資訊相關從業人員之核心自我評估對迷信之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：39

、訪客IP：3.144.12.205

姓名

田博仁(Bo-Ren Tian) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

資訊相關從業人員之核心自我評估對迷信之影響
(IT/IS professionals' core self-evaluation on the effect of superstition)

相關論文

★ 企業再造或企業組織精簡--以一家無線電視公司為例	★ 銀行業的資訊系統危機管理
★ 平衡計分卡、企業智能在企業績效管理之角色	★ 資訊系統再造管理議題之研究-以臺灣證券集中保管公司存託系統為例
★ 客服中心資訊系統之管理	★ 以科技接受模式探討採用網路ATM因素之研究
★ 美容瘦身業導入門市銷售系統之關鍵成功因素探討	★ 台商在中國大陸與越南投資遭遇問題之比較研究
★ 飛機維護管理分散式資料庫整合平台之研究-以A航空公司為例	★ 經營環境劇烈變化下企業服務系統迅速開發專案管理之個案研究－以A公司為例
★ 資訊相關從業人員之宗教信仰強度對生命意義、感激與寬恕之影響	★ 部落格經營研究—社交智能對部落格社會互動與內容之影響
★ 資管教育讓資管學生了解企業管理問題嗎?	★ 社群網站自我揭露的社會抑制之研究-人情智能與成人依附之考量
★ 人情智能對感知的情緒貼圖使用恰當性之影響	★ 行動通訊軟體使用者的人情智能對社群互動，社群認同及社群信任之影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

資訊相關從業人員在遇到問題時，往往會以邏輯思考為主、經驗為輔的方式嘗試處理問題。不過，台灣企業的資訊部門，遇到系統當機時，常常歸咎於迷信因素。譬如：為了避免電腦無來由的當機，資訊部門會在機房的周圍、主機的附近等靠近電腦的地方，放置『綠色』包裝的乖乖，其他顏色包裝則會有反效果；另一個類似的例子是：不可以放置旺旺仙貝，因為電腦將會常常出問題，致使機房『人丁興旺』。
　　根據上述現象，研究者產生了研究動機：放置食物在機房，容易滋生生物，提高機房設備損壞風險，對於資訊相關從業人員而言，機房維護的概念應是眾所皆知，何以資訊部門會有這樣的迷信表現呢？
　　本研究的主要研究對象以資訊相關從業人員為主，一般管理工作人員為對照組，透過問卷發放的方式進行資料蒐集，並以核心自我評估理論評量研究對象的人格特質。研究結果發現，核心自我評估對迷信有顯著影響，且男性、年齡較大、工作性質上管理比例較高、年資較長的樣本，核心自我評估分數相對較高。有趣的是，資訊相關從業人員雖在迷信水準上比一般管理工作人員低，但對於『放置綠色乖乖在電腦旁』這項迷信做法卻反而比較高。

摘要(英)

In case of problems, IT/IS professionals often dominated by logical thinking and supplemented by experience, trying to deal with problems. However, when computer systems crash, IT/IS departments in Taiwan’’s enterprises often attributed to superstition factor. For example: In order to avoid the computer no reason behind the crash, IT/IS departments will put some green packaging “Kuai Kuai” (A kind of snack, means obedient or well-behaved) nearby computers. But other color packaging will have the negetive effect. Another similar example is that: Don’t put “Want Want” (Means flourishing) Senbei nearby computers, because the computer will often go wrong, resulting in a flourishing population room.
　　Based on the above phenomenon, researchers had the research motivation: To place food in the room will easy breeding animals and increase the damage risk on equipments in the generator room. It should be common sense for IT/IS professionals, but why IT/IS departments in Taiwan’’s enterprises have this superstition behavior?
　　The main samples of this research are IT/IS professionals, and non-IT/IS professionals is in the control group. The study uses questionnaires to collect data, and use core self-evaluation theory to evaluating the personality characteristics of samples. The results showed that: Core self-evaluation have a significant effect on superstitious; Men, older age, higher management proportion job and longer working years, the core self-evaluation scores relatively high. Interestingly, although the superstition of IT/IS professionals than non-IT/IS professionals are low, IT/IS professionals have higher superstition level than non-IT/IS professionals for this superstitious behavior “put some green packaging Kuai Kuai nearby computers.”

