評估學生自願使用e-portfolio對於提高課程表現的成效－以國立中央大學為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：20

、訪客IP：3.133.136.25

姓名

周艷伶(Zhou-Yan Ling) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

數學系

論文名稱

評估學生自願使用e-portfolio對於提高課程表現的成效－以國立中央大學為例
(Assessing the effectiveness of a voluntary e-portfolioon improving students’ course performance)

相關論文

★ 中小學數學教師創意教學競賽金牌得獎作品可行性分析之個案研究	★ 線上問卷調查開發應用與Matlab對於微積分學習成效之探討
★ 探討學生在不同學習環境下、線上學習系統之線上學習行為與學業成績之間的關係－以微積分課程為例	★ 中小學數學創意教學競賽實施之研究
★ 評分者對數學科創意教學觀點之比較以中小學數學教師創意教學競賽為例	★ 小波轉換於圖形比對的一種方法
★ 算術計算中誤解的文字或符號所造成的錯誤及影響	★ 相同教學單元之創意作品所著重創意觀點與創意呈現之比較－以『中小學數學教師創意教學競賽』作品為例
★ 利用凌波轉換保護影像竄改及偵測還原	★ 遊戲方式表現創意的教學策略之探討－以『中小學數學教師創意教學競賽』作品為例
★ 國小四、五年級分數運算錯誤類型分析之研究	★ 因、倍數創意教學作品分析與比較－以「中小學數學教師創意教學競賽」作品為例
★ On the Positive Solution for Grad-Shafranov Equation	★ 從微積分課後輔導，分析學生的數學學習問題:以一個助教的實例作探討
★ 線上討論的知識建構模式特徵 -以批踢踢實業坊的微積分討論為例	★ 以課程論壇做為知識分享工具之研究 –以中央大學計算機概論課程為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究的目的是調查學生之間的複雜關係－整體的學習成效、微積分學習成效、使用電腦態度的傾向、MATLAB學習成效和e-portfolio的使用程度。研究對象為國立中央大學的學生。以多重對應分析、集群分析、徑路分析和滯後序列分析為研究方法進行資料分析。
結果發現整體學習成效表現越好的學生，則e-portfolio的使用程度、微積分學習成效、使用電腦態度的傾向和MATLAB學習成效的表現會比較好。進一步探討，同一集群的學生，如果e-portfolio使用程度較高，則微積分學習成效表現會相對較好。
整體而言，使用電腦態度傾向會顯著影響MATLAB學習成效、MATLAB學習成效會顯著影響e-portfolio使用程度、e-portfolio使用程度會顯著影響微積分學習成效、微積分學習成效會顯著影響整體學習成效。

摘要(英)

The purpose of this study was to investigate the complex relationship between the achievement in schoolwork, the achievement in calculus, the attitude toward learning mathematics with technology, the achievement in MATLAB and use of e-portfolio. We focus on the students of National Central University, and analysis by multiple correspondence analysis, cluster analysis, path analysis and lag-sequential analysis.
It was found that the students who has good overall achievement in schoolwork the e-portfolio the achievement in calculus, the attitude toward using computer and the achievement in MATLAB will be better than the students who has if. Furthermore, in the same group of students, if they use e-portfolio frequently, then their achievement in calculus will be better.
In conclusion, the attitude of learning mathematics with technology will obviously affect the achievement in MATLAB, the achievement in MATLAB will significantly affect the use of e-portfolio, the use of e-portfolio will significantly affect the achievement in calculus, achievement in calculus will affect the achievement in schoolwork.

關鍵字(中)

★ 科技媒介學習
★ e-portfolio
★ 微積分聯合教學
★ 學習成效

關鍵字(英)

★ e-portfolio
★ Joint teaching of calculus
★ learning outcome
★ Technology media of learning

