博碩士論文 964207017 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:36 、訪客IP:18.223.195.20
姓名 陳家銘(Chia-ming Chen)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 人力資源管理研究所
論文名稱 工作家庭平衡措施滿意度對員工工作態度之影響─以知覺組織支持為中介變項
(Perceived Organizational Support As a Mediator Between Work-family Benefit Satisfactions and Work Attitudes)
相關論文
★ 空服員之工作特性、工作壓力源與個人壓力反應★ 人力資源管理活動對員工離職意願之影響- 以工作滿意度為中介變項
★ 直線主管之管理訓練與其參與人力資源管理活動之關聯★ 直線經理參與人力資源管理活動之影響因素探討
★ 員工風險承擔對個人持股意願之影響★ 人力資本投資、知識分享與組織績效之關聯
★ 人力資源部門跨界活動對企業採行高績效人力資源管理實務之影響★ 賦權感知、工作滿意、組織承諾與服務行為之相關性研究―以某連鎖便利商店為例
★ 業務代表人格特質與核心職能對績效影響的探討 —以某藥廠為例★ 實施利益分享制度對心理賦權感及工作滿意之影響
★ 員工股票獎酬對員工心理所有權之影響---以內外控人格特質為干擾變項★ 組織氣候感知、組織承諾與組織公民行為之關聯
★ 人力資源高績效工作實務、創新氣候與組織績效之關聯-以IC設計產業為例★ 高績效工作實務對員工知識分享行為之影響 -
★ 人格特質與工作績效之關係研究─以航空服務業空服人員為例★ 員工對功能彈性氣候的感知對工作滿意度的影響 以工作自主與工作要求為中介變項
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 在全球經濟快速變遷之下,二十一世紀已成為高度競爭的世代。企業組織競爭優勢的關鍵,已漸趨向於吸引及留住一流的人才。然而近年來在社會結構、勞參率、消費支出的變遷以及幸福企業、樂活企業概念的倡導下,員工對於工作及家庭之間的平衡也越趨重視。
本研究欲了解在工作家庭平衡措施滿意程度與員工工作態度影響上,並探究是否存在知覺組織支持之中介變項。故本研究主要的研究目的為:
1. 探討工作家庭平衡措施滿意程度對工作滿意、工作投入及組織承諾之影響。
2. 探討知覺組織支持是否為工作家庭平衡措施滿意程度與工作滿意、工作投入
及組織承諾之中介變項。
3. 探討性別是否為工作家庭平衡措施滿意程度與工作滿意、工作投入及組織承
諾之干擾變項。
本研究發現員工對於工作家庭平衡措施之滿意程度對於員工工作態度包括工作滿意、工作投入及組織承諾上皆呈現正向顯著影響;再者,知覺組織支持在工作家庭平衡措施滿意度與員工工作態度間亦呈現顯著中介效果;然而,工作家庭平衡措施滿意度對於男性或女性員工的工作態度面向上皆呈現顯著影響。是故性別在工作家庭平衡措施滿意度對工作態度的影響上並沒有其干擾效果存在。
因此,企業組織在追求其競爭力與自身成本可以承擔的範圍內,應更關切員工身心與工作平衡的相關問題、或是新的職家平衡之議題,並建立更適當、更符合員工需求的相關措施;以法定之工作家庭平衡措施為基礎,發展並延伸其相關福利服務;同時提升員工對組織工作家庭政策的知覺程度,也才能更加提升員工對工作滿意、工作投入與組織承諾等工作態度的程度。
摘要(英) Under rapid transformation in the global economy, the competition among companies has become much intenser in the 21st century. Companies tend to recognize attracting and retaining talents as the competitive advantage. However, high payment is not the only condition for talents to enter and stay. Recently, the changes of social structure and family structure and the concept promotion of LOHAS lifestyle make employees regard work-family balance as an important issue. Employees want to get more balance and fewer conflicts between work and family to enhance their life quality. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between satisfaction of work-family benefits and work attitudes by testing the effect of perceived organizational support as a mediator.
The result of this study showed the following: (1) there is a positive correlation between satisfactions of work-family benefits and work attitudes; (2) the relationship between satisfaction of work-family benefits and work attitudes was mediated through perceived organizational support.
關鍵字(中) ★ 工作家庭平衡措施
★ 員工工作態度
★ 知覺組織支持
關鍵字(英) ★ perceived organizational support.
