於綠色供應鏈管理情境下使用預應環境策略公司之第三方物流供應商評選模型

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：18

、訪客IP：3.147.53.205

姓名

楊媖茹(Inn-zu Yang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

於綠色供應鏈管理情境下使用預應環境策略公司之第三方物流供應商評選模型
(A 3PL Provider Selection Model for Companies Adopting a Pro-Active Environmental Strategy in the Context of Green Supply Chain Management)

相關論文

★ 全球供應鏈下專業代工夥伴的管理模組與績效評估模組之因果關係的研究-- 以A公司為例	★ 以平衡計分卡的觀念及層級分析法所建立的相連部件供應商篩選模式– 個案研究
★ 接單式生產環境下之物料管控問題的探討 -- 以一牙科用鹵素燈生產業者為研究對象	★ 國際標準品質管理系統共同之關鍵成功因素對組織績效的影響
★ 工業安全衛生研究與探討-以高科技A公司作業流程為例	★ 推行六標準差品質管理系統之研究 -- 以A公司為例
★ 記憶體模組廠商進入小型記憶卡的產業競爭優勢之探討	★ 電子產品製造商成立模具中心之優劣分析—以A公司為研究對象
★ 臺灣筆記型電腦廠商績效分析	★ 設計協同機制導入過程及實施績效探討- 以 A 公司為例
★ JIT交貨看板電子化導入與應用方式之探討--以A公司為研究對象	★ 顧客關係管理關鍵影響因素之研究 - 以S公司為例
★ 供應商端綠色產品管理系統之研究--以國內主要鋁鎂合金件供應商(W科技公司)為例	★ 台灣IP安全監控產業之競爭優勢與策略建構-以A公司IP監控產品為例
★ 探討ERP系統導入後之組織績效－以A公司為對象分析	★ 拉式生產模式的物料管理資訊系統導入--以A公司為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

快速變化的市場動態使得企業希望他們的供應鏈能夠靈活反應，也能朝更永續、具環境意識的綠色供應鏈發展，除了為符合愈來愈嚴峻的環保法規外，也是希望藉由採取環境預應策略，把握形成競爭優勢的機會以領先市場上的主要競爭者。這些改變促使企業經理人必須重新思考目前的供應鏈策略、第三方物流提供者在改善企業流程與供應鏈過程之間所扮演的角色、企業與第三方物流服務提供者之間的關係，以及第三方物流供應商能從那些方面協助企業流程及供應鏈的綠化。
企業欲進行物流外包時會面對的問題之一即是缺乏具備有物流相關深入知識的人員與評選專家團隊的組成；同時，企業也對在評選第三方物流供應商時環境績效該占多大比重表示疑惑。然而，過去學者所提出之第三方物流供應商評選模式均只偏重評估供應商的基礎物流能力或是單單考量供應商的綠色績效。因此本研究希望能加強評量模式的完整性，兼顧第三方物流供應商的基礎能力與環境績效。企業可藉由評量模式的改變選出最佳第三方物流供應商，並同時提升綠色供應鏈績效。研究中利用文獻探討以及前測問卷施測結果分析篩選出相關之重要指標發展為評量模式。再以分析層級程序法(AHP)，藉由評估構面與準則的兩兩比較，取得綜合的評估概念以及指標的重要性排序，以建立一套針對在綠色供應鏈管理情境之下採行預應環境策略的公司所需要之第三方物流業者評估模式。
研究結果發現企業在評估第三方物流業者時，最重視的構面依序是一般物流公司考量、一般環境考量、協助使用者進行流程及供應鏈綠化的能力、長期關係、供應商之物流實務與企業之供應鏈結構的適配度、改善環境效率的能力；而流程與供應鏈改善的預期能力、綠色投資與採購則相對來說較不受到重視。在整體架構中，最重視的前十二項評估指標分別是，「服務品質」、「服務價格」、「ISO14000系列認證」、「執行逆向物流的能力」、「員工環境教育訓練」、「管理品質」、「全球物流能力」、「改善運輸及/或碼頭排程的能力」、「改善運輸效率」、「資訊系統能力」、「提供有效率的存貨管理服務」與「作業與遞送彈性」。最後，模擬企業在選擇物流供應商之情境，驗證本研究之評選模式在實務中是適用的。

摘要(英)

