參考文獻 |
參考文獻
一、中文部分
1、王君茹(2003),「家產繼承性別偏好的臺灣經驗:族群、世代、婚姻狀況與社會結構地位」,臺北大學社會學系碩士論文。
2、王彩婺(2003),「男嬰偏好對臺灣地區已婚有偶婦女生育動機與生育行為的影響」,臺北醫學大學公共衛生學研究所碩士論文。
3、李大正,楊靜利(2004),「臺灣婦女勞動參與類型與歷程之變遷」,人口學刊,28,109-134。
4、林佩琪(2003),「已婚婦女之子女價值、理想子女數與性別偏好-世代觀點之比較分析」,臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系家政教學碩士班學位論文。
5、原新,涂肇慶(2004),「中國大陸出生性別比偏高之分析」,人口學刊,29,147-181。
6、梁文敏(2002),「臺灣地區第八次家庭與生育力研究調查」調查報告及相關議題之探討,國民健康局91年度科技研究發展計畫。
7、陳狄秋(2011),「夫妻家務分攤的角力-教育與所得差異扮演的角色」,中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。
8、梁香撰(2001),「臺灣南部地區婦女生育動機及其相關因素之研究」,嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文。
9、曾敏傑(2001),「臺灣地區兩性薪資差異與變遷:1982、1992及2000年的比較」,人口學刊,23,147-209。
10、鄭衛東(2007),「論小傳統生育文化-以日照市東村為例」,人口學刊,35,147-169。
11、賴思帆,余清祥(2006),「臺灣與各國生育率模型之實證與模擬比較」,人口學刊,33,33-59。
12、薛承泰(2000),「臺灣地區已婚婦女再就業時機的初步分析」,人口學刊,21,77-100。
13、簡文吟(2004),「臺灣已婚婦女勞動再參與行為的變遷」,人口學刊,28,1-47。
二、英文部分
1.Bumiller, E. (1990), “May You be the Mother of a Hundred Sons:A Journey among the Women of India,” Random House, New York.
2.Chahnazarian, A. (1991), “Determinants of the Sex Ratio at Birth:Review of the Recent Literature,” Social Biology, 35, 214-235.
3.Chung, W. and Gupta, M.D. (2007), “The decline of son preference in South Korea:The roles of development and public policy,” Population and Development Reviea, 33(4), 757-783.
4.Clare, J.E. and Kiser, C.V. (1951), “Preference for Children of Given Sex in Relation to Fertility,” Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 29(4), 440-92.
5.Edlund, L. and Lee, C. (2009), “Son Preference, Sex Selection and Economic Development:Theory and Evidence from South Korea,” Columbia University Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series.
6.Freedman, D.S., Freedman, R. and Whelpton, P.K. (1960), “Size of Family and Preference for Children of Each Sex,” American Journal of Sociology, 66(2), 141-146.
7.Freedman, R. (1959), “Social Value about Family Size in the Uinted States,” International Population Conference, 173-83.
8.Gu, B.and Roy, R. (1995), “Sex ratio at Birth in China, with Reference to other Areas in East Asia:What we know,” Asia Pacific Population Journal, 10(3), 17-42.
9.Hull, T.H. (1990), “Recent trends in sex ratios at birth in China,” Population and Development Review, 16, 63-83.
10.Jackman, S. (2000), “Models for Ordered Outcomes,” Political Science 200C.
11.Johansson, S. and Nygren, O. (1991), “The missing girls of China:A new demographic account,” Population and Development Review, 17, 35-51.
12.Kureishi, W. and Wakabayashi, M. (2011), “Son preference in Japan,” Journal of Population Economics, 24(3), 873-893.
13.Poston, D.L. JR(2002), “Son Preference and Fertility in China,” Journal of Biosocial Science, 34, 333-347.
14.Poston, D.L. JR and Gu, B. (1987), “Socioeconomic development, family planning and fertility in China:a subregional analysis,” Demography, 24, 531-551.
15.Poston, D.L. JR, Wu, J.J., Yuan, M.M. and Glover, K.S. (2000), “Patterns and variation in the sex ratio at birth in China and Taiwan,” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Chinese Sociologists Association, Washington, DC, august 11.
16.Puri, S., Adams, V., Ivey, S., and Nachtigall, R.D. (2011), “There is such a thing as too many daughters, but not too many sons:A qualitative study of son preference and fetal sex selection among Indian immigrants in the United States,” Social Science and Medicine, 72, 1169-1176.
17.Shek, D.T.L. (1996), “Hong Kong Parents’ Attitudes About Marital Quality and Children,” The Journal of Psychology, 157(2), 125-135.
18.Williamson, N.E. (1976), “Son or Daughtersn: A Cross-Cultural Survey of Parental Preference,” Beverly Hills : Sage Publication.
19.Zeng, Y., Yu, P., Gu, B., Xu, Y., Li, B., and Li, Y. (1991), “Causes and implications of the recent increase in the reported sex ratio at birth in China,” Population, 19, 283-302.
三、網路資料
1、女性就業與婚育概況社會指標(2005),行政院主計處。
2、中華民國內政部統計資訊網(http://www.stat.gov.tw)。
3、生育概況社會指標(2007),行政院主計處。
4、亞洲嬰兒性別失衡之探討社會指標(2009),行政院主計處。
5、國際比較-統計資料比較,行政院主計處。 |