行動學習環境中「表徵形式」與「線索有無」對學習者學習行為、認知負荷與學習成效之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：150

、訪客IP：3.144.252.49

姓名

郭雨珍(Yu-Chen Kuo) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

學習與教學研究所

論文名稱

行動學習環境中「表徵形式」與「線索有無」對學習者學習行為、認知負荷與學習成效之影響
(The Effects of “Types of Representations” and “Cueing” on Learners’ Learning Behavior, Cognitive Load, and Learning Performance in the Mobile Learning Environment)

相關論文

★ 在亞卓市教案編輯系統中設計學校本位教案發展之模組	★ 以同儕互評與討論提升小六學童之寫作表現 ~以行動學習輔具教室為例
★ 以言談分析方法解析鷹架輔助之線上即時互動	★ 『教學決策參照架構』對教師應用無線科技進行數學教學成效影響之實驗研究
★ 高中生「相關」迷思概念診斷工具之發展歷程研究	★ 以模擬為基礎的統計學習軟體之初探性評估研究
★ 線上同儕互評對國小六年級學童寫作學習成效影響之實驗研究	★ 模擬輔助理解系統對高中生統計「相關」概念學習成效之實驗研究
★ 認知風格對模擬為基礎之電腦輔助學習的影響	★ 認知風格對學習者於互動多媒體輔助統計學習之影響－以圖像型與文字型為例
★ Exploring Computer-based Nature Science Instruction Based on the Cognitive Load Theory: Spatial Contiguity Effect, and Effects of Prior Knowledge on Performance Assessments	★ 使用電腦字典輔助英文閱讀之認知負荷、認知歷程與非刻意字彙習得
★ 認知負荷理論的應用與省思：優化電腦模擬輔助學習之介面設計與認知支持的系列研究	★ 虛擬教室結合頭戴式顯示器之注意力偵測設計及準確度分析與研究
★ 電腦模擬輔助學習中「人機互動」對認知負荷、學習歷程與學習成效的影響	★ 影響中小學教師行動科技融入教學之因素模式探討

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

行動學習環境中，多元的表徵雖可提供學習者豐富的感官經驗，卻也因此增加分散注意力效應發生的機會，並進而增加學習者在多元訊息中整合重點的困難度。然而，過去較少有研究針對行動學習環境從認知負荷的角度思考「聲音表徵」以及「聲音線索」對學習成效與學習歷程的影響。據此，本研究欲探討行動學習環境中，「不同表徵形式」（文字表徵與聲音表徵）以及「有無聲音線索」的教材版本對學習者在植物葉片辨識學習的學習行為、認知負荷以及學習成效之影響。本研究採單因子實驗設計，75名國小學童被隨機分派至不同的組別（包含：文字解說組、聲音解說組以及聲音線索組）。學習過程中，研究對象須自評在學習階段所費的心力，研究者並以攝影機全程記錄學習者的學習行為；在學習階段結束後，三組學習者皆須接受保留測驗、理解測驗以及應用測驗的評量，並且自評在不同測驗中所費的心力。本研究以事前比較進行統計分析，研究結果指出：(1)在「表徵形式」的部分，與文字解說組相比，聲音解說組的學習者在學習過程中有較多與植物接觸的行為，而且在保留測驗和應用測驗皆發現顯著的形式效應。不過，兩組在學習階段和測驗階段的認知負荷皆無顯著差異。(2)在「線索有無」的部分，聲音解說組與聲音線索組的學習者在學習行為、認知負荷以及學習成效上，皆無顯著差異，線索的效果在本研究中未獲得印證。本論文依據研究結果提出許多討論與建議，將可作為未來在行動學習環境中的多媒體教材設計參考。

摘要(英)

