參考文獻 |
Accascina, G., & Rogora, E. (2006). Using Cabri3D Diagrams for Teaching Geometry. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 13(1), 12.
Ai-Lim Lee, E., Wong, K.W., & Fung, C.C. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1424-1442.
Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & Education, 33(2-3), 131-152.
Ainsworth, S., & Th Loizou, A. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27(4), 669-681.
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183-198.
Baki, A., Kosa, T., & Guven, B. A comparative study of the effects of using dynamic geometry software and physical manipulatives on the spatial visualisation skills of pre service mathematics teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology.
Battista, M.T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 2, 843-908.
Boggan, M., Harper, S., & Whitmire, A. (2010). Using manipulatives to teach elementary mathematics. Educational Research, 3, 1-6.
Bruner, J.S., & Kenney, H.J. (1965). Representation and mathematics learning. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 30(1), 50-59.
Cakir, M.P., Stahl, G., & Zemel, A. (2010). Interactional achievement of shared mathematical understanding in a virtual math team.
Calder, N.S. (2008). Processing mathematical thinking through digital pedagogical media: the spreadsheet.
Caprotti, O., & Seppala, M. Mathematics Education in Second Life.
Chan, H., Tsai, P., & Huang, T.Y. (2006). Web-based learning in a geometry course. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGYAND SOCIETY, 9(2), 133.
Chittaro, L., & Ranon, R. (2007). Web3D technologies in learning, education and training: Motivations, issues, opportunities. Computers & Education, 49(1), 3-18.
Christou, C., Jones, K., Mousoulides, N., & Pittalis, M. (2006). Developing the 3DMath dynamic geometry software: theoretical perspectives on design. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 13(4), 168-174.
Clements, D.H. (1999). Concrete manipulatives, concrete ideas. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1(1), 45-60.
Crowley, M.L. (1987). The van Hiele model of the development of geometric thought. Learning and teaching geometry, K-12, 1-16.
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M.J.W. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3 D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10-32.
Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
Debellis, V.A., & Goldin, G.A. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 131-147.
De Freitas, S. (2008). Serious virtual worlds: a scoping study.
des Mathematiques, A. 3D Geometry and learning of mathematical reasoning. CERME 6VWORKING GROUP 5, 796.
DeWindt-King, A.M., & Goldin, G.A. (2003). Children’s visual imagery: Aspects of cognitive representation in solving problems with fractions. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 1-42.
Dickey, M.D. (2005). Brave new (interactive) worlds: A review of the design affordances and constraints of two 3D virtual worlds as interactive learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 13(1), 121-137.
Douglas H. Clements and Michael T. Battista. (2009). Constructivist Learning and Teaching Retrieved from NCTM
Durmus, S., & Karakirik, E. (2006). Virtual Manipulatives in Mathematics Education: A Theoretical Framework. Online Submission, 7.
Duval, R. (1998). Section II. GEOMETRY FROM A COGNITIVE POINT OF VIEW. Perspectives on the Teaching of Geometry for the 21st Century, 5, 37.
Duval, R. (1999). Representation, Vision and Visualization: Cognitive Functions in Mathematical Thinking. Basic Issues for Learning.
Ernest, P. (1999). Is mathematics discovered or invented. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 12, 9-13.
Feldkamp, J.K. (2008). The effectiveness of electronic whiteboards and PowerPoint lessons in the mathematics classroom. Senior Honors Theses, 144.
Gagatsis, A., & Shiakalli, M. (2004). Ability to translate from one representation of the concept of function to another and mathematical problem solving. Educational Psychology, 24(5), 645-657.
Gawlick, T. (2005). Connecting arguments to actions─Dynamic geometry as means for the attainment of higher van Hiele levels. ZDM, 37(5), 361-370.
Girouard, A., Solovey, E.T., Hirshfield, L.M., Ecott, S., Shaer, O., & Jacob, R.J.K. (2007). Smart Blocks: a tangible mathematical manipulative.
Goldin, G.A. (1998). Representational systems, learning, and problem solving in mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 137-165.
Gutierrez, A. (1996). Visualization in 3-dimensional geometry: In search of a framework.
Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 102-117.
Hancock, G., & Lane, C. (2010). Case study: the effectiveness of virtual manipulatives in the teaching of primary mathematics.
Harnisch, DL. Importance of mathematical visualization: I can see what you mean now.
Hauptman, H. (2010). Enhancement of spatial thinking with Virtual Spaces 1.0. Computers & Education, 54(1), 123-135.
Heddens, J.W. Improving mathematics teaching by using manipulatives. Kent University. Retrieved from the World Wide Web at: www. fed. cuhk. edu. hk/~ fllee/mathfor/edumath/9706/13hedden. html.