★ work attitudes
★ work-family benefits
論文目次 目錄
中文摘要 ........................................................................................................................................... i
Abstract .............................................................................................................................................. ii
目錄 ................................................................................................................................................. iii
圖目錄.............................................................................................................................................. iv
表目錄............................................................................................................................................... v
第一章 緒論 .................................................................................................................................... 1
第一節 研究動機.......................................................................................................................... 1
第二節 研究目的.......................................................................................................................... 3
第二章 文獻探討 ............................................................................................................................. 4
第一節 工作家庭平衡措施 .......................................................................................................... 4
第二節 知覺組織支持 .................................................................................................................. 8
第三節 性別對工作家庭平衡措施滿意度之干擾效果 ...............................................................13
第三章 研究方法 ............................................................................................................................15
第一節 研究架構.........................................................................................................................15
第二節 樣本來源.........................................................................................................................15
第三節 研究變項定義 .................................................................................................................17
第四節 分析方法.........................................................................................................................21
第四章 研究結果 ............................................................................................................................22
第一節 樣本特性分析 .................................................................................................................22
第二節 驗證性因素分析 .............................................................................................................27
第三節 相關分析.........................................................................................................................28
第四節 回歸分析.........................................................................................................................28
第五節 性別的干擾效果 .............................................................................................................32
第五章 結論與建議.........................................................................................................................37
第一節 結論 ...............................................................................................................................37
第二節 管理意涵.........................................................................................................................40
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 ..............................................................................................42
參考文獻 .........................................................................................................................................43
參考文獻 一、中文部分
方啟元 (2005),人力資源管理活動對工作滿意之影響─探討員工知覺組織支持
的中介效果。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所。
李佳俐 (2004),工作/家庭政策、工作/家庭平衡與員工績效關係之研究。國立
成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
邱皓政 (2003),結構方程模式「Lisrel的理論、技術與應用」,台北:雙葉書廊有限公司。
林佳蓉 (2006),員工福利滿意對工作態度之影響─以知覺組織支持為中介變
項。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
陳重志 (2002),購併後被併公司員工期望落差、知覺組織支持、組織承諾與工
作壓力反應之關係探討。國立東華大學國企所。
許永忠 (2001),組織特性、員工福利、員工態度之關聯性研究─以北部地區服
務業員工為實證對象。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
許菁容 (2001),員工福利措施對勞資關係影響之研究。國立中山大學人力資源
管理研究所碩士在職專班論文。
喬治‧雷瑟(George Ritzer)、柯朝欽等(譯)(2007),社會學理論,台北:巨流圖書
公司。
劉怡伶 (2008),影響企業提供工作/家庭平衡措施之因素探討。國立台灣大學國
家發展研究所。
蔡婷婷 (2006),工作家庭政策、工作家庭衝突與組織承諾之研究。國立中山大
學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班論文。
鍾錦季 (2001),台灣地區企業福利制度之研究。國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士
論文。
44
二、英文部分
Allen, D. G., Shore, L. M., & Griffeth, R. W. 2003. The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process. Journal of Management. 29(1):99-118.
Aquino, K., & Griffeth, R. W. 1999. An exploration of the antecedents and consequences of perceived organizational support: A longitudinal study. Unpublished manuscript, University of Delaware.
Armeil, S., Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., and Lynch, P. 1998. Perceived organizational support and police performance : The moderating influence of socioemotional needs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2),288-297.
Aselage, J., & Eisenberger, R. 2003. Perceived organizational support and psychological contracts: a theoretical integration. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 24:491-509.
Baptiste, N. R. 2007. Tightening the link between employee wellbeing at work and performance- A new dimension for HRM. Management design.46(2):284-309.
Batt, R., & Valcour, P. M. 2003. Human resources practices as predictors of work-family outcomes and employee turnover. Industrial relation. 42(2):189-220.
Berg, P., Kalleberg, A. L., & Appelbaum, E. 2003. Balancing work and family : The role of high-commitment environments. Industrial relations. 42(2):168-188.
Clark, S. C. 2001. Work cultures and work/family balance. Journal of vocational behavior. 58:348-365.
Cropanzano, R., Howes, J. C., Grandey, A. A., & Toth, P. 1997. The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 22:159-180.
Cullen, J. C., Silverstein, B. A., and Foley, M. P. 2008. Linking biomechanical workload and organizational practices to burnout and satisfaction. J Bus Psychol. 23:63-71.
Currie, P., Dollery, B. 2006. Organizational commitment and perceived organizational support in the NSW police. An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management.
45
29(4):741-756.
Eaton, S. C. If you can use them: Flexibility policies, organizational commitment, and perceived performance. Industrial Relations. 42(2):145-167.
Eby, T. L., Casper, J. W., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. 2005. Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980-2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior 66 (2005):124-197.
Eisenberger. R., Armeli. S., Rexwinkel. B., Lynch. P. D., & Rhoades. L. 2001. Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology. 86:42-51.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. 1986. Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3),500-507.
Eisenberger, R., Rhoades, L., & Cameron, J. 1999. Does pay for performance increase or decrease or decrease perceived self-determination and intrinsic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 77:1026-1040.
Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., and Davis-LaMastro, V. 1990. Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of applied Psychology, 75(1),51-59.