Multiple representations provide learners with a variety of sensual experiences, but it could also lead to increased chances of spilt-attention and degree of difficulty in finding the key information. However, few studies considered the instructional design from the perspective of cognitive load theory in a mobile learning environment. Therefore, the present study investigated the effects of the “types of representations” and “cueing” on learners’ learning behavior, cognitive load, and learning performance in a mobile learning environment on leaf morphology of plants as a function of different versions of the material. The single-factor experiment was used to achieve the purpose. Seventy-five elementary students were randomly assigned to the following three conditions: (1) real plants + text, (2) real plants + audio, and (3) real plants + audio with cueing. During the learning phase, participants’ learning behavior were recorded by video camera. In the test phases, participants’ performance on retention, comprehension and application tests was collected. In addition, their cognitive load was measured in the learning and test phases.
Planned contrasts was used to examine effects of the “types of representations” and “cueing” on learners’ learning behavior, cognitive load, and learning performance. The results of this study are as follows: First, for the effects of the “types of representations” on learners’ learning behavior, cognitive load, and learning performance, participants in the audio condition had more contacts with the plants than participants in the text condition, and the modality effect on retention and application tests was proved. However, no significant difference of cognitive load was found in any phase. Second, for the effects of the “cueing” on learners’ learning behavior, cognitive load, and learning performance, no significant difference of learning behavior, cognitive load, and learning performance was found between the audio condition and the audio with cueing condition. The implications of the results for research and design of mobile learning environments are discussed.

關鍵字(中)

★ 學習行為
★ 行動學習
★ 認知負荷
★ 線索
★ 形式效應

關鍵字(英)

★ modality effect
★ mobile learning
★ cognitive load
★ learning behavior
★ cueing

論文目次

摘　要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌　謝 III
目　錄 IV
表目錄 VI
圖目錄 VII
第一章緒　論 1
　　第一節研究背景與動機 1
　　第二節研究目的與待答問題 7
　　第三節名詞釋義 7
第二章文獻探討 9
　　第一節行動科技輔助實物觀察學習及其相關研究 9
　　第二節認知負荷理論 14
　　第三節形式效應及其相關研究 19
　　第四節線索及其相關研究 25
　　第五節研究假設 30
第三章研究設計與實施 33
　　第一節研究架構 33
　　第二節研究對象 35
　　第三節研究設計 35
　　第四節研究步驟 42
　　第五節資料蒐集與分析 46
第四章資料分析結果 51
　　第一節「表徵形式」對學習行為、認知負荷以及學習成效的影響 52
　　第二節「線索有無」對學習行為、認知負荷以及學習成效的影響 55
第五章討　論 59
第六章結論與建議 67
　　第一節研究結論 67
　　第二節研究限制與建議 69
參考文獻 73
附錄一 81
附錄二 83

