環境永續性與總量管理模式與系統之研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：27

、訪客IP：13.59.169.37

姓名

劉偉麟(Wei-lin Liu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

環境工程研究所

論文名稱

環境永續性與總量管理模式與系統之研究
(A Study on Environmental Sustainability and Total Quantity Management Model and System)

相關論文

★ 彩色濾光片生產線清潔生產之改善研究	★ 以離子交換法處理半導體廠氫氧化四甲基銨廢液之研究
★ 建立量測水位、MLSS濃度與SS濃度及污泥沉澱速度光學量測裝置之研究	★ 奈米晶相Fe(OH)3催化臭氧反應程序處理油煙VOCs之發展
★ 無塵室揮發性有機污染物防制對策的探討	★ 應用數位影像技術於廢水真色色度監測之研究
★ 污水處理廠操作最佳化之研究	★ 河川流域水土資源承載力與永續力評量模式之發展
★ 單槽連續進流回分式活性污泥系統微生物菌相之研究	★ 單槽連續進流回分式活性污泥系統溶氧控制之研究
★ 工業區廢水管理資訊系統之發展與建立－以觀音工業區為例	★ 河川流域水管理系統動力學模式之發展與建立
★ 連續流回分式活性污泥系統好氧相曝氣控制策略之研究-線上即時量測溶氧轉換率與需氧量方法之建立	★ 智慧型環境詞彙庫之發展與建置
★ 環境法規資料庫之發展與建置	★ 連續流循序批分式活性污泥系統好氧相即時曝氣控制策略之發展 — 低溶氧生物脫氮除磷程序控制技術之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

過去在追求環境永續性提升的方法通常是先進行對環境永續性之評估，再根據評估結果而先研擬政策或區域之整體性策略，最後再訂定政策或區域內各污染排放者與資源使用者之管理策略及行動計畫。然而此種分段式規劃方法缺乏系統性的考量，無法達到整體政策或區域的最大永續性。因此本研究之目的在於發展環境永續性與總量管理方法論與系統，以克服上述分段式規劃方法之缺點。本研究首先以系統思維(Systems thinking)、結果管理(Managing for Results)、系統分析(Systems analysis)等方法，發展環境永續性與總量管理體系架構，並結合驅動力─壓力─狀態─衝擊─回應(Driving force-Pressure-State-Impact-Response, DPSIR)架構，發展一套包括環境、社會、經濟三面向的指標系統，此一指標系統乃是依據DPSIR關係而用於發展環境永續性與總量管理模式，以同時評估與計算得到最大之永續性，代表促進永續發展之效益。本研究同時根據系統層級性，發展出以物件鏈結三個決策層之多階段多選擇概念模式架構，以發展出雙重界限(目標值與限制值)隱式列舉法(Enumeration of Multiple Bounds for Objectives and Constraints, EMBOC)之求解演算法，而解決同時擬定整體管理策略與個別污染者/使用者管理策略之複雜問題。本研究並根據上述體系架構與模式，以Visual Basic、地理資訊系統(Geographic Information System, GIS)、MS Excel軟體，發展環境永續性與總量管理雛型系統。本研究以我國高爾夫球場設置政策以及中壢工業區為案例研究對象，不但可得到上述政策及工業區之最大永續值，同時可以得到最佳策略下的高爾夫球場設置總量、各高爾夫球場之污染防治/資源調配管理策略，以及工業區整體污染排放/資源使用總量、區內所有工廠之污染排放/資源使用量等。研究結果顯示，本研究所提出之方法論與雛型系統，初步能夠有效協助主管機關以系統化的方法研擬出政策與工業區管理之策略與行動計畫，以追求提昇政策與工業區之永續性。

摘要(英)