論文目次

摘要 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ i
Abstract ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ ii
致謝 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ iii
目錄 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ iv
圖目錄 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ vi
表目錄 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ viii
第一章：緒論 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 1
第一節：研究動機 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 1
第二節：研究模型和研究目的 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 5
第二章：文獻探討 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 11
第一節：Technology Acceptance Model ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 11
第二節：科技媒介學習成效模式 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 15
第三節：電子學習之優缺點 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 18
第四節：電子學習之課程設計 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 19
第五節：電子學習之成功因素 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 21
第六節：電子學習之成效 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 22
第三章：資料分析 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 23
第一節：微積分聯合教學制度 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 23
第二節：E-portfolio數位學習歷程平台 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 24
第三節；MATLAB課程 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 26
第四節：研究對象 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 28
第五節：研究資料 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 31
第六節：分析方法 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 37
第七節：研究流程 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 44
第四章：結論 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 45
第一節：多重對應分析之結果 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 45
第二節：集群分析之結果 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 50
第三節：徑路分析之結果 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 60
第四節：滯後序列分析法之結果 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 64
第五章：討論 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 72
第一節：結論 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 72
第二節：研究限制與未來研究方向 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 77
參考文獻 ‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧‧ 78

參考文獻

[1] 余泰魁 (2007)。科技媒介學習環境之學習成效比較研究。教育心理學報，39(1)，69-90。
[2] Alavi, M. & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Research commentary: technology-mediated learning-a call for greater depth and breadth of research. Information Systems Research, 12(1), 1-10.
[3] Baillie, C., & Percoco, G. (2000). A study of present use and usefulness of computer-based learning at a technical university. European of Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 33-43.
[4] Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. (2nd Ed.). UK: Cambridge University Press.
[5] Barrett, Helen (2000, April). Create Your Own Electronic Portfolio. Learning & Leading with Technology, 27(7), 14-21.
[6] Benbunan-Fich, R., & Hiltz, S. R. (2003). Mediators of the effectiveness of online courses. IEEE Transactions on Professional communication, 46 (4), 298-312.
[7] Brown, T. S., Brown. J.'T., & Baack. S A. (1988). A reexamination the attitudes toward computer usage scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 261-269.
[8] Chen, Y., Lou, H., & Luo, W. (2001/ 2002). Distance learning technology adoption: a motivation perspective. Journal of Computer Information Systems, winter, 38-43.
[9] Davis, F.D. &Venkatesh, V. (1996), A Critical Assessment of Potential Measurement Biases in the Technology Acceptance Model: Three Experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 19-45.
[10] Davis, F. D. (1989a). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
[11] Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. & Warshaw, P. R. ( 1989b). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science. 35(8), 982-1003.
[12] England, E. (1985). Interactional analysis: The missing factor in computer-aided learning design and evaluation. Educational Technology, 25(9), 24–28.
[13] Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I.(1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addsion-Wesley, Reading MA.
[14] Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (2002). What makes learning networks effective? Communications of the ACM, 45 (4), 56-59.
[15] Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (2005). Education goes digital: The evolution of online learning and the revolution in higher education. Communications of the ACM, 48 (10), 59-64.
[16] Hou, H. T., Chang, K. E., & Sung, Y. T. (2008). Analysis of Problem-Solving Based Online Asynchronous Discussion Pattern. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 17-28.
[17] Hou, H. T., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2009). Exploring the behavioral patterns of an online knowledge sharing discussion activity among teachers with problem-solving strategy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 1, 101-108.
[18] Jafari, A. (2004), The “Sticky” ePortfolio System: Tackling Challenges and Identifying Attributes. EDUCAUSE Review, 39(4), 38-49. February 10th, 2007.
[19] Jeong, A. C. (2003). The sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online threaded discussions. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 25–43.
[20] King, F., & M. Roblyer. (1984). Alternative designs for evaluating computer-based instruction. Journal of Instructional Development,7 (3), 23–29.
[21] Lim, D. H., & Kim, H. (2003). Motivation and learner characteristics affecting online learning and learning application. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 31 (4), 423-439.
[22] Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: a research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skill training. MIS Quarterly, 25 (4), 401-426.
[23] Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M. & Zvacek, S.(2000), Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
[24] Weglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service Policy Information Center.
[25] Wilson, E.V. (2000). Student characteristics and computer-mediated communication. Computer & Education, 34, 67-76.
[26] Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organization management. Academy of Management Review, 14 (3), 361-384.
[27] Woodrow, J. E. J. 1992. The influence of programming training on the computer literacy and attitudes of preservice teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25: 165-187.
[28] Zellers, M. & Mudrey, R. (2007). Electronic Portfolios and Metacognition: A phenomenological examination of the implementation of e-Portfolios from the Instructors’ perspective. International Journal of Instructional Media, 34(4), 419-430.

指導教授

蕭嘉璋(Chia-Chang Hsiao (蕭嘉璋))

審核日期

2011-12-2

推文