組織結構與策略行為對組織吸收能力影響之研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：75

、訪客IP：3.17.186.88

姓名

虞享和(Hsiang-Ho Yu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

組織結構與策略行為對組織吸收能力影響之研究
(The influence of organization structure and strategic behavior on organizational absorptive capacity)

相關論文

★ 行動應用程式產業生態系之研究	★ 設計思維應用於醫療器材組裝之研究
★ 台灣中小型家族企業傳承─交班困難因素之探討	★ 電動機車共享經濟營運模式之研究
★ 區塊鏈運作原理與應用之研究	★ P2P網路信用借貸營運模式之研究
★ 線上交友平台商業模式之研究─以亞洲領導品牌為例	★ 台灣航空貨運業冷鏈業務發展策略－以中華航空公司為例
★ 設計思考在半導體製程改善之應用－以X公司為例	★ 成果驅動創新方法應用之研究－以門機產品為例
★ 藝文特展之商業模式研究－以MSC公司為例	★ 智慧家庭產業發展之研究
★ MES導入成功關鍵因素之研究	★ 運用GA 分析改善數位廣告之研究
★ 專利到期影響醫師處方因素之研究─以美商在台分公司之藥品為例	★ 攝影教學新創事業商業模式之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

面對全球市場快速的改變以及企業間劇烈的競爭，企業面臨如何創新以取得競爭優勢。公司除了必需不斷尋求新的外部知識，還必需吸收所獲取的新知並且將其應用在公司的商業目標上。如何協助企業獲取新知、吸收獲得的新知並應用其新知來促進企業創新已成為一重要課題。
在企業的競爭環境下，不同的組織因應企業的行為不同而有不同的行為導向，而組織的結構也因組織形成方式的不同而有所差異，過去的研究指出，組織內影響吸收能力的因素包含組織結構、組織策略及流程特質。因此，本研究將著重於組織結構以及組織行為如何影響組織的吸收能力並進行實證的分析。
本研究以組織結構的程序化、中央極權和專門化三個構面以及組織策略行為的客戶導向、競爭者導向、創新導向和內部/成本導向四個構面，來分別探討對於組織吸收能力兩個階段不同的影響，本研究並非著重在組織創新的績效而是以能夠達成組織創新的吸收能力做為衡量變數，此為本研究與前研究的不同處。
本研究以台灣製造業之廠商為研究主體，並請有參與過新產品開發專案的人員及主管填寫問卷，所得樣本為274份。經由實證結果發現，組織結構程序化與專門化皆對組織吸收能力兩階段產生正向影響，而中央集權則是都沒有顯著影響的。策略行為的競爭者導向和創新導向皆對組織吸收能力兩階段產生正向影響，在內部/成本導向對實質吸收能力產生正向影響，潛在部分則沒有顯著影響，客戶導向則是都沒有顯著影響。這些不顯著的結果跟之前學者所推論的結果是有段差異的。本研究認為即使中央集權可以幫助執行的效率，客戶導向會讓組織有動力尋求外部新知應用於產品上，但當個人能力不足時，不管是在外部知識的取得、消化甚至是轉換以及應用上都會降低執行的成效。

摘要(英)

Facing to change rapid global marketing and competitive environment, organizations must realize innovation to get the competitive advantage. Organizations have to look for external knowledge, assimilate it and exploit it on the business target. How to improve acquirement new knowledge, assimilation and exploitation capability in the organizations becomes an important issue.
In the competitive global environment, organizations have different behaviors based on the strategies. The organizational construct difference comes from how to form an organization. In the past studies, the factors to influence absorptive capacity including organizational construct, organizational strategy and process characteristic.
We examine organizational construct, organizational behaviors and absorptive capacity. Organizational constructs separate three types: formalization, centralization and specialization. Strategic behaviors have four kinds of dimensions: customer-oriented, competitor-oriented, innovation-oriented and internal/cost oriented. We use three types of constructs and four kinds of orientations to find out influences on two phases of absorptive capacity. The difference with other researches is that we don’t focus on the performance instead of absorptive capacity. We examine the source of innovation to improve performance.
Our empirical analysis focuses on Taiwan manufacturing industry and we send the questionnaires to the NPD team. Totally we collected 274 questionnaires. Through the empirical result, formalization and specialization have a significantly positive relation with absorptive capacity. Centralization has no significantly relation with absorptive capacity. Competitor-oriented and innovation-oriented have a significantly positive relation with absorptive capacity. Internal/cost-oriented has a significantly positive relation with realized absorptive capacity, but no significantly relation with potential absorptive capacity. Customer-oriented has no significantly relation with absorptive capacity. We suggested that even though centralization increases the efficiency. Customer-oriented makes the team find new external knowledge and exploit it on the product. But if the personal capability is not enough to acquire, assimilate, transform and exploit the knowledge. It will still decrease the effects on absorptive capacity.