Changing market dynamics make shippers want responsive supply chains. They also want to create more sustainable, environmentally conscious supply chains with the aim of meeting stringent regulations and anticipating main competitors. These developments are prompting some executives to re-evaluate current supply chain strategies, the role 3PL provides, relationships with their 3PL providers, and how a 3PL provider could help customers with green supply chain initiatives.
However, the 3PL evaluation model suggested before seem to focus partially either on generic 3PL purchasing circumstances or on supplier’s environmental performance; therefore, important 3PL evaluation criteria for a supply chain perspective and the linkage between 3PL and green supply chain are identified through literature review and pre-test analysis and are modeled within a AHP decision-making framework.
This study concluded that the critical dimensions in evaluating 3PL providers for GSCM are enumerated as follows: general company considerations, general environmental considerations, capability to help with the greening of processes and supply chain, long-term relationship, fit between logistics practices and supply chain structure, capability to improve environmental efficiency; expected capability of process and supply chain improvement, green purchasing and investment are less valued by shippers, which manifests that although user respondents believe 3PL providers can help with the greening of processes and supply chain operations, and they are closely considering the strategic logistics services 3PL providers can offer, they still need to be shown that their 3PL providers have the capabilities and deep business expertise needed to move to the strategic partner level. The top 12 criteria are “quality of services”, “price of services”, “ISO 14000 certification”, “facilitating reverse logistics”, “environmental staff training”, “quality of management”, “global capabilities”, “improving transportation and/or docking scheduling”, “improving transportation efficiency”, “capable IT”, “providing efficient inventory management” and “flexibility in operations and delivery”.
Last, the results of the empirical validation show that the proposed 3PL evaluation model for GSCM is feasible in real-world practices.

關鍵字(中)

★ 分析層級程序法 (AHP)
★ 評選指標
★ 環境策略
★ 綠色供應鏈
★ 第三方物流

關鍵字(英)

★ evaluation criteria
★ Green Supply Chain
★ Third-Party Logistics
★ environmental strategies
★ Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

論文目次

ABSTRACT I
論文摘要 II
TABLE OF CONTENTS III
LIST OF FIGURES V
LIST OF TABLES VI
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 RESEARCH BACKGROUND 1
1.2 RESEARCH MOTIVES 3
1.3 RESEARCH PURPOSES 5
1.4 STRUCTURE 6
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 8
2.1 GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN 8
2.1.1 Supply Chain Management 8
2.1.2 Green supply chain 9
2.1.3 Green supply chain management 10
2.2 THIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS/ LOGISTICS OUTSOURCING 11
2.2.1 Logistics 11
2.2.2 Definition of Third-Party Logistics 13
2.2.3 Types of 3PL providers 14
2.2.4 The linkage between 3PL activities and GSC 20
2.3 CRITERIA CONSIDERED IN SELECTING 3PLS FOR GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT 22
2.3.1 Basic evaluation construct 23
2.3.2 Environmental criteria considered in selecting 3PL providers for companies developing a pro-active green strategy 36
2.4 METHODS OF EXAMINING CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES 52
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 57
3.1 PROCEDURES FOR CONSTRUCTING THE 3PL EVALUATION MODEL IN THE CONTEXT OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN 57
3.2 CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGY CLASSIFICATION AND PRELIMINARY SAMPLE SCREENING 58
3.3 THE MODEL FOR EVALUATING AND SELECTING 3PL PROVIDERS WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN 60
3.4 THE DEFINITIONS AND MEASURES OF EVALUATION DIMENSIONS AND CRITERIA 64
3.5 QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN AND SAMPLE SELECTION 74
3.6 METHODS AND TOOLS FOR DATA ANALYSIS 76
3.6.1 Data analysis methods 76
3.6.2 Data analysis tools 82
CHAPTER 4 ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION 84
4.1 ANALYSIS OF PRE-TEST SAMPLE STRUCTURE AND DATA 84
4.1.1 Characteristics of sample respondents 84
4.1.2 Data analysis of pre-test questionnaire 85
4.2 DATA ANALYSIS AND RESULTS OF AHP QUESTIONNAIRE 102
4.2.1 Characteristics of AHP expert respondents 102
4.2.2 Data analysis of AHP Expert questionnaire 104
4.3 DATA AND SAMPLE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS OF VALIDATION QUESTIONNAIRE 108
4.3.1 Characteristics of validation expert respondents 108
4.3.2 Elaboration of validation model 109
4.3.3 Results of model validation 110
4.3.4 3PL provider evaluation matrix for companies adopting a pro-active environmental strategy in the context of GSCM 113
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 115
5.1 CONCLUSIONS 116
5.2 SUGGESTIONS 119
5.3 RESEARCH LIMITATIONS AND FURTHER STUDIES 120
REFERENCES 125
APPENDIX I—PRE-TEST QUESTIONNAIRE 130
APPENDIX II—AHP QUESTIONNAIRE 137
APPENDIX III—VALIDATION QUESTIONNAIRE 151