關鍵字(中)

★ 迷信
★ 超自然信念
★ 核心自我評估
★ 一般自我效能
★ 自尊
★ 控制源
★ 神經質

關鍵字(英)

★ Paranormal Beliefs
★ Superstition
★ Core Self-Evaluation
★ General Self-Efficacy (GSE)
★ Self-Esteem
★ Locus of Control
★ Neuroticism

論文目次

中文摘要...................................................i
英文摘要..................................................ii
誌謝辭...................................................iii
目錄......................................................vi
圖目錄....................................................ix
表目錄.....................................................x
第一章　緒論...............................................1
1.1　　　研究背景與動機....................................1
1.2　　　研究目的..........................................4
1.3　　　研究流程..........................................5
第二章　文獻探討...........................................6
2.1　　　迷信..............................................6
　2.1.1　　迷信的定義......................................6
　2.1.2　　迷信的種類......................................8
　2.1.3　　迷信的量表與正面迷信...........................10
　2.1.4　　迷信的相關研究.................................12
2.2　　　核心自我評估.....................................14
　2.2.1　　自我效能.......................................14
　2.2.2　　自尊...........................................16
　2.2.3　　控制源.........................................17
　2.2.4　　神經質.........................................18
第三章　研究方法..........................................20
3.1　　　研究架構.........................................20
3.2　　　研究變數與操作化.................................21
　3.2.1　　自我效能.......................................21
　3.2.2　　自尊...........................................22
　3.2.3　　控制源.........................................23
　3.2.4　　神經質.........................................25
　3.2.5　　迷信...........................................27
3.3　　　研究假說.........................................28
3.4　　　資料蒐集方法.....................................33
3.5　　　資料分析方法.....................................34
　3.5.1　　樣本基本資料分析...............................34
　3.5.2　　信度與效度檢定.................................35
　3.5.3　　各構念間實質關係檢定...........................35
　3.5.4　　資料分析流程...................................35
第四章　資料分析..........................................37
4.1　　　問卷回收情況.....................................37
4.2　　　整體核心自我評估的分數計算.......................40
4.3　　　樣本基本資料分析.................................41
　4.3.1　　敘述統計與單因子變異數分析.....................41
　4.3.2　　單因子變異數分析──事後檢定...................49
　4.3.3　　獨立樣本 t 檢定................................52
　4.3.4　　資訊工作者與一般工作者在迷信題項上的分數差異...55
4.4　　　信度與效度檢定...................................56
　4.4.1　　信度檢定.......................................57
　4.4.2　　表面效度與內容效度.............................57
　4.4.3　　因素分析──針對迷信測量工具...................58
4.5　　　各構念間實質關係檢定.............................60
　4.5.1　　模式與假說檢定.................................60
　4.5.2　　主要研究變數相關係數檢定.......................63
4.6　　　小結.............................................65
第五章　結論與建議........................................67
5.1　　　結論.............................................67
　5.1.1　　核心自我評估存在的組間差異.....................67
　5.1.2　　迷信存在的組間差異.............................69
　5.1.3　　核心自我評估影響迷信...........................70
5.2　　　研究貢獻.........................................71
　5.2.1　　學術貢獻.......................................71
　5.2.2　　管理實務意涵...................................72
5.3　　　研究限制.........................................73
　5.3.1　　樣本來源.......................................73
　5.3.2　　抽樣方式.......................................73
5.4　　　未來研究方向.....................................74
參考文獻..................................................75
第一節　中文部份..........................................75
第二節　英文部份..........................................77
附錄一　本研究問卷........................................83
附錄二　超自然信念量表改良版..............................87

