摘要(英) |
There are many ethnics in Taiwan society, which consists of different cultures, languages, customs, and values, etc. It is inevitable to have some different opinions and conflicts during the distribution of public resources. Governments usually deal with those conflicts and crisis by two ways. First, elect the delegates to show the representation. Second, increase the percentage of representative bureaucracy. However, it is not easy to reflect the value of minority groups, and the bureaucracy may not function properly because of resources squeeze. Accordingly, many countries started to set up representative agencies to protect the welfare of minority groups.
The set-up of Hakka representative agency was caused by Hakka campaigns, which includes the operations of Hakka leagues and TV programs, started from1987. By 13-year-efforts, Hakka Affairs Council was set up and started to operate in 2000. It is the first time Hakka was recognized by the government, and it is the foundation of Hakka administrative agency of Local Governments. Despite the highly representation and specialty of the representative agency, it is still a part of the government and should be supervised by legislators , people, and media to set up an operate pattern. Different patterns of accountability may interfere the representative agencies. It is the purpose of this research to keep the balance between the accountability and representation.
The author takes Hakka Affairs Council and Hakka Affairs Department, New Taipei City for example to format the suitable pattern of Ethnic-based Representative Agency through administrative accountability, political accountability, and social accountability and hopes it can enforce the accountability of current Hakka administrative organizations to make it better.
|
參考文獻 |
一品公共行政研究室編著,2008,《行政學辭典》,台北:一品。
王雲東,2007,《社會研究方法 ─ 量化與質性取向及其應用》,台北:威仕曼文化事業股份有限公司。
王俐容,2012,《台灣客家族群文化政策》。台北:智勝文化。
江明修、梅高文,2003,〈自律乎?他律乎?財團法人監督機制之省思〉,《中國行政評論》, 第12卷第2期:137-160。
江明修,2004,〈公私協力關係中台灣非營利組織公共課責與自主性之探究:理論辯證與制度設計〉,行政院國家科學委員會九十三年度專題研究計畫成果報告。
李嵩賢,2003,〈非營利組織管理課責初探〉,《人事月刊》,第37卷第1期:頁27-35。
余致力,2007,〈性別差異對公共管理者任用之影響:代表性文官體系的理論省思與實證探索〉,《國家菁英》,第3卷第4期:頁61-107。
呂育誠,2000,〈課責觀點下行政中立的意涵與落實途徑〉,《考銓季刊》,第23期:頁68-80。
呂苔瑋、邱玲裕等譯,Owen E. Hughes原著, 2006,《公共管理與行政》,台北:雙葉書廊出版。
呂育誠、陳文學,2011,〈從代表性官僚概念論身心障礙人員考試改進〉《國家菁英》,第7卷第1期:頁97-119。
吳定等,1996,《行政學》,國立空中大學修訂3版第2冊。
吳親恩、李鳳玉,2007,〈選舉制度與台灣政黨族群議題立場的和緩〉,《政治學報》,第43期,頁:71-99。
