2008年台灣西南部地區TRMM降雨雷達與七股雷達回波觀測比較分析及降雨估計應用研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：143

、訪客IP：18.217.189.152

姓名

蔡國榮(Kuo-jung Tsai) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

大氣物理研究所

論文名稱

2008年台灣西南部地區TRMM降雨雷達與七股雷達回波觀測比較分析及降雨估計應用研究
(Comparisons of Reflectivity and Rain Rate Derived from the TRMM Precipitation Radar and the CWB Cigu Radar over the Southwestern Area of Taiwan in 2008)

相關論文

★ 單雷達風場反演—【移動坐標法】的特性分析與應用	★ 宜蘭地區秋冬季降雨特性之研究
★ 台灣地區午後對流降水特性之分析	★ 台灣梅雨季中尺度對流系統之數值模擬研究-TAMEX IOP 8 個案
★ 由都卜勒風場反演熱動力場的新方法 ——TAMEX IOP#2颮線個案應用分析	★ 利用整合探空系統分析南海北部大氣邊界層特性之研究
★ 中尺度波譜模式對梅雨期豪雨個案模擬之研究	★ 利用VAD技術及回波保守方程反演渦度場
★ 利用單都卜勒雷達反演三維風場之研究─以數值模式資料驗證	★ 宜蘭地區秋冬季豪大雨特性之研究
★ 台灣東南部地區局部環流與邊界層特性之研究	★ 台灣東南部地區複雜地形局部環流的模擬研究
★ 宜蘭地區豪雨個案之研究	★ 在地形上由都卜勒風場反演熱動力場
★ 利用Extended-GBVTD方法反求非軸對稱颱風（颶風）風場結構	★ 台灣北部地區雨滴粒徑分佈特性與降雨估計之探討

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

由於熱帶降雨觀測計畫 TRMM (Tropical Rainfall Measuring mission)已成功執行長達十餘年，現在已有能力在定量上提供地基式雷達與星載雷達之間較具確定性的比較。因此本研究選取 2008 年西南部地區較顯著的降雨事件作為研究對象，並且使用同時間所通過的降雨雷達（PR)及七股雷達掃描資料，再以地面雨量站的資料作驗證，以期能夠增進七股雷達的降雨估計能力。另一方面，也透過與美國NCAR S-POL 雷達之間的資料比對，評估降雨雷達在台灣地區的降水觀測能力。
研究結果顯示，高度小於五公里的區域，PR 與七股雷達的回波分佈相當接近；但在五公里以上的高度，地面雷達的回波則有高估的情形。分析回波與高度的機率密度函數，發現兩者在三公里高度的分佈較一致，因此後續研究統一使用位於三公里高度的回波作分析。
比較兩種雷達所辨識的降雨類型，在針對大於 18dBZ 的回波時，兩者的分類一致性相當高。此外，對於不同降雨型態及不同下表面（陸地及海洋）時的分佈情形也相當一致，顯示 PR 所觀測的回波在台灣西南部地區具有相當高的可信度。值得一提的是，兩種雷達的回波差異量會隨著回波值的大小而呈現線性相關，並非單一的常數。
在估計降雨能力的部份，過去使用 Z-R 關係式估算降雨率時，時常會低估強降雨事件的降雨率。利用 PR 所修正後的七股雷達回波重新估算降雨，並且利用 2008 年和雨量站資料的線性回歸式調整高降雨率的部份，能有效改進地基式雷達的降雨估計能力。而針對不同年份的強降雨個案所作的估計累計降雨，也比使用傳統 Z-R 關係式所估計的降雨來得準確許多。

摘要(英)

Base on the decade-long and highly successful Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission（TRMM）,it is now possible to provide more quantitative comparisons between ground-based radar and the spaceborne TRMM precipitation radar (PR) with greater certainty. Therefore, this research select the significant precipitation events in the southwestern area of Taiwan in 2008, and compare the PR reflectivity data with simultaneous RCCG plan position indicator reflectivity data. In addition, rain gauge data are used to compare the rainfall derived from PR and RCCG separately, and try to improve the rainfall estimation ability of RCCG. In the aspect of accuracy for PR reflectivity, we introduce the NCAR SPOL data as a ground truth to validate the performance of PR retrieval algorithm.
Comparison results suggest that the reflectivity distribution of PR and RCCG are quite close at lower levels (<5km), but the RCCG’s reflectivity is overestimated at higher levels (>5km). Analyzing the probability distribution frequency of reflectivity at different height, it reveals that the distribution pattern of reflectivity is more closer at three kilometer height. Therefore, the data at 3km will be used to analyze and intercompare in this research.
The results of identifying precipitation type for the reflectivity larger than 18 dBZ agree well between PR and RCCG, the average agreement can reach 83%. Besides, for the different type of rainfall over different surface,such as convective,stratiform rain over land and ocean, the PDF of reflectivity at 3km height is quite close between PR and RCCG. It’s worth mentioning,the offset between RCCG and PR is linear-correlated with the reflectivity magnitude,and not a constant traditionally.
In the part of rainfall estimation,using Z-R relationship to estimate rainfall often underestimate the heavy rainfall rate in the past. In this research, we first tune the reflectivity distribution by PR-RCCG statistical relationship. Second, using the PR-tuned RCCG reflectivity estimate rainfall again, and adjust the heavy rainfall part by linear regression with rain gauge in 2008. After the upper two steps, we use two significant precipitation events in different years to verify the method. The results show that it indeed improve the ground-based radar’s ability in rainfall estimation.