The methods for promoting the environmental sustainability are usually to assess the environmental sustainability at first. Then, the integral strategy for a policy or a region is generated based on the assessment results. The management strategy and action plan for each pollution discharger and resource user are devised according to the integral strategy at last. However, this separately planning method lacks of systematical considerations. Achieving the maximal sustainability of a policy or a region is difficult. The purpose of this study is to develop an environmental sustainability and total quantity management methodology and system. This study uses the methods of systems thinking, managing for results (MFRs), and systems analysis to develop an environmental sustainability and total quantity management framework. An indicator system, which involves environmental, social, and economic phases, is devised based on this framework and the driving force-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) framework. This indicator system is integrated into an optimization model based on its DPSIR relationships to simultaneously assess and obtain the maximal sustainability, meaning the effectiveness of moving toward sustainable development. A conceptual multiple-stage-option model framework is developed, which uses the concept of object to link the multiple decision layers based on the thinking in hierarchy of system structure. The enumeration of multiple bounds for objectives and constraints (EMBOC) is developed to devise the optimization model to simultaneously generate the strategies for the integral region and the individual source of pollution discharge and resource use. This study develops a prototype system for environmental sustainability and total quantity management (ESTQMS) using Visual Basic, geographic information system (GIS), and MS Excel. The golf course installation policy and the Jhongli Industrial Park in Taiwan are used as case studies. The optimal sustainability of this policy and this industrial park can be obtained. Furthermore, the total quantities of golf courses, the management strategies for pollution control and resource allocation of each golf course, the total quantities of pollution discharges and resource uses of this industrial park, and the quantities of pollution discharges and resource uses of each manufactory can be obtained together. Analytical results indicated that the proposed methodology and prototype system can be preliminary used to assist the authorities to effectively and systematically generate the strategies and action plans for policy and industrial park management while simultaneously pursuing their optimal sustainability.

關鍵字(中)

★ 總量管理
★ 環境永續性
★ 驅動力壓力狀態衝擊回應
★ 系統分析
★ 結果管理
★ 系統思維
★ 雙重界限隱式列舉法

關鍵字(英)

★ systems thinking
★ managing for results (MFRs)
★ systems analysis
★ driving force-pressure-state-impact-response (DP
★ environmental sustainability
★ total quantities of pollution discharge and reso
★ enumeration of multiple bounds for objectives an

論文目次

摘要 ........................................................................................................................... i
誌謝 ........................................................................................................................... v
目錄 ........................................................................................................................... vii
圖目錄........................................................................................................................... ix
表目錄........................................................................................................................... xii
第一章研究緣起與目的............................................................................................. 1
第二章文獻回顧......................................................................................................... 5
2.1 環境永續性評估............................................................................................ 5
2.2 策略性環境評估............................................................................................ 13
2.3 環境承載力.................................................................................................... 18
2.4 總量管理........................................................................................................ 21
2.5 系統思維、系統分析與結果管理於環境管理之應用................................ 23
第三章研究方法論
3.1 環境永續性與總量之管理體系架構............................................................ 29
3.2 問題了解與系統界定.................................................................................... 36
3.3 環境永續性之評估........................................................................................ 46
3.4 環境永續性及總量之管理策略規劃............................................................ 52
3.5 環境永續性及總量管理之執行與績效管制................................................ 58
第四章環境永續性與總量管理模式之發展............................................................. 67
4.1 環境永續性與總量管理模式發展概念........................................................ 67
4.2 高爾夫球場設置政策之環境永續性與總量管理模式................................ 67
4.3 工業區管理之環境永續性與總量管理模式................................................ 79
第五章環境永續性與總量管理雛型系統之發展..................................................... 97
5.1 環境永續性評估子系統................................................................................. 100
5.2 永續環境管理策略規劃子系統..................................................................... 100
5.3 對工廠總量管理子系統................................................................................. 113
5.4 績效管理子系統............................................................................................ 116
第六章案例研究......................................................................................................... 119
6.1 高爾夫球場設置政策之案例........................................................................ 119
6.2 工業區管理之案例........................................................................................ 148
第七章結論與建議..................................................................................................... 173
7.1 結論................................................................................................................. 173
7.2 建議................................................................................................................. 175
參考文獻....................................................................................................................... 177
附錄一環境永續性指標計算式及標準化............................................................... 183
附錄二環境永續性指標之DPSIR 動力關係 ......................................................... 271

