需求與有效的控制成本成為一項關鍵的因素。因此，工程變更 (Engineering Change, EC) 顯然已成為企業不可忽視的問題，此外企業對於工程變更的管理作業亦是日趨重要。
因此，本研究專注於產品生命週期的差異化產品設計，並嘗試以物件為基礎、屬性為導向的概念建立差異化產品設計之的變更影響分析。本研究將產品結構物件化以建構產品模型，並且透過產品項目 (items)、屬性 (attributes) 與關聯 (linkages) 特徵化產品，並進一步詳細定義關聯的細部。當產品設計期間產生變更時，本研究透過即透過物件導向 (object-oriented) 的技術與遞迴 (recursive) 的機制能有效率的找出受到該變更影響的項目
。本研究也將透過一個產品實例，驗證本研究所提出的方法模型與所實作出之變更影響分析系統的可行性。本研究亦針對文獻中所探討的相關產品設計之方法與本研究所提出之方法相互比較，亦進一步討論使用本系統的效益。最後，針對現有的運用與研究限制進行討論，並提出未來研究的可能方向。

摘要(英)

Change is inevitable and may occur any time during product lifecycle. When changes occur, all the affected items must be handled in order to maintain the consistency and integrity of the product. With the market turning to globalized and customer-oriented, responding customer requirements rapidly and controlling the cost effectively is crucial. Thus, engineering change (EC) has been a non-negligible issue for enterprises, and the management to ECs has also become important.
Therefore, this research focuses on variant product design in product lifecycle and uses the object-based and attribute-oriented concepts. Specifically, this research objectifies the structure of the product and characterizes the product itself through the items, attributes and linkages, and further defines the detail of the linkages. When changes occur during product design period, this research uses an object-oriented and recursive mechanism to handle dynamic looping in determining the impact of changes effectively. An example is presented to verify the proposed approach and the feasibility of the change impact analysis (CIA) system. Finally, discussion and suggestions are presented for the future research.

關鍵字(中)

★ 工程變更管理
★ 工程變更
★ 產品設計
★ 物件導向技術

關鍵字(英)

★ variant product design
★ object technology
★ engineering change
★ engineering change management

論文目次

摘要 ........................................................................................................................................ i
Abstract …………………………………………………………………...……………….. ii
Acknowledgement …..…………………………………………………………………... iii
Table of Contents …………………………………………….………………………..... iv
List of Figures ……………………………………………………………………….…... vi
List of Tables …………………………………………………………………………… viii
Chapter I Introduction ………………………………………………………………. 1
1.1 General Background Information ……………………….……………………… 1
1.2 Objective and Motivation ……………………………………………………….. 2
Chapter II Literature Review …………………………………….…………………. 5
2.1 Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) ……………………….……………….. 5
2.1.1 Product Data Management (PDM) …………………………………………. 6
2.1.2 Engineering Data Management (EDM) …………………………………….. 7
2.1.3 PDM and EDM ……………………………………………………………... 8
2.2 Engineering Change and Engineering Change Management ………………... 9
2.3 Methods of Handling EC ………………………………………………………... 9
2.3.1 Design Structure Matrix (DSM) ……………………………………………. 9
2.3.2 Quality Function Deployment (QFD) ……………………………………... 11
Chapter III Approach ….……………………………………...…………………….. 14
3.1 Framework Design ……….....………………………………………………….. 14
3.1.1 Research Scope ……………………………………………………………. 14
v
3.1.2 Process ………………………………………..……………….…………... 15
3.2 Structure Design ………………………………..……………………………..... 17
3.2.1 Terminology Definition ……………………………………………………. 17
3.2.2 Applying Attribute-Oriented Impact Analysis Engineering Changes ……... 18
3.2.3 Model Framework ……………………………………………………….… 20
3.3 Behavior Design (Mechanism: Change Propagation) …………...………….. 21
Chapter IV System Implementation ………………………...………………........ 24
4.1 System Architecture ………………………...………………………………...... 24
4.2 Functions of System ……………………………………………...…………..… 26
Chapter V Example ………………………………………………...………………… 33
5.1 Building the Product Model of the Bicycle ……………………..………….… 34
5.2 Applying Changes on Bicycle ………………………………….…………….... 35
5.3 Change Propagation Analysis ……………………………………………... 38
Chapter VI Discussion ………………………...…………………………………..… 42
6.1 Comparisons ……………..……………………………………………………… 42
6.2 Discussion ………………………….…………………………………………… 47
Chapter VII Conclusion and Future Work ………………………………..…51
Appendix …………………………………………………………………………………. 53
Reference ………………………………………………………………………………… 56

