博碩士論文 974208004 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:75 、訪客IP:18.217.128.108
姓名 李思慧(Szu-Hui Li)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 財務金融學系
論文名稱 金融變革下之授信行為對企業投融資決策之影響
相關論文
★ 金融機構不良債權處理機制之研究★ 放款作業流程的滿意度調查研究 —以S銀行為例
★ 工業銀行持股公司多角化策略、董事會特性及經營績效之研究★ 台灣企業的大陸經營模式、治理機制與盈餘管理之研究
★ 外資進入對本國問題銀行之影響★ 銀行如何訂定建築業的授信政策
★ 台灣境外結構型商品的監理法規與行銷策略之研究★ 問題放款的解決途徑及個案分析
★ 國家風險與信用評等制度之建立★ 證券業及保險業資本適足率、公司治理與經營績效之比較
★ 商業銀行如何藉由風險中立評價法 衡量放款部位的信用風險★ 中小企業信保案件之違約機率、回收率與信用風險值的實證研究
★ 商業銀行如何建置符合新巴賽爾資本協定的信用評分制度★ 資產減損與債務協商機制對台灣上市櫃公司之衝擊
★ 檢視Basu的盈餘不對稱時效性模型在台灣金融服務業的適用性★ 商業銀行如何檢視淨值貸款與二胎房貸的地域效果
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 本篇旨在探討台灣歷經金融變革後,商業銀行的授信行為會否隨著企業的信用評等高低而有影響。實證結果顯示高信用風險的企業有顯著較高的借款利差,而不管是「打銷巨額呆帳」之銀行或是「卡債損失慘重」之銀行其給予客戶的放款利率均顯著較高,但「卡債損失慘重」之銀行針對高信用風險之客戶仍給予其較低之利差;而因法規的鬆綁允許外資進入,使得國內金融市場競爭激烈,因此在削價競爭下,國內銀行給予借款客戶的利差均顯著較低,也因為在這種情況下,國內銀行均不會對借款客戶信用風險的高低而給予不同之定價;相反的,外資銀行在承做放款時會檢視借款客戶的信用風險高低而作出合理之定價。再探討往來關係上,企業之最大債權銀行和主力銀行均會給予借款客戶較低的利差,且即使是高信用風險之客戶也有較低的借款成本。
本研究的第二個重點為企業的投資和融資行為會否受銀行授信行為的改變而有顯著的差異。實證發現企業之最大債權銀行為「打銷巨額呆帳」或是「卡債損失慘重」者,這些企業會保留較多之自有資金去因應未來的資本支出;銀行所有權類型也是影響企業投融資決策因素之一;最後就企業信用風險評等的高低和企業信用評等調升降狀態去檢視其投融資決策,則發現亦有顯著影響。
摘要(英) This study examines the effect of borrower’s credit risk rating on banks’ credit behavior after the financial restructuring in Taiwan. The evidence shows that risky firms experience higher loan rate. And not only bank with “the write off large bad debt” but also banks with “large loss from credit card crisis” significantly price higher loan rate for their customers. However, bank with “large loss from credit card crisis” still lend lower rate for the high credit risk borrowers; Because of deregulation and the involvement of foreign banks, Taiwan’s financial industry become more and more competition. In this situation private domestic banks tend to provide lower rate for their customers regardless credit risk. On the contrary, foreign banks price the rational loan rate depending on borrowers’ credit risk. Then borrowers with closer lending relationship pay low loan rate even for risky borrowers.
The second purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of banks’ credit behavior on firms’ investment and financing decisions. The result shows that firms borrow from bank with “the write off large bad debt” or banks with “large loss from credit card crisis” have higher sensitivity of investment to cash flow. Firms with relationship with different bank ownership types also affect firms’ investment and financing decisions. Finally, the evidence suggests that firm’s credit risk rating and ratings upgrade or downgrade also influence the sensitivity of investment to cash flow.