參考文獻

1. Aghazadeh, S. (2003). How to choose an effective third party logistics provider. Management research news, 26(7), 50-58.
2. Andersson, D., & Norrman, A. (2002). Procurement of logistics services─a minutes work or a multi-year project? European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 8(1), 3-14.
3. Azzone, G., Bianchi, R., Mauri, R., & Noci, G. (1997). Defining operating environmental strategies: Programmes and plans within Italian industries. Environmental Management and Health, 8(1), 4-19.
4. Basu, R., & Wright, J. (2007). Total supply chain management: Butterworth Heinemann.
5. Bayazit, O. (2006). Use of analytic network process in vendor selection decisions. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 13(5), 566-579.
6. Bhushan, N., & Rai, K. (2004). Strategic decision making: applying the analytic hierarchy process: Springer Verlag.
7. Boyson, S., Corsi, T., Dresner, M., & Rabinovich, E. (1999). Managing effective third party logistics relationships: What does it take? Journal of Business Logistics, 20, 73-100.
8. Bradley, P. (1994). What really matters. Purchasing, 117(1), 66-71.
9. Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of marketing research, 16(1), 64-73.
10. Coyle, J. J., Langley, C. J., Gibson, B. J., Novack, R. A., & Bardi, E. J. (2009). Supply chain management: A logistics perspective (8th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
11. Dowlatshahi, S. (2000). Developing a theory of reverse logistics. Interfaces, 30(3), 143-155.
12. Dyer, J. (1996). Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry. Strategic management journal, 17(4), 271-291.
13. Dyer, J., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of management review, 23(4), 660-679.
14. Farley, G. (1997). Discovering supply chain management: a roundtable discussion. APICS-The Performance Advantage, 7(1), 38-39.
15. Fleischmann, M., Van Nunen, J. A. E. E., & Grave, B. (2003). Integrating closed-loop supply chains and spare-parts management at IBM. Interfaces, 33(6), 44-56.
16. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
17. Foster, T. (1999). Dot-com retailers give 3PLs their big chance. Logistics Management & Distribution Report, 38, 38.
18. Fujimoto, T., & Clark, K. (1995). Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry. Harvard Business School Press/Cambridge Ma.
19. Galbraith, J. (1977). Organizational design: Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
20. Ghodsypour, S., & O'brien, C. (1998). A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. International Journal of Production Economics, 56, 199-212.
21. Gol, H., & Catay, B. (2007). Third-party logistics provider selection: insights from a Turkish automotive company. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(6), 379-384.
22. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6 ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.
23. Handfield, R., Walton, S. V., Sroufe, R., & Melnyk, S. A. (2002). Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 141(1), 70-87.
24. Handfield, R. B., Walton, S., Seegers, L., & Melnyk, S. (1997). 'Green' value chain practices in the furniture industry. Journal of Operations Management, 15(4), 293-315.
25. Hertz, S., & Alfredsson, M. (2003). Strategic development of third party logistics providers. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(2), 139-149.
26. Humphreys, P., McIvor, R., & Chan, F. (2003a). Using case-based reasoning to evaluate supplier environmental management performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 25(2), 141-153.
27. Humphreys, P. K., Wong, Y. K., & Chan, F. T. S. (2003b). Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 138(1-3), 349-356.
28. Industrial Sustainable Development Clearinghouse. (2010). Retrieved December, 30, 2010, from http://proj.moeaidb.gov.tw/isdn/Norm/norm-more.asp?lLG2xMiemYJGe6W2x7qDyZ6Zkol=
29. Jharkharia, S., & Shankar, R. (2005). Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach. Omega, 35(3), 274-289.
30. Jones, A. P., & James, L. R. (1979). Psychological climate: Dimensions and relationships of individual and aggregated work environment perceptions. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 201-250.
31. Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ulukan, Z. (2003). Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management, 16(6), 382-394.
32. Kaiser, H. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
33. Kim, C., Yang, K., & Kim, J. (2008). A strategy for third-party logistics systems: A case analysis using the blue ocean strategy. Omega, 36(4), 522-534.
34. Klassen, R., & McLaughlin, C. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199-1214.
35. Kopicki, R., Berg, M., Legg, L., Dasappa, V., & Maggioni, C. (1993). Reuse and recycling: Reverse logistics opportunities. Council of Logistics Management, Oak Brook, IL.
36. Langley Jr, C., Newton, B., & Tyndall, G. (1999). Has the future of third-party logistics already arrived. Supply Chain Management Review, 5, 85¡V94.
37. Langley Jr., Albright, D., Morton, J., Wereldsma, D., Alf, M., Swaminathan, S., et al. (2009). The state of logistics outsourcing in 2009: Results and findings of the 14th annual study. The 14th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study.
38. Langley Jr., Hoemmken, S., van Dort, E., Morton, J., Strata, R., & Riegler, M. (2007). The state of logistics outsourcing in 2007: Results and findings of the 12th annual study. The 12th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study.