邱榮舉,謝欣如,2008,〈台灣客家運動與客家發展〉,張維安、徐正光、羅烈師(編),《多元族群與客家─台灣客家運動20年》,頁95-132,台北:台灣客家研究學會。
周育仁、詹富堯、張敦程,2008,〈從課責與監督概念探討美國政府負責機制〉,2008年TASPAA年會暨「夥伴關係與永續發展」國際學術研討會(5月24日),台中:東海大學行政管理暨政策學系。
周錦宏、鄭閔文,2011,〈客家特色產業競爭力之分析-以新埔柿餅為例〉,載於江明修(主編),客家城市治理(頁320-343)。台北市:智勝文化。
范振乾,2002,〈客家事務行政體系之建構〉,「客家公共政策」研討會,台北:行政院客家委員會。
施能傑,1996,〈我國文官甄補政策的回顧與檢討〉《國立大學政治學報》,第73期:頁111-144。
洪聖斐等譯,Grover Starling原著, 2008,《行政學:公部門之管理》,台北:新加坡商聖智學習出版。
郭博文,2011,〈績效課責:五大構成要素與六項基本實務〉,《政府審計季刊》,第31卷第2期:頁89-94。
孫本初,1999,〈課責與績效管理〉,《人事月刊》,第29卷第3期,頁28-32。
孫本初,2001,〈公部門課責問題之探究〉,《人事月刊》,第33卷第3期:頁10-21。孫本初,2009,《新公共管理》,台北:一品文化出版。
孫煒,2010b,〈設置族群型代表性行政機關的理論論證〉,《台灣政治學刊》,第14卷第1期:105-158。
孫煒,2010c,〈我國族群型代表性行政機關的設置及其意涵〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,第7卷第4期:85-136。
張瓊玲,2008,〈台灣郵政公司「正名」過程的課責問題:以治理理論為觀點〉,《空大行政學報》,第19卷:67-94。
張世杰,2009,〈公共部門的多元課責關係困境:台灣全民健康保險制度的個案分析〉,《法政學報》,第22期:107-142。
張四明,2006,〈強化績效審計與公共課責連結的重要性〉,《政府審計季刊》,第27卷第1期:頁88-96。
張政亮,2011,《從民主憲政體制的變革中論我國的總統課責》,國立台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文,台北。
陳志瑋,2004,〈行政課責與地方治理能力的提昇〉,《政策研究學報》,第四期:23-45。
陳志瑋,2005,〈邁向民主課責:透明化機制運用之分析〉,《國家菁英》,第1卷第4期:頁131-147。
陳敦源,2009,〈透明之下的課責:台灣民主治理中官民信任關係的重建基礎〉,《文官制度季刊》,第1卷第2期:頁21-55。
陳無邪,2010,《地方治理的課責研究-以北北基一綱一本政策為例》,國立台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文,台北。
陳文學,2011,〈政府機關於原住民族特考提列職缺的探討〉,《台灣原住民族研究季刊》,第4卷第1期:頁117-144。
陳金貴,2011,〈社會課責在公部門的運用〉,《空大行政學報》,第22期:頁1-17。
陳定銘,2012,《客家社會企業與社會網絡分析》。台北:智勝文化。
黃煥榮,2007,〈突破玻璃天花板--女性行政菁英事業生涯發展的問題與展望〉,《國家菁英》,第3卷第4期:頁85-107。
彭渰雯、巫偉倫,2009,〈非營利組織參與治理的代表性與課責─以出版品分級評議為例〉,《台灣民主季刊》,第6卷第3期:頁87-123。
楊國鑫,2008,〈台灣客家運動與客家發展〉,張維安、徐正光、羅烈師(編),《多元族群與客家─台灣客家運動20年》,頁133-153,台北:台灣客家研究學會。
蔡良文,2004,〈考試院研議原住民族文官考銓問題與對策過程之評析〉,《考銓季刊》,第40期:頁20-61。
趙偉伶,2009,《我國公設財團法人課責之研究─以財團法人國家文化藝術基金會為例》,國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系研究所碩士論文,台北。
鄭名呈,2009,《論國家重大政策變遷與政治課責―以核四廠停工事件為例》,國立政治學研究所在職進修碩士班,台北。
蕭新煌、黃世明,2008,〈台灣客家運動與客家發展〉,張維安、徐正光、羅烈師(編),《多元族群與客家─台灣客家運動20年》,頁157-182,台北:台灣客家研究學會。
蕭鈺,2008,〈公共性人力資源發展的概念與實務意涵〉,《考銓季刊》,第五十五期;頁82-98。
劉坤億,2011,〈公法人與公共課責:從審計機關角色功能分析〉,《政府審計季刊》,第32卷第1期:頁78-91。
劉湘琦,2010,《原住民代表性官僚的理想與現實─以溪洲部落拆遷事件為例》,國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,台北。
關健,2006,《民主是個好東西》。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
蘇偉業,2009〈公部門事前定向績效管理:反思與回應〉,《公共行政學報》,第30期:頁105-130。
顧慕晴、盧姵緁,2008,〈我國公部門原住民工作權保障之研究〉,《國家菁英》,第4卷第1期:頁19-42。
Banfield, E. C.(1975), Corruption as feature of governmental organization, Journal of Law and Economics, 18: 587-605.