參考文獻

一、中文部份
吳瑞源與吳慧敏（民97）。動畫教材之學習者控制播放模式與多媒體組合形式對學習成效與學習時間影響之研究。師大學報，53，1-26。
張國恩、宋曜廷、吳正偉、陳平福與侯惠澤（民93年11月）。國外行動學習案例探討。「行動學習之數位內容建置及運用技術研究」研討會發表之論文，台北。
陳彙芳、范懿文（民89）。認知負荷對多媒體電腦輔助學習成效之影響研究。資訊管理研究，2，45-60。
靳知勤（民96）。科學教育應如何提升學生的科學素養—台灣學術精英的看法。科學教育學刊，15，627-646。
蔡振家、陳佳利、李捷葳（民99）。博物館中的文學聲景：試析聲音元素在文學展示中的角色與功能。博物館學季刊，24，93-113。
謝明憲（民93）。即時傳訊系統之聲音提示對使用者工作績效的影響（未出版之碩士論文）。國立清華大學，新竹市。
二、英文部份
Aldalalah, O. M., & Fong, S. F. (2010). Effects of modality and redundancy principles on the learning and attitude of a computer-based music theory lesson among jordanian primary pupils. International Education Studies, 3(3), 52-64.
Amadieu, F., Marine, C., & Laimay, C. (2011). The attention-guiding effect and cognitive load in the comprehension of animations. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.009
Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 135-146). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511816819.009
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556-559. doi: 10.1126/science.1736359
Betrancourt, M. (2005). The animation and interactivity principles in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, (pp. 287 -296). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bitgood, S. (1996). The role of attention in designing effective interpretive labels. Journal of Interpretation Research, 5(2), 31-45.
Boucheix, J. M., & Lowe, R. K. (2010). An eye tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animations. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 123-135. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.015
Britton, B. K., Glynn, S. M., Meyer, B. J., & Penland, M. (1982). Effects of text structure on use of cognitive capacity during reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(1), 51-61. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.74.1.51
Brünken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2004). Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning with dual-task methodology: Auditory load and modality effects. Instructional Science, 32(1), 115-132. doi: 10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021812.96911.c5
Cao, Y., Theune, M., & Nijholt, A. (2009). Modality Effects on Cognitive Load and Performance in High-Load Information Presentation. In: 13th International Conference on Intelligent User Interface (IUI), pp. 335-344
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1992). The split attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(2), 233-246. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1992.tb01017.x
Chang, C. C., Lei, H., & Tseng, J. S. (2011). Media presentation mode, English listening comprehension and cognitive load in ubiquitous learning environments: Modality effect or redundancy effect? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 633-654.
Chang, C. C., Tseng, K. H., & Tseng, J. S. (2011). Is single or dual channel with different English proficiencies better for English listening comprehension, cognitive load and attitude in ubiquitous learning environment? Computers & Education, 57(4), 2313-2321. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.006
Chang, C. Y., Sheu, J. P., & Chan, T. W. (2003). Concept and design of AD hoc and mobile classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 336-346. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.00035.x
Chen, Y. S., Kao, T. C., & Sheu, J. P. (2003). A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 347-359. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00036.x
Chen, Y. S., Kao, T. C., Yu, G. J., & Sheu, J. P. (2004). A Mobile Butterfly-Watching Learning System for Supporting Independent Learning. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the The 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education(WMTE 2004), Jhongli, Taiwan.
Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Costabile, M. F., De Angeli, A., Lanzilotti, R., Ardito, C., Buono, P., & Pederson, T. (2008). Explore! Possibilities and Challenges of Mobile Learning. In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2008 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, pp. 145-154.
Crooks, S. M., Cheon, J., Man, F., Ari, F., & Flores, R. (2012). Modality and cueing in multimedia learning: Examining cognitive and perceptual explanations for the modality effect. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 1063-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.010
de Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38(2), 105-134. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0
de Jong, T., Specht, M., & Koper, R. (2008). Contextualised media for learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 41-53.
de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2007). Attention cueing as a means to enhance learning from an animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 731-746. doi:10.1002/acp.1346
de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2009). Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. Educational psychology review, 21(2), 113-140. doi:10.1007/s10648-009-9098-7
de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2010a). Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: Seeing is understanding? Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 111-122. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.010
de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2010b). Learning by generating vs. receiving instructional explanations: Two approaches to enhance attention cueing in animations. Computers & Education, 55(2), 681-691. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.027
de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2011). Attention cueing in an instructional animation: The role of presentation speed. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 41-45. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.010
Debuse, J. C. W., Hede, A., & Lawley, M. (2009). Learning efficacy of simultaneous audio and on-screen text in online lectures. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 748-762.
Evans, C. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers & Education, 50(2), 491-498. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.016
Fong, S. F., & Aldalalah, O. A. (2010a). Effects of computer-based instructional designs among internals-externals: a cognitive load perspective. European Journal of Social Sciences, 14(1), 164-182.
Fong, S. F., & Aldalalah, O. M. (2010b). Modality and redundancy effects on music theory learning among pupils of different anxiety levels. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 5(9), 589-597.