Hitt, F. (2002). Representations and mathematical visualization: PME-NA Working Group (1998-2002). Mexico City: Cinvestav-IPN.
Hohenwarter, M., & Preiner, J. (2007). Dynamic mathematics with GeoGebra. Journal of Online Mathematics and its Applications, 7.
Hollebrands, K.F. (2003). High school students' understandings of geometric transformations in the context of a technological environment. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(1), 55-72.
Hung, D.W.L. (2000). Some insights into the generalizing of mathematical meanings. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(1), 63-82.
Hwang, W.Y., Chen, N.S., & Hsu, R.L. (2006). Development and evaluation of multimedia whiteboard system for improving mathematical problem solving. Computers & Education, 46(2), 105-121.
Hwang, W.Y., Chen, N., Dung, J., & Yang, Y. (2007). Multiple representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving using a multimedia whiteboard system. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGYAND SOCIETY, 10(2), 191.
Hwang, W.Y., Su, J.H., Huang, Y.M., & Dong, J.J. (2009). A Study of Multi-Representation of Geometry Problem Solving with Virtual Manipulatives and Whiteboard System. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 229!V247.
Hwang, W.Y., Hsu, J.L., Tretiakov, A., Chou, H.W., & Lee, C.Y. (2009). Intra-action, Interaction and Outeraction in blended learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 222-239.
Hyo-Jeong SO. (2010). Towards Rigor of Online Interaction Research: Implication for Future Distance Learning Research. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology.
Jonassen, D.H., & Carr, C.S. (2000). Mindtools: Affording multiple knowledge representations for learning. Computers as cognitive tools, volume two: no more walls: theory change, paradigm shifts, and their influence on the use of computers for instructional purposes, 165.
Jones, K. (1998). Theoretical frameworks for the learning of geometrical reasoning. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 18(1-2), 29-34.
Kaufmann, H. (2011). Virtual Environments for Mathematics and Geometry Education. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 2(1-2), pp. 131-152.
Kaufmann, H., Steinbugl, K., Dunser, A., & Gluck, J. (2005). General training of spatial abilities by geometry education in augmented reality. Annual Review of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine: A Decade of VR, 3, 65-76.
Koedinger, K.R., & Nathan, M.J. (2004). The real story behind story problems: Effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(2), 129-164.
Kurtulus, A., & Uygan, C. (2010). The effects of Google Sketchup based geometry activities and projects on spatial visualization ability of student mathematics teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 384-389.
Kwon, O.N., Kim, S.H., & Kim, Y. (2002). Enhancing spatial visualization through Virtual Reality (VR) on the web: Software design and impact analysis. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(1), 17-32.
Laborde, C. (1995). Designing tasks for learning geometry in a computer-based environment. Technology in mathematics teaching, 35-67.
Laborde, C. (2002). Integration of technology in the design of geometry tasks with Cabri-Geometry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6(3), 283-317.
Lane, S. (1993). The conceptual framework for the development of a mathematics assessment instrument for QUASAR. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(2), 16-23.
Lane, S., Silver, E.A., Ankenmann, R.D., Cai, J., Finseth, C., Liu, M., . . . Parke, C.S. (1995). QUASAR Cognitive Assessment Instrument (QCAI). University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics, 33-40.
Maragos, C. (2004). Building educational scenarios with “Sketchpad”. [Online]. http://hermes.di.uoa.gr/edugames/sketchpad/ScetchPad.pdf. [2008, July 21].
McGee, M.G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86(5), 889.
McLeay, H. (2006). Imagery, Spatial Ability and Problem Solving. Mathematics Teaching Incorporating Micromath, 195, 3.
Mehdiyev, R. (2009). Exploring students’ learning experiences when using a Dynamic Geometry Software (DGS) tool in a geometry class at a secondary school in Azerbaijan.
Moon, J.W., & Kim, Y.G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217-230.
Moyer, P.S., Bolyard, J.J., & Spikell, M.A. (2002). What are virtual manipulatives? Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(6), 372-377.
Moyer-Packenham, P.S., Salkind, G., & Bolyard, J.J. (2008). Virtual manipulatives used by K-8 teachers for mathematics instruction: Considering mathematical, cognitive, and pedagogical fidelity. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 202-218.
Muhlpfordt, M., & Stahl, G. (2007). The integration of synchronous communication across dual interaction spaces.
Munger, D. (2007).Children learn and retain math better using manipulatives [Msg.1]. Message posted to http://scienceblogs.com/cognitivedaily/2007/10/children_learn_and_retain_math.php
Najjar, L. J. (2001). Principles of educational multimedia user interface design. In R. W. Swezey, & D. H. Andrews (Eds.), Readings in training and simulation: A 30-year perspective (pp. 146–158). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factorsand Ergonomics Society.
