使用四維變分都卜勒雷達變分分析系統(VDRAS)與WRF改善短期定量降水預報

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：224

、訪客IP：3.147.27.71

姓名

楊靜伃(Ching-yu Yang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

大氣物理研究所

論文名稱

使用四維變分都卜勒雷達變分分析系統(VDRAS)與WRF改善短期定量降水預報
(Improving short-term QPF by using a 4DVAR radar data assimilation system (VDRAS) and WRF)

相關論文

★ 單雷達風場反演—【移動坐標法】的特性分析與應用	★ 由都卜勒風場反演熱動力場的新方法 ——TAMEX IOP#2颮線個案應用分析
★ 利用VAD技術及回波保守方程反演渦度場	★ 利用單都卜勒雷達反演三維風場之研究─以數值模式資料驗證
★ 在地形上由都卜勒風場反演熱動力場	★ 利用Extended-GBVTD方法反求非軸對稱颱風（颶風）風場結構
★ 同化雷達資料對數值預報影響之研究	★ 使用系集卡曼濾波器同化都卜勒雷達資料之研究
★ 以3DVAR同化都卜勒雷達觀測及反演資料對於數值模擬結果的影響	★ 台灣北部初秋豪雨個案之降雨特性研究
★ 同化都卜勒雷達資料改善模式預報之研究	★ 2008年台灣西南部地區TRMM降雨雷達與七股雷達回波觀測比較分析及降雨估計應用研究
★ 使用四維變分同化都卜勒雷達資料以改進短期定量降雨預報	★ 同化多部都卜勒雷達資料以提升降水預報能力之研究-2008 SoWMEX IOP8個案分析
★ 結合VDRAS、WRF與雷達網聯資料，以檢視對台灣地區短期降水預報改善之成效	★ 結合都卜勒雷達觀測及反演氣象變數與COSMIC RO資料以改進模式預報之可行性研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

美國國家大氣研究中心(National Center for Atmospheric Research:NCAR)發展的都卜勒雷達變分分析系統(Variational Doppler Radar analysis System: VDRAS)，是利用四維變分資料同化方法(4DVAR)同化雷達回波和徑向風觀測資料，可反演出天氣系統之三維動力場及熱力場，並進行預報。VDRAS曾用於台灣地區檢視同化雷達資料後模式的預報能力，並將VDRAS之最佳分析場，與WRF(Weather Research and Forecasting)模式結合並進行預報，其結果明顯比VDRAS和WRF的單獨預報佳。本研究使用VDRAS同化多部都卜勒雷達資料，對VDRAS之分析場進行同化窗區敏感度實驗，並改善VDRAS與WRF之結合方式，期望提升短期定量降水預報之能力。
本實驗針對2008年SoWMEX/TiMREX (西南氣流實驗) IOP8(第八次密集觀測期間)中6月14日的梅雨鋒面進行研究分析。第一部分為VDRAS同化窗區敏感度實驗，檢視同化窗區數目對分析場及預報場的影響，進行1~3個同化窗區測試。結果顯示兩個同化窗區的VDRAS在分析場之動力及熱力結構的表現較佳。
第二部分為VDRAS分析場與WRF模式的同化實驗，其中WRF模式使用單一區域及開放式邊界條件進行模擬，以避免同化後在WRF模式邊界所產生的不平滑問題。在此採用「直接取代結合」與「WRF 3DVAR結合」為同化方式，檢視同化方式對預報結果之影響。將VDRAS的分析場與WRF進行直接取代結合，其對定量降水預報的影響可以持續四小時，在降雨分佈的結果中，取代後的WRF模式可以很好的模擬降雨分佈與地形之間的效應，對降雨的預報有明顯改善。其中以兩個窗區的VDRAS分析場與WRF進行取代結合，在四小時的定量降水預報的表現最好。但是以WRF 3DVAR結合VDRAS分析場與WRF模式，對於結合結果的調整能力有限，且此方法需要很長時間的spin up。
本研究提供了一種在台灣地區多山的情況下較有效地使用VDRAS來預報降雨的方案。

