薪酬與績效關聯性認知、員工績效與員工留任關聯性之研究─一項跨層次調節式中介效果之檢驗

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：35

、訪客IP：52.14.32.113

姓名

陳美齡(Mei-ling Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

薪酬與績效關聯性認知、員工績效與員工留任關聯性之研究─一項跨層次調節式中介效果之檢驗
(A Study of Relationships Among Pay-Performance Linkage of Cognitive, Employee Performance and Intent to Stay: A Multilevel Moderated Mediation Models)

相關論文

★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。	★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究	★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究	★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估	★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究－一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素	★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例	★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析	★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討－以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

組織的薪酬與績效關聯性認知對於員工留任意願有正向影響效果，顯示組織的薪酬議題將是影響人才留任的重要因素。然而，過去鮮少有實證研究以跨層次的角度探討薪酬與績效關聯性認知對於員工行為面的影響，多以個體層級的角度討論。人才留任已是全球企業所關注的重要人資議題，其中薪酬因素更是影響員工留任的關鍵，因此本研究深入探討組織的薪酬制度特性對員工行為影響。
本研究針對薪酬與績效關聯性、員工績效與員工留任意願進行一項跨層次調節式中介效果之檢驗，以問卷調查的方式，針對台灣45家企業進行調查。本研究採階層線性模式進行分析，研究結果發現，員工績效在薪酬與績效關聯性認知對於員工留任意願間具有部分的跨層級中介效果，薪酬與績效關聯性認知程度將會正向影響員工績效，進而對員工留任意願產生正向影響效果。此外，薪酬與績效關聯性認知在員工績效與員工留任意願之間，具有跨層級的調節效果。顯示公司的薪酬與績效關聯性認知程度，將會影響高績效人才是否願意續留任於組織中的意願，本研究結果亦與過去相關研究觀點相呼應。

摘要(英)

Pay-performance linkage of cognitive have positive effect on employee intent to stay, it showed that pay-performance linkage of cognitive as an important factor for retention. However, little empirical research has addressed that pay-performance linkage of cognitive affect to individual behaviors from cross-level perspective, most of research all discussed in individual level. Retention issue is one of the most important human resources issues in the organization today, and the factor of compensation is also the key for employee retention. Thus, we will examine the relationship between pay-performance linkage of cognitive and employee intent to stay.
We examine the relationship among pay-performance linkage of cognitive, employee performance and intent to stay by multilevel moderated mediation models. We collect 604 valid questionnaires of 45 companies from multiple industries, then using HLM to analysis. Results from our studies, employ performance play a role in multilevel mediating of pay-performance linkage of cognitive and intent to stay. Besides, pay-performance linkage of cognitive produces the multilevel moderating effect between employee performance and intent to stay. In this study, it showed that pay-performance linkage of cognitive in organization will affect that high performer would like be stay or not.

關鍵字(中)

★ 薪酬與績效關聯性認知
★ 員工績效
★ 留任意願
★ 階層線性模式

關鍵字(英)

★ pay-performance linkage of cognitive
★ performance
★ intent to stay
★ hierarchical linear model
★ HLM

