博碩士論文 954401020 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:52 、訪客IP:3.133.133.150
姓名 郭麗琴(Li-chin Regina)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 企業永續發展的產業趨勢及其對公司財務績效之影響
(Industrial Movement of Corporate Sustainability and its Effects on Firm’s Financial Performance)
相關論文
★ 從生態共生觀點發展組織合作模式★ 影響產業垂直分工因素之探討
★ 發展台籍專業管家的人力派遣模式★ 影響軍事機關審計品質之關鍵性因素及其相對效率衡量
★ 台灣光碟片設備供應商競爭策略分析★ 國防科技研發機構組織向心力之研究
★ 衡量半導體零組件通路商之相對經營績效★ 衡量半導體晶圓代工廠商生產單位之營運績效
★ 商業銀行營運型態與組織調整對分行營運效率的影響★ 發展行動條碼為基礎的隨傳隨用視訊平台之應用
★ 飛機引擎定子零件維修之訂價調整方式★ 國際化、創新活動與公司績效:台灣上市公司董事會結構論析
★ 探討網際網路事件達成關鍵多數之影響因素★ 生態循環農業產銷策略個案研究
★ 探討以政策規範高耗能產業參與再生能源開發之綜效-以太陽光電發電系統為例★ 適地性服務(LBS)之顧客體驗整合性設計—以中華電信行動導遊為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 本研究的目在於探討企業永續管理的產業趨勢以及企業永續績效與財務指標之間可能存在的因果關係與相互之間的影響。 第一部份是針對全球311家廠商區分為16個產業在永續發展的管理績效以資料包絡分析方法進行產業層面的評估,觀察各個產業永續績效的效率值在三年期間的績效變遷狀況;第二部份則是以線性結構模式探討企業永續管理與財務指標之間的相關性。 本研究的企業永續管理績效評分資料是由SAM Sustainable Asset Management所提供,該評分標準為道瓊永續指數(Dow Jones Sustainability Group Indexes)的標準分別評估企業在經濟,環境與社會三個面向的永續相關管理政策。依據本研究的實證發現1)不同產業在永續管理績效上有顯著差異 2)多數產業在本研究樣本區間內之永續管理績效有逐年進步的趨勢 3)在天然資源相關產業的廠商相對在永續管理績效表現較其他產業的表現穩定4) 永續管理績效指標較高者對當期與後一期之獲利有正面影響的傾向 5) 在永續管理績效表現相對較好的群組之中,永續管理與獲利可能存在正向互為因果的關係 6) 在永續管理績效相對較低的群組,永續指標對獲利指標有負面影響。
摘要(英) This research studies industrial trend of firms’ sustainability1 management, the possible casual relationship and effects between corporate sustainable development and financial indicators. The first portion of this study aims at industrial level of performance assessment by Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) whereby applying datasets of 311 global firms’ sustainability management performance among 16 industrial sectors; the 16 sectors’ efficiency performance of sustainability over three consecutive years as well as their changes over time are being observed on a relative efficiency position plot. The second part of this research explores the causal relationship between corporate sustainable development and financial performance by second-order linear structural equation model (SEM). This study applies the underlying sustainability performance scores supplied by SAM Sustainable Asset Management, the assessment criteria are also the Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes standards which evaluates three dimensions of economic, environmental, social management policies. This empirical research reveals 1) different industrial sectors have significant differences on sustainability performance; 2) most industrial sectors’ sustainability performance are progressing over the three years’ sampling interval; 3) firms in the natural resource sector’s sustainability performance prevail others relatively in term of stability ; 4) the better sustainability performers may have a tendency of positive influence on firm’s profitability in the same and later periods; 5) a positive reciprocal causality may exist between sustainability and profitability among the better sustainability group; 6) sustainability influences firms’ profitability negatively in the lower sustainability group.