參考文獻

[第一節　中文部份]
●iThome：高效能伺服器研討會　為機房做室內設計 (存取日期：2010/6/9)，取自 http://www.ithome.com.tw/itadm/article.php?c=44298
●Mobile01：關於乖乖大神的真人真事... (存取日期：2010/6/9)，取自 http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=174&t=534231&p=1
●小兔趴趴照 – udn 部落格：乖乖的妙用 (存取日期：2010/6/9)，取自 http://blog.udn.com/sayuri/779385
●中文維基百科：米爾格倫實驗 (Milgram experiment) (存取日期：2010/6/9)
●朱慶龍 (2002)，“五大人格特質、工作價值觀和工作滿意三者相互關係之研究”，國立政治大學心理學研究所，碩士論文
●吳信寬 (2004)，“資訊從業人員工作滿意與生活滿意之硏究：從工作特性、工作壓力、決策風格與工作適配性探討”，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所，碩士論文
●李牧衡 (2007)，“資訊工作人員之心理資本對工作滿意及生活滿意之影響”，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所，碩士論文
●李婉菱 (2007)，“組織變革過程中內部工作轉換機制與個人特性對轉職者個人與環境適配程度之影響”，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所，碩士論文
●李鑑軒 (2006)，“資訊工作人員之生命流對工作滿意及生活滿意的影響”，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所，碩士論文
●汪慧君 (2007)，“臺北縣某高中學生知覺生活壓力、自尊、社會支持與自殺意念之相關研究”，國立臺灣師範大學健康促進與衛生教育研究所在職進修碩士班，碩士論文
●沒見過壞人嗎？：一年一度拜乖乖 (存取日期：2010/6/9)，取自 http://blog.lester850.info/archives/2006/08/04/351/
●乖乖公司官方網站 (存取日期：2010/6/9)，取自 http://www.kuai-kuai.com.tw/
●林哲宇 (2007)，“資訊工作人員之核心自我評估對工作滿意及生活滿意之影響”，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所，碩士論文
●林家蓁 (2007)，“員工工作不滿意與行為反應之關係：組織政治知覺、職涯主義及自我效能之調節效果”，國立東華大學企業管理研究所，碩士論文
●范振義 (2005)，“大學生身體活動、情緒智力及自尊心之關係研究”，國立中正大學運動與休閒教育研究所，碩士論文
●徐鳳卿 (2008)，“內外控人格傾向、自我效能與工作滿足感關聯性之研究 - 以臺北市立國民小學人事人員為例”，世新大學行政管理研究所，碩士論文
●高振傑 (2002)，“反社會性格疾患與藥物依賴男性受刑人在性格特質向度之比較”，國立成功大學行為醫學研究所，碩士論文
●張培璇 (2008)，“職場暴力知覺與員工偏差行為之關聯性：人格特質的調節效果”，國防大學國防管理學院後勤管理研究所，碩士論文
●陳美伶 (2004)，“空中服務員之內外控人格特質、組織服務氣候與服務導向公民行為之關係研究 - 以本國航空公司為例”，世新大學觀光研究所，碩士論文
●劉于甄 (2008)，“內外控性格與大學生活型態對社會化歷程之影響”，義守大學工業工程與管理研究所，碩士論文
●劉麗君 (2006)，“華人迷信信念之初探 - 以台灣地區為例”，輔仁大學管理學研究所，碩士論文
●蔡瑞龍 (2007)，“派遣員工心理契約、人格特質對工作績效與離職傾向之影響 - 以派遣公司為調節變項”，逢甲大學經營管理研究所碩士在職專班，碩士論文
●盧威丞 (2007)，“資訊相關從業人員之宗教信仰強度對生命意義、感激與寬恕之影響”，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所，碩士論文
●簡晉龍 (2002)，“自我建構與主觀幸福感：自尊與相融和諧的角色”，國立政治大學心理學研究所，碩士論文
[第二節　英文部份]
●Anson, J. and Anson, O. (2001), “Death rests a while: holy day and Sabbath effects on Jewish mortality in Israel.” Social Science & Medicine, vol.52, no.1, p.83-97.
●Adorno, T. W.; Frenkel-Brunswick, E.; Levinson, D. J. and Sanford, R. N. (1950), The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper. Allport, G. W.
●Bandura, A. (1977), Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
●Bandura, A. (1986), Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
●Bleak, J. L. and Frederick, C. M. (1998), “Superstition behavior in sport: Levels of effectiveness and determinants of use in three collegiate sport.” Journal of Sport Behavior, vol.21, p.1-15.
●Britannica Online Encyclopedia - Superstition (Access Time: 2010/6/9), http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/574567/superstition
●Brugger, P. and Graves, R. E. (1997), “Testing vs. Believing Hypotheses: Magical Ideation in the Judgment of Contingencies.” Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, vol.2, no.4, p.251-272.
●Buhrmann, H. G.; Brown, B. and Zaugg, M. K. (1982), “Superstitious beliefs and behavior: A comparison of male and female basketball players.” Journal of Sport Behavior, vol.5, p.175-185.
●Campbell, C. (1996), “Half-Belief and the Paradox of Ritual Instrumental Activism: A Theory of Modern Superstition.” The British Journal of Sociology, vol.47, no.1, p.151-166.
●Chang, E. C. and D‘Zurilla, T. J. (1996), “Irrational beliefs as predictors of anxiety and depression in a college population.” Personality and Individual Differences, vol.20, no.2, p.215-219.
●Chen, G.; Gully, S. M. and Eden, D. (2001), “Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale.” Organizational Research Methods, vol.4, no.1, p.62-83.
●Costa, P. T. Jr. and McCrae, R. R. (1992), The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
●Dag, I. (1999), “The relationships among paranormal beliefs, locus of control and psychopathology in a Turkish college sample.” Personality and Individual Differences, vol.26, no.4, p.723-737.