論文目次

目錄................VII
圖目錄.......... VIII
表目錄.......... VIII
第一章緒論..................1
第一節研究背景與動機...................1
第二節研究目的...................6
第二章文獻探討..........7
第一節留任意願...................7
第二節薪酬與績效關聯性認知.......8
第三節薪酬與績效關聯性認知對於員工留任意願的影響...........9
第四節薪酬與績效關聯性認知對於員工績效的影響.....10
第五節員工績效對於員工留任意願的影響.........11
第六節員工績效在薪酬與績效關聯性認知與員工留任意願之間的中介效果.12
第七節薪酬與績效關聯性認知在員工績效與員工留任意願之間的調節效果.14
第三章研究方法....................16
第一節研究架構.................16
第二節研究樣本與資料來源.........16
第三節研究工具與研究變項說明.............17
第四節資料分析方法.........19
第四章資料分析與結果........20
第一節敘述性資料統計.................20
第二節基本特性的驗證.................22
第三節模式與假說驗證.................23
第五章研究結論與建議..................31
第一節實證結果探討.........31
第二節研究貢獻.................33
第三節管理意涵.................35
第四節研究限制與未來研究建議.............37
參考文獻..........38
中文文獻..................38
英文文獻..................39
附錄一主管填答問卷............46
附錄二部屬填答問卷............49
圖目錄
圖 3.1 研究架構..........16
圖 4.1 本研究結果..................29
圖 4.2 薪酬與績效關聯性認知、員工績效、員工留任意願之交互作用圖..........30
圖 5.1 員工選擇和公司之薪酬與績效關聯性認知關係......36
表目錄
表 4.1 研究樣本特性彙整表..............20
表 4.2 驗證性因素分析結果彙總表..............21
表 4.3 個體層級變項間的組間差異與相關係數彙整表......23
表 4.4 截距結果模型與隨機係數模型之驗證結果..............26
表 4.5 跨層級中介與調節效果之驗證結果..............28