關鍵字(中) ★ 資料包絡分析
★ 企業永續發展
★ 產業永續發展趨勢
★ 績效
★ 線性結構模式
關鍵字(英) ★ Structural equation model (SEM)
★ industrial sustainable development trend.e
★ data envelopment analysis (DEA)
★ Corporate sustainability
★ performance
論文目次 中文摘要 iii
ABSTRACT v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS vii
LIST OF FIGURES viii
LIST OF TABLES ix
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1-1 Research Motivation and Questions 1
1-2Research Purpose 5
1-3Research Construct and Process 6
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 10
2-1Corporate Sustainability 10
2-2Industrial Overview 12
2-3Economic and Environment 15
2-4Economic and Social Responsibility 17
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 21
3-1Data Scope and Data Source 21
3-2Analytical Methods 24
3-2-1Data Envelopment Analysis 25
3-2-2Linear Structure Relation Model 28
CHAPTER 4 INDUSTRIAL MOVEMENT OF CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY 30
4-1 Variables and Descriptive Statistics 30
4-2Measuring Industrial Level of Sustainability Performance 37
4-3 Industrial Changes of Corporate Sustainability Performance 40
4-3 Discussion 43
CHAPTER 5 SUSTAINABILITY AND ITS EFFECTS ON FIRM’S FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 47
5-1 Framework and Measurement of Causal Variables 47
5-2 Models and Hypotheses 52
5-3Results and Discussion 58
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS 68
6-1Summary 68
6-2Managerial Implications 70
6-3Research Limitations and Suggestions for Future Study 73
REFERENCES 75
參考文獻 1. Alvesson, M., Kärreman, D., (2007). Constructing mystery: empirical
matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review, 32(4),1265-1281.
2. Aragón-Correa, J.A. (1998, Oct.). Research notes: strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5):556-567.
3. Argandoña, A. (1998, Jul.). The stakeholder theory and the common good.
Journal of Business Ethics, 17(9/10): 1093-1102.
4. Aras, G., Crowther, D., 2009. Corporate sustainability reporting: A study in disingenuity?Journal of Business Ethics. 87, 279-288.
5. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Swarts J., Thomas, D.A., 1989. An introduction to data envelopment analysis with some of its models and their uses. In: Chan, J.L., Patton, J.M. (Eds.), Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting. JAI Press, Connecticut 5, pp. 125-163.
6. Barla, P. (2007), 'ISO 14001 certification and environmental performance in
Quebec's pulp and paper industry , Jounal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53(3), 291-306.
7. Barnett, L. Michael (2007), Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility, Academy of Management Review, 32(3),794-816.
8. Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate
sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 197-218.
9. Bernroider, E., Stix, V., 2005. A method using weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis for ranking and validity issues in decision making. Computers & Operations Research. 34(9), 2637-2647.
10. Bosetti, V., Locatelli, G. (2006), A data envelopment analysis approach to the
assessment of natural parks, economic efficiency and sustainability. The case of Italian national park', Sustainable Development, 14, 277-286.
11. Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
12. Brammer, S. & Millington, A. (2005). Corporate reputation and philanthropy- an
empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 61: 29-44.
13. Buchholtz, A.K., Amason, A.C. & Rutherford, M.A. (1999, Jun.). Beyond resources:the mediating of top management discretion and values on corporate
philanthropy. Business and Society, 38(2): 167-187.
14. Caves, D. W., Christensen, L.R. and Diewert, W.E. (1982a), The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity, Econometrica, 50(6), 1393-1414.
15. Caves, D. W., Christensen, L.R. and Diewert, W.E.(1982b), Multilateral comparisons of output, input, and productivity using superlative index numbers, The Economic Journal, 92(365),73-86.
16. Carroll, A. (1979, Oct.). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate
performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(000004): 497-505.
17. Cerin, P., Dobers, P., 2001. What does the performance of the Dow Jones Sustainability Group Index tell us? Eco-Management and Auditing, 8(3), 123-133.
18. Chand, M. (2006), The relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance: industry type as a boundary condition, The Business Review, Cambridge, 5(1),240-245.
19. Chang, D.S., Kuo, L.C. (2008), The effects of on firm's financial performance--an empirical approach, Sustainable Development,16(6),365-380.
20. Charnes A., C. W. W., Rhodes E. (1978), Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6),429-444.
21 Christmann, P. (2000), Effects of "best practices" of environmental management on cost advantage: the role of complementary assets, Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663-680.
22. Chen, Y., Ali, A.I. (2003), DEA Malmquist productivity measure: new insights with an application to computer industry, European Journal of Operational Research, 159(1),239-249.
23. Chen, K.H. & Metcalf, R.W. (1980). The relationship between pollution control
record and financial indicators revisited and further comment. The Accounting
Review, 55(1):168-177.
24. Christmann, P. (2000, Aug.). Effects of “best practices” of environmental
management on cost advantage: the role of complementary assets. Academy of
Management Journal, 43(4): 663-680.
25. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995), A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance, Academy of Management, 20(1), 92-117.
26. Clarkson, M.B.E. (1988). Corporate social performance in Canada, 1976-86. In L.E.Preston (Ed), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 10,
241-265. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
27. Clarke, T. (Summer 2001). Balancing the triple bottom line: financial, social and
environmental performance. Journal of General Management, 26(4): 16-27.
28. Cochran, P. L., Wood R.A. (1984), Corporate social responsibility and financial
performance, Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 42-56.
29. Cooper, W. W., Seiford L.M., Tone K. (2000), Data Envelopment Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers:Norwell.
30. Cottrill, M.T. (1990). Corporate social responsibility and the marketplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 9: 723-729..
31. Corbett, C.J. & Wassenhove, L.N.V. (Fall 1993). The green fee: internalizing and
operationalizing environmental issues. California Management Review, 36(1):
116-135.
32. Daily, B.F. & Huang, S.C.(2001). Achieving sustainability through attention to
human resource factors in environmental management. International Journal of
Operations & Production Management, 21(12):1539-1552.
33. Desrochers, P. (2002), Industrial ecology and the rediscovery of inter-firm
recycling linkages: historical evidence and policy implications, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(5), 1031-1057.
34. de Burgos Jiménez, J. & Lorente, J.J.C. (2001). Environmental performance as an operations objective. International Journal of Operations & Production
management, 21. (12): 1553-1572.
35. de Geus, A. (1997, Mar.-Apr.). The living company. Harvard Business Review,
75(2):51-59.
36. Ding, L., Velicer, W.F., & Harlow, L.L. (1995). Effects of estimation methods,
number of indicators per factor and improper solutions on structural equation
modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling, 2(2): 119-143.
37. Diltz, D.J. (1995). The private cost of socially responsible investing. Applied
Financial Economics, 5(2): 69-77.
38. Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes. SAM’s Corporate Sustainability Assessment for the Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes 2004.
39. Dunphy, D., Griffiths, A., Benn, S., (2003), Organizational change for corporate sustainability, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, London and N.Y.
40. Dyckhoff, H., Allen K. (2001), Measuring ecological efficiency with data
envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 132,312-325.
41. Elkington, J. (Winter 1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win
business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review,
36(2): 90-100.
42. Elkington, J. (1999, Mar.). Triple bottom-line reporting: looking for balance.
Australian CPA, 69(2): 18-21
43. Färe , R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B., Roos, P. (1992), Productivity change in
Swedish pharmacies 1980-1989: A nonparametric malmquist approach, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3(1), 85-102.
44. Figge, F., Hahn, T. (2005), The cost of sustainability capital and the creation of
sustainable value by companies, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4),47-58.
45. Fineman, S., Clarke, K. (1996), Green stakeholders: industry interpretations and response, Journal of Management Studies, 33(6),715-730.
46. Fisher, D. R., Freudenburg,W.R. (2004), Postindustrialization and Environmental Quality: An Empirical Analysis of the Environmental State, Social Forces, 83(1),157-188.
47. Fogler, H.R. & Nutt, F. (1975), A note on social responsibility and stock valuation,Academy of Management Journal, 18(000001): 155-160.
48. Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom (Chicago: University of Chicago
Press, 1962)
49. Frooman, J. (1997, Sept.). Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and
shareholder wealth, a meta-analysis of event studies. Business and Society,
36(3):221-249.
50. Graafland, J.J., Eijffinger, S.C.W. (2004), Corporate social responsibility of Dutch companies: benchmarking, transparency and robustness, De Economist, 152(3),403-426.
51. Griffin, J.J. & Mahon, J.F. (1997, Mar.). The corporate social performance and
corporate financial performance debate : Twenty-five years of incomparable
research. Business and Society, 3(1): 5-31.
52. Hair Jr., J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. & Black, W.C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
53. Hart, S.L. (1997, Jan.-Feb.). Beyond Greenings:Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75(1): 66-76.
54. Harvey, B. & Schaefer, A. (2001, Apr.). Managing relationships with environmental stakeholders: a study of U.K. water and electricity utilities. Journal of Business
Ethics, 30(3): 243-260.
55. Henriques, I., Sadorsky, P. (1996), The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm:an empirical approach, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,30(26), 381-395.