●Davies, M. F. and Kirkby, H. E. (1985), “Multidimensionality of the relationship between perceived control and belief in the paranormal: Spheres of control and types of paranormal phenomena.” Personality and Individual Differences, vol.6, no.5, p.661-663.
●Emme, E. E. (1940), “Modification and origin of certain beliefs in superstitution among 96 college students.” Journal of Psychology, vol.10, p.279-291.
●Eysenck, S. B. G. and Eysenck, H. J. (1968), “The measurement of psychoticism: A study of factor stability and reliability.” British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, vol.4, p.286-294.
●Groth-Marnat, G. and Pegden, J.-A. (1998), “Personality correlates of paranormal belief: Locus of control and sensation seeking.” Social Behavior and Personality, vol.26, no.3, p.291-296.
●Irwin, H. J. (1986), “The relationship between locus of control and belief in the paranormal.” Parapsychological Journal of South Africa, vol.7, p.1-23.
●Jahoda, G. (1969), The psychology of Superstition. New York: Penguin.
●Jahoda, G. (1970), “Supernatural beliefs and changing cognitive structures among Ghanaian university students.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, vol.1, no.2, p.115-130.
●James, W. (1890), The Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt.
●Johnston, J. C.; De Groot, H. P. and Spanos, N. P. (1995), “The Structure of Paranormal Belief: A Factor-Analytic Investigation.” Imagination, Cognition and Personality, vol.14, no.2, p.165-174.
●Jones, W. H.; Russell, D. W. and Nickel, T. W. (1977), “Belief in the Paranormal Scale: An objective instrument to measure belief in magical phenomena and causes.” Journal Supplement Abstract Service, Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, vol.7, p.100.
●Judge, T. A.; Locke, E. A.; Durham, C. C. and Kluger, A. N. (1998), “Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations.” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol.83, no.1, p.17-34.
●Levenson, H. (1981), “Differentiating among internality, powerful others, and chance.” Research with the Locus of Control Construct, New York: Academic Press, p.15-63.
●Lindeman, M. and Aarnio, K. (2007), “Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model.” Journal of Research in Personality, vol.41, no.4, p.731-744.
●Lindeman, M.; Cederström, S.; Simola, P.; Simula, A.; Ollikainen, S. and Riekki, T. (2008), “Sentences with core knowledge violations increase the size of N400 among paranormal believers.” Cortex, vol.44, no.10, p.1307-1315.
●Malinowski, B. (1954), Magic, science, and religion. New York: Doubleday.
●Maller, J. B. and Lundeen, G. E. (1934), “Superstition and Emotional Maladjustment.” Journal of Educational Research, vol.27, no.8, p.592-617.
●Milgram, S. (1974), Obedience to Authority; An Experimental View. New York: Harpercollins.
●Oxford English Dictionary - Superstition (Access Time: 2010/6/9), http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/50242805?queryword=superstition
●Phillips, D. P. and Feldman, K. A. (1973), “A Dip in Deaths Before Ceremonial Occasions: Some New Relationships Between Social Integration and Mortality.” American Sociological Review, vol.38, no.6, p.678-696.
●Phillips, D. P.; Liu, G. C.; Kwok, K.; Jarvinen, J. R.; Zhang, W. and Abramson, I. S. (2001), “The Hound of the Baskervilles effect: natural experiment on the influence of psychological stress on timing of death.” British Medical Journal, vol.323, p.1443-1446.
●Phillips, D. P. and Smith, D. G. (1990), “Postponement of Death Until Symbolically Meaningful Occasions.” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol.263, no.14, p.1947-1951.
●Randall, T. M. and Desrosiers, M. (1980), “Measurement of Supernatural Belief: Sex Differences and Locus of Control.” Journal of Personality Assessment, vol.44, no.5, p.493-498.
