| 摘要(英) |
People concern more about the traffic safety as the living quality is getting better. Speeding is always a main reason of most traffic accidents. We need a more effective way to control the speed. This article will discuss mostly about how different traffic signs result in different speeds.
First experiment, drivers are driving in an urban alley that is total 10 meters width. And set five different traffic signs (Stop, Make way, Yellow flash light, Red flash light and None) on the intersection with different opposite vehicles(car and bikers). And the dangerous car comes from the right side or left side on the intersection. By those factors of this experiment, we get 25 missions on each intersection with random order. The result shows that all the four traffic signs could make the driver slow down their speed. Compare with none any sign, the sequence of effective in those traffic signs: Red flash light (slow down 16.02%), Stop (13.32%), Make Way (9.82%) and Yellow flash light (8.87%). Any kind of traffic sign will not influence the drivers’ lateral stability. The drivers who can remember the signs they saw in the experiments will have less traffic accidents than the ones who cannot remember the signs. Often, compare with cars, scooters that come from the opposite lead to less crisis awareness to the drivers.
Second experiment, drivers are driving in an urban road that is two fast lanes and one slow lane, and keep driving in the middle lane. Set 12 different traffic sign or reduce speed marking on each road section to test the effect of the driver. The result shows that the reduce speed marking could remind drivers to notice their velocity, and drivers will decrease their velocity when they are approaching intersection. When they are approaching a traffic sign, they will also decrease velocity lightly to read information. The sign that could easily be read will be more effect on drivers. And we see no significant reaction from the drivers when their velocities are under the speed limited.
When drivers are faster than the limited speed, they will have bigger response to the traffic facilities. That means these facilities could reduce speeding effectively. By the different response of each facility, we can set the most effective facilities to different crisis awareness of road section or intersection. For example, set the Red Flash Light or Stop on the hyper-dangerous intersection. And set the reduce speed marking on the road section that drivers often speeding.
Keyword: Speed Management, Reduce Speed Marking, Sign, Drive Simulator
|
| 參考文獻 |
1. 內政部警政署，98年道路交通事故統計，上網日期：民國100年5月，網址：http://www.npa.gov.tw/NPAGip/wSite/ct?xItem=42038&ctNode=12593&mp=1
2. 教育部交通安全教育網，汽車安全駕駛手冊，上網日期:民國100年5月，網址: http://content.edu.tw/primary/traffic/tn_dg/driver01-4.htm
3. Global Road Safety Partnership, Speed Management, Retrieved: June 20, 2011, from: http://www.grsproadsafety.org/page-good_practice-347.html?gp_id=2
4. Honda，ドライビングシミュレーターの歴史，上網日期:民國100年5月，網址:http://www.honda.co.jp/simulator/history/driving_02.html
5. VTI, simulator III, Retrieved: June 20, 2011, from:http://www.vti.se/templates/Page____11861.aspx
6. Toyota, Driving Simulator, Retrieved: June 20, 2011, from:http://www.toyota-global.com/innovation/safety_technology_quality/safety_measurements/driving_simulator.html
7. The University of Iowa, The National Advanced Driving Simulator, Retrieved: June 20, 2011, from:http://www.nads-sc.uiowa.edu/
8. University of Leeds, University of Leeds Driving Simulator, Retrieved: June 20, 2011, from:http://www.its.leeds.ac.uk/research/facilities/uolds/
9. 交通部運輸研究所，運輸安全組暨駕駛模擬器實驗室，上網日期:民國100年5月，網址:http://210.69.172.5/ct.asp?xItem=117508&ctNode=1045&mp=1
10. Bhagwant, N. P., Richard, A. R. & Craig, A. L., “Crash reduction following installation of centerline rumble strips on rural two-lane roads”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(6), 1073–1079, 2004.
11. Mikko, R., “Effects of a rumble strip barrier line on lane keeping in a curve”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37(3), 575–581, 2005.
12. Kattan, L., Tay, R. & Acharjee, S., “Managing speed at school and playground zones”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(5), 1887-1891, 2011.
13. Massimiliano, P. & Silvano, A., “Do speed bumps really decrease traffic speed? An Italian experience”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 33(5), 585–597, 2001.
14. Tay, R. & De Barros, A., “Effectiveness of Road Safety Messages on Variable Message Signs”, Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 10(3), 18-23, 2010.
15. Pirkko, R. & Risto, K., “Effects of variable message signs for slippery road conditions on driving speed and headways”, Transportation Research Part F, 3(2), 85-94, 2000.
16. Cornelie J. G. van Driel, Ragnhild J. Davidse & Martin F. A. M. van Maarseveen,”The effects of an edgeline on speed and lateral position: a meta-analysis”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(4), 671–682, 2004.
17. Jamson, S., Lai, F. & Jamson, H., “Driving simulators for robust comparisons: A case study evaluating road safety engineering treatments”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(3), 961–971, 2010.
18. Francesco, G., Filomena, M., Alfonso, M., Mariano, P., Massimo, A. & Antonio, D., “Traffic calming along rural highways crossing small urban communities: Driving simulator experiment”, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(6), 1585–1594, 2010.
19. Roskam, A. J., Brookhuis, K. A., De Waard, D., Carsten, O. M. J., Read, L., Jamson, S., et al. “Development of Experimental Protocol”, HASTE Project No. GRD1/2000/25361 S12.319626, 2002.
20. 丁秉煌，"駕駛模擬儀之開發驗證及應用於駕駛疲勞之研究"，國立中央大學機械工程研究所，博士論文，民國九十七年六月。
21. 張順惠，"應用駕駛績效預測車輛碰撞風險之研究"，國立中央大學機械工程研究所，博士論文，民國九十八年六月。
22. 蘇育賢，"虛擬實境在駕駛行為之研究與應用"，國立中央大學機械工程研究所，碩士論文，民國九十一年六月。
|
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit