參考文獻 |
參考文獻
﹝1﹞ Audouin, O. and Bodin, J.,“Analysis of slug-tests with high-frequency oscillations”, Journal of Hydrology, 334, 282-289, 2007.
﹝2﹞ Audouin, O. and Bodin, J., ”Cross-borehole slug test analysis in a fractured limestone aquifer”, Journal of Hydrology, 348, 510-523, 2008.”
﹝3﹞ Barker, J. A., “A generalized radial flow model for hydraulic tests in fractured rock”, Water Resource Research, 24(10), 1796-1804, 1988.
﹝4﹞ Bouwer, H. and Rice, R. C., “A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells ”, Water Resource Research, 12(3), 423-428, 1976.
﹝5﹞ Butler, J. J., Jr., The Design, Performance, and Analysis of Slug Tests., Boca Raton, Florida: Lewis Publishers., 1998.
﹝6﹞ Butler, J. J., Jr., “A simple correction for slug tests in small-diameter wells”, Ground Water, 40(3), 2003.
﹝7﹞ Butler, J. J., Jr. and Zhan X.,“Hydraulic tests in highly permeable aquifers”, Water Resource Research, 40, 2004.
﹝8﹞ Chen C. S. and Wu C. R., “Analysis of depth-dependent pressure head of slug tests in highly permeable aquifers”, Ground Water, 44(3), 472-477,2006.
﹝9﹞ Chen C. S., “An analytic data analysis method for oscillatory slug tests”, Ground Water, 44(4), 604-608, 2006.
﹝10﹞ Chen J. S., Wu C. L. and Liu C. W., “Analysis of contaminant transport towards a partially penetrating extraction well in an anisotropic aquifer”, Hydrological Processes. 24, 2010.
﹝11﹞ Chirlin, G. R., “A critique of the Hvorslev method for slug test analysis:the fully penetrating well”, Ground Water Monitoring review, 9(2),130-138, 1989.
﹝12﹞ Churchill, R. V., Operational Mathematics, McGraw-Hill, New York,1972.
﹝13﹞ Cooper, H. H. Jr., Bredehodft, J. D. and Papadopulos, I. S. and Bennett,R. R., “The response of well-aquifer systems to seismic waves ”, Journal of Geophysical Research, 70, 3915-3926, 1965.
﹝14﹞ Cooper, H. H., Jr., Bredehodft, J. D. and Papadopulos, I. S., “Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water”, Water Resource Research, 3(1), 263-269, 1967.
﹝15﹞ Hantush, M. S., Hydraulics of Wells, In advances in Hydrosciences. Vol.1, Academic, San Diego, Calif, 1964.
﹝16﹞ Hvorslev, M. J., Time lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations., US Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station Bulletin No. 36, Mississippi, USA, 1951.
﹝17﹞ Hyder, Z., Butler, J. J., Jr., McElwee, C. D., and Liu W. Z., “Slug tests in partially penetrating wells”, Water Resources Research, 30(11),2945-2957, 1994.
﹝18﹞ Hyder, Z. and Butler J. J. Jr.,“Slug tests in unconfined formation : An assessment of the Bouwer and Rice technique”, Ground Water, 33(1), 1995.
﹝19﹞ Kipp K. L., “Type curve analysis of inertial effects in the response of a well to a slug test”, Water Resources Research, 21(9), 1397 – 1408, 1985.
﹝20﹞ Mathias, S. A., and A. P. Butler, “An improvement on Hvorslev’s shape factors”, Geotechnique, 56(10), 705-706, 2006.
﹝21﹞ Mathias, S. A., and A. P. Butler, “Shape factors for constant-head double-packer permeameters” , Water Resources Research, 43, W06430.,2007.
﹝22﹞ McElwee, C. D., “Improving the analysis of slug tests”, Journal of Hydrology, 269, 122-133, 2002.
﹝23﹞ McElwee, C. D. and Zenner M. A., “A nonlinear model for analysis of slug-test data”, Water Resources Research, 34(1), 55-66, 1998.
﹝24﹞ McElwee, C.D., Bohling G. C. and Butler J. J., Jr., “Sensitivity analysis of slug tests Part1 : The slugged well”, Journal of Hydrology, 164, 53-67,1995.
﹝25﹞ Pasandi M., Samani, N. and Barry, D. A., “Effect of wellbore storage and finite thickness skin on flow to a partially penetrating well in a phreatic aquifer”, Advances in Water Resources, 31: 383– 398, 2008.
﹝26﹞ Rehbinder, G., “The double packer permeameter with Narrow packers.Analytical solution for non steady flow”, Applied Scientific Research, 56, 255–279, 1996.
﹝27﹞ Rehbinder, G., “Relation between non-steady supply pressure and flux for a double packer conductivity meter: An approximate analytical solution”, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 74, 1 – 20, 2005.
﹝28﹞ Springer, R. K., and Gelhar, L. W., Characterization of large-scale aquifer heterogeneity in glacial outwash by analysis of slug tests with oscillatory response., Cape Cod, Massachusetts. U.S.Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 91-4034, 3-40, 1991.
﹝29﹞ Van der Kamp, G., “Determining aquifer transmissivity by means of well response tests: The underdamped case”, Water Resources Research, 12(1), 71-77, 1976.
﹝30﹞ Widdowson, M. A., Molz, F. J., and Melville, J. G., “An analysis technique for multilevel and partially penetrating slug test data”. Ground Water, 28(6), 937-945, 1990.
﹝31﹞ Zemansky, G. M. and McElwee, C. D., “High-resolution slug resting”, Ground Water, 43(2), 222-230, 2005.
﹝32﹞ Zenner, M. A.,“Analysis of slug tests in bypassed wells”, Journal of Hydrology, 263, 72-91, 2002.
﹝33﹞ Zlotnik, V., Interpretation of slug and packer tests in anisotropic aquifers, Ground Water. 32(5), 761-767, 1994.
﹝34﹞ Zlotnik, V. A. and McGuire, V.L., “Multi-level slug tests in highly permeable formations:1. Modification of the Springer-Gelhar (SG) model”, Journal of Hydrology, 204, 271-282, 1998.
﹝35﹞ Zlotnik, V. A. and Zurbuchen, B. R.,“Field study of hydraulic conductivity in a heterogeneous aquifer: Comparison of single-borehole measurements using different instruments”, Water Resource Research,39(4), 1101, 2003.
﹝36﹞ Zlotnik, V.A., Goss, D. and Duffield, G. M., “General steady-state shape factor for a partially penetrating well”, Ground Water,48(1), 111-116,2010.
﹝37﹞ Zurbuchen, B. R., Zlotnik, V.A. and Butler, J. J., Jr., “Dynamic interpretation of slug tests in highly permeable aquifers”, Water Resource Research, 38(3), 1025, 2002.
|