56. Hillman A.J., K. G. D. (2001), Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and
social issues: what's the bottom line?, Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125-139.
57. Holmes, S. L. (1977), Corporate social performances: past and present areas of
commitment, Academy of Management Journal, 20(3), 433-438.
58. Holland, L. (2003, Dec.). Can the principle of the ecological footprint be applied to measure the environmental sustainability of business? Corporate
Social-Responsibility and Environmental Management, 10(4): 224-232.
59. Holliday, C. (2001, Sep.). Sustainable growth, the DuPont way. Havard Business
Review, 79(8):129-132.
60. Hillman, A.J. & Keim, G.D. (2001, Feb.). Shareholder value, stakeholder
management, and social issues: what’s the bottom line? Strategic Management
Journal, 22(2): 125-139.
61. Jones P., C. D., Hillier D. (2006), Corporate social responsibility and the UK
construction industry, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 8(3),134-150.
62. Jones, T.M. (1983, Oct.). An integrating framework for research in business and
society: a step toward the elusive paradigm? The Academy of Management
Review, 8(000004): 559-564.
63. Keim, G.D. (1978, Jan.). Corporate social responsibility: an assessment of the
enlightened self-interest model. The Academy of Management Review,
3(1): 32-39.
64. Knoepfel, I., 2001. Dow Jones Sustainability Groupo Index: A global benchmark for corporate sustainability. Corporate Environment Strategy. 8(1), 6-15.
65. Kuosmanen, T., Kortelainen, M. (2005), Measuring eco-efficiency of production
with data envelopment analysis, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4),59-72.
66. Kuo, L.C.(2005). The causal relationship of corporate sustainability and
profitability. MBA thesis, Department of Business Administration, National
Central University, Taiwan.
67. Lazonic, W. (1999), The Japanese economy and corporate reform: what path to
sustainable prosperity?, Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(4), 607-633.
68. Litz, R.A. (1996), A resource-based-view of the socially responsible firm:
stakeholder interdependence, ethical awareness, and issue responsiveness as
strategic assets, Journal of Business Ethics, 15(12): 1355-1363.
69. Mahlbert , B., Obersteiner, M., 2001. Remeasuring the HDI by data envelopment
analysis. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Interim Report IR-01-069, Laxemburg, Austria.
70. Marrewijk, M.v. (2003, May), Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate
sustainability: Between agency and communion, Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2/3), 95-105.
71. Margolis, J.D. & Walsh, J.P. (2001). People and profits? The search for a link
between a company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
72. Maxwell, J., Rothenberg, S., Briscoe, F. & Marcus, A. (Spring 1997). Green
schemes: corporate environmental strategies and their implementation.
California Management Review, 39(3): 118-120.
73. Mendenhall, M.E., Macomber, J.H., Cutright, M.(2000), Mary Parker Follett: prophet of chaos and complexity, Journal of Management History, 6(4), 191-202.
74. Möller, A., Schaltegger, S. (2005), The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework for eco-efficiency analysis, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4),73-83.
75. McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D.(2000, May). Research notes and communications.
Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or
misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5): 603-609.
76. McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D. (2001, Jan.). Note. Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26(1):
117-127.
77. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. & Wood, D.J. (1997, Oct.). Toward a theory of
stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what
really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853-886.
78. Mill, G.A. (Spring 2006). The financial performance of a socially responsible
investment over time and a possible link with corporate social responsibility.
Journal of Business Ethics, 63:131-148.
79. Molnar, E. & Mulvihill, P.R. (2003). Sustainability-focused organizational learning:recent experiences and new challenges. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46(2): 167-176.
80. Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review, 1(1): 71-75.
81. Moon, Jeremy. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to
sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15(5):296.
82. Norton,B.G. & Toman, M.A. (1997, Nov.). Sustainability: Ecologist and economic perspectives. Land Economics, 73(4): 553-568.
83. Osés-Eraso, N., Viladrich-Grau M. (2007), On the sustainability of common
property resources, Jounal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53(3),393-401.
84. Orlitzky, M. (2001, Sep.). Does firm size confound the relationship between socialperformance and firm financial performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2):167-180.
85. Orlitzky, M. & Benjamin, J.D. (2001, Dec.). Corporate social performance and firm risk: a meta-analytic review. Business and society, 40(4): 369-396.
