| 姓名 |
鄒春旺(Chun-wang Tsou)
查詢紙本館藏 |
畢業系所 |
環境工程研究所在職專班 |
| 論文名稱 |
限用物質對漆包線產業影響探討
(The exploration and impact of restricted substance to enameled wire industry.)
|
| 相關論文 | |
| 檔案 |
 [Endnote RIS 格式]
[Bibtex 格式]
 [相關文章]  [文章引用]  [完整記錄]  [館藏目錄]  [檢視] [下載]- 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
- 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
- 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。
|
| 摘要(中) |
摘 要
國際間綠色產品發展趨勢與歐盟RoHS與REACH環境危害限用物質管制法規實施，造成企業營運相當的衝擊與影響。企業藉由綠色供應鏈管理與綠色產品管理系統推動，迎接綠色產品挑戰要求，已是當今企業面臨最重要的課題。
本研究以廣泛使用於電子電機產品零組件的漆包線為對象，探討限用物質管制要求對企業所造成的影響，目的在確認漆包線業界面臨限用物質管制要求時所產生的問題及所需要之協助，尋求較佳的管理模式面對這不可抵擋的綠色衝擊。研究結果顯示，漆包線產業面對RoHS指令與REACH法規要求的限用物質管制，都已被供應鏈客戶端要求進行限用物質管制，並且企業因應限用物質管制都有不同程度的瞭解與採取不同的因應措施，積極應對的廠商採取的方法為加入SONY公司Green Partner之綠色供應鏈體系或是導入IECQ HSPM QC080000無有害物質管理系統，未積極應對的廠商也採取於原有ISO 14001環境管理系統或是ISO 9001品質管理系統，再加以強化限用物質管制內容。由平衡計分卡展開的企業經營視角研究發現，平衡計分卡四大構面中漆包線產業以內部流程構面之資源投入最多，所得到的管理績效也最佳，展開之細部評量指標則以企業內部流程構面之創新流程、生產流程與顧客構面之夥伴關係與配合能力表現較佳，顯示漆包線產業在平衡計分卡內部流程改善與配合顧客要求議題上，因應情形表現良好。
本研究建議企業面對限用物質管制的挑戰，企業可以採取推行IECQ HSPM QC080000或SONY Green Partner等綠色產品管理系統、要求供應商建立內部限用管制物質管理規範，或是要求供應商加入公司綠色供應鏈夥伴組織之方式強化公司對限用物質管制之能力。
關鍵詞：RoHS、REACH、限用物質、綠色供應鏈、IECQ HSPM QC080000、綠色產品、平衡計分卡、漆包線產業
|
| 摘要(英) |
Abstract
With the ever-increasing demands on electrical and electronic products and short life cycles of these products, it is imperative that these products possess minimum risk to human health and the environment during their life cycle. The Restriction of the use of Hazardous Substances Directive of the European Union, RoSH, aims to limit the amount of six hazardous substances used in the manufacturing of many electrical and electronic products. Starting from July 1st 2006, electrical and electronic equipment producers are required to provide document proving that their products are compliant with RoSH.
Enameled wire is used in applications such as winding electric motor coils, transformers, electromagnets and inductors. Almost all electrical and electronic equipment contains components made of enameled wire. Most of the enameled wire use polymer resins as coating material, which makes it a possible candidate of RoSH requirements. This research attempts to analyze the compliance status and approach, taken or to be taken, of enameled wire manufacturers toward RoSH requirements.
A questionnaire survey was utilized to collect the information of the responding enameled wire manufacturers located in Taiwan, Mainland China and Southeast Asia. Questions based on the four perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard such as financial, customer, learning and growth, and internal business processes were designed to evaluate a company’s attitude and implementation strategy concerning RoSH or green supply chain. The survey results were checked for validity and reliability before being processed using SPSS software.