關鍵字(中)

★ 七股雷達
★ 降雨雷達

關鍵字(英)

★ Cigu radar
★ precipitation radar

論文目次

中文摘要...............................................................i
Abstract.............................................................. ii
致謝.................................................................. iii
表目錄................................................................ vi
圖目錄................................................................ vii
符號說明.............................................................. xi
第一章緒論.......................................................... 1
1-1 前言.............................................................. 1
1-2 文獻回顧.......................................................... 1
1-3 研究目的.......................................................... 5
第二章資料來源...................................................... 6
2-1 觀測儀器.......................................................... 6
2-1-1 降雨雷達........................................................ 6
2-1-2 七股雷達........................................................ 7
2-1-3 SPOL雷達........................................................ 7
2-1-4 自動雨量站資料及地形資料........................................ 8
2-1-5 個案驗證資料.................................................... 8
2-2 2008年天氣簡述.................................................... 9
第三章研究方法...................................................... 10
3-1 地面雷達資料處理...................................................11
3-2 降雨雷達資料處理...................................................12
3-3 雨量及地形資料處理.................................................16
3-4 地面雷達分類方法...................................................16
3-5 降雨雷達分類方法...................................................18
第四章結果與討論.....................................................22
4-1 回波觀測比較分析...................................................22
4-1-1 比對資料的高度選定...............................................22
4-1-2 降雨型態分類結果比較.............................................23
4-1-3 偏移量...........................................................24
4-1-4 降雨雷達與 SPOL的比較.............................................26
4-2 雨量估計及應用.....................................................26
4-2-1 降雨估計比較.....................................................26
4-2-2 個案驗證.........................................................29
4-3 降雨雷達的垂直統計.................................................30
4-3-1 垂直結構的季節差異...............................................30
4-3-2 垂直結構在陸地及海洋的差異....................................... 31
第五章結論與未來展望......................................... 32
5-1 結論.......................................................... 32
5-2 未來展望.......................................................... 33
參考文獻................................................... 34