參考文獻

中文文獻
1. 余鑑、于俊傑、陳秀斐、廖珮妏、許立群(2011)，以組織併購過程觀點來探討關鍵人才留任因素─以台灣金控集團個案為例，中華管理評論，14卷，1期
2. 陳惠芳、洪嘉徽(2006)，員工知覺薪酬公平與賦權對組織承諾影響之研究，東吳經濟商學學報，52，235-262
3. 溫福星、邱皓政(2009)，組織研究中的多層次調節式中介效果：以組織創新氣氛、組織承諾與工作滿意的實證研究為例，管理學報
4. 林鉦棽、彭台光(2006)，多層次管理研究：分析層次的概念、理論和方法，管理學報，23(6)，649-675
5. 廖卉、莊璦嘉(2008)，多層次理論模型的建立及研究方法，組織與管理研究的實證方法，381-410，華泰出版，台北市
6. 溫福星(2006)，階層線性模式：原理、方法及應用，雙葉書廊
7. 溫福星、邱皓政(2011)，多層次模式方法論─階層線性模式的關鍵問題與試解，αβγ實驗室
英文文獻
1. Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436
2. Akintoye, I. R. (2000). The place of financial management in personnel psychology. A Paper Presented as Part of Personnel Psychology Guest Lecture Series Department of Guidance and Counselling, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
3. Anis, A., & Rehman, I. U., & Nasir, A., & Safwan, N. (2011). Employee retention relationship to training and development: A compensation perspective. African Journal of Business Management, 5(7), 2679-2685
4. Armstrong, M. (2005). A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice(5th Ed.). Ohio: Kogan Page.
5. Ashraf M., & Joarder M.H.R. (2009). Talent management and retention practices from the faculty’s point of view: a case study. Journal of Human Capital, 1(2), 151-163
6. Banker, R. D., & Lee, S. Y., & Potter, G.,& Srinivasan, D. (1996). Contextual analysis of performance impacts of outcome-based incentive compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 920-948
7. Banker, R. D., & Lee, S. Y., & Potter, G.,& Srinivasan, D.(2001). An empirical analysis of continuing improvements following the implementation of a performance-based compensation plan. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30, 315-350
8. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182
9. Black, J. S., & Stevens, G. K. (1989). The influence of spouse on expatriate adjustment and intent to stay in overseas assignments. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 3(3), 585-592
10. Bliese, P. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. 349-381. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Boachie-Mensah, F. & Dogbe, O. D. (2011). Performance-based pay as a motivational tool for achieving organizational performance: An exploratory case study. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(12), 270-285
12. Chang, E., & Hahn, J.(2006). Does pay-for-performance enhance perceived distributive justice for collectivistic employees?. Personnel Review, 35(4), 397-412
13. Chiu, C., & Yang, C. F. (1987). Chinese subjects’ dilemmas: Humility and cognitive laziness as problems in using rating scales. Bulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society, 18: 39-50
14. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
15. Corbo, A., & Kleiner, B. H. (1991). How to effectively link compensation with performance. Industrial Management, 33(3), 21
16. Doh, J. P., & Stumpf, S. A. & Tymon, W., & Haid, M. (2008). How to retain talent in India. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(1), 5-7
17. Ducharme, M. J., & Singh, P., & Podolsky, M. (2005). Exploring the links between performance appraisals and pay satisfaction. Compensation & Benefits Review, 37, 46-51
18. Dyer, N. G., & Hanges, P. J., & Hall, R. J. (2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. Leader Quarterly, 16, 149-167
19. Ghazanfar, F., & Chuanmin, S., & Khan, M. M., & Bashir, M.(2011). A study of relationship between satisfaction with compensation and work motivation. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(1), 120-131
20. Gordon, E. E.(2009). Winning the global talent showdown. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers
21. Hall, B. J. (2002). Incentive strategy within organization. Harvard Business School Case, 9-902-131, March 13
22. Hair, J. F., & Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. (1988). Multivariate data analysis(5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International.
23. Haar, J. M., & Spell, C. S.(2009). How does distributive justice affect work attitudes? The moderating effects of autonomy. The International Journal of Human Resource Manangement, 20(8), 1827-1842
24. Helm, C., & Holladay, C. L., & Tortorella, F. R.(2007). The performance management system: applying and evaluating a pay-for-performance initiative. Journal of Healthcare Management, 52(1), 49-62
25. Henderson R. I. (2005). Compensation management in a knowledge-based world(10th Ed.). Prentice Hall
26. Hirst, G. & Knippenberg, D. V., & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 280-293
27. Ho, J. L. Y., & Lee, L. C., & Wu, A. (2009). How changes in compensation plans affect employee performance, recruitment and retention: an empirical study of a car dealership. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(1), 167-199
28. Igharia, M., & Greenhaus, J. H. (1992). Determinants of MIS employees’ turnover intentions: A structural equation model. Personnel Management, 35(2), 34-49
29. Irshad, M. (2011). Factors affecting employee retention: evidence from literature review. Abasyn Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 84-102
30. Jackofsky, E. F. (1984). Turnover and job performance: An integrated process model. Academy of Management Review, 9(1), 74-83
31. Jackson H. G.(2012). The next challenge: global talent migration. HR magazine, 57(5), 8
32. James, L. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 219-229
33. James, L. R., & Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). γ_wg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 306-309
34. Johnston, J. (1995). The determinants of service quality: Satisfiers and dissatisfiers. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 6(5), 53-71
35. Khan, W., & Mufti, E. O. (2012). Effect of compensation on motivating employees in public and private banks of Peshawar(BOK and UBL). Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(5), 4616-4623
36. Khatri, P., & Gupta, S., & Gulati, K., & Chauhan, S. ( 2010). Talent management in HR. Journal of Management and Strategy. 1(1), 39-46