關鍵字(中)

★ 吸收能力
★ 組織結構
★ 策略行為

關鍵字(英)

★ Strategy behavior
★ Absorptive capacity
★ Organizational construct

論文目次

第一章緒論
第一節研究背景與動機
第二節研究目的與問題
第二章文獻探討及假說
第一節吸收能力
第二節組織結構
第三節組織策略行為
第三章研究方法
第一節研究架構
第二節研究假說
第三節衡量變數定義
第四節結構化模型
第五節抽樣方法與問卷設計
第四章實證分析
第一節樣本基本資料分析
第二節衡量模型之評估
第三節結構模型之評估
第四節研究假設分析
第五章結論與建議
第一節研究結果與貢獻
第二節研究建議
第三節研究限制與未來研究建議
參考文獻
附錄 ........................................................................................................................ 42

參考文獻

1. Alberts, W. (n.d.). The Experience Curve Doctrine Reconsidered. Journal of Marketing , 53 (July), pp. 36–49.
2. Armstrong, J. S., & Collopy, F. (1996). Competitor Orientation: Effects of Objectives and Information on Managerial Decisions and Profitability. Journal of Marketing Research , 33 (May), pp. 188–199.
3. Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual Capital: An Exploratory Study That Develops Measures And Models. Management Decision , 36 (2), p. 63.
4. Bruhn, M., Georgi, D., & Hadwich, K. (2008). Customer equity management as formative second-order construct. Journal of Business Research , 61 (12), pp. 1292-1301.
5. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock Publications.
6. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multi-Trait-Multi-Method Matrix. Psychological Bulletin , 56 (2), pp. 81-105.
7. Chen, M. J. (1996). Competitor Analysis and Interfirm Rivalry: Toward a Theoretical Integration. Academy of Management Review , 21 (1), pp. 100–134.
8. Chin, W. (1998b). The PLS approach to SEM. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Chin, W. W. (1988a). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly , 22 (1), pp. vii-xvi.
10. Christensen, C., & Bower, J. (1996). Customer Power, Strategic Investments, and the Failure of Leading Firms. Strategic Management Journal , 17 (3), pp. 197–218.
11. ClarkB.K., & FujimotoT. (1991). Product development performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
12. Cockburn, I., Henderson, R., & Stern, S. (2000). Untangling the origins of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal , 21, pp. 1123–1146.
13. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly , 35 (1), pp. 128–152.
14. Day, G. S. (1994b). Continuous Learning About Markets. California Management Review , 36 (Summer), pp. 9–31.
15. Day, G. S. (1990). Market Driven Strategy. New York: The Free Press.
16. Day, G. S. (1984). Strategic Market Planning: The Pursuit of Competitive Advantage. St. Paul MN: West Publishing.
17. Day, G. S. (1994a). The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations. Journal of Marketing , 58 (October), pp. 37–52.
18. Day, G. S., & Nedungadi, P. (1994). Managerial Representations of Competitive Advantage. Journal of Marketing , 58 (April), pp. 31–44.
19. Deshpande, R., & Zaltman, G. (1982). Factors Affecting the Use of Market Research Information: A Path Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research , Feb (19), pp. 14-31.
20. Deshpandé, R., Farley, J., & Jr., F. E. (1993). Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis. Journal of Marketing , 57 (January), pp. 23–37.
21. Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative Versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration. British Journal of Management , 17 (4), pp. 263–282.
22. Fornell, C. R., & Bookstein, F. (1982). ,Two Structural Equation Model: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory. Journal of Marketing Research (19), pp. 440-452.
23. Fornell, C., & Larker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research , 18 (1), pp. 39-50.
24. Galbraith, J., & Kazanjian, R. (1986). Strategy Implementation: Structure, Systems, and Process. St. Paul MN: West Publishing.
25. Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J. M. (1997). Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance. Journal of Marketing Research , 34 (February), pp. 77–90.
26. Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1970). Social Change in Complex Organizations. New York: Random House.
27. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis.
28. Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link? Journal of Marketing , 62 (October), pp. 30–45.
29. Homburg, Christian, Workman, J., & Krohmer, H. (1999). Marketing's Influence Within the Firm. Journal of Marketing , 63 (April), pp. 1-17.
30. Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. (1998). Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination. Journal of Marketing , 62 (July), pp. 42–54.
31. Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Vaidyanath, D. (2002). Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage. Journal of Management , 28, pp. 413–446.
32. Jansen, J. J., Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2005). Managing Potential And Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents? Academy of Management Journal , 48 (6), pp. 999–1015.
33. Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research. The Journal of Consumer Research , 30 (2), pp. 199-218.
34. Johansson, J. K., & Yip, G. S. (1994). Exploiting Globalization Potential: U.S. and Japanese Strategies. Strategic Management Journal , 15 (8), pp. 579-601.
35. Johnston, A. C., & Warkentin, M. (2010). Fear Appeals and Information Security Behaviors: An Empirical Study. MIS Quarterly , 34 (3), pp. 549-566.
36. Kim, L. (1997b). From imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea's technological learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
37. Kim, L. (1997a). The dynamics of Samsung's technological learning in semiconductors. Caliiornia Management Review , 39 (3), pp. 86-100.