The results from this research show that the enameled wire manufacturers are subjected to the restriction of the use of hazardous substances arising from the green supply chain requirements. The survey results reveal that the enameled wire manufacturers have different levels of knowledge and understanding of RoSH. Proactive organizations have responded to the EU Directive by participating in the green supply chain of Sony’s Green Partner or by adopting IECQ HSPM QC080000, which applies a systems approach in managing restricted substances. A number of the enameled wire producing companies have expanded their existing ISO 14001 environmental management system or ISO 9001 quality management system to meet RoSH requirements. This research has found that the most proactive companies in the enameled wire business have invested resources in upgrading their internal processes. Results from the Balanced Scorecard illustrate that customers’ demands have the greatest impact on enameled wire manufacturers’ willingness to improve their internal processes.
This research recommends that when facing the challenges of restricted substances control, enameled wire manufacturers should adopt the systems approach such as IECQ HSPM QC080000 or should join the Sony Green Partner program. Manufacturers should also request their suppliers to set up their internal restricted substances control program or request the suppliers to become part of the green supply chain in order to strengthen their restricted substances control capability.
Keywords: RoHS, REACH, Green Supply Chain, IECQ HSPM QC080000, Green Product, Balanced Scorecard, Enameled Wire
|
| 關鍵字(中) |
★ IECQ HSPM QC080000
★ 限用物質
★ 綠色供應鏈
★ 綠色產品
★ REACH
★ RoHS
★ 平衡計分卡
★ 漆包線產業 |
關鍵字(英) |
★ REACH
★ IECQ HSPM QC080000
★ Green Supply Chain
★ Green Product
★ Balanced Scorecard
★ Enameled Wire
★ RoHS |
| 論文目次 |
目 錄
頁次
中文摘要 .............................................................................................................. i
英文摘要 ............................................................................................................... ii
誌謝 ................................................................................................................... iv
目錄 .................................................................................................................... v
圖目錄 ................................................................................................................ ix
表目錄 ................................................................................................................. x
第一章 緒論.................................................................................................... 1
1.1 研究背景與動機...................................................................................... 1
1.2 研究目的與範圍...................................................................................... 2
1.2.1 研究目的................................................................................................. 2
1.2.2 研究範圍................................................................................................. 3
1.3 研究方法與流程...................................................................................... 3
1.3.1 研究方法................................................................................................. 3
1.3.2 研究架構................................................................................................. 4
第二章 文獻探討............................................................................................. 5
2.1 漆包線產業介紹...................................................................................... 5
2.1.1 漆包線產業............................................................................................. 5
2.1.2 漆包線與限用物質之關係.................................................................... 8
2.2 限用物質管理法令法規現況.................................................................. 8
2.2.1 RoHS與WEEE指令立法背景.................................................................. 8
2.2.2 RoHS與WEEE指令簡介........................................................................... 9
2.2.3 RoHS相關國際法令比較........................................................................ 13
2.2.4 REACH法規介紹................................................................................... 17
2.2.5 限制物質國際大廠綠色採購標準....................................................... 21
2.3 綠色供應鏈與綠色採購管理體系........................................................ 22
2.3.1 供應鏈的定義與供應鏈管理............................................................... 22
2.3.2 綠色供應鏈管理................................................................................... 23
2.3.3 綠色採購............................................................................................... 25