參考文獻

1. Al-Muzaini, S., 1998, Industrial wastewater management in Kuwait. Desalination, 115, 57-62.
2. Badawy, M.I., Ali, M.E.M., 2006, Fenton’s pre-oxidation and coagulation processes for the treatment of combined industrial and domestic wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, B136, 961-966.
3. Bass, L., 1998, “Cleaner production and industrial ecosystems, a Dutch experience”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 6, 189-197.
4. Belmonte, A.C., Gonzalez, J.M., Mayorga, A.V., and Fernandez, S.C., 1999, “GIS tools applied to the sustainable management of water resources: Application to the aquifer system 08-29”, Agricultural Water Management, 40, 207-220.
5. Cabrera, C., M.C. Ldpez, C. Gallego, M.L. Lorenzo, E. Lillo, 1995 , Lead contamination levels in potable, irrigation and waste waters from an industrial area in Southern Spain. Science of the Total Environment, 159, 17-21.
6. Carlson, R. and Palsson, A.C., 2001, “Industrial environmental information management for technical systems”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 9, 429–435.
7. Cape Charles, 2004, http://www.sustainablepark.com/incentives.html, Cape Charles Sustainable Technology Park.
8. Carrer, S., Leardi, R., 2006, Characterizing the pollution produced by an industrial area Chemometric methods applied to the Lagoon of Venice. Science of the Total Environment, 370, 99~116.
9. Chen, C. H., Liaw, S. L., Wu, R. S., Chen, Q. L., and Chen, J. L., 1997, “Development of a Decision Making Theory and a Decision Support System for River Basin Water Management,” Proceedings of the National Science Council, R.O.C., Part A, Physical science and engineering, 21(5), 389-409.
10. Chen, C. H., Wu, R. S., Liaw, S. L., Sue, W. R., and Chiou, I. J., 2000, “A Study of Water-Land Environment Carrying Capacity for a River Basin,” Water Science and Technology, 42(3-4), 389-396.
11. Chen, C. H., Liu, W. L., Liaw, S. L., and C. H. Yu, 2005a, “Development of a Dynamic Strategy Planning Theory and System for Sustainable River Basin Land Use Management,” Science of the Total Environment, 346, 17-37.
12. Chen, C. H., Liu, W. L., and C. H. Chen, 2005b, “Development of a Multiple Objective Planning Theory and System for Sustainable Air Quality Monitoring Networks,” Science of the Total Environment, 354, 1-19.
13. Chen, C. H., W. L. Liu, and H. G. Leu, 2006a, “Sustainable Water Quality Management Framework and a Strategy Planning System for a River Basin”, Environmental Management, Vol. 38, pp. 952-973.
14. Chen, C. H., W. L. Liu, and S. L. Liaw, 2006b, “Development of an integrated assessment and management model for environmental sustainability, carry capacity, and total quantity,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 111-127.
15. Chen, C. H., W. L. Liu, S. Y. Yuan, J. H. Liu, and J. D. Wang, 2007a, “Development of Management Framework and Evaluation Indicators for Environmental Pollution Control after Natural Disaster”, Proceeding CD of the 2nd International Conference on Urban Disaster Reduction, Poster Session-1, No.18, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC, November 27-29.
16. Chen, C. H., W. L. Liu, I. J, Chiou, and F. C. Huang, 2007b, “Development and Application of Concepts and Methods of Systems Thinking and Systems Analysis on Environmental Problem”, 2007年台灣環境資源永續發展研討會光碟論文集，pp. 3-78 ~ 3-105，台灣環境資源永續發展協會，中央大學，桃園縣。
