以設計結構矩陣為基底之流程與分工結構圖整合機制

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：120

、訪客IP：18.116.62.45

姓名

鄧煥友(Whan-Yo Deng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

以設計結構矩陣為基底之流程與分工結構圖整合機制
(A DSM-based Approach to Integrating Process with WBS)

相關論文

★ 移動代理人監控系統之設計與實作	★ 以正規表式法為基礎之地理編碼服務設計與實作
★ Android應用程式開發之持續整合系統	★ 基於設計矩陣之需求追溯關係建立方法
★ 點對點移動代理人之設計與實作與於車資通訊之應用	★ 網頁內容叢集分類法之設計與實作
★ 設計與實作於行動裝置上以XUL為基礎之介面呈現	★ Android平台上以OSGi為基礎之服務遞送
★ 利用網頁內容結構之區塊擷取方法以呈現新聞服務	★ 設計與實作以感測器為中心的查詢機制
★ 針對路徑規劃服務之Web 2.0系統設計與實作	★ 整合OSGi與RESTful服務之BPEL引擎
★ 利用文件相似度以轉換網路內容為OSGi Bundles	★ 量測Java類別的耦合關係
★ 轉換Android應用程式為OSGi Service	★ 物聯網應用之Context塑模方法

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

在軟體開發的專案中，分工結構圖可以用來定義專案的範圍、預估專案成本與時程、協助專案監控，然而要制定一個完整專案的分工結構圖並不是一件簡單的事情，尤其分工結構圖的制定必須符合組織內部的標準流程，以組織內部標準流程為基準發展專案計劃提供較穩定的流程效能，否則容易發生專案預估超時或過短的情況進而導致專案失敗。設計結構矩陣的技術目前已廣泛應用在專案開發的系統分析上，應用範圍包含系統架構模組分析、人員規劃、專案流程規劃等，本研究希望能透過設計結構矩陣整合流程與分工結構圖，並協助專案經理人於以下兩點：
1. 流程轉分工結構圖：制訂分工結構圖時能主動參考組織內部的標準流程，以增加專案時程規劃的準確性。
2. 分工結構圖轉流程：將分工結構圖轉換成可執行工作流程定義語言，並利用工作流程引擎進行專案流程控管以增加專案執行的效率。

摘要(英)

In software development, project plans document scope, cost, effort, and schedule, guide project managers, and control project execution. Developing a project plan without incorporating how an organization doing things -- i.e., organizational culture -- may lead to project failure. To ensure stable process performance and to benefit from organizational culture, it is crucial that organizational processes be taken into account in project planning. Organizational processes enable stable process performance across an organization and provide a basis for cumulative, long-term benefits to the organization. In proposing a systematic approach that supports bi-directional transformation between processes and the work breakdown structure (WBS), we propose Process2WBS and WBS2Process to assist project managers in project planning with an organization’’s set of standard processes. Process2WBS consumes processes and transforms them into a WBS with design structure matrix (DSM) analysis, and WBS2Process transforms the WBS with project-specific information into executable processes expressed in XPDL.

關鍵字(中)

★ 流程管理
★ 專案管理
★ 設計結構矩陣
★ 專案規劃

關鍵字(英)

★ Project Planning
★ Process Management
★ and Design Structure Matrix
★ Project Management

論文目次

ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii
DEDICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v
TABLE OF CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi
LIST OF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii
LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix
CHAPTER
I INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
I.A Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
I.B Organization of the Dissertation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
II BACKGROUND WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
II.A Project Planning and Work Breakdown Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
II.B Design Structure Matrix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
II.C XML Process Definition Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
III INTEGRATING PROCESS WITH WBS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
III.A Process2WBS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
III.B WBS2Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
IV EXEMPLARY SCENARIO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
IV.A Process2WBS Scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
IV.B WBS2Process Scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
V RELATED WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
V.A Process and Project Integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
VI CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
VI.A A Summary of the Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
VI.B Future Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