●Rosenberg, M. (1965), Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
●Rotter, J. B. (1954), Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, US: Prentice-Hall.
●Rotter, J. B. (1966), “Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.” Psychological Monographs, vol.80, no.1, p.1-28.
●Rudski, J. (2001), “Competition, superstition, and the illusion of control.” Current Psychology, vol.20, no.1, p.68-84.
●Scheidt, R. J. (1973), “Belief in supernatural phenomena and locus of control.” Psychological Reports, vol.32, no.3, p.1159-1162.
●Sherer, M.; Maddux, J. E.; Mercandante, B.; Prentice-Dunn, S.; Jacobs, B. and Rogers, R. W. (1982), “The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation.” Psychological Reports, vol.51, p.663-671.
●Shweder, R. A.; Casagrande, J. B.; Fiske, D. W.; Greenstone, J. D.; Heelas, P. and Lancy, D. F. (1977), “Likeness and Likelihood in Everyday Thought: Magical Thinking in Judgments About Personality.” Current Anthropology, vol.18, no.4, p.637-658.
●Sica, C.; Novara, C. and Sanavio, E. (2002), “Culture and psychopathology: superstition and obsessive-compulsive cognitions and symptoms in a non-clinical Italian sample.” Personality and Individual Differences, vol.32, no.6, p.1001-1012.
●Spector, P. E. (1988), “Development of the work locus of control scale.” Journal of Occupational psychology, vol.61, no.4, p.335-340.
●Tobacyk, J. J. and Milford, G. (1983), “Belief in paranormal phenomena: Assessment instrument development and implications for personality functioning.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.44, no.5, p.1029-1037.
●Tobacyk, J. J. and Mitchell, T. E. (1987), “Out-of-body experience status as a moderator of effects of narcissism on paranormal beliefs.” Psychological Reports, vol.60, p.440-442.
●Tobacyk, J. J.; Nagot, E. and Miller, M. (1988), “Paranormal Beliefs and Locus of Control: A Multidimensional Examination.” Journal of Personality Assessment, vol.52, no.2, p.241-246.
●Tobacyk, J. J. and Shrader, D. (1991). “Superstition and self-efficacy.” Psychological Reports, vol.68, p.1387-1388.
●Tobacyk, J. J. (2004), “A Revised Paranormal Belief Scale.” The International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, vol.23.
●Todd, M. and Brown, C. (2003), “Characteristics associated with superstitious behavior in track and field athletes: Are there NCAA divisional level differences?” Journal of Sport Behavior, vol.26, p.168-187.
●Torgler, B. (2007), “Determinants of superstition.” Journal of Socio-Economics, vol.36, no.5, p.713-733.
●Voracek, M. (2009), “Who wants to believe? Associations between digit ratio (2D:4D) and paranormal and superstitious beliefs.” Personality and Individual Differences, vol.47, no.2, p.105-109.
●Vyse, S. A. (1997), Believing in Magic: The Psychology of Superstition. US: Oxford University Press.
●Watson, P. J.; Sherbak, J. and Morris, J. M. (1998), “Irrational beliefs, individualism-collectivism, and adjustment.” Personality and Individual Differences, vol.24, no.2, p.173-179.
●Windholz, G. and Diamant, L. (1974), “Some personality traits of believers in extraordinary phenomena.” Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, vol.3, p.125-126.
●Wiseman, R. and Watt, C. (2004), “Measuring superstitious belief: why lucky charms matter.” Personality and Individual Differences, vol.37, no.8, p.1533-1541.
●Wolfradt, U. (1997), “Dissociative experiences, trait anxiety and paranormal beliefs.” Personality Individual Differences, vol.23, no.1, p.15-19.
●Yang, C. H.; Huang, Y. T.; Janes, C.; Lin, K. C. and Lu, T. H. (2008), “Belief in ghost month can help prevent drowning deaths: A natural experiment on the effects of cultural beliefs on risky behaviours.” Social Science & Medicine, vol.66, no.9, p.1990-1998.

指導教授

林子銘(Tzu-Ming Lin)

審核日期

2010-7-6

推文