86. Oktem, U., Lewis, P., Donovan, D., Hagan, J.R. & Pace, T. (Summer 2004). EMS and sustainable development. A model and comparative studies of integration. Greener Management International, 46: 11-28.
87. Panchak, P. (2002), Time for a triple bottom line, Industry Week, 5(251), 7.
88. Parthasarathy, G., Hart, R., Jamro, Ed., Miner, L. (2005), Value of sustainability:
perspectives of a chemical manufacturing site, Clean Technologies and
Environmental Policy, 3(7),219-229.
89. Pava, M.L. Krausz, J. (1996, Mar.). The association of CSR and financial
performance: The paradox of social cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3):
321-357.
90. Porter, M.E. & van der Linde, C. (1995, Sep.- Oct.). Green and competitive--
Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5):120-134.
91. Palmer, K., Oates, W.E. & Portney, P.R.(Fall 1995). Tightening environmental
standards: the benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? The Journal of Economic
Perspectives, 9(4): 119-132.
92. Reed, R.,R.J. DeFillippi. (1990), Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and
Sustainable Competitive Advantage, Academy of Management Review,
15(1),88-102.
93. Russo, M.V. & Fouts, P.A. (1997), A resource-based perspective on corporate
environmental performance and profitability, Academy of Management Journal, 40(3): 534-559.
94. Russo, M. V. (2003), The emergence of sustainable industries: building on natural capital, Strategic Management Journal, 24(4),317-331.
95. Reinhardt, F. (Summer 1998). Environmental product differentiation:
Implications for corporate strategy. California Management Review, 40(4): 43-73.
96. Reinhardt, F. (2000, May/Jun.). Sustainability and the firm. Interface, 30(3): 26-41.
97. Rennings, K. Schröder, M. Ziegler, A. (2003, Winter). The Economic
Performance of European Stock Corporations. Greener Management International, 44: 33-43
98. Rugman, A.M. & Verbeke, A.(1998, Apr.). Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: an organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4):363-375.
99. Rowley, T.J. (1997, Oct.). Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of
stakeholder influences. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 887-910.
100. Salzmann, O., Ionescu-Somers, A. & Steger, U.(2005). The business case for
corporate sustainability: literature review and research options. European
Management Journal, 23(1): 27-36.
101. Schuler, D.A. & Cording, M. (2006). A corporate social performance-corporate
financial performance behavioral model for consumers. The Academy of
Management Review, 31(3): 540-558.
102. Sethi, S.P. (1979, Jan.). A conceptual framework for environmental analysis of
Social issues and evaluation of business response patterns. The Academy of
Management Review, 4(1): 63-74.
103. Simpson, G., 2005. Programmatic efficiency comparisons between unequally
sized groups of DMUs in DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 56(12),1431-1438.
104. Simpson, G., 2007. A cautionary note on methods of comparing programmatic
Efficiency between two or more groups of DMUs in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 28(1-2), 141-147.
105. Strand, R. (1983, Jan.). A systems paradigm of organizational adaptations to the
social environment. The Academy of Management Review, 8(000001): 90-96.
106. Stanwick, P.A. & Stanwick S.D. (1998a, Jan.). The relationship between
corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: an empirical examination. Journal of Business
Ethics, 17(2): 195-204.
107. Stanwick, P.A. & S.D. (1998b). Corporate social responsiveness: an empirical
examination using the environmental disclosure index. International Journal of
Commerce & Management, 8(3/4): 26-40.
108. Stead, E., McKinney, M.M., Stead, J.G., 1998. Institutionalizing environmental
performance in US industry: is it happening and what if it does not? Business
Strategy and the environment. 7(5), 261-270.
109. Schaefer, A. (2004, Dec.). Corporate sustainability-integrating environmental
and social concerns? Corporate Social-Responsibility and Environmental
Management, 11(4): 179-187.
110. Sturdivant, F.D. & Ginter, J.L. (Spring 1977). Corporate social responsiveness.
Management attitudes and economic performance. California Management
Review, 19. (000003): 30-39.
111. Simpson, W. G. & Kohers, T. (2002, Jan.). The link between corporate social
and financial performance: evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(2): 97-109.
112. Sarkis, J., Weinrach, J. (2001), Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate
environmentally conscious waste treatment technology, Journal of Cleaner Production, 9, 417-427.
113. Sharma, S., Henriques I.(2005), Stakeholder influences on sustainability
practices in the Canadian forest products industry, Strategic Management Journal, 26, 159-180.