參考文獻

[1] Ahmadi, R., Wang, R.H., 1999, Managing Development Risk in Product Design Processes, Operations Research, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 235-246.
[2] Akao, Y., 1990, QFD: Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design, Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA.
[3] Akao, Y., Mizuno, S., 1994, QFD: The Customer-Driven Approach to Quality Planning and Development, Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo, Japan.
[4] Ameri, F., Dutta, D., 2005, Product Lifecycle Management: Closing the Knowledge Loops, Computer Aided Design & Applications, Vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 577-590.
[5] Brett, S., 1994, Take a Step Inside, CAD/CAM, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 27.
[6] Browning, T.R., 2001 Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 292-306.
[7] Bryan, M.G., Sackett, P.J., 1997, The point of PDM, Manufacturing Engineer, Vol. 76, No. 4, pp. 161-164.
[8] Chen, C.Y., Chen, L.C., Lin, L., 2004, Methods for processing and prioritizing customer demands in variant product design, IIE Transactions, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 203-219.
[9] Chen, Y.M., Hsiao, Y.T., 1997, A collaborative data management framework for concurrent product and process development, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 446-469.
[10] Chu, X., Fan Y., 1999, Product data management based on web technology, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 84–88.
[11] CIMdata, 1998, Product Data Management: The Definition, An Introduction to Concepts, Benefits, and Terminology, A CIMdata Report. (CIMdata Inc., http://www.CIMdata.com)
[12] CIMdata, 2002, Product Lifecycle Management: Empowering the Future of Business, A CIMdata Report. (CIMdata Inc., http://www.CIMdata.com)
[13] CIMdata, 2003, PDM to PLM: Growth of An Industry, A CIMdata Report. (CIMdata Inc., http://www.CIMdata.com)
[14] Clarkson, P.J., Simons, C., Eckert, C., 2001, Predicting Change Propagation in Complex Design, Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Pittsburgh, USA.
[15] Cohen, L., 1995, Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.
[16] Cristiano, J.J., Liker, J.K., White, C.C., 2001, Key Factors in the Successful Application of Quality Function Deployment (QFD), IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 81-95.
[17] Eckert, C., Clarkson, P.J., Zanker, W., 2004, Change and customisation in complex engineering domains, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1-21.
[18] Eppinger, S.D., 2001, Innovation at the speed of Information, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 149-158.
[19] Eppinger, S.D., Whitney, D.E., Yassine, A.A., 2005, The Design Structure Matrix - DSM Home Page. (http://www.dsmweb.org/)
[20] Gadh, R., 1996, Special issue: computer-aided concurrent design, Computer Aided Design, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 319.
[21] Gover, C.P.M., 1996, What and how about quality function deployment (QFD), International journal of production economics,Vol. 46-47, pp. 575-585.
[22] Hauser, J.R. and Clausing, D., 1988, The House of Quality, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 66, No. 3, pp. 63-73.
[23] Hayes, R.H., Wheelwrignt, S.C., Clark, K.B., 1988, Dynamic manufacturing: creating the learning organization, New York: Free Press.
[24] Hoffer, J.A., George J.F., Valacich, J.S., 2005, Modern Systems Analysis and Design, fourth ed. Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey, USA.
[25] Hsu, C.C., Hwang, S.L., 2004, A study of interface design improvement in an engineering data management system on the world wide web, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 47, pp31-43.
[26] Huang, G.Q., Yee, W.Y., Mak, K.L., 2003, Current practice of engineering change management in Hong Kong manufacturing industries, Journal of Materials processing Technology, Vol. 139, No. 1-3, pp. 481-487.
[27] IBM, 2002, PDM vs. EDM.
[28] ICM, 1999, Configuration Management II: Change Effectivities, Forms and Traceability, Institute of Configuration Management.
[29] Jarratt, T., Eckert, C., Clarkson P. J., 2004, Development of a Product Model to Support Engineering Change Management, Proceedings of the TCME 2004, Lausanne, Switzerland.
[30] Keller, R., Eger, T., Eckert, C.M., Clarkson, P.J., 2005, Visualizing Change Propagation, International Conference on Engineering Design, Melbourne, Australia.