37. Krull, J. L., & Mackinon (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 249-177
38. Liao, H. & Rupp, D. E. (2005). The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: a cross-level multifoci framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 242-256
39. Markham, S. E., & Scott, K. D., & Hills, F. S.(1989). The empirical verification of key linkages in a transit system’s pay-for-performance program. Public Administration Quarterly, 13(1),122-139
40. Mathiue, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2007). A Framework for testing meso-mediational relationship in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 141-172
41. McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59
42. McEvoy, G. M., & Cascio, W. F. (1987). Do good or poor performance leave? A meta-analysis of the relationship between performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 30(4), 744-762
43. Michaels, C. E.,& Spector, P. E. (1982). Causes of employee turnover. A test of the Mobley, Griffeth, Hand and Meglino model. Journal of Applied Phychology. 67(1), 53-59
44. Milkovich, G. T., & Newman, J. M. (1996) Compensation. (5th Editon). Montreal: Irwin
45. Milkovich, G. T., & Newman, J. M., & Gerhart, B.(2010). Compensation. (10th Edition.). McGraw-Hill
46. Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(2), 237-240
47. Mobley, W. H., & Griffeth, R. W., & Hand, H H., & Meglino, B. M. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(3), 493-522
48. Mowday, R. T., & Porter, L. W. & Steers, R. M. (1982). Organizational linkage: the psychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover. California: Academic Press
49. Nwokocha, I., & Iheriohanma, E. B. J. (2012). Emerging trends in employee retention strategies in a globalizing economy: Nigeria in focus. Asian Social Science, 8(10), 198-207
50. Orpen, C. (1976). The effect of perceived instrumentality on the relationship between the valence of pay and performance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 98, 131-132
51. Park, S., & Sturman, M. C. (2009). The relative effects of merit pay, bonuses, and long-term incentives on future job performance. Cornell University
52. Park, S., & Sturman, M. C. (2012). How and what you pay matters: the relative effectiveness of merit pay, bonuses, and long-term incentives on future job performance. Compensation & Benefits Review, 44(2), 80-85
53. Perry, J. L., Engbers, T. A., & Jun, S. Y. (2009). Back to the future? Performanced-related pay, empirical research, and the perils of resistance. Public Administrative Review, 69(1), 33-51
54. Porter, M. V. (2001). “The bottom line is employee compensation”. Association Management, 53(4), 44-50
55. Porter, J. H. (2011). Attract and retention top talent. Strategic Finance. 56-61
56. Price, J. L. (1977). The study of turnover. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
57. Price, J. L. & Mueller, C. W. (1981). A causal model of turnover for nurses. Academy of Management Journal, 24(3)
58. Rynes, S. L., & Gerhart, B., & Parks, L. (2005) Personnel Psychology: Performance evaluation and pay for performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 571-600
59. Schuler, R. S. (1998). Personnel and human resources management. (3rd Edition). Toronto: West Publishing Company.
60. Scott, D., & McMullen, T., & Royal, M. (2012). Retention of key talent and the role of rewards. Worldatwork report
61. Sinclair, R. R., & Tucker, J. S., & Cullen, J. C., & Wright, C. (2005). Performance differences among four organizational commitment profiles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1280-1287
62. Stahl G. K., & Bjorkman I., & Farndale E., & Morris S. S., & Paauwe J., & Stiles P., & Trevor J., & Wright P.(2012). Six Principles of Effective Global Talent Management. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(2), 24-32
63. Sturman, M. C. & Trevor, C. O., & Boudreau, J. W. & Gerhart, B.(2003). Is it worth it to win the talent war? Evaluating the utility of performance-based pay. Personnel Psychology, 56, 4, 997-1034
64. Steers, R. M., & Mowday, R. T. (1981). Employee turnover and post-decision accommodation process. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 3, 235-281, Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
65. Swabe, A. I. R. (1989). Performance-related pay: A case study. Employee Relations, 11(2) , 17-23
66. Tangirala, S. & Ramanujam, R. (2008). Employee silence on critical work issues: the cross level effects of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 61, 37-68
67. Tett, R. P. & Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: path analysis based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 342-346
68. Trevor, C. O., & Gerhart, B., & Boudreau, J. W.(1997). Voluntary turnover and job performance: Curvilinearity and the moderating influences of salary growth and promotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 44-61
69. Trevor, C. O., & Reilly, G., & Gerhart, B. (2012). Reconsidering pay dispersion’s effect on the performance of interdependent work: reconciling sorting and pay inequality. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 585-610
70. Tsui, A. S., & Pearce, J. L., & Porter, L. W., & Tripoli, A. M. (1997). Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship: Does investment in employees pay off?. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1089-1121
71. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley
72. Williams, C. R., & Livingstone, L. P. (1994). Another look at the relationship between performance and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), 269-298
73. Zenger, T. R.(1992). Why do employers only reward extreme performance? Examining the relationships among performance, pay and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37,2, 198-219
74. Zimmerman, R. D., & Darnold, T. C. (2009). The impact of job performance on employee turnover intentions and the voluntary turnover process: A meta-analysis and path model. Personnel Review, 38(2), 142-158

指導教授

林文政(Wei-jeng Lin)

審核日期

2013-7-17

推文