17. Chen, C. H., and I. J. Chiou, 2008, “Remediation of Heavy-metal-contaminated Farm Soil Using Turnover and Attenuation Method Guided with a Sustainable Management Framework”, Environmental Engineering Science, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 20-41.
18. Chen, C. H., R. S. Wu, W. L. Liu, W. R. Sue, and Y. M. Chang, (2009) “Development of a Methodology for Strategic Environmental Assessment: Application to the Assessment of Golf Course Installation Policy in Taiwan”, Environmental Management, Vol. 43, pp. 166-188. (Ncpfs-Fac-089-001, NSC-94-2621-Z-253-001 and NSC-95-2621-Z-253-001)
19. Chen, C. H., W. L. Liu, and S. L. Liaw. 2011. Integrated dynamic policy management methodology and system for Strategic Environmental Assessment of golf course installation policy in Taiwan, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 31, pp. 66-76. (NSC-94-2621-Z-253-001 and NSC-95-2621-Z-253-001).
20. Chen, L. H., Lee, C. Y., 2002, “Urban Regeneration－Industrial Estate Redevelopment in the UK,” 2002工業區永續經營機制國際研討會，台南。
21. Drucker, P., 1964, Managing for Results, Harper and Row, NY, USA.
22. Esty, D. C., M. Levy, T. Srebotnjak, and A. D. Sherbinin, 2005, 2005 Environmental Sustainability Index: Benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship, New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy.
23. European Union, http://europa.eu/index_en.htm。
24. European Environment Agency (EEA), 1999, Environmental indicators: Typology and overview, Copenhagen, Denmark.
25. Farla, J., Blok, K., Schipper, L., 1997. “Energy efficiency developments in the pulp and paper industry”. Energy Policy 25 (7-9), pp.745-758.
26. Hsieh, L.T., Yang, H.H., and Chen, H.W., 2006, Ambient BTEX and MTBE in the neighborhoods of different industrial parks in Southern Taiwan, Journal of Hazardous Materials, A128, 106–115.
27. Hogland, W. and Stenis, J., 2000, “Assessment and system analysis of industrial waste management”, Waste Management, 20, 537-543.
28. Maryland State Government, 1997, Managing for Results Guidebook, Maryland State Government.
29. Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs of Syracuse University, 2002, Paths to Performance in State and Local Government, Syracuse University, NY, USA.
30. Nanduri, M., J. Nyboer, M. Jaccard, 2002, “Aggregating physical intensity indicators: results of applying the composite indicator approach to the Canadian industrial sector.” Energy Policy 30, pp.151-163.
31. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 1993, OECD Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews, OECD, Paris, France.
32. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 1997, In Search of Results: Performance Management Practices, OECD, Paris, France.
33. Perkins, R.M. and Xiang, W.N., 2006, “Building a geographic info-structure for sustainable development planning on a small island developing state”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 78, 353–361.
34. Phylipsen, G.J.M., Blok, K., Worrell, E., 1997. “International comparisons of energy efficiency methodologies for the manufacturing industry.” Energy Policy 25 (7-9), pp.715-725.
35. Phylipsen, G.J.M, K. Blok, and E. Worrell, 1998, Handbook on International Comparisons of Energy Efficiency in the Manufacturing Industry, Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University.
36. Saaty, T. L. 2003. Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary? European Journal of Operational Research, 145, 85-91.