2.3.4 綠色產品............................................................................................... 27
2.3.5 綠色產品管理系統............................................................................... 27
第三章 研究方法........................................................................................... 30
3.1 研究流程與架構.................................................................................... 30
3.2 研究方法與評量模式............................................................................ 32
3.2.1 平衡計分卡介紹................................................................................... 33
3.3.2 問卷的形式與計分............................................................................... 35
3.3 問項及問卷設計.................................................................................... 36
3.4 資料處理................................................................................................ 39
3.4.1 效度及信度........................................................................................... 39
3.4.2 敘述統計............................................................................................... 40
3.4.3 相關分析............................................................................................... 41
3.4.4 單因子變異數分析............................................................................... 41
3.5 研究限制................................................................................................ 42
第四章 結果與討論...................................................................................... 43
4.1 研究企業及個人基本資料.................................................................... 43
4.2 企業對於限用物質管制執行情形........................................................ 48
4.2.1 信度分析............................................................................................... 48
4.2.2 限用物質管制執行情形研究變項描述性統計分析........................... 49
4.2.2.1 限用物質管制執行情形「財務構面」描述性統計分析結果............ 49
4.2.2.2 限用物質管制執行情形「顧客構面」描述性統計分析結果.............. 51
4.2.2.3 限用物質管制執行情形「內部流程構面」描述性統計分析結果......53
4.2.2.4 限用物質管制執行情形「學習與成長構面」描述性統計分析結果..57
4.2.2.5 限用物質管制執行情形「反式問項」描述性統計分析結果............. 60
4.3 企業對於限用物質管制執行困難......................................................... 61
4.3.1 企業尚未進行限用物質管制工作可能原因........................................ 62
4.3.2 因應客戶限用物質管制工作要求企業所面臨的問題........................ 63
4.3.3 因應限用物質管制工作企業內部執行問題........................................ 64
4.4 企業對於限用物質管制改善建議......................................................... 68
4.4.1 企業因應限用物質管制要求需要加強之改善措施............................ 68
4.4.2 企業因應限用物質管制工作可能採取的永續經營/持續改善措施... 70
4.5 研究資料分析與檢定............................................................................. 71
4.5.1 基本資料研究變項之相關分析............................................................ 71
4.5.2 不同背景條件對企業限用物質管制因應之影響分析........................ 74
4.5.2.1 公司資本額對企業限用物質管制資產利用之影響........................... 74
4.5.2.2 公司資本額對企業限用物質管制顧客綠色滿意之影響................... 75
4.5.2.3 廠商型態對企業限用物質管制創新流程之影響............................... 76
4.5.2.4 HSPM驗證對企業限用物質管制生產流程之影響............................ 78
4.5.2.5 SONY GP驗證對企業限用物質管制生產流程之影響...................... 80
4.5.2.6 HSPM管制方式對企業限用物質管制生產流程之影響.................... 82
4.5.2.7 SONY GP管制方式對企業限用物質管制生產流程之影響….......... 84
4.5.2.8 不同背景條件對企業限用物質管制因應影響分析總結..................... 85
第五章 結論與建議.......................................................................................... 87
5.1 研究結論.................................................................................................... 87
5.2 建議............................................................................................................ 90
參考文獻........................................................................................................... 93
附錄一 問卷調查表........................................................................................ 96
|
| 參考文獻 |
參考文獻
[1] Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE), Official Journal of the European Union, 2003.
[2] Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (RoHS), Official Journal of the European Union, 2003.
[3] REGULATION (EC) No 1907/2006 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 18 December 2006。Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals, (REACH)。
[4] 林俊豪，“新環保規範=新貿易壁壘”，財經文摘，2005年5月。
[5] 台灣區電線電纜工業同業公會網站 http://www.taiwancable.org.tw/
[6] “2009-2012年漆包線行業發展前景分析及投資風險預測報告”，慧典市場研究報告網 http://www.hdcmr.com/
[7] DIRECTIVE 2009/125/EC establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (ErP指令)
[8] European Parliament 2005/618/EC Directive COMMISSION DECISION of 18 August, 2005.
[9] Dr. John H. Lau,“因應歐盟RoHS指令之無鉛組裝技術最新發展研討會”
[10] 「電子信息產品污染控制管理辦法」(中華人民共和國信息產業部令第39號2006年2月28日)
[11] 「電子信息產品污染控制標示要求」(SJ-T11364-2006) (中華人民共和國信息產業部，2006年)
[12] 張家淵，“台商面對大陸綠色產品規範浪潮之因應策略”，永續產業發展雙月刊，2006。
[13] 「資源有效利用促進法」(Law for the Promotion of Effective Utilization of Resources)，日本通產省， Revised : 27 April, 2006.