Frase, L. T., & Schwartz, B. J. (1979). Typographical cues that facilitate comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 197-206. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.2.197
Gaddy, M. L., van den Broek, P., & Sung, Y. C. (2001). The inXuence of text cues on the allocation of attention during reading. Text representation: linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects, 89-110.
Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction, 15(4), 313-331. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.001
Guan, Y. H. (2009). A study on the learning efficiency of multimedia-presented, computer-based science information. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 62-72.
Harskamp, E. G., Mayer, R. E., & Suhre, C. (2007). Does the modality principle for multimedia learning apply to science classrooms? Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 465-477. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.010
Hung, P. H., Lin, Y. F., & Hwang, G. J. (2010). Formative assessment design for PDA integrated ecology observation. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 33-42.
Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023-1031. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.002
Hwang, G. J., Chu, H. C., Shih, J. L., Huang, S. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). A decision-tree-oriented guidance mechanism for conducting nature science observation activities in a context-aware ubiquitous learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 53-64.
Jamet, E., Gavota, M., & Quaireau, C. (2008). Attention guiding in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 135-145. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.011
Jung, E. H. S. (2003). The role of discourse signaling cues in second language listening comprehension. The modern language journal, 87(4), 562-577.
Kalyuga, S. (2008). Managing cognitive load in adaptive multimedia learning, Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Kalyuga, S. (2010). Schema Acquisition and Sources of Cognitive Load. In J.L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brünken (Eds.)., Cognitive Load Theory, ch. 3. New York: Cambridge.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13(4), 351-371. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199908)13:4<351::AID-ACP589>3.0.CO;2-6
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 126-136. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.92.1.126
Keskin, N. O., & Metcalf, D. (2011). The current perspectives, theories and practices of mobile learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 202-208.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory, modality of presentation and the transient information effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 943-951. doi: 10.1002/acp.1787
Lin, L., & Atkinson, R. K. (2011). Using animations and visual cueing to support learning of scientific concepts and processes. Computers & Education, 56(3), 650-658. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.007
Lin, Y. F., Wu, T. H., Hung, P. H., Hwang, G. J., & Yeh, Y. F. (2009 , March). A cognitive load-based framework for integrating PDAs into outdoor observations. Paper presented at the the 5th International Workshop on Mobile and Ubiquitous Learning Environments (MULE 2009), University of Tokushima, Japan.
Liu, T. C. (2007). Teaching in a wireless learning environment: A case study. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (1), 107-123.
Liu, T. C., Lin, Y. C., & Paas, F. (in press). Effects of cues and real objects on learning in a mobile device supported environment. British Journal of Educational Technology. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01331.x
Liu, T. C., Lin, Y. C., Tsai, M. J., & Paas, F. (2012). Spilt-attention and redundancy effects in mobile learning in physical environments. Computers & Education. 58(1), 172-180. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.007
Liu, T. C., Peng, H., Wu, W. H., & Lin, M. S. (2009). The effects of mobile natural-science learning based on the 5E learning cycle: a case study. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 344-358.
Liu, T. C., Wang, H. Y., Liang, J. K., Chan, T. W., Ko, H. W., & Yang, J. C. (2003). Wireless and mobile technologies to enhance teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 371-382. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00038.x
Looi, C. K., Zhang, B., Chen, W., Seow, P., Chia, G., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2011). 1: 1 mobile inquiry learning experience for primary science students: a study of learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 269-287. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00390.x
Lorch, R. F. (1989). Text-signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes. Educational psychology review, 1(3), 209-234. doi:10.1007/BF01320135
Lowe, R., & Boucheix, J. M. (2011). Cueing complex animations: Does direction of attention foster learning processes? Learning and Instruction, 21(5), 650-663. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.02.002
Mann, B., Newhouse, P., Pagram, J., Campbell, A., & Schulz, H. (2002). A comparison of temporal speech and text cueing in educational multimedia. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 296-308. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2002.00241.x
Mautone, P. D., & Mayer, R. E. (2001). Signaling as a cognitive guide in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 377-389. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.93.2.377
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Cognitive theory and the design of multimedia instruction: An example of the two-way street between cognition and instruction. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002(89), 55-71. doi:10.1002/tl.47
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312-320. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.90.2.312
Mayer, R. E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R., & Tapangco, L. (1996). When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 64-73. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.88.1.64
Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 187-198. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.187
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological review, 63(2), 81-97. doi:10.1037/h0043158
Moreno, R., & Duran, R. (2004). Do multiple representations need explanations? the role of verbal guidance and individual differences in multimedia mathematics learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 492-503. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.492