Fasolo, P. 1995. Procedural justice and perceived organizational support: Hypothesized effects on job performance. In R. Cropanzano & K. Kacmar(Eds.). Organizational politics, justice, and support:185-195.
Ferris, G. R. and Kacmar, K. M. 1992. Perception of organizational politics. Journal of Management. 18:93-116.
Frone, M. R., Yardley, J. K., and Markel, K. S. 1997. Developing and testing an integrative model of the work-family interface. Journal of vocational behavior. 50:145-167.
George. J. M., Reed. T. F., Ballard. K. A., Colin. J., & Fielding. J. 1993. Contact with AIDS patients as a source of work-related distress: Effects of organizational and social support. Academy of Management Journal. 36:157-171.
Greenhaus, H. J., Powell, N. G., 2006. When work and family are allies: A Theory of
46
Work-Family Enrichment. Academy of Management Review. 31(1):72-92.
Haar, J. M., & Spell, C. S. 2004. Programme knowledge and value of work-family practices and organizational commitment. The international Journal of Human Resource Management. 15(6):1040-1055.
Hammer, L. B., Allen, E., & Grigsby, T. D. 1997. Work-family conflict in dual-earner couples: Within-individual and crossover effects of work and family. Journal of vocational behavior. 50:185-203.
Henninger, A., Wimbauer, C., and Dombrowski, R. 2008. Demography as a push toward gender Equality? Current reforms of German family policy. Published by Oxford University press. 287-314.
Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C., Perrewe, P. L., & Johnson, D. 2003. Perceived organizational support as a mediator of the relationship between politics perceptions and work outcomes. Journal of vocational behavior. 63:438-456.
Hutchison, S., & Garstka, M. L. 1996. Sources of perceived organizational support: Goal setting and feedback. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 26(15):1351-1366.
Knippenberg, D. V., Dick, R. V., and Tavares, S. 2007. Social identity and social exchange: Identification, support, and withdrawal from the job. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 37(3):457-477.
Konrad, A. M., and Mangel, R. 2000. The impact of work-life programs on firm productivity. Strategic Management Journal. 21:1225-1237.
Lee, J., and Peccei, R. 2007. Perceived organizational support and affective commitment: the mediating role of organization-based self-esteem in the context of job insecurity. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 28:661-685.
Lewis, J., and Campbell, M. 2007. UK work/family balance policies and gender equality, 1997-2005. Published by Oxford University Press. 4-30.
Mearns, K. J., Reader, T. 2008. Organizational support and safety outcomes: An un-investigated relationship? Safety Science. 46:388-397.
47
Moorman, R. H., Blakely, G. L., & Niehoff, B. P. 1998. Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior? Academy of Management Journal. 41:351-357.
O’Driscoll. M. P., & Randall. D. M. 1991. Perceived organizational support, satisfaction with rewards, and employee job involvement and organizational commitment. Applied Psychology: An international review. 48:197-209.
Parasuraman, S., Purohit, Y. S., Godshalk, V. M., & Beutell, N. J. Work and family variables, entrepreneurial career success, and psychological well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 48:275-300.
Poelmans, S. A. Y., Chinchilla, N., and Cardona, P. 2003. The adoption of family-friendly HRM policies – Competing for scare resources in the labour market. International Journal of Manpower. 24(2):128-147.
Prottas, D. J., Thompson, C. A., Kopelman, R. E., and Jahn, E. W. 2005. Work-family programs: factors affecting employee knowledge and accuracy. Personnel Review. 36(2):163-189.
Randall, M. L., Corpanzano, R., Bormann, C. A., and Birjulin, A. 1999. Organizational politics and organizational support as predictors of work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 20:159-174.
Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R. 2002. Perceived organizational support : A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology. 87(4):698-714.
Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. 2001. Affective commitment to the organization : The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology. 86:825-836.
Rupp, D. E., and Cropanzano, R. 2002. The mediating effects of social exchange relationships in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Precesses. 89:925-946.
Settoon, R. P., Bennett. N., & Liden, R. C. 1996. Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81:219-227.
48
Shore, L. M. and Tetrick, L. E. 1991. A construct validity study of the Survey of Perceived Organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology. 76:613-643.
Shore, L. M. & Wyane, S. J. 1993. Commitment and employee behavior: Comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5):774-780.
Streich, M., Casper, W. J., and Salvaggio, A. N. 2007. Examining couple agreement about work-family conflict. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 23(3):255-257.
Valentine, S., Greller, M. M., and Richtermeyer, S. B. 2006. Employee job response as a function of ethical context and perceived organization support. Journal of Business Research. 59:582-588.
Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. 1997. Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal. 40:82-111.
Witt,L.A., 1991. Exchange ideology as a moderator of job-attitudes- organizational citizenship behaviors relationships. Journal of applied social psychology,21:1490-1501.
指導教授 劉念琪 審核日期 2010-6-20
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明