38. Klein, R., & Rai, A. (2009). Interfirm Strategic Information Flows In Logistics Supply Chain Relationships. MIS Quarterly , 33 (4), pp. 735-762.
39. Kohli, A., & Jaworski, B. (1990). Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications. Journal of Marketing , 54 (July), pp. 53–70.
40. Kotha, Suresh, & Vadlamani, B. (1995). Assessing Generic Strategies: An Empirical Investigation of Two Competing Typologies in Discrete Manufacturing Industries. Strategic Management Journal , 16 (1), pp. 75-84.
41. Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: a critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. A academy of Management Review , 31 (4), pp. 833–836.
42. Lichtenthaler, U. (2009). Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, And The Complementarity Of Organizational Learning Process. Academy of Management Journal , 52 (4), pp. 822-846.
43. Loch, K. D., Straub, D. W., & Kamel, S. K. (2003). Diffusing the Internet in the Arab World: The Role of Social Norms and Technological Culturation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 50 (1), pp. 45-63.
44. Lynn, G., Morone, J., & Paulson, A. (1996). Marketing and Discontinuous Innovation: The Probe and Learn Process. California Management Review , 38 (3), pp. 8–37.
45. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Method , 1 (2), pp. 130-149.
46. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science , 2 (1), pp. 71-87.
47. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science , 2 (1), pp. 71–87.
48. Menon, Anil, Bharadwaj, S., Adidam, P., & Edison, S. (1999). Antecedents and Consequences of Marketing Strategy Making. Journal of Marketing , 63 (April), pp. 18-40.
49. Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1992). Causes of Failure in Network Organizations. California Management Review , 4 (Summer), pp. 53–72.
50. Mintzberg, H. (1981). Organization Design: Fashion or Fit? Harvard Business Review , 59 (1), pp. 103–116.
51. MintzbergHenry. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
52. Narver, C., J., Slater, S. F., & MacLachlan, D. L. (2004). Responsive and Proactive Market Orientation, and New Product Success. Journal of Product Innovation Management , 21 (5), pp. 337-47.
53. Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability. Journal of Marketing , 54 (October), pp. 20–35.
54. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. (2nd, Ed.) McGraw-Hill, New York.
55. Olson, E. M., Slater, S. F., & Hult, G. T. (2005). The Performance Implications of Fit Among Business Strategy, Marketing Organization Structure, and Strategic Behavior. Journal of Marketing , 69, pp. 49–65.
56. Olson, E. M., Walker, O. C., & Ruekert, R. W. (1995). Organizing for New Product Development: The Moderating Role of Product Innovativeness. Journal of Marketing , 59 (January), pp. 48–62.
57. Ouchi, W. (1977). The Relationship Between Organizational Structure and Organizational Control. Administrative Science Quarterly , 20 (1), pp. 95–113.
58. Petter, S., Straub, D. W., & Rai, A. (2007). Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly , 4, pp. 623-656.
59. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage. New York: The Free Press.
60. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York: The Free Press.
61. Porter, M. E. (1996). What Is Strategy? Harvard Business Review , 74 (6), pp. 61–78.
62. Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., & Patnayakuni, N. (2006). Firm Performance Impacts of Digitally Enabled Supply Chain Integration Capabilities. MIS Quarterly , 30 (2), pp. 225-246.
63. Robbins, S. P. (2002). Organizational Behavior (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
64. Rocha, F. (1999). Inter-firm technological cooperation: Eifects of absorptive capacity, firm-size and specialization. Economics of Innovation and New Technology , 8 (3), pp. 253–271.
65. Ruekert, R. W., Walker, O. C., & Roering, K. J. (1985). The Organization of Marketing Activities: A Contingency Theory of Structure and Performance. Journal of Marketing , 49 (January), pp. 13–25.
66. Slater, S., & Narver, J. (1995). Market Orientation and the Learning Organization. Journal of Marketing , 59 (July), pp. 63–74.
67. Snell, S. (1992). Control Theory in Strategic Human Resource Management: The Mediating Effect of Administrative Information. Academy of Management Journal , 35 (2), pp. 292–327.
68. Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal , 17, pp. 27–43.
69. TannenbaumS.Arnold. (1968). Control in Organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
70. Treacy, M., & Wiersema, F. D. (1993). Customer Intimacy and Other Value Disciplines. Harvard Business Review , 71 (1), pp. 84–93.
71. Ullrich, R., & Wieland, G. (1980). Organization Theory and Design. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
72. Walker, O. C., & Ruekert, R. W. (1987). Marketing’s Role in the Implementation of Business Strategies: A Critical Review and Conceptual Framework. Journal of Marketing , 51 (July), pp. 15–33.
73. Wixom, B., & Watson, H. (2001). An Empirical Investigation Of The Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success. MIS Quarterly , 25 (1), pp. 17-41.
74. Wold, H. (1982). Systems under Indirect Observation Using PLS. A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis. (F. I. C., Ed.) Praeger, New York.
75. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review , 27 (2), pp. 185–203.
76. Zollo, M. M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science , 13, pp. 339–351.
77. Zollo, M., Reuer, J. J., & Singh, H. (2002). Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organization Science , 13, pp. 701–713.

指導教授

陳炫碩(Ken Chen)

審核日期

2011-6-15

推文