摘要(英)

The NCAR Variational Doppler Radar Analysis System (VDRAS) is a system which uses the 4DVAR technique to assimilate the radar reflectivity and radial wind observations, and is capable of providing the three-dimensional kinematic and thermodynamic fields within a weather system. Since VDRAS is formulated on a Cartesian coordinate, its application to Taiwan where the topography is complicated is expected to be limited. Previous studies in which the analysis fields from VDRAS were merged with WRF showed encouraging results in improving the model Quantitative Precipitation Forecast (QPF). The purpose of this study is to test the sensitivity of the cycling configuration for VDRAS, and find a robust way of combining VDRAS and WRF.
A real case of Mei-Yu front occurred on 14 June 2008 during Southwest Monsoon Experiment (SoWMEX) IOP8 is selected. In the first set of experiment, three tests are designed to examine the sensitivity of the analysis and forecast with respect to VDRAS cycling configuration containing 1-3 cycles in assimilation processes, respectively. The results of the principal kinematic and thermodynamic features reveal that VDRAS with two cycles is better than the other designs. In the second set of experiment, the VDRAS analysis fields are merged with WRF model. Assuming that the synoptic scale influence can be neglected within a period of three to four hours, it is found that using a single domain instead of nested domains can effectively remove the noises generated along the domain boundaries. Two different ways are used to merge VDRAS with WRF, and they are “direct replacement” and “WRF 3DVAR”, respectively.
It is found that when the VDRAS analysis fields generated by 1-3 cycles are directly merged with WRF model, the two-cycle VDRAS analysis field produces the best results. The impact of using VDRAS outputs to improve the QPF can last for about four hours. The accuracy of the predicted 4-hour accumulated rainfall after merging VDRAS and WRF turns out to be significantly higher than that generated by using VDRAS or WRF alone. This can be attributed to the assimilation of meso- and convective scale information, embedded in the radar data into the VDRAS, and to a better treatment of the topographic effects by the WRF model simulation. However, the experiments of using “WRF 3DVAR” to merge VDRAS analysis fields with WRF are not successful, and this method needs a longer time to spin up.
This research suggests an effective way of using VDRAS to forecast rainfall under Taiwan’s mountainous situation.

關鍵字(中)

★ 都卜勒雷達變分分析系統
★ 四維變分
★ WRF
★ 都卜勒雷達
★ 定量降水預報

關鍵字(英)

★ 4DVAR
★ VDRAS
★ WRF
★ QPF
★ Doppler radar

論文目次

中文摘要...................................i
Abstract...................................ii
致謝.......................................iv
目錄.......................................v
圖表說明...................................vii
第一章緒論................................1
1.1 前言...................................1
1.2 文獻回顧...............................2
1.3 研究目的...............................3
第二章個案介紹...........................5
2.1 2008年西南氣流實驗....................5
2.2 IOP8個案介紹..........................6
第三章研究方法...........................8
3.1 雷達資料品質控管與處理................8
3.2 都卜勒雷達變分分析系統VDRAS...........8
3.2.1 中尺度背景場.........................9
3.2.2 雲模式...............................10
3.2.3 四維變分.............................11
3.3 WRF模式系統與三維變分同化系統.........13
3.4 校驗方法..............................15
3.4.1 定量降水預報校驗.....................15
3.4.2 風場驗證.............................17
第四章 VDRAS同化窗區之敏感度實驗..........19
4.1 VDRAS同化窗區實驗設計.................19
4.2 分析場之敏感度 ........................21
4.3 VDRAS預報結果.........................24
第五章 VDRAS與WRF結合之定量降水預報實驗...27
5.1 直接取代結合方法......................27
5.2 直接取代結合預報結果..................29
5.3 WRF 3DVAR結合方法.....................31
5.4 WRF 3DVAR結合之分析場與預報結果.......32
第六章結論與未來展望.....................34
6.1 結論...................................34
6.2 未來展望...............................35
參考文獻...................................37
附表.......................................40
附圖.......................................42