[31] Lee, D.L., Chen, Y.M., 1996, Integrated product and process data management, Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1-4.
[32] Lee, S.G., Ma, Y.S., Thimm, G.L., Verstraeten, J., 2008, Product lifecycle management in aviation maintenance, repair and overhaul, Computers in Industry, Vol. 59, pp. 293-303.
[33] Liu, D.T., Xu, X.W., 2001, A review of web-based product data management systems, Computers in Industry, Vol. 44, pp. 251-262.
[34] MacIntosh, K.G., 1995, Engineering Data Management: A Guide to Successful Implementation, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
[35] Maheswari, J.U., Varghese, K., 2005, A Structured Approach to Form Dependency Structure Matrix for Construction Projects, International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, pp. 1-6.
[36] Martini, W.J., 1996, The Electronic Change Request: Applying TQM to the Creative Design Process, Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 1-6.
[37] Medhat, S.S., Rook, J., Veness, P.J., 1995, Engineering Data Management and its Role in Implementing a Concurrent Engineering Environment, IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management Conference, pp. 180-184.
[38] Miller, E., 1993, Managing engineering data: an inside look at PDM, Computer-Aided Engineering.
[39] Peng, T.K., Trappey, A.J.C., 1998, A step toward STEP-compatible engineering data management-the data model of product structure and engineering changes, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 14, pp. 89-109.
[40] Prasad, B., 1997, Concurrent Engineering Fundamentals, Volume II: Integrated Product Development, Prentice Hall PTR, New Jersey, USA.
[41] Rouibah, K., Caskey, K.R., 2003, Change management in concurrent engineering from a parameter perspective, Computers in Industry, Vol. 50, pp. 15–34.
[42] Saaksvuori, A., Immonnen, A., 2008, Product Lifecycle Management, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, New York, USA.
[43] Sha, M., 2002, Development of Design Information Model for Change Impact Analysis, SIMTech Technical Report.
[44] Sireli, Y., Kauffmann, P., Ozan, E., 2007, Integration of Kano’s Model Into QFD for Multiple Product Design, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 380-390.
[45] Stark, J., 2000, Product Data Management-Introduction to PDM system, John Stark Associated. (http://www.johnstark.com)
[46] Steward, D.V., 1981, Design Structure System: A Method for Managing the Design of Complex Systems, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 71-74.
[47] Sung, C.S., Park, S.J., 2007, A component-based product data management system, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 33, pp. 614-626.
[48] Tseng, Y.J., Kao, Y.W., Huang, F.Y., 2008, A model for evaluating a design change and the distributed manufacturing operations in a collaborative manufacturing environment, Computers in Industry, Vol. 59, No. 8, pp. 798-807.
[49] Wang, F., Zhou, L., 2009, An Object-oriented Product Data Management, International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology, Vol. 1, pp. 409-413.
[50] Westfechtel, B., Conradi, R., 1998, Software Configuration Management and Engineering Data Management: Differences and Similarities, Proceedings of the SCM-8 Symposium on System Configuration Management, pp. 95-106.
[51] Wright, I.C., 1997, A review of research into engineering change management: implications for product design, Design Studies, Vol. 18, pp. 33-42.
[52] Yang, C.O., Cheng M.C., 2003, Developing a PDM/MRP Integration Framework to Evaluate the Influence of Engineering Change on Inventory Scrap Cost, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 22, pp. 161–174.
[53] Yang, C.O., Liu, H.C., 2001, Developing a Computer-Aided Environment to Investigate the Influences of Design Schedule Changes on Material Requirement Planning, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 17, pp. 11-26.
[54] Yassine, A.A., 2004, An Introduction to Modeling and Analyzing Complex Product Development Processes Using the Design Structure Matrix (DSM) Method, Quadernidi Management (Italian Management Review), No. 9.
[55] Yassine, A.A., Braha, D., 2003, Complex Concurrent Engineering and the Design Structure Matrix Method, Concurrent Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 165–176.

指導教授

陳仲儼(Chung-Yang Chen)

審核日期

2010-7-20

推文