114. Shrivastava, P. (1995), The role of corporations in achieving ecological
sustainability, The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 936-961.
115. Siegel, S. Castellan, N.J.Jr. (1988), Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral
sciences., McGraw-Hill Book Co.:Singapore.
116. Sturdivant, F.D. & Ginter, J.L. (1977), Corporate social responsiveness.
Management attitudes and economic performance, California Management Review, 19. (000003): 30-39.
117. Thorpe, J. & Prakash-Mani, K. (Winter 2003). Developing value. The business
case for sustainability in emerging markets. Greener Management International,
44(44): 17-32.
118. Tsolas, I. (2008). Derivation of mineral processing environmental sustainability
Indicators using a DEA weight-restricted algorithm. Trade and Industry, 25(4):199-205.
119. Tuzzolino, F. & Armandi, B.R.(1981, Jan.). A Need-hierarchy framework for
assessing corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 6(1): 21-28.
120. Viederman, S. (1993, Apr.) Sustainable development: what is it and how do we
get there? Current History, 92(573): 180-185.
121. Verschoor, C.C. & Murphy, E.A. (2002). The financial performance of large
U.S. firms and those with global prominence: how do they best corporate citizens rate? Business and Society Review, 107(3): 371-380.
122. Voinov,A., (2008). Understanding and communicating sustainability: global
versus regional perspectives. Environment, Development and Sustainability,
10(4):487-501.
123. Wagner, M., Schaltegger, S. (2004), The effect of corporate environmental
Strategy choice and environmental performance on competitiveness and economic performance: An empirical study of EU manufacturing, European Management Journal, 22(5), 557-572.
124. Wagner, M. (2005), Sustainability and competitive advantage: empirical
evidence on the influence of strategic choices between environmental management approaches, Environmental Quality Management, 14(3), 31-48.
125. Watson, K., Klingenberg, B., Polito, T. & Geurts, T.G. (2004), Impact of
environmental management system implementation on financial performance: a
comparison of two corporate strategies, Management of Environmental Quality,
15(6): 622-628.
126. Weber, O. (2005), Sustainability benchmarking of European banks and
financial service organizations, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 12(2), 73-87.
132. Waddock, S.A. & Graves, S.B. (1997, April). The corporate social performance
-finance performance link. Strategic Management Journal,(18)4: 303-319.
127. Wagner, M., Van Phu, N., Azomahou, T. & Wehrmeyer, W. (2002, Sep.). The
relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: an
empirical analysis of the European paper industry. Corporate
Social–Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(3): 133-146.
128. Wagner, M. & Schaltegger, S. (2004). The effect of corporate environmental
strategy choice and environmental performance on competitiveness and economic performance: an empirical study of EU manufacturing. European Management Journal, 22(5): 557-572.
129. Wagner, M. (Spring 2005). Sustainability and competitive advantage: empirical
evidence on the influence of strategic choices between environmental
management approaches. Environmental Quality Management, 14(3): 31-48.
130. Wartick, S.L. & Cochran, P.L. (1985, Oct.). The evolution of the corporate
social performance model. The Academy of Management Review, 10(000004):
758-769.
131. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development),( 1987), Our
Common Future (The Brundtland Report) (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
132. Wilkinson, A., Hill, M. & Gollan, P. (2001). The sustainability debate.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(12): 1492-1502.
133. Walley, N. & Whitehead, B. (1994, May-Jun.). It’s not easy being green.
Harvard Business Review, 72(3):46-51.
134. Wood, D.J. (1991, Oct.). Corporate social performance revisited. The Academy
of Management Review, 16(4): 691-718.
135. Young, W., Tilley, F., 2006. Can Business Move Beyond Efficiency? The Shift
toward Effectiveness and Equity in the Corporate Sustainability Debate. Business Strategy and the Environment.15(6),402-415.
136. Zenisek, T.J. (1979, Jul.). Corporate social responsibility: a conceptualization
bsed on organizational literature. The Academy of Management Review, 4(3):359-368.
137. Zhang, Y., Bartels, R., 1998. The effect of sample size on the mean efficiency
in DEA with an application to electricity distribution in Australia, Sweden and New Zealand. Journal of Productivity analysis. 9(3), 187-204.
指導教授 張東生(Dong Shang Chang) 審核日期 2010-6-7
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明