參考文獻

鄧仁星，2000：RASTA(Radar Analysis System for Taiwan Area)使用說明書。
Barnes, S. L., 1973: Mesoscale objective map analysis using weighted time series observations. NOAA Tech. Memo. Erl Nssl-62, 60pp.
Crook, N. A., and J. Sun, 2002: Assimilating radar, surface and profiler data for the Sydney 2000 forecast demonstration project. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 19, 888–898.
Crook, N. A., and J. Sun, 2004: Analysis and Forecasting of the Low-Level Wind during the Sydney 2000 Forecast Demonstration Project. Weather and Forecasting, 19, 151-167.
Gal-Chen, T., 1978: A method for the initialization of the anelastic equations: Implications for matching models with observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 106, 587–606.
Kawabata J., H. Seko, K. Saito, T. Kuroda, K. Tamiya, T. Tsuyuki, Wakazuki, 2007: An assimilation and forecasting experiment of the Nerima heavy rainfall with a cloud-resolving nonhydrostatic 4-dimensiojnal variational data assimilation system, J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 85, 255-276.
Kawabata, T., T. Kuroda, H. Seko, and K. Saito, 2011：A cloud-resolving 4D-Var assimilation experiment for a local heavy rainfall event in the Tokyo metropolitan area, Mon. Wea. Rev., AMS early release version.
Lin, Y., P. Ray, and K. Johnson, 1993: Initialization of a modeled convective storm using Doppler radar derived fields. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 2757–2775.
Snyder, C., and F. Zhang, 2003: Assimilation of simulated Doppler radar observations with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon.Wea. Rev., 131, 1663–1677.
Sun, J., and N. A. Crook, 1997: Dynamical and microphysical retrieval from Doppler radar observation using a cloud model and its adjoint. Part I: Model development and simulated data experiments. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 1642–1661.
Sun, J., and N. A. Crook, 1998: Dynamical and microphysical retrieval from Doppler radar observations using a cloud model and its adjoint. Part II: Retrieval experiments of an observed Florida convective storm. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 835–852.
Sun, J., and N. A. Crook, 2001: Real-time low-level wind and temperature analysis using single WSR-88D data. Wea. Forecasting, 16, 117–132.
Sun, J., 2005a: Initialization and numerical forecasting of a supercell storm
observed during STEPS. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 793–813.
____, and Y. Zhang, 2008: Analysis and prediction of a squall line observed during IHOP using multiple WSR-88D observations, Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 2364–2388.
____, M. Chen, and Y. Wang, 2010: A frequent-updating analysis system based on radar, surface, and mesocale model data for the Beijing 2008 Forecast Demonstration Project. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 1715-1735.
Warner, T. T., E. E. Brandes, C. K. Mueller, J. Sun, and D. N. Yates, 2000: Prediction of a flash flood in complex terrain. Part I: A comparison of rainfall estimates from radar, and very short range rainfall simulations from a dynamic model and an automated algorithmic system. J. Appl. Meteor., 39, 815–825.
Tai, S.-C., Y.-C. Liou, J. Sun, S.-F. Chang, and M.-C. Kuo, 2011: Precipitation Forecasting Using Doppler Radar Data, a Cloud Model with Adjoint, and the Weather Research and Forecasting Model: Real Case Studies during SoWMEX in Taiwan. Wea. Forecasting, 26, 975–992.
Tong, M., and M. Xue, 2005: Ensemble Kalman filter assimilation of Doppler radar data with a compressible nonhydrostatic model: OSS experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 1789–1807.
Xiao, Q., Y. H. Kuo, J. Sun, W. C. Lee, E. Lim, Y. R. Guo, and D. M. Barker, 2005: Assimilation of Doppler radar observations with a regional 3DVAR System: Impact of Doppler velocities on forecasts of a heavy rainfall case. J. Appl. Meteor., 44, 768–788.
Xiao, Q., and J. Sun, 2007: Multiple radar data assimilation and short-range QPF of a squall line observed during IHOP_2002. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 3318–3404.

指導教授

廖宇慶(Yu-Chieng Liou)

審核日期

2012-7-27

推文