參考文獻

[1] Application of the analytical design planning technique to construction project management. Project Manage. J., vol. 31, pp. 48V59, 2000.
[2] Innovation at the speed of information. in Harvard Bus. Rev., 2001, vol. 79, pp. 149 V158.
[3] Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). http://www.hyperthot.com/pm wbs.htm.
[4] XML Process Definition Language (XPDL). http://www.wfmc.org/xpdl.html.
[5] S. Austin, A. Baldwin, B. Li, and P. Waskett. Development of the adept methodology: An interim report on the link idac 100 project. Loughborough University, Dept. of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough, U. K., 1998.
[6] S. Austin, A. Baldwin, and A. Newton. A data flow model to plan and manage the building design process. J. Eng. Des., vol. 7, pp. 3V25, 1996.
[7] A. Bahrami. Integrated process management: from planning to work execution. In BSN ’05: Proceedings of the IEEE EEE05 international workshop on Business services networks, pages 11–11, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2005. IEEE Press.
[8] Booz, Allen, and Hamilton. Earned value management tutorial module 2: Work breakdown structure. Office of Project Assessment, Dec 2008.
[9] T. R. Browning. Modeling and analyzing cost, schedule, and performance in complex system product development. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Inst. Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1998.
[10] T. R. Browning. Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: A review and new directions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(3):292–306, August 2001.
[11] T. R. Browning and S. D. Eppinger. Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(4):428 – 442, November 2002.
[12] C. Bussler. Workflow instance scheduling with project management tools. In 9th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA’98), page 753, 1998.
[13] M. Carrascosa, S. D. Eppinger, and D. E. Whitney. Using the design structure matrix to estimate product development time. in Proc. ASME Des. Eng. Tech. Conf. (Design Automation Conf.), Atlanta, GA, 1998.
[14] S.-H. Cho and S. D. Eppinger. A simulation-based process model for managing complex design projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(3):316 – 328, August 2005.
[15] L. M. Chung and K. C. Chan. Integrating project planning and process modeling for software development. IEEE Workshop on Application-Specific Software Engineering and Technology, 0:276, 1999.
[16] P. J. Clarkson and J. R. Hamilton. ’Signposting’: A parameter-driven task-based model of the design process. Res. Eng. Des., vol. 12, pp. 18V38, 2000.
[17] M. Danilovic and T. R. Browning. Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices. International Journal of Project Management, 25(3):300–314, April 2007.
[18] M. L. Danilovic. Leadership and organization of integration in product development. Ph.D. dissertation, Linkopings Universitet, Linkoping, Sweden, 1999.
[19] M. Gnatz, M. Deubler, M. Meisinger, and A. Rausch. Towards an integration of process modeling and project planning. In 5th International Workshop on Software Process Simulation and Modeling (ProSim 2004), pages 22–31, 2004.
[20] G. T. Haugan. Effective Work Breakdown Structures. Management Concepts, 2001.
[21] P. Huovila, L. Koskela, L. Pietilainen, and V.-P. Tanhuanpaa. Use of the design structure matrix in construction. in 3rd Int. Workshop on Lean Construction, Albuquerque, NM, 1995.
[22] S. E. Institute. Cmmi for development version 1.2, Technical Report CMU/SEI-2006-TR-008, 2006.
[23] K. Kahkonen, V.-P. Tanhuanpaa, and S. Leino. Design process analysis, optimization and managementXA practical tool for the construction and engineering projects. VTT Building Technology, Finland, 1997.
[24] L. Koskela, G. Ballard, and V.-P. Tanhuanpaa. Toward lean design management. In 5th Annu. Conf. of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC-5), 1997.
[25] J. Lee and Y.-Y. Fanjiang. Modeling imprecise requirements with xml. Information and Software Technology, 45(7):445–460, May 2003.
[26] J. Lee and K.-H. Hsu. Modeling software architectures with goals in virtual university environment. Information and Software Technology, 44(6):361–380, April 2002.
[27] J. Lee, C.-L. Wu, W.-T. Lee, and K.-H. Hsu. Aspect-enhanced goal-driven sequence diagram. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25:712–732, 2010.
[28] J. Lee and N.-L. Xue. Analyzing user requirements by use cases: A goal-driven approach. IEEE Software, 16(4):92–101, July/August 1999.
[29] J. Lee, N.-L. Xue, and J.-Y. Kuo. Structuring requirements specifications with goals. Information and Software Technology, 43(2):121–135, February 2001.
[30] W.-T. Lee, W.-Y. Deng, J. Lee, and S.-J. Lee. Change impact analysis with a goal-driven traceability-based approach. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25:878–908, 2010.
[31] B. J. Makins and D. Miller. Web-based aerospace system evaluation software: The development and assessment of conceptual space missions. in Proc. 10th Annu. Int. Symp. of INCOSE, Minneapolis, MN, 2000, pp. 167V174.
[32] J. Malmstrom, P. Pikosz, and J. Malmqvist. The complementary roles of IDEF0 and DSM for the modeling of information management processes. Concurrent Eng.: Res. Applicat., vol. 7, pp. 95 V103, 1999.
[33] T.W. Malone, K. Crowston, J. Lee, and B. Pentland. Tools for inventing organizations: Toward a handbook of organizational processes. Technical report, March 1999.
[34] NASA (2001). NASA NPR 9501.2D., May 23 2001.
[35] M. Nour and J. Scanlan. Modeling and simulating product development process. in Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Concurrent Enterprising, Toulouse, France, 2000, pp. 111V118.
[36] Object Management Group. Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) 1.1. http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/1.1/PDF/.
[37] S. M. Osborne. Product development cycle time characterization through modeling of process iteration. M.S. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1993.
[38] C. Ouyang, M. Dumas, and A. H. M. T. Hofstede. Translating BPMN to BPEL.
[39] R. D. Pinkett. Product development process modeling and analysis digital wireless telephones. S.M. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1998.
[40] T. A. R. R. H. Ahmadi and R. H. Wang. Structuring product development processes. Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 130, pp. 539V558, 2001.
[41] R. A. Radice, N. K. Roth, A. C. O’Hara, Jr., and W. A. Ciarfella. A programming process architecture. 24(2):79–90, 1985.
[42] G. J. Rushton and A. Zakarian. Modular vehicle architectures: A systems approach. in 10th Annu. Int. Symp. of INCOSE, Minneapolis, MN, 2000, pp. 29V35.
[43] M. Sequeira. Use of the design structure matrix in the improvement of an automobile development process. M.S. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1991.
[44] D. V. Steward. Partitioning and tearing systems of equations. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics: Series B, Numerical Analysis, 2(2):345–365, 1965.
[45] D. V. Steward. The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 28:71–74, 1981.
[46] A. Thibault, A. Siadat, R. Bigot, and P. Martin. Proposal for product process integration using classification and rules. In EUROCON, 2007. The International Conference on ”Computer as a Tool”, pages 753 –758, 9-12 2007.
[47] Workflow Management Coalition. Workflow management coalition workflow standard - process definition interface – xml process definition language v2.0, 2005.
[48] A. A. Yassine, D. E. Whiteny, and T. Zambito. Assessment of rework probabilities for simulating product development processes using the design structure matrix (dsm). In Proc. ASME Design Eng. Tech. Conf., 2001, no DETC2001/DTM-21693.

指導教授

李允中(Jonathan Lee)

審核日期

2010-7-12

推文