Nakahara, Tadao. (2008). “Cultivating Mathematical Thinking through Representation-Utilizing the Representational System-”, APEC-TSUKUBA International Congress, Japan.
NCTM (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
NCTM (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
NCTM (2006).Curriculum Focal Points for Prekindergarten through Grade 8 Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Nickell, J. (2007). Useful online and teacher production tools of the Geometer’s Sketchpad. Mathematics Teacher, 100(8), 565V567.
Olkun, S. (2003). Making connections: Improving spatial abilities with engineering drawing activities. International Journal of Mathematics, 1.
Olkun, S., Altun, A., & Smith, G. (2005). Computers and 2D geometric learning of Turkish fourth and fifth graders. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 317-326.
Owens, K., & Outhred, L. (2006). The complexity of learning geometry and measurement. Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education. Past, present and future, 83-115.
Pittalis, M., Mousoulides, N., & Christou, C. (2010). Students’ 3D geometry thinking profiles. Proceedings of CERME6, 816-825.
Rico, L.(2000). On the notions of representation and comprehension in research in mathematics education.
Rieber, L.P. (2005). Multimedia learning in games, simulations, and microworlds. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 549-567.
Saads, S., & Davis, G. (1997). Spatial abilities, van Hiele levels & language use in three dimensional geometry.
Selim, H.M. (2003). An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course websites. Computers & Education, 40(4), 343-360.
Serow, P., & Callingham, R. (2008). The Introduction of Interactive Whiteboard Technology in the Primary Mathematics Classroom: Three Case Studies. MERGA Inc. from http://www. merga. net. au/documents/RP542008. pdf.
Sheffield, L.J. (2000). Creating and Developing Promising Young Mathematicians. Teaching Children Mathematics, 6(6), 416-419,426.
Spicer, J. (2000). Virtual manipulatives: A new tool for hands-on math. ENC Focus, 7(4), 14-15.
Stahl, G., Zemel, A., Sarmiento, J., Cakir, M., Weimar, S., Wessner, M., & Muhlpfordt, M. (2006). Shared referencing of mathematical objects in online chat.
Stahl, G., Wee, J.D., & Looi, CK. (2007). Using chat, whiteboard and wiki to support knowledge building.
Stahl, G. (2010). Social practices of group cognition in virtual math teams. Learning Across Sites: New Tools, Infrastructures and Practices, 190.
Strom, J. (2009). Manipulatives in mathematics instruction. Unpublished master!|s thesis, Bemidji State University, Bemidji, MN. Retrieved July, 2, 2010.
Swan, K., Schenker, J., & Kratcoski, A. (2008). The effects of the use of interactive whiteboards on student achievement.
Taylor, C.H. (2008). Promoting Mathematical Understanding Through Open-Ended Tasks; Experiences of an Eighth-Grade Gifted Geometry Class. Middle-Secondary Education and Instructional Technology Dissertations, 36.
Taxen, G., & Naeve, A. (2002). A system for exploring open issues in VR-based education. Computers & Graphics, 26(4), 593-598.
Tutak, T., Birgin, O. (2008). The Effects of Computer Assisted Instruction on the Students’ Achievement in Geometry.[Online]http://ietc2008.home.anadolu.edu.tr/ietc2008/208.doc [2008, September 09].
Utah State University (2009). National Library of Virtual Manipulatives [online], available: http://nlvm.usu.edu/siteinfo.html [accessed 08 May 2010].
Van de Walle, J. A. (2007). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., & Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
Villegas, J.L., Castro, E., & Gutierrez, J. (2009). Representations in problem solving: a case study with optimization problems. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(1), 30.
Wessner, M., Shumar, W., Stahl, G., Sarmiento, J., Muhlpfordt, M., & Weimar, S. (2006). Designing an online service for a math community.
Wilkins, J.L.M. (2008). The relationship among elementary teachers!| content knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 139-164.
Winn, W. (2002). Research into practice: Current trends in educational technology research: The study of learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 14(3), 331-351.
Wood, T., Williams, G., & McNeal, B. (2006). Children's mathematical thinking in different classroom cultures. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(3).
Yeh, A., & Nason, R. (2004). VRMath: A 3D microworld for learning 3D geometry.
Yeh, A., & Nason, R. (2004). Toward a semiotic framework for using technology in mathematics education: The case of learning 3D geometry.
Yeh, A.J.C. (2007). Knowledge construction of 3D geometry in virtual reality microworlds.
Yelland, N.J., & Glass, B. (2008). LEARNING AND TEACHING GEOMETRY WITH COMPUTERS IN THE ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOL. Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Research syntheses, 1, 109.
Zhang, J. (1991). The interaction of internal and external representations in a problem solving task.
|