參考文獻

邱清安、林博雄、謝閔耕，2005：台灣地區氣象測站之詮釋資料與日氣溫、日降水之資
料檢定。氣象學報，第32期，第33-45頁。
蔡明達、陳萬金、方錫棋、劉振榮、李慶忠，2006：TRMM/PR降雨估算之驗證及其應
用－台灣陸地降雨之研究。大氣科學，第34 期，第1-24頁。
Anagnostou, E. N., C. A. Morales, and T. Dinku, 2001: The use of TRMM precipitation radar
observations in determining ground radar calibration biases. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,
18, 616-628.
Andrieu, H., and J. D. Creutin, 1995: Identification of vertical profiles of radar reflectivity for
hydrological applications using an inverse method. Part I: Formulation. J. Appl. Meteor.,
34, 225-239.
Awaka, J., T. Iguchi, H. Kumagai, and K. Okamoto, 1997: Rain type classification algorithm
for TRMM precipitation radar. Proc. Int. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp., Suntec
City, Singapore, IEEE, 1633-1635.
Bolen, S. M., and V. Chandrasekar, 2000: Quantitative cross validation of space-based and
ground-based radar observations. J. Appl. Meteor., 39, 2071-2079.
Carbone, R. E., and L. D. Nelson, 1978: The evolution of raindrop spectra in warm-based
convective storms as observed and numerically modeled. J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 2302–2314.
Chandrasekar, V., A. Hou, E. Smith, V. N. Bringi, S. A. Rutledge, E. Gorgucci, W.A. Petersen,
and G. S. Jackson, 2008: Potential role of dual-polarization radar in the validation of
satellite precipitation measurements. Bull Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89, 1127-1145.
Churchill, D. D., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1984：Development and structure of winter monsoon
cloud clusters on 10 December 1978. J. Atmos. Sci., 41,933-960.
Collier, C. G., S. Lovejoy, and G. L. Austin, 1980: Analysis of bright bands from 3-D radar
data. Preprints, 19th
Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Miami Beach, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc.,
44-47.
Dingle, A. N., and K. R. Hardy, 1962: The description of rain by means of sequential 35
raindrop-size distributions. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 88, 301–314.
Geerts, B. and T. Dejene, 2005: Regional and diurnal variability of the vertical structure of
precipitation systems in Africa, based on spaceborne radar data. J. Climate, 18, 893-916.
Houze, R. A., Jr., S. Brodzik, C. Schumacher, and S. E. Yuter, 2004: Uncertainties in oceanic
radar rain maps at Kwajalein and implications for satellite validation. J. Appl. Meteor.,
43, 1114-1132.
──, and A. K. Betts, 1981: Convection in GATE. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 19, 541-576.
Iguchi, T., R. Meneghini, 1994: Intercomparison of single frequency methods for retrieving a
vertical rain profile from airborne or spaceborne radar data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,
11, 1507-1516.
Kawanishi, T., T. Kozu, R. Meneghini, J. Awaka, and K. Okamoto,1998: Preliminary results
of rain profiling with TRMM precipitation radar. Proc. SPIE: Microwave Remote
Sensing of the Atmosphere and Environment, Beijing, China, International Society for
Optical Engineering, 94-101.
──, H. Kuroiwa, M. Kojima, K. Oikawa, T. Kozu, H. Kumagai, K. Okamoto, M. Okumura, H.
Nakatsuka, and K. Nishikawa, 2000: TRMM precipitation radar. Remote Sens. Appl.:
Earth Atmos. Oceans, 25, 969-972.
Kozu, T., T. Kawanishi, H. Kuroiwa, M. Kojima, K. Oikawa, H. Kumagai, K. Okamoto, M.
Okumura, H. Nakatsuka, and K. Nishikawa, 2000: Development of precipitation radar on
board the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) satellite. IEEE Trans. Geosci.
Remote Sens., 39, 102-116.
Liao, L., R. Meneghini, and T. Iguchi, 2001: Comparisons of rain rate and reflectivity factor
derived from the TRMM precipitation radar and the WSR-88D over the Melbourne,
Florida site. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 18, 1959-1974.
Meneghini, R., T. Iguchi, T. Kozu, L. Liao, K. Okamoto, J. A. Jones, and J. Kwiatkowski,
2000: Use of the surface reference technique for path attenuation estimates from the
TRMM Precipitation Radar. J. Appl. Meteor., 39, 2053-2070.
Nesbitt, S. W., R. Cifelli, and S. A. Rutledge, 2006: Storm morphology and rainfall
characteristics of TRMM precipitation features. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2702-2721.
Rosenfeld, D., E. Amitai, and D. B. Wolff, 1995: Classification of rain regimes by the 36
three-dimensional properties of reflectivity field. J. Appl. Meteor., 34, 198-211.
Sachidananda, M. and D. S. Zrnic´, 1986: Differential propagation phase shift and rainfall rate
estimation. Radio Sci., 21, 234-247.
Schumacher, C., and R. A. Houze Jr., 2000: Comparison of radar data from the TRMM
satellite and Kwajalein oceanic validation site. J. Appl. Meteor., 39, 2151-2164.
Simpson, J., C. Kummerow, W.-K. Tao, and R. F. Adler, 1996: On the Tropical Rainfall
Measuring Mission (TRMM). Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 60, 19-36.
Steiner, M., R. A. Houze Jr., and S. E. Yuter, 1995: Climatological characterization of
three-dimensional storm structure from operational radar and rain gauge data. J. Appl.
Meteor., 34, 1978-2007.
──, and R. A. Houze Jr., 1993：Three-dimensional validation at TRMM ground truth sites：
Some early results from Darwin, Australia. Preprints, 26th Int. Conf. on Radar
Meteorology, Norman, OK, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 417-420.
Takahashi, N., H. Kuroiwa, and T. Kawanishi, 2003: Four-year result of external calibration
for Precipitation Radar (PR) of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM)
satellite. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 41, 2398-2403.
Ulbrich, C. W., and L. G. Lee, 1999: Rainfall measurement error by WSR-88D radars due to
variations in Z-R law parameters and the radar constant. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 16,
1018-1024.
Yuter, S. E., R. A. Houze Jr., 1995: Three-dimensional kinematic and microphysical evolution
of Florida cumulonimbus. Part II: Frequency distributions of vertical velocity,
reflectivity and differential reflectivity. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123, 1941-1963.
Wang, J. , and D. B. Wolff, 2009: Comparisons of Reflectivities from the TRMM precipitation
Radar and Ground-Based Radars. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 857-875.
Zrnic´ D. S., T. D. Keenan, L. D. Carey, and P. May, 2000: Sensitivity analysis of polarimetric
variables at a 5-cm wavelength in rain. J. Appl. Meteorol., 39, 1514-1526.

指導教授

林沛練、廖宇慶
(Pay - liam Lin、Yu - Chieng Liou)

審核日期

2010-7-26

推文