[14] 「電気･電子機器の特定の化学物質の含有表示方法（The marking for presence of the specific chemical substances for electrical and electronic equipment），日本工業標準 JIS C 0950」
[15] SB20(Sher):Electronic Waste Recycling Act of 2003 ; SB50(Sher): Emergency Amendment to SB 20 ; SB 20 & 50:DTSC guidance，SB 20 (Sher, Chapter 526, Statutes of 2003) and SB 50 (Sher, Chapter 863, Statutes of 2004), California.
[16] The Act for Resource Recycling of Electrical/Electronic Products and Automobiles, 2006 2, Ministry of Environment Republic of Korea.
[17] 「促進節約及資源回收法案」(Act on the Promotion of Saving and Recycling of Resources) , Ministry of Environment Republic of Korea.
[18] 「歐盟法規1907/2006/EC化學物質之註冊、評估、許可和限制(REACH)附錄17(ANNEX XVII)修訂（276/2010/EC）」
[19] SONY公司SS-00259「零部件和材料中的环境管理物质管理规定」，索尼技術標準事務局，2010年4月1日
[20] Oliver, R. K. and Webber, M. D.（1982）,"Supply-chain management: logistics catches up with strategy," Outlook, cit. Martin Christopher, Logistics, The Strategy Issues, London: Chapman and Hall, 1992.
[21] 莊仁閔，“電腦產業供應鏈管理價值之研究”，長榮管理學院經營管理研究所碩士論文，2002。
[22] Thomas, D .J. and P .M . Griffin, "Coordinated Supply Chain Management", European Journal of operational Research 94, pp1-15, 1996.
[23] Green Business Network, "Going Green Upstream: The promise of supplier environmental management", Green Business Network, The National Environmental Education & Training Foundation, 2001.
[24] 丁執宇，“知識經濟時代清潔生產新趨勢─綠色供應鏈管理”，永續產業發展，期7，頁21-32，2003。
[25] 陳穆臻，“勢在必行的綠色供應鏈”，管理雜誌，期373，頁72-76，2005。
[26] 楊致行，“產業綠色供應鏈運作機制與案例彙編─管理篇”，臺北市：經濟部工業局，2005。
[27] 汪波、白彥壯、李敏，“企業可持續發展的綠色供應鏈管理研究”，天津大學管理學院。http://www.paper.edu.cn/，2005。
[28] 許享承，“綠色供應鏈管理機制建構之研究-以A公司為例”，國立中央大學管理學院高階主管企管碩士班碩士論文，2006。
[29] 黃英傑，“綠色供應鏈管理的策略分析－以智邦科技為例”，清華大學，2006。
[30] 經濟部工業局，“產業綠色採購指引－邁向產業永續發展之路”，臺北市：經濟部工業局；臺灣環境管理協會，2003。
[31] 經濟部工業局，“綠色採購與綠色設計－邁向產業永續發展之路”，臺北市：經濟部工業局；臺灣環境管理協會，2002。
[32] “International Electrotechnical Commission—IEC Quality Assessment System for Electronic Components (IECQ)”, IEC, Part 5: Hazardous Substance Process Management Requirements, 2005.
[33] 漢康科技，“運用平衡計分卡推動企業績效管理”，2003年5月19日，取自http://bi.fast.com.tw/Product/Vi23.htm.
[34] Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic Management system. In Harvard Business School (Ed.), Harvard Business Review on measuring corporate performance, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1996.
|
| 指導教授 |
于樹偉(Shuh-woei Yu)
|
審核日期 |
2011-7-21 |
| 推文 |
 facebook  plurk  twitter  funp  google  live  udn  HD  myshare  reddit  netvibes  friend  youpush  delicious  baidu
|
| 網路書籤 |
 Google bookmarks  del.icio.us  hemidemi myshare
|