關鍵字(中) ★ 授信行為
★ 信用評等
★ 銀行往來關係
★ 投融資決策
關鍵字(英) ★ Credit behavior
★ banking relationship
★ credit rating
★ Investment and financing decisions
論文目次 第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第貳章 研究文獻回顧 6
第一節 銀行所有權類型對授信的影響 6
第二節 公司和銀行的信用風險對銀行授信決策的影響 7
第三節 公司投融資限制的影響因素 8
第參章 研究方法 10
第一節 選樣設計 10
第二節 變數定義與實證模型 10
一 授信行為對企業放款利差之影響 10
二 企業的營運現金流量如何在金融變革下,支應資本投資增額 16
第肆章 實證分析與結果 21
第一節 敘述統計分析 21
第二節 實證分析結果 26
一 授信行為對企業放款利差之影響 26
二 外資五大銀行對企業放款利差之影響 34
三 金融變革下之最大債權銀行,對企業投融資決策之影響 36
第伍章 結論與建議 45
參考文獻 47
中文部分 47
英文部分 47
附錄1 企業與各債權銀行之借款金額 52
附錄2 企業之最大債權、主力與非主力銀行的借款金額比較 52
參考文獻 中文部分
1. 王健安與沈中華,民92,「資訊不對稱環境下,公司投資與銀行融資限制關係之研究」,管理學報,第二十卷第四期,第721至748頁。
2. 行政院金管會銀行局網站
3. 陳家彬與賴怡洵(92年),「銀行往來關係和授信行為之研究」,經濟論文,第31卷第3期,第497至520頁。
4. 陳宜汶(2009),信用評等改變對公司資本結構決策之影響,國立中央大學財務金融學系碩士論文。
5. 郭碧雲與陳錦村著(98年9月23日審查中),「銀行的經營態勢對借款企業往來關係之影響-以台灣的微小型企業與中大型企業為例」,中山管理評論。
6. 陳錦村,2004。銀行管理概要,台北:新陸書局出版
7. 謝易宏(97年7月),「台灣「金融控股公司」競爭規範之探討」,公平交易季刊,第16卷第3期,第1至20頁。
英文部分
1. Barth, J.R., Caprio, Jr.G., and Levine, R., 2000, “Banking systems around the globe: do regulation and ownership affect performance and stability?” Working Paper 2325, World Bank.
2. Berger, A.N. and Humphrey, D.B., 1992, “Mega mergers in Banking and the Use of Cost Efficiency as an Antitrust Defense.” Antitrust Bulletin, 37, pp.541-600.
3. __________ and Udell, G.F., 1995, “Relationship lending and lines of credit in small firm finance.” Journal of Bussiness, 68, pp.351–381.
4. __________, Saunders A., Scalise, J.M., and Udell G.F., 1998, “The Effects of Bank Mergers and Acquisitions on Small Business Lending.” Journal of Financial Economics, 50, pp.187-229.
5. __________, L. F. Klapper, and Udell, G.F., 2001, “The Ability of Banks to Lend to Informationally Opaque Small Businesses.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, pp.2127-67.
6. __________, Hasan, I., and Klapper, L.F., 2004, “Further evidence on the link between finance and growth: An international analysis of community banking and economic performance.” Journal of Financial Services Research, 25, pp.169–202.
7. __________, Klapper, L.F., Martinez Peria, M.S., and Zaidi, R., 2008, “Bank ownership type and banking relationships.” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 17, pp.37–62.
8. Bhaumik, S.K., and Piesse, J., 2005, “Does lending behavior of banks in emerging economies vary by ownership? Evidence from the Indian banking sector.” working paper
9. Bolton, P., and Freixas, X., 2000, “Equity, Bonds and Bank Debt: Capital Structure and Financial Market Equilibrium under Asymmetric Information.” Journal of Political Economy,108,pp.324-351.
10. Bonaccorsi, E., di Patti and Gobbi, G., 2003, “The effect of bank mergers on credit availability:evidence from corporate data.” working papers.
11. Bonin, J.P., Hasan, I., and Wachtel, P., 2005, “Bank privatization and performance: Evidence from transition countries.” Journal of Banking Finance, 29, pp.31–53.
12. Boot, A.W.A., and Marinˇc, M., 2006, “Competition and entry in banking: Implications for stability and capital regulation.” Discussion paper 5518, CEPR.
13. Broecker, T., 1990, “Credit-worthiness tests and interbank competition.” Econometrica, 58, pp.429–452.
14. Campa JM, and Hernando, I., 2006, “M&As performance in the European financial industry.” Journal of Banking Finance, 30, pp.3367–3392.
15. Claessens, S., Aslt Demirguc, and Huizinga, H., 2001, “How does foreign entry affect domestic banking markets?” Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, pp. 891-911.
16. __________, Aslt Demirguc, and Huizinga, H., 2002, “Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings,” Journal of Finance, 60, pp.2741-2771.
17. Clarke, G., Cull, R., and Martinez Peria, M.S., 2002, “How does foreign bank participation affect access to credit by SMEs? Evidence from survey data.” Working paper.
18. Coleman A.D.F., Esho N., and Sharpe I.G., 2002, “Do Bank Characteristics Influence Loan Contract Terms?” Working Paper.
19. De la Torre, A., Martinez Peria, M.S., and Schmukler, S.L., 2008, “Bank involvement with SMEs: Beyond relationship lending.” Working Paper.
20. Degryse, H., and Van Cayseele, P., 2000, “Relationship lending within a bank-based system: Evidence from European small business data.” Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9, pp.90–109.
21. Detragiache, E., Tressel, T., and Gupta, P., 2006, “Foreign banks in poor countries: Theory and evidence.” Working paper.
22. Diaz, B., Olalla, M., and Azorfa, S., 2004, “Bank acquisitions and performance: evidence from a panel of European credit entities.” Journal of Economic Business, 56, pp.377–404.
23. Elsas, R., and Krahnen, J.P., 1998, “Is relationship lending special? Evidence from credit-file data in Germany.” Journal of Banking Finance, 22, pp.1283–1316.
24. Fazzari S.M., Hubbard R.G., and Petersen B.C., 1988, “Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, pp.141-206.
25. Fischer, K., 1990, “Hausbankbeziehungen als Instrument der Bindung Zwischen Banken und Unternehmen:Eine theoretische Analyse,” working paper.
26. Focarelli, Dario, and Fabio Panetta., 2003, “Are Mergers Beneficial to Consumers? Evidence from the Market for Bank Deposits.” American Economic Review, 93, pp.1152–71.
27. Giannetti, M., and Ongena, S., 2008, ‘‘Lending by example: Direct and indirect effects of foreign banks in emerging markets.” Working Paper.
28. Gibson, M.S., 1995, “Can bank health affect investment? Evidence from Japan.” Journal of Business, 68, pp.281–308.
29. __________, 1997, “More evidence on the link between bank health and investment in Japan.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 11, pp.296–310.
30. Gorton, G., and Kahn, J., 1996, “The design of bank loan contracts, collateral, and renegotiation.” Working Paper.
31. Haber, S., and Musacchio, A., 2005, “Contract Rights and Risk Aversion: Foreign banks and the Mexican economy, 1997–2004.” Working paper.
32. Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., and Scharfstein, D., 1993, “The choice between public and private debt: an analysis of post-deregulation corporate financing in Japan.” Working paper.
33. Hubbard, R.G., Kuttner, K., and Palia, D., 2002, “Are there bank effects in borrowers' costs of funds? evidence from a matched sample of borrowers and banks.” Journal of Business, 75, pp.559-581.
34. Kisgen, D.J., 2007, “Do firms target credit ratings of leverage levels?" Working paper.
35. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A., 2002, “Government ownership of banks.” Journal of Finance, 57, pp.256–301.
36. Machauer, A., and Weber, M., 2000, “Number of bank relationships: An indicator of competition, borrower quality or just size?” Working paper.
37. Martinez Peria, M.S., and Mody, A., 2004, “How foreign participation and market concentration impact bank spreads: Evidence from Latin America.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 36, pp.511–537.
38. Panetta, F., Schivardi, F. and Shum, M., 2009, “Do Mergers Improve Information? Evidence from the Loan Market.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 41, pp.673-709.
39. Petersen, M.A., and Rajan, R., 1994, “The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data.” Journal of Finance, 49, pp.3–37.
40. ____________, and Rajan, R., 1995, “The Effect of Credit Market Competition on Lending Relationships.” Quarterly Journal Economic, 110, pp.407-442.
41. Rhoades, and Stephen, A., 1998, “The Efficiency Effects of Bank Mergers: An Overview of Case Studies of Nine Mergers.” Journal of Banking & Finance, 22, pp.273-291.
42. Santos, J., and Winton, A., 2008, “Bank loans, bonds, and information monopolies across the business cycle.” Journal of Finance, 63, pp.1315–1359.
43. Sapienza, P., 2004, “The effect of government ownership on bank Lending.” Journal of Financial Economics, 72, pp.357–384.
44. Sharpe, S.A., 1990, “Asymmetric Information, Bank Lending, and Implicit Contracts: A Stylized Model of Customer Relationships.” Journal of Finance, 4, pp.1069–1087.
45. Strahan, P.E., and Weston J.P., 1998, “Small Business Lending and the Changing Structure of The Banking Industry.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 22, pp.821-845.
46. __________, 2003, “The real effects of U.S. banking deregulation.” Federal Reserve Bank of St.Louis Review, 85, pp.111-128.
47. Tang, T., 2009, “Information asymmetry and firm's' credit market access: Evidence from Moody's credit rating format refinement.” Journal of Financial Economics, 93, pp.325-351.
48. Tilly, R.H., 1989 , “Banking Institutions in Historical and Comparative Perspective: Germany,Great Britain and the United States in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 145, pp.289–209.
49. Yang, C.C, Baker, H.K., Chou, L.C., and Lu, B.W., 2009, “Does Switching from NASDAQ to the NYSE Affect Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivity?” Journal of Business Research, 62, pp.1007-1012.
指導教授 陳錦村(Jing-Twen Chen) 審核日期 2010-6-21
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明