37. Saaty, T. L. 2006. Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 168, 557-570.
38. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Sustainable Development，2006，http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/index.html。
39. United Nations Division for Sustainable Development (UNDSD), 2001, Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies, United Nations, New York, USA.
40. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2002, Managing for Improved Results, USEPA, Washington DC, USA.
41. United States General Accounting Office (USGAO), 1997, Managing for Results: Using the Results Act to Address Mission Fragmentation and Program Overlap, USGAO, Washington DC, USA.
42. United States General Accounting Office (USGAO), 2001, Environmental Protection Agency: Status of Achieving Key Outcomes and Addressing Major Management Challenges, USGAO, Washington DC, USA.
43. Vanderhaegena M., and Murob, E., 2005, “Contribution of a European spatial data infrastructure to the effectiveness of EIA and SEA studies,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25, 123-142.
44. Yang, P.P. and Lay, O.B., 2004, “Applying ecosystem concepts to the planning of industrial areas: a case study of Singapore’s Jurong Island”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 12, 1011–1023.
45. 于秀娟，2003，工業與生態，北京環境科學與工程出版中心。
46. 孔憲法、鍾國輝、游振偉，2002，「台灣地區工業區永續經營指標系統」，2002工業區永續經營機制國際研討會，台南。
47. 行政院國家永續發展委員會，2004，台灣二十一世紀議程國家永續發展願景與策略綱領，行政院國家永續發展委員會，台北。
48. 行政院環境保護署，2005，國家環境保護計畫，行政院環境保護署，台北。
49. 吳銘峰，2003，「製造業能源效率指標的台灣實證研究」，碩士論文，台北大學，台北。
50. 周金柱，2007，系統思維組織管理評鑑制度之研究，博士論文，國立中央大學，中壢。
51. 施心皓，2002，「生態效益應用於生態化工業區之績效評估研究」，碩士論文，南華大學，嘉義。
52. 洪國郎，2005，「地區性產業園區永續發展策略的探討－以安平工業區為例」，碩士論文，立德管理學院，台南。
53. 財團法人工業技術研究院，2002，工業區產業資源永續經營推動策略計畫，經濟部工業局九十一年度專案執行成果報告，財團法人工業技術研究院。
54. 張添晉，2007，工業區生態化指標建立及環境績效評估，產業鏈結及園區生態化訓練講義，行政院環境保護署，台北。
55. 許志義，1996，「汽電共生系統在工業區內直接供電之可行性探討」，台灣銀行季刊，47卷4期，頁164-190，台北。
56. 許和鈞，2002，我國環境績效評估指標之建立暨資料庫系統之整合（I），行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告，國立交通大學，新竹。
57. 陳仁仲，2002，「工業區效率用水管理系統技術發展」，永續產業發展雙月刊，第4期，頁61-70，台北。
58. 陳慶和、廖述良、林裕彬、童慶斌、葉欣誠、劉偉麟、葛賢台、簡坤晃、劉家福、盧麒承、彭存偉、曾偉桓、李訓謙等，2006，環境承載力、累積性衝擊評量及政策環評與總量管制之相關性研究—子計畫四：環境永續性評價與管理：廢棄物與空氣資源面向環境承載力、累積性衝擊評量及政策環評與總量管制之相關性研究(II)，國科會研究報告，南亞技術學院，中壢。
59. 陳慶和、劉偉麟、張民忠、王主一，2007，「環境承載力、累積性衝擊評量及政策環評與總量管制之相關性研究─子計畫四：環境永續性評價與管理：廢棄物與空氣資源面向環境承載力、累積性衝擊評量及政策環評與總量管制之相關性研究(III)」，行政院國科會研究計畫報告(NSC-95-2621-Z-253-001)，南亞技術學院，中壢。
60. 陳慶和、劉偉麟、王主一、許瑞芬、杜天龍、陳佳瑩、余任鎧，(2008)，「永續環境政策之規劃與設計：永續環境管理機制與支援決策工具之發展-工業區尺度、空氣資源與廢棄物面向(I)」，行政院國科會研究計畫報告(NSC-96-2621-Z-253-001)，南亞技術學院，中壢。
61. 陳慶和、劉偉麟、曾錦良、許瑞芬、杜天龍、陳佳瑩、余任鎧、王藝潔、邱芳儀，(2009)，「永續環境政策之規劃與設計：永續環境管理機制與支援決策工具之發展 - 工業區尺度（II）」，行政院國科會研究計畫報告(NSC-97-2621-M-253-001)，南亞技術學院，中壢。
62. 陳慶和、劉偉麟、曾錦良、胡嫻筠、林嘉玲、王藝潔、邱芳儀，(2010)，「工業區永續環境管理系統發展之研究」，行政院國科會研究計畫報告(NSC-98-2221-E-152 -003)，國立台北教育大學，台北。
63. 陳禮樂，2001，「台灣地區工業區環境永續發展評估體系與綜合指標研究」，碩士論文，文化大學，台北。
64. 曾柏霜，2003，「工業區污水廠處理水再利用效益評估-以台南科技工業區為例」，碩士論文，立德管理學院，台南。
65. 經濟部工業局，http://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/portal/index.jsp。
66. 經濟部工業局工業廢棄物清除處理輔導資訊網，http://proj.moeaidb.gov.tw/iwcta/index.asp。
67. 經濟部工業局資源化工業網，http://proj.moeaidb.gov.tw/riw/index.asp。
68. 廖述良，2006，環境系統分析，課程講義，國立中央大學，中壢。
69. 蔣本基，2007，建立生態化工業區及促進產業生態化-工具及規劃，產業鏈結及園區生態化訓練講義，行政院環境保護署，台北。
70. 蔣本基、張怡怡、顏有利等，2007，桃園縣既有工業區生態化推動策略計畫，桃園縣政府環境保護局委託研究計畫，國立台灣大學嚴慶齡工業發展基金會合設工業研究中心，台北。
71. 鍾國輝、孔憲法，2000，「生態工業園區（EIP）概念發展之探討」，中華民國建築學會第十二屆建築研究成果發表會論文集。

指導教授

廖述良、陳慶和
(Shu-liang Liaw、Ching-ho Chen)

審核日期

2011-7-28

推文