39. Langley Jr., C. J., Morton, J., Wereldsma, D., Swaninathan, S., Murphy, J., Deakins, T. A., et al. (2008). The state of logistics outsourcing in 2008: Results and findings of the 13th annual study. The 13th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study.
40. Leahy, S. E., Murphy, P. R., & Poist, R. E. (1995). Determinants of successful logistical relationships: A third-party provider perspective. Transportation Journal, 35(2), 5-13.
41. Liu, H., & Wang, W. (2009). An integrated fuzzy approach for provider evaluation and selection in third-party logistics. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 4387-4398.
42. Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores: Addison-Wesley Reading, MA.
43. Meade, L., & Sarkis, J. (2002). A conceptual model for selecting and evaluating third-party reverse logistics providers. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7(5), 283-295.
44. Menon, M., McGinnis, M., & Ackerman, K. (1998). Selection criteria for providers of third-party logistics services: An exploration study. Journal of Business Logistics, 19, 121-138.
45. Miles, L. (1984). Organization fit: Fit, failure and the hall of fame. California Management Review, 26, 10-28.
46. Millet, I., & Saaty, T. L. (2000). On the relativity of relative measures-accommodating both rank preservation and rank reversals in the AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 121(1), 205-212.
47. Nikbakhsh, E. (2009). Green supply chain management. Supply Chain and Logistics in National, International and Governmental Environment, 195-220.
48. Noci, G. (1997). Designing 'green' vendor rating systems for the assessment of a supplier's environmental performance. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 3(2), 103-114.
49. Nunnally, J. (1979). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
50. Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill
51. Porter, M., & Linde, C. (1999). Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate. Journal of Business Administration and Policy Analysis.
52. Porter, M., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
53. Prokesch, S. (2010). The Sustainable Supply Chain. Harvard Business Review, 88, 70-72.
54. Rabinovich, E., Windle, R., Dresner, M., & Corsi, T. (1999). Outsourcing of integrated logistics functions. Management, 29(6), 353-373.
55. Rao, P., & Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 25(9), 898-916.
56. Ravi, V., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. (2005). Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 48(2), 327-356.
57. Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Criteria for scale selection and evaluation. In Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
58, Rogers, D., & Tibben-Lembke, R. (1999). Going backwards: Reverse logistics trends and practices: University of Nevada, Reno, Center for Logistics Management, Reno.
59. Saaty, T., & Vargas, L. (1980). Hierarchical analysis of behavior in competition: Prediction in chess. Behavioral science, 25(3), 180-191.
60. Saaty, T. L. (1994). How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Interfaces, 24, 19-43.
61. Saaty, T. L. (2001). Decision making with dependence and feedback : The analytic network process : The organization and prioritization of complexity (2 ed.). Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
62. Sarkis, J. (1998). Evaluating environmentally conscious business practices. European Journal of Operational Research, 107(1), 159-174.
63. Selviaridis, K., & Spring, M. (2007). Third party logistics: a literature review and research agenda. Management, 18(1), 125-150.
64. Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (2003). Designing and managing the supply chain: Concepts, strategies, and case studies (2 ed.). Boston, Mass.: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
65. Sink, H., & Langley, C. (1997). A managerial framework for the acquisition of third-party logistics services. Journal of Business Logistics, 18, 163-190.
66. Srivastava, S. (2007). Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 53-80.
67. Stevenson, W. J. (2010). Operations Management (10th ed.). Taipai: McGraw-Hill.
68. Stock, G., Greis, N., & Kasarda, J. (2000). Enterprise logistics and supply chain structure: The role of fit. Journal of Operations Management, 18(5), 531-548.
69. Vaidyanathan, G. (2005). A framework for evaluating third-party logistics. Communications of the ACM, 48(1), 89-94.
70. Walton, S., Handfield, R., & Melnyk, S. (1998). The green supply chain: integrating suppliers into environmental management processes. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 34(2), 2-11.
71. Wilson, D. (1995). An integrated model of buyer-seller relationships. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 23(4), 335-345.
72. Winsemius, P., & Guntram, U. (1992). Responding to the environmental challenge. Business Horizons, 35(2), 12-20.
73. Wu, H., & Dunn, S. (1995). Environmentally responsible logistics systems. Management, 25(2), 20-38.
74. Zahedi, F. (1986). The analytic hierarchy process: A survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces, 96-108.
75. Zaltman, G., & Burger, P. (1975). Marketing research: Fundamentals and dynamics: Dryden Press.
76. Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265-289.
77. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2008). Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 261-273.

指導教授

何應欽(Ying-chin Ho)

審核日期

2011-1-20

推文