Behn, R. D. (2001). Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Washington, D. C.:
BrookingsInstitution Press.
Bovens, M. (2005). Public Accountability. In E. Ferlie, Jr. L. E. Lynn, & C. Pollitt
(Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management (pp. 182-208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Castles, Stephen (1997), Multicultural Citizenship: The Australian Experience. In Bader, Veit (Eds.), Citizenship and Exclusion (pp.113-138).London:Macmillan Press Ltd.
Carman, J. G. (2010), The accountability movement: What is wrong with this theory of change? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(2), 256-274.
Diamond, Larry.(1997), Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Themes and Perspectives. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
Denhardt, J.D & Denhardt, R.B. (2003), The New Public Service:Serving, Not Steering. Armonk, NY:M.E. Sharpe.
Dowdle ,M. W. (2006), Public Accountability: Designs and Experiences. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Eaman, Milton J.(1997), “Public Administration, Ethnic Conflict, and Economic
Development.”Public Administration Review, Vol,57,No.6:527-533.
Erkkilä. T. (2007), ”Governance and Accountability–a shift in conceptualisation “.Public Administration Quarertly. Spring. pp: 2-38.
Ferlie,J.&Kettle,D.(1996), The Politics of Administrative Process, N.J., Chatham Home : Chatham,p.317.
Hall, Stuart (2000), The multicultural question. In Barnor Hesse (Ed.), Un/Settled
Multiculturalism: Diasporas, Entanglements, Transruptions (pp. 209-241).
London: Zen Books.
Kingsley, J. Donald.(1944), Representative Bureaucracy: An Interpretation of the British Civil Service. Yellow Springs, Ohio: Antioch Press.
Kaufman, Herbert.(1956),“Emerging Conflicts in the Doctrines of Public Administration.”American Political Science Review, Vol.50,No.4:1057-1073.
Krislov, Samuel.(1974), Representative Bureaucracy. Englewood Cliffs. N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Kymlicka, Will. (1995), Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kearns, K. P. (1996), Managing for Accountability: Preserving the Public Trust in
Public and Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Keohane, Robert O. (2002), “Political Accountability.” Paper Prepared for Conference on Delegation to International Organization, Park City, Utah, May 3-4. pp. 28.
Koppell, J. GS. (2005), Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of
multiple accountabilities disorder, Public Administration Review, 65(1): 94-108.
Light, P. C. 1994. “Federal Inspectors General and the Paths to Accountability.” in T.
L. Cooper eds. Philanthropy and Law in Asia: A Comparative Study of Nonprofit Legal Systems in Ten Asia Pacific Societies. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lim, H. H.(2006), “Representative Bureaucracy: Rethinking Substantive Effects and
Active Representation.”Public Administration Review 66(2): 193-204.
Mosher, Frederick C.(1968), Democracy and the Public Service. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mulgan, R. 2000. “Accountability: An Ever-Expanding Concept?” Public
Administration 78 (3): 555-573.
McNeil, M and C. Marlena (eds.) (2010) Demanding Good Governance: Lessons from Social Accountability Initiatives in Africa. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Romzek, B.& Dubnick, M.(1987),“Accountability in the Public Sector, Lessons from the Challenger Tragedy.”Public Admainistration Review,47(3):p227.
Romzek, B.S.(2000 ),“Dynamic of public sector accountability in an era of reform.” International Review of Administrative Science, 66(1): pp21-24.
Vertovec,Steven. 1998. Mult-multiculturalisms. IN Marco Martiniello(ed.), Multicultural Policies and the State:A Comparison of Two European Societies (pp.23-34).Utrecht, European Research Centre on Migration and Ethnic Relations.
Van Riper, Paul. 1958. History of the United States Civil Service. New York:Harper&Row.
WB. 2004a. “Social Accountability: An Introduction to the Concept and Emerging Practice.” Social Development Paper No.76.
http://www.ndi.org/files/2065_citpart_social_120104.pdf
|