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358-368. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.358
Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 319-334. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.87.2.319
Ozcelik, E., Arslan-Ari, I., & Cagiltay, K. (2010). Why does signaling enhance multimedia learning? Evidence from eye movements. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 110-117. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.001
Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429-434. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429
Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 122-133. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.122
Quinn, C. (2000). mLearning: mobile, wireless and in-your-pocket learning. LiNE Zine. Retrieved from http://www.linezine.com/2.1/features/cqmmwiyp.htm
Reynolds, R., Walker, K., & Speight, C. (2010). Web-based museum trails on pdas for university-level design students: design and evaluation. Computers & Education, 55(3), 994-1003. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.010
Savoji, A. P., Hassanabadi, H., & Fasihipour, Z. (2011). The modality effect in learner-paced multimedia learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1488-1493. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.288
Schmidt-Weigand, F., Kohnert, A., & Glowalla, U. (2010a). A closer look at split visual attention in system- and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 100-110. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.011
Schmidt-Weigand, F., Kohnert, A., & Glowalla, U. (2010b). Explaining the modality and contiguity effects: new insights from investigating students’’ viewing behaviour. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(2), 226-237. doi:10.1002/acp.1554
Segers, E., Verhoeven, L., & Hulstijn-Hendrikse, N. (2008). Cognitive processes in children’’s multimedia text learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 375-387. doi: 10.1002/acp.1413
Seppala, P., & Alamaki, H. (2003). Mobile learning in teacher training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 330-335.
Seufert, T., Schütze, M., & Brünken, R. (2009). Memory characteristics and modality in multimedia learning: An aptitude-treatment-interaction study. Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 28-42. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.01.002
Sharples, M., Corlett, D., & Westmancott, O. (2002). The design and implementation of a mobile learning resource. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 6(3), 220-234. doi:10.1007/s007790200021
Shih, J. L., Chuang, C. W., & Hwang, G. J. (2010). An inquiry-based mobile learning approach to enhancing social science learning effectiveness. Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 50-62.
Shonk, K. (2006). Technology for the Birds: An Electronic Field Guide of Bird Study Incorporating Sight & Sound. The American Biology Teacher, 68(6), 362-364. doi:10.1662/0002-7685(2006)68[362:AEFGOB]2.0.CO;2
Stiller, K. D., Freitag, A., Zinnbauer, P., & Freitag, C. (2009). How pacing of multimedia instructions can influence modality effects: A case of superiority of visual texts Explaining modality effects. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 184-203.
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., Hou, H. T., & Chen, P. F. (2010). Designing an electronic guidebook for learning engagement in a museum of history. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 74-83. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.004
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., Lee, Y. H., & Yu, W. C. (2008). Effects of a mobile electronic guidebook on visitors’’ attention and visiting behaviors. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 67-80.
Sung, Y. T., Hou, H. T., Liu, C. K., & Chang, K. E. (2010). Mobile guide system using problem solving strategy for museum learning: a sequential learning behavioural pattern analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(2), 106-115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00345.x
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational psychology review, 22(2), 123-138. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
Sweller, J., Ayres. P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York : Springer.
Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational psychology review, 10(3), 251-296. doi: 10.1023/A:1022193728205
Tabbers, H. K., Martens, R. L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004). Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: Effects of modality and cueing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(1), 71-81. doi:10.1348/000709904322848824
Traxler, J., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2005). Mobile Learning in Developing Countries. In G. Chin (Ed.), A report commissioned by the Commonwealth of Learning. Vancouver, BC: Commonwealth of Learning.
Trifonova, A. (2003). Mobile learning – review of the literature. Technical report DIT-03-009, Informatica e Telecomunicazioni, University of Trento.
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational psychology review, 17(2), 147-177. doi:10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
Wang, H. Y., Liu, T. C., Chou, C. Y., Liang, J. K., Chan, T. W., & Yang, S. (2004). A framework of three learning activity levels for enhancing the usability and feasibility of wireless learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(4), 331-351. doi:10.2190/PWME-0H2W-GAEU-AD9P
Witteman, M. J., & Segers, E. (2010). The modality effect tested in children in a user-paced multimedia environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(2), 132-142. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00335.x
Woodruff, A., Aoki, P. M., Hurst, A., & Szymanski, M. H. (2001). Electronic guidebooks and visitor attention. In D. Bearman & J. Trant (Eds.). Cultural Heritage Informatics (Proc. 6th ICHIM)(pp.437-454). Philadelphia: A & MI.
Yang, J. C., & Lin, Y. L. (2010). Development and evaluation of an interactive mobile learning environment with shared display groupware. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 195-207.
Yeung, A. S., Jin, P. T., & Sweller, J. (1997). Cognitive load and learner expertise: Split-attention and redundancy effects in reading with explanatory notes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(1), 1-21. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1997.0951

指導教授

劉子鍵(Tzu-Chien Liu)